Ontario Landlord and Tenant Board
Vicky Liu
MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntarioBeta
Rulings, compared with the board
About the board's rate against tenantsDecided against tenants about as often as the board does on comparable applications, across 161 contested orders.
Orders are grouped by who applied and what they applied for, and this member’s record is compared with the board’s on that same mix. Withdrawn, settled and non-attendance dismissals are excluded. It measures how these decisions differ from the board’s on cases of the same type.
Dismissals, compared with the board
Bars tenants and landlords about as oftenDismissed tenants' and landlords' applications as not proved, out of jurisdiction or barred on procedure at rates that do not differ once the kind of application is accounted for, across 16 such dismissals of tenants' applications and 8 of landlords'.
Counts only dismissals the member ruled on — not proved, outside the board’s jurisdiction, or barred on procedure. Applications withdrawn, settled or dismissed because nobody attended are excluded, as they are above. The two sides are compared on this member’s own docket, against the board’s rate on the same kinds of application. It does not measure whether any decision was right.
Orders
Showing 51–100 of 255- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMay 11, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tenants' maintenance application was dismissed after they failed to attend the scheduled hearing.
- The tenant's T6 application is dismissed as abandoned due to the tenant's failure to attend the hearing. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyMay 11, 2026$1,300
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application alleging substantial interference was resolved through a consent order requiring the landlord to pay $1,300.00 to the tenant.
- Landlord ordered on consent to pay the tenant $1,300.00 to resolve all issues in the application · $1,300
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · settled by agreementMay 11, 2026
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application alleging substantial interference was dismissed as withdrawn on consent following an adjudicative case conference.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed as withdrawn on consent. · to the landlord
LTB-T-066162-25 · T2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantMay 8, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tribunal denied the tenant's motion to set aside an eviction order after finding the tenant breached a previous conditional payment order. The stay of eviction was lifted immediately.
- The tenant's motion to set aside the eviction order is denied and the stay of eviction is lifted immediately · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMay 8, 2026
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application alleging substantial interference was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMay 8, 2026
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application claiming substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
LTB-T-058460-25 · T2Landlord and Tenant BoardGreater Sudbury Housing CorporationRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyMay 7, 2026$48
- Substantial interference
The tenant and the landlord reached a consent agreement to resolve the tenant's application. The landlord agreed to pay the tenant $48.00.
- The Landlord shall pay the Tenant $48.00 on consent · $48
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnMay 7, 2026
- Illegal entry
The tenant withdrew their application alleging illegal entry by the landlord. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMay 7, 2026
- Lockout and illegal eviction
- Illegal entry
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant's rights application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the scheduled hearing.
- Decision against tenantMay 7, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tenant's motion to set aside an earlier eviction order was denied because she breached payment conditions under a prior Board order. The stay of the eviction order was lifted effective May 31, 2026.
- The tenant's motion to set aside the eviction order is denied, the stay is lifted effective May 31, 2026, and the eviction order remains unchanged. · to the landlord
- Decision against landlordMay 6, 2026$18,000 Damages
- Personal use eviction
- Bad faith eviction
The tribunal found that the landlord served an N12 notice of termination in bad faith knowing the purchaser did not intend to occupy the rental unit. The landlord was ordered to pay $21,048.00 in rent differential, general compensation, and application fee reimbursement to the tenant.
- Damages · $18,000
- Damages · $3,000
- Filing fee · $48
Basement, 479 Northcliffe Boulevard, Toronto
LTB-T-084465-24 · T5Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyMay 5, 2026
- Maintenance issues
- Breach of conditions
The landlord's application was resolved by a consent order allowing the tenancy to continue under specified conditions regarding unit cleanliness and pest control preparation.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · settled by agreementMay 5, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
On consent of both parties, the tenant's motion to set aside an earlier eviction order was denied, and the stay of eviction was ordered lifted on July 31, 2026.
- Motion to set aside order LTB-L-018814-26 denied on consent and stay of order lifted on July 31, 2026 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMay 5, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tenants' maintenance application was dismissed after they failed to attend the scheduled adjudicative case conference.
- The tenant's T6 application is dismissed as abandoned for failure to attend the hearing. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyMay 5, 2026
- Illegal act
- Breach of conditions
- Safety concerns
The tenant's motion to set aside an eviction order was granted on consent. The parties agreed to continue the tenancy subject to behavioural, fire safety, and support conditions.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
LTB-L-015513-26 · L4Landlord and Tenant BoardPerth and Stratford Housing CorporationRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyMay 5, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tenant's motion to set aside a previous eviction order was granted on consent after the landlord confirmed the tenant paid all outstanding rent arrears in full.
- Order LTB-L-018763-26 issued on March 9, 2026 is set aside and cannot be enforced.
- No finding against either partyMay 5, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tribunal set aside a prior eviction order on consent of both parties and established a payment plan for $5,891.00 in rent arrears.
- Arrears · $5,891 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyMay 4, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The parties resolved the tenant's maintenance application through a consent order. The landlord agreed to repair or replace the front door of the rental unit by May 29, 2026.
- Repair order
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnMay 4, 2026
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant withdrew their application regarding harassment and interference, and the file was closed.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMay 4, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed as abandoned because neither party attended the hearing.
LTB-T-075042-25 · T6Landlord and Tenant BoardShepherds of Good Hope, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantMay 4, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tenant's motion to set aside an ex parte eviction order was granted after the tenant demonstrated improved financial stability. The eviction order was set aside, and the previous conditional payment order remains in full force and effect.
- No finding against either partyMay 1, 2026
- Breach of conditions
On consent of the parties, the tribunal denied the tenant's motion to set aside an earlier eviction order. The stay of eviction will be lifted on July 31, 2026.
- On consent, the tenant's motion to set aside order LTB-L-020560-26 is denied and the stay of eviction is lifted on July 31, 2026 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMay 1, 2026
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application alleging harassment and interference was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the scheduled hearing.
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · not provedMay 1, 2026
- Tenant agreed termination
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy was dismissed because the tenant had already vacated the rental unit in accordance with their notice. The landlord's request for reimbursement of the filing fee was also denied.
- The landlord's application for termination and eviction is dismissed because the tenant had already vacated the rental unit.
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedMay 1, 2026
- Lockout and illegal eviction
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application alleging an illegal lockout, substantial interference, and harassment was dismissed. The tribunal found that the tenant had already vacated the rental unit when the landlord changed the locks to secure the property.
- The tenant's application is dismissed as the claims of illegal lockout, substantial interference, and harassment were not proved. · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantApril 30, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tenant's motion to void an eviction order was granted on the condition that the tenant pay $324.00 in Sheriff enforcement costs to the landlord.
- Sheriff enforcement costs incurred by the landlord · $324 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · settled by agreementApril 30, 2026
- Tenant agreed termination
The tenant's motion to set aside an earlier eviction order was denied on consent of both parties. The stay on the underlying eviction order was ordered lifted on May 17, 2026.
- On consent, the tenant's motion to set aside the order is denied, the stay of the order is lifted on May 17, 2026, and the previous order remains unchanged. · to the landlord
LTB-L-020247-26 · L3Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyApril 30, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The landlord and tenant consented to an order terminating the tenancy on July 31, 2026, and establishing a payment plan for $29,286.00 in rent arrears.
- Arrears · $29,286 · to the landlord
LTB-L-018588-26 · L4Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyApril 30, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
On consent, the tribunal granted the tenant's motion to set aside a previous eviction order and established a payment schedule for the tenant to pay $4,603.25 in rent arrears and costs.
- Arrears · $4,603 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedApril 29, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tenant's motion to set aside an earlier eviction and arrears order was denied after the tenant failed to attend the hearing. The stay of the previous order was lifted.
- The tenant's motion to set aside order LTB-L-019075-26 is denied as abandoned for non-attendance, and the stay of that order is lifted immediately. · to the landlord
LTB-L-019075-26 · L4Landlord and Tenant BoardMinto Multi-Res Income Prtnrs 1, GPRead the order (PDF) - Decision against landlordApril 29, 2026$3,037 Damages
- Maintenance issues
The tribunal found the landlords breached their maintenance obligations by failing to properly repair plumbing issues, resulting in a sewage flood. The landlords were ordered to pay the tenant $3,176.46 for damaged personal property, hotel expenses, and the application filing fee.
- Damages · $3,037
- Damages · $91
- Filing fee · $48
6458 Finch Avenue West, Toronto
LTB-T-042535-25 · T6Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedApril 28, 2026
- Tenant rights
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant's rights application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the scheduled hearing.
- The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to the tenant's failure to attend the hearing. · to the landlord
- Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord did not meet the Act's requirementsApril 28, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for non-payment of rent was dismissed because the landlord failed to provide an address for service in writing under section 12 of the Act, making the notice of termination invalid.
- The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy is dismissed.
- No finding against either partyApril 28, 2026$900
- Substantial interference
The tenant and landlord reached a consent agreement at an Adjudicative Case Conference resolving the application. The landlord agreed to pay the tenant $900.00.
- The landlord shall pay the tenant $900.00 on consent · $900
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedApril 27, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed because the tenant failed to attend the scheduled hearing.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnApril 27, 2026
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant requested to withdraw their application. The tribunal granted the request and dismissed the application.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed as withdrawn.
LTB-T-055661-25 · T2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Britain MechanicalRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedApril 27, 2026
- Illegal entry
The tenant's application regarding illegal entry was dismissed as abandoned because neither party attended the hearing.
- The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedApril 27, 2026
- Tenant rights
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application regarding substantial interference was dismissed as abandoned because the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedApril 24, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the scheduled hearing.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to the Tenant's failure to attend the hearing. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedApril 24, 2026
- Illegal entry
- Illegal charges or collection
The tenant's applications concerning illegal entry and illegal charges were dismissed after neither party attended the hearing.
- The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedApril 24, 2026
- Tenant rights
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application alleging harassment and substantial interference was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyApril 24, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Tenant agreed termination
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application was resolved by a consent order terminating the tenancy on May 31, 2025.
- Tenancy terminated on consent as of May 31, 2025 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedApril 23, 2026
- Illegal entry
- Vital services
The tenant's application regarding illegal entry and vital services was dismissed after neither party attended the hearing.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed due to non-attendance and abandonment. · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedApril 22, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed after they failed to attend the case conference. The tenant was ordered to pay $90.00 in costs to the landlord.
- Costs awarded to the landlord due to the tenant's failure to attend the conference · $90 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedApril 21, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed as abandoned because the tenant failed to attend the scheduled hearing.
- The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyApril 21, 2026$400
- Maintenance issues
The tenant's maintenance application was resolved through a consent order at an adjudicative case conference. The landlord agreed to pay the tenant $400.00.
- The landlord shall pay the tenant $400.00 on or before May 15, 2026 · $400
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedApril 21, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
- The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedApril 20, 2026
- Tenant rights
The tenant's application regarding access to personal property following eviction was dismissed after neither party attended the hearing.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord
LTB-T-036821-25 · T2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedApril 20, 2026
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application alleging harassment and interference was dismissed as abandoned because the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
LTB-T-041121-25 · T2Landlord and Tenant BoardResidenza Affordable Housing c/o M.F Arnsby Property Management Ltd.Read the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantBoth applications dismissed · not provedApril 17, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Substantial interference
The landlord withdrew their non-payment application, and the tribunal dismissed the tenant's claim of substantial interference from foul odours for lack of evidence.
- The landlord's L1 application is dismissed as withdrawn.
- The tenant's T2 application and section 82 claim are dismissed for failure to meet the burden of proof. · to the landlord
LTB-L-042491-25 · L1Landlord and Tenant Board1652557 ONT Inc, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)