Vicky Liu

• Non-payment of rent
• Substantial interference

The landlord withdrew their non-payment application, and the tenant's application alleging substantial interference from foul odors was dismissed due to insufficient evidence.

• The landlord's L1 application is dismissed as withdrawn.
• The tenant's T2 application and section 82 claim are dismissed because the tenant failed to prove substantial interference on a balance of probabilities. · to the landlord

• Illegal entry

The tenant withdrew their application alleging illegal entry by the landlord. The tribunal dismissed the application as withdrawn.

• Personal use eviction
• Bad faith eviction

The tenant's application alleging a bad-faith eviction was dismissed because the tenant failed to prove that the purchaser's child did not move into the rental unit.

• The Tenant's T5 bad faith eviction application is dismissed as the claims were not proved. · to the landlord

• Renovation and demolition

The tribunal granted the landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for extensive renovations and conversion of the detached house into a duplex.

• Substantial interference

The landlord requested to withdraw its application to terminate the tenancy. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.

• Unauthorized occupants
• Assignment or sublet

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict an unauthorized occupant, but withdrew the application at the hearing.

• The landlord's application was withdrawn and the file is closed.

• Unauthorized occupants
• Assignment or sublet

The tribunal ordered the unauthorized occupant to pay the landlord daily compensation for the period of unauthorized occupation, along with the application filing fee.

• Filing fee · $201 · to the landlord

• Daily compensation for use and occupation of the rental unit from October 1, 2025 to March 10, 2026 · $6,841 · to the landlord

• Property damage
• Safety concerns

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant based on an N7 notice was dismissed. The tribunal found the notice of termination was invalid because it failed to provide sufficient details and particulars of the alleged conduct.

• The Landlord's L2 application is dismissed due to an invalid N7 notice lacking required particulars.

• Assignment or sublet

The tenants applied for an order claiming the landlord arbitrarily or unreasonably withheld consent to assign the rental unit. The tribunal dismissed the application after finding the landlord's refusal to consent was reasonable under the circumstances.

• The tenants' application determining that the landlord arbitrarily or unreasonably withheld consent to assignment is dismissed. · to the landlord

• Tenant rights

The tenant sought to withdraw their application regarding property removal following an eviction. The tribunal granted the withdrawal and dismissed the application.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as withdrawn. · to the landlord

• Tenant rights
• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant withdrew their T1 and T2 applications, and the tribunal dismissed the matter as withdrawn.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as withdrawn. · to the landlord

• Illegal charges or collection
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenants withdrew their applications regarding alleged illegal charges and harassment. The tribunal dismissed the applications as withdrawn.

• The tenants' applications are dismissed as withdrawn. · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues
• Breach of conditions

The tenant's motion to set aside an eviction order was denied after the tribunal found the tenant failed to comply with an earlier order requiring preparation of the unit for pest control treatment. The stay of eviction will be lifted on June 30, 2026.

• The tenant's motion to set aside eviction order LTB-L-098470-25 is denied, and the stay of the eviction order is lifted on June 30, 2026. · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed due to abandonment for non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's maintenance application was resolved by a consent order. The landlord agreed to inspect the rental unit and complete any necessary repairs to three windows by specified dates.

• Repair order
• Repair order

• Maintenance issues

The tenant requested to withdraw their maintenance application, which the tribunal granted and dismissed the proceeding.

• The tenant's maintenance application is dismissed upon withdrawal. · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the scheduled hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed as abandoned after the tenant filed a request to withdraw and neither party attended the scheduled hearing.

• The tenant's T6 maintenance application is dismissed as abandoned following a withdrawal request and non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Personal use eviction

The tribunal granted the landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for the purchaser's personal use, ordering the tenant to move out by July 31, 2026.

• Breach of conditions

The tribunal ordered the termination of the tenancy because the tenant's employment as superintendent had ended. The tenant was ordered to pay daily compensation for overholding and reimbursement of the landlord's filing fee.

• Arrears · $10,365 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tenant chose to withdraw their maintenance application, and the tribunal dismissed the application as withdrawn.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as withdrawn. · to the landlord

• Breach of conditions

The tribunal terminated the tenancy of the superintendent premises following the end of the tenant's employment and ordered the tenant to pay daily compensation for overholding plus the filing fee.

• Arrears · $1,655 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Breach of conditions

The tribunal terminated the tenancy because the tenant's employment as superintendent ended, and ordered the tenant to pay daily compensation for overholding along with filing fee costs.

• Arrears · $4,912 · to the landlord
• Arrears · $45 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Persistent late payment

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy due to persistent late payment of rent. The parties agreed to a consent order terminating the tenancy effective August 31, 2026, subject to rent payment terms.

• Daily compensation for use of the unit starting September 1, 2026 until the tenant moves out · $134 · to the landlord

• Breach of conditions

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy following the end of the tenant's employment as an assistant superintendent. The tribunal granted the application, terminating the tenancy and ordering the tenant to pay compensation for occupation of the unit plus filing costs.

• Arrears · $7,371 · to the landlord
• Arrears · $62 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Breach of conditions

The tribunal granted the landlord's application to terminate the tenancy following the end of the tenant's employment as superintendent, ordering eviction and compensation for occupation.

• Arrears · $12,118 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Breach of conditions

The tribunal granted the landlord's application to terminate the tenancy because the tenant's employment as superintendent had ended. The tenant was ordered to vacate the unit and pay compensation for overholding along with the filing fee.

• Arrears · $9,857 · to the landlord
• Arrears · $86 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Breach of conditions

The tribunal ordered the termination of the superintendent tenancy as of March 2, 2026, and required the tenant to pay $6,290.96 in daily compensation for overholding plus the $186.00 application fee.

• Arrears · $6,291 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Tenant agreed termination

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy following the end of the tenant's employment as superintendent. The parties resolved the matter by consenting to an order terminating the tenancy.

• Tenancy terminated on consent effective March 31, 2026 · to the landlord

• Substantial interference
• Breach of conditions

The tribunal granted the tenant's motion to set aside an ex parte eviction order because changed circumstances rendered future noise breaches unlikely. Although the tribunal found that the tenants had breached a prior conditional order, it exercised its discretion to set aside the eviction and maintain the tenancy.

• The tenant's motion to set aside Order LTB-L-084278-25 is granted and the eviction order is set aside
• The previous conditional order issued on July 14, 2025 remains in full force and effect · to the landlord

• Breach of conditions

The landlord withdrew its application to terminate the tenancy following the end of the tenant's employment as superintendent. The file has been closed.

• The landlord's application was withdrawn. · to the landlord

• Substantial interference

The landlord and tenant resolved the landlord's application for termination on consent. The tenancy will end on July 31, 2026, and the landlord agreed to waive rent arrears and rent through July 2026.

• The landlord waives all rent arrears up to March 31, 2026 and waives rent for April through July 2026.

• Tenant agreed termination

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy following the end of the tenant's employment as superintendent. The parties reached a consent agreement terminating the tenancy, with the tenant agreeing to vacate and pay compensation.

• Arrears · $14,281 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Breach of conditions

The tribunal terminated the tenancy following the end of the tenant's employment as superintendent and ordered the tenant to pay compensation for overholding and reimbursement of the filing fee.

• Arrears · $7,665 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tenants applied regarding maintenance obligations. The application was dismissed as abandoned because neither party attended the conference.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned for non-attendance.

• Substantial interference

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for alleged substantial interference due to smoking smells was dismissed.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant is dismissed

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed after they failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application was dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed because the tenant named the wrong party as landlord and failed to comply with an interim order to amend the application.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed for failing to name the proper Landlord and comply with the interim order.

• Maintenance issues

The parties reached a consent agreement resolving the tenant's maintenance application, with the landlord agreeing to pay $4,000.00.

• The Landlord shall pay the Tenant $4,000.00 on or before May 20, 2026. · $4,000

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed as abandoned after they failed to attend the hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed.

• Assignment or sublet

The application to evict an overholding subtenant was dismissed as abandoned when neither party attended the hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned because the Tenant did not attend the hearing.

• Tenant rights
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application regarding care home agreement terms and substantial interference was dismissed as abandoned after neither party attended the hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed because neither party attended the hearing and it was deemed abandoned.

• Bad faith eviction
• Rent deposit disputes

The tenant's application alleging a bad faith notice of termination was dismissed because the tenant's actual claim concerned an unreturned deposit, which cannot be determined under a T5 application.

• The Tenant's T5 application is dismissed.

• Personal use eviction

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for personal use was granted. Eviction was postponed to June 30, 2026, to allow the tenant time to secure alternate housing.

• Maintenance issues
• Lockout and illegal eviction
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's applications concerning tenant rights and maintenance were dismissed as withdrawn after an adjournment request was denied.

• The Tenant's applications are dismissed as withdrawn

• Non-payment of rent
• Rent reduction

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for non-payment of rent was dismissed because the N4 notice misstated the lawful rent. The tribunal found the parties had agreed to reduce the rent to $2,500.00 for lack of laundry facilities.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed because the N4 notice of termination was invalid.

999 Isabella Street, Innisfil

• Non-payment of rent
• Persistent late payment

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy for non-payment of rent and persistent late payment. The tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the persistent late payment claim and ordered a voidable eviction for rent arrears, postponing enforcement to April 30, 2026.

• Arrears · $5,545 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• The Landlord's L2 application is dismissed as withdrawn.
• Compensation of $32.42 per day starting February 27, 2026 until the unit is vacated · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tribunal dismissed the tenant's maintenance application, finding that the landlord responded promptly and reasonably to sewage backup issues.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed.