Terri van Huisstede

• Tenant agreed termination
• Maintenance issues

The tenant's maintenance application was resolved on consent with the tenancy confirmed terminated as of August 31, 2025. The tenant withdrew all claims for monetary compensation.

• The tenant's application was settled on consent, terminating the tenancy effective August 31, 2025 and withdrawing monetary claims

• Maintenance issues

The parties consented to an order resolving the tenant's maintenance application. The landlord agreed to pay the tenant a $279.45 rent abatement.

• Rent abatement · $279

• Tenant rights
• Substantial interference

The parties reached a consent agreement to resolve the tenant's application. The landlord agreed to pay the tenant $500.00 in compensation.

• Damages · $500

• Tenant rights
• Substantial interference

The parties reached a consensual settlement resolving the tenant's application. Under the consent order, the tenancy was terminated and a prior arrears order of $13,447.06 against the tenant was reduced to $0.00 in full satisfaction of the application.

• Debt owed by the tenant under a prior order is set off in full satisfaction of the tenant's application and reduced to $0.00 · $13,447

• Maintenance issues

The tenant withdrew their maintenance application at the hearing. The Landlord and Tenant Board consented and closed the file with no findings made.

• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging harassment and interference was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed due to the tenant's failure to attend the hearing. · to the landlord

• Tenant rights
• Substantial interference

The tenant and landlord reached a consent agreement resolving the tenant's rights application. The landlord agreed to compensate the tenant $2,413.50, to be deducted from monthly rent over three months.

• Damages · $2,414

• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenants' application alleging harassment and interference was dismissed as abandoned after neither party attended the hearing.

• Substantial interference

The tenant and the landlord agreed to a consent order resolving the tenant's application. The landlord agreed to pay the tenant $1,100.00 in compensation by May 31, 2026.

• Damages · $1,100

• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenants withdrew their tenant rights application at the hearing. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.

• The tenants' application was withdrawn and the Board's file is closed.

• Maintenance issues

The tenant withdrew their maintenance application at the hearing with the landlord's consent. The tribunal closed the file without making any findings.

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's maintenance application was resolved by a consent order requiring the landlords to pay a rent abatement of $437.50.

• Rent abatement · $438

• Tenant rights

The tenant's rights application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the scheduled hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance at the hearing. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The tribunal granted the landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for non-payment of rent and ordered the tenant to pay arrears and costs to avoid eviction.

• Arrears · $22,395 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tribunal dismissed the tenants' application alleging substantial interference and harassment by the landlord. The tribunal found that the alleged parking disruption, roof repair noise, and dispute over left-behind property did not establish substantial interference or compensable harm.

• The Tenants' application is dismissed. · to the landlord

• Tenant agreed termination
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application regarding substantial interference was resolved on consent by agreeing to terminate the tenancy. The application was withdrawn.

• The tenancy is terminated as of June 30, 2025 on consent, and the application is withdrawn

• Substantial interference
• Breach of conditions

The tribunal terminated the tenancy and ordered the tenant evicted after finding that the tenant breached a previous order requiring them to refrain from smoking inside the rental unit.

• Personal use eviction
• Bad faith eviction

The tenant's bad faith eviction application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the scheduled de novo hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Lockout and illegal eviction
• Illegal entry
• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant requested to withdraw their tenant rights application, and the Landlord and Tenant Board consented. The file is closed with no findings against either party.

• The tenant's application is withdrawn upon request and the file is closed. · to the landlord

• Illegal entry

The tenant's application alleging illegal entry was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing. The tribunal ordered the tenant to pay $100 in Board costs for filing a frivolous application outside the statutory limitation period.

• Fine · $100

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to failure to attend the hearing. · to the landlord

• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging harassment and interference was dismissed as abandoned because the tenant did not attend the hearing.

• The tenant's T2 application is dismissed due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Illegal entry

The tenants withdrew their application regarding illegal entry at the hearing. The file was closed with no findings against either party.

• The tenants' application was withdrawn and the file closed.

• Maintenance issues
• Rent deposit disputes

The tenants' maintenance application was resolved through a consent order. The landlord agreed to pay the tenants $6,900.00 in installments for rent reimbursement and deposit return, and the tenancy was terminated on consent.

• Illegal rent refunded · $2,100
• Deposit returned · $4,800

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tribunal granted the tenants' motion to set aside an ex parte eviction order, allowing the tenancy to continue on condition that the tenants pay $86.00 in outstanding rent arrears and pay rent on time for twelve months.

• Arrears · $86 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The tenant paid all outstanding arrears and required fees to void the previous eviction order. The tribunal ordered that the eviction order is void and cannot be enforced.

• Order LTB-L-041641-25 is declared void and cannot be enforced by the Landlord.

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tribunal granted the tenant's motion on consent to set aside a previous eviction order. The parties agreed to a payment plan for rent arrears and costs totalling $1,136.80.

• Arrears · $1,137 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tenant's motion to set aside an earlier eviction order was resolved on consent. The parties agreed to payment terms and that the stay of eviction would be lifted on May 31, 2026.

• The tenant's motion to set aside order LTB-L-084110-25 is denied on consent and the stay of the order is lifted May 31, 2026. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tenants' motion to set aside a previous eviction order was denied after they failed to attend the hearing. The original order remains confirmed and the stay of eviction is lifted.

• The tenants' motion to set aside Order LTB-L-016050-26 is denied due to abandonment for non-attendance, and the stay of the order is lifted. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tenant's motion to set aside a previous eviction order was denied after the tenant abandoned the hearing. The stay on the eviction order was lifted immediately.

• The tenant's motion to set aside order LTB-L-018507-26 is denied, leaving the eviction order unchanged and lifting the stay of eviction immediately · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Persistent late payment

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment of rent was granted conditionally, allowing the tenants to maintain their tenancy if they pay rent on time and cover the application filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tenant's motion to set aside an earlier eviction order was resolved by a consent agreement. The stay of eviction will be lifted on May 15, 2026, and the previous order remains unchanged.

• Substantial interference

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for substantial interference was dismissed because the notice of termination was invalid.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy is dismissed due to an invalid notice of termination.

• Breach of conditions

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy alleging the tenants no longer qualified for the rental unit, but withdrew the application at the hearing.

• Maintenance issues
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's applications regarding maintenance and tenant rights were dismissed due to a lack of sufficient particulars. The tenant was granted previous opportunities to amend the claims to include required dates and details, but failed to do so.

• The Tenant’s applications are dismissed.

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tenant's motion to set aside an ex parte eviction order was granted, allowing the tenancy to continue on condition that rent is paid on time every month through April 1, 2027.

• The ex parte eviction order is set aside and the tenancy continues on condition that the tenant pays monthly rent on time through April 1, 2027

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tenant failed to attend the hearing for their motion to set aside an earlier order. The tribunal deemed the motion abandoned, denied it, and lifted the stay on the original order.

• The tenant's motion to set aside order LTB-L-018091-26 is denied as abandoned for non-attendance, and the stay of the order is lifted immediately. · to the landlord

• Persistent late payment

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment of rent was withdrawn on consent after the tenants vacated the rental unit.

• The Landlord's application is withdrawn on consent and the file is closed.

• Persistent late payment

The landlord withdrew its application to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment of rent. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.

• The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment was withdrawn and the file is closed

• Substantial interference
• Breach of conditions
• Utility costs

The landlord's application was resolved with a conditional order requiring the tenant to pay $1,519.99 in outstanding utility arrears plus the filing fee. The tenancy continues provided the tenant complies with the monthly repayment schedule and pays ongoing utility costs on time.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Unpaid utility arrears for the period ending December 30, 2025 · $1,520 · to the landlord

• Persistent late payment

The tribunal terminated the tenancy due to persistent late payment of rent, postponing eviction until June 30, 2026. The tenants were also ordered to pay the landlord's application filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tenants' maintenance application was dismissed after they failed to attend the de novo hearing.

• The tenants' application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Utility costs

The parties resolved the landlord's application for arrears by reaching an order on consent. The former tenant agreed to pay $35,000 in monthly installments, and the landlord withdrew the claim for unpaid utilities.

• Arrears · $35,000 · to the landlord

• The landlord's claim for unpaid utilities was withdrawn on consent.

• Substantial interference

The landlord's eviction application was dismissed after the landlord failed to attend the hearing to support the claim.

• The landlord's L2 application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Property damage

The tribunal dismissed the landlords' application to terminate the tenancy and for damage compensation. The landlords failed to prove that the tenant caused willful or negligent damage to the stove.

• The Landlords' application to terminate the tenancy and for repair/replacement costs is dismissed as the Landlords did not prove willful or negligent damage.

• Personal use eviction
• Tenant agreed termination

The landlord and tenant reached a consent agreement to terminate the tenancy on July 31, 2026, with the landlord waiving rent until that date.

• Whether the Act applies

The tribunal dismissed the tenants' application after they failed to attend the hearing. The tenants were ordered to pay $700 in costs to the landlords.

• costs awarded to the landlords for hearing preparation and attendance · $700 · to the landlord

• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference
• Whether the Act applies
• Assignment or sublet

The tribunal dismissed the occupant's T2 application because the applicant was an occupant rather than a tenant under the Residential Tenancies Act. The tribunal found that the legislation did not apply to the relationship between the landlord and the occupant.

• The tenant's T2 application is dismissed because the Act does not apply to the occupant. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The tribunal denied the tenant's request to review an eviction order for non-payment of rent and confirmed the original order, lifting the stay effective April 30, 2026.

• Maintenance issues
• Rent reduction
• Whether the Act applies

The tribunal determined that the Residential Tenancies Act applies to the tenancy. The tenant's applications for a rent reduction and maintenance remedies were both dismissed.

• The tenant's T3 application for a rent reduction due to discontinued services was dismissed as not proved. · to the landlord
• The tenant's T6 application regarding maintenance obligations for lawn care and snow removal was dismissed as not proved. · to the landlord

• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application was dismissed as abandoned after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord