Terri van Huisstede

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy following a breach of a previous order's payment conditions. The parties reached a consent agreement allowing the tenancy to continue under a payment schedule for $3,992.00 in rent arrears.

• Arrears · $3,992 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Tenant agreed termination

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and collect rent arrears was dismissed because the landlord failed to attend the hearing.

• The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and for rent arrears is dismissed as abandoned due to the landlord's failure to attend the hearing.

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tenant's motion to set aside an earlier eviction order was denied on consent after the tenant breached a previous payment condition. The stay of eviction was ordered lifted effective June 30, 2026.

• The tenant's motion to set aside order LTB-L-028600-26 is denied and the stay of the eviction order is lifted effective June 30, 2026. · to the landlord

• Persistent late payment

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy due to persistent late payment of rent. The tribunal found the tenant had been persistently late but granted relief from eviction under section 83, ordering the tenant to pay rent on time for 12 months and reimburse the landlord's filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• The tenant shall pay lawful monthly rent on or by the first day of each month for 12 consecutive months, failing which the landlord may apply under section 78 to terminate the tenancy · to the landlord

• Personal use eviction
• Substantial interference

The tenant's request to review a previous eviction order was denied. The Board confirmed the original order and lifted the stay of eviction.

• Tenant rights
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment was dismissed as abandoned after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Renovation and demolition

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for demolition and conversion into office space was granted. The tribunal ordered the tenant to vacate the rental unit by June 7, 2026.

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the scheduled hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to the Tenant's failure to attend the hearing. · to the landlord

• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenants' request to review a previous order was denied because they failed to establish that they were unable to participate in the original hearing. The original order remains confirmed and unchanged.

• The tenants' request to review order LTB-T-045562-25 is denied and the original order is confirmed. · to the landlord

• Renovation and demolition

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for demolition was dismissed. The tribunal found that the landlord failed to prove they had obtained all necessary municipal permits to carry out the proposed work.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant for demolition is dismissed as the Landlord did not prove they obtained the necessary permits.

• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment due to the landlord's failure to provide a copy of the lease was dismissed. The tribunal found the tenant did not prove the allegations on a balance of probabilities.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed because the allegations were not proven on a balance of probabilities.

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tenant's motion to set aside an eviction order under section 78 was denied because the tenant breached payment conditions under a prior order. The stay of eviction was ordered lifted on August 31, 2026, granting the tenant delayed relief to find alternate housing.

• Bad faith eviction

The tenant's application alleging a bad faith notice of termination was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Property damage
• Breach of conditions

The tenant's motion to set aside an earlier eviction order was denied after the tenant failed to attend the hearing. The stay of the eviction order was lifted immediately.

• The tenant's motion to set aside order LTB-L-013395-26 is denied due to abandonment for non-attendance, and the stay of the order is lifted. · to the landlord

• Breach of conditions
• Utility costs

The tribunal dismissed the tenant's motion to set aside an eviction order, finding that the tenant breached a previous conditional order by failing to pay water utility bills in full and on time.

• The tenant's motion to set aside Order LTB-L-026546-26 is denied and the stay of the eviction order is lifted effective May 31, 2026 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tribunal granted the tenants' motion to set aside an earlier eviction order after the tenants demonstrated extenuating circumstances and paid all outstanding rent arrears.

• Order LTB-L-025724-26 issued on March 27, 2026 is set aside and cannot be enforced

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tenants' motion to set aside a previous eviction order was denied after they failed to attend the hearing. The stay on the prior order was lifted immediately.

• The tenants' motion to set aside order LTB-L-022102-26 was denied due to abandonment, and the stay of that order was lifted immediately. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tenant's motion to set aside an eviction order was denied because the tenant breached order conditions and had already been evicted under a separate proceeding. The stay of eviction was lifted.

• The tenant's motion to set aside order LTB-L-023812-26 is denied and the stay of the eviction order is lifted immediately · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tenant's motion to set aside a previous ex parte eviction order was granted. The prior order was set aside and cannot be enforced after the tenant paid all outstanding rent arrears.

• Motion to set aside Order LTB-L-026963-26 is granted; the order is set aside and cannot be enforced

• Non-payment of rent

The tenant's motion to void an eviction order for non-payment of rent was granted on condition that the tenant pay outstanding sheriff enforcement costs. The landlord's request for costs was denied.

• Sheriff enforcement costs payable into the Board to void the eviction order · $323 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tenants' motion to set aside an eviction order was denied because they breached the payment terms of a previous consent order and could not afford the rent arrears. The tribunal delayed lifting the stay of eviction until June 30, 2026, to give the tenants time to find alternative housing.

• The tenants' motion to set aside order LTB-L-017574-26 is denied and the stay of the order is lifted effective June 30, 2026 · to the landlord

• Lockout and illegal eviction
• Illegal entry
• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging illegal lockout, illegal entry, harassment, and substantial interference was dismissed. The tribunal found that the parties mutually agreed to terminate the tenancy and the tenant failed to prove their claims on a balance of probabilities.

• The tenant's application is dismissed. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Property damage
• Substantial interference
• Utility costs

The tribunal terminated the tenancy as of the date the tenant moved out and ordered the tenant to pay rent arrears, unpaid utility costs, and the filing fee. The landlord's claim for property damage was dismissed for insufficient evidence.

• Arrears · $4,500 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• The landlord's claim for property damage was dismissed for lack of supporting evidence
• Out-of-pocket expenses for unpaid gas, hydro, and water utility charges · $2,786 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The tenant's request for review of a previous order requiring payment of rent arrears was denied. The tribunal confirmed that both joint tenants remain jointly and severally liable for rent.

• The tenant's request for review is denied, the stay of the order is lifted, and the original order ordering payment of rent arrears is confirmed. · to the landlord

• Renovation and demolition

The tribunal granted the landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for extensive repairs and renovations. The eviction was postponed to May 17, 2026 to allow the tenant time to recover from surgery.

• Renovation and demolition

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for major repairs or renovations was dismissed. The tribunal found that the landlord failed to obtain the required building permits and the notice of termination lacked sufficient particulars.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant for renovations is dismissed because the Landlord failed to obtain the required permits pursuant to section 73 of the Act and the notice lacked sufficient particulars.

• Personal use eviction
• Bad faith eviction

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for personal use was dismissed as an abuse of process and an impermissible collateral attack on an earlier Board decision. The tribunal also declined to order the tenant to return the one month's compensation paid.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant is dismissed as an abuse of process.

44 Blenheim Street, West Perth

• Non-payment of rent

The tenant's request for a review of an eviction order for non-payment of rent was denied. The underlying order was confirmed, and the stay of eviction was ordered to be lifted on June 8, 2026.

• Payment out of money paid into the Board returned to the tenant because it was insufficient to void the order · $2,382

• Substantial interference
• Breach of conditions

The tribunal granted the tenant's motion to set aside an ex parte eviction order issued for breach of a prior consent order. Given the severe and traumatic circumstances surrounding the incident and the absence of further issues, the eviction order was set aside.

• Order LTB-L-096105-25, issued on November 24, 2025, is set aside and cannot be enforced

• Illegal entry
• Vital services
• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging harassment, substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment, illegal entry, and interference with vital services was dismissed. The tribunal found that the tenant failed to prove the claims on a balance of probabilities.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Substantial interference

The landlord's applications for rent arrears and eviction were withdrawn after the tenants vacated the rental unit. The tenants' request for costs was dismissed.

• The Tenants' request for costs is dismissed.
• The Landlord's L1 and L2 applications are withdrawn. · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues
• Safety concerns

The tenant's maintenance application seeking replacement of the rental unit's wooden door with a steel door was dismissed. The tribunal determined that the landlord had properly maintained the door and lock, and committed no maintenance breach.

• Persistent late payment

The tribunal terminated the tenancy due to persistent late payment of rent and ordered the tenant to vacate the rental unit by May 31, 2026.

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's maintenance application was resolved on consent. The tribunal ordered that the tenancy terminated on November 30, 2025, fully resolving all issues between the parties.

• Tenancy terminated on consent as of November 30, 2025, resolving all issues relating to the tenancy

• Maintenance issues
• Assignment or sublet

The tenants and landlord resolved the application through a consent order. The landlord agreed to provide a $400.00 rent credit towards the tenants' reassignment costs.

• Credit towards the May 1, 2026 rent for the tenants' reassignment costs · $400

• Property damage
• Substantial interference
• Breach of conditions
• Utility costs

The tribunal terminated the tenancy and ordered the tenant to pay $3,334.80 for unpaid utilities, garage door damage, and the application filing fee.

• Damages · $1,815 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Unpaid utility costs (heat and water) · $1,334 · to the landlord

• Personal use eviction

The tribunal granted the landlords' application to terminate the tenancy for personal use by their daughter, postponing the eviction to May 31, 2026. The landlords were ordered to pay the mandatory one-month rent compensation by May 8, 2026.

• One-month rent compensation required by section 48.1 of the Act · $630

• Personal use eviction

The tribunal granted the landlords' application to terminate the tenancy for personal use by their daughter, postponing the eviction date to May 31, 2026. The landlords were ordered to reissue the required one-month statutory compensation of $630 to the tenant.

• One-month rent compensation required under section 48.1 of the Act · $630

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed as abandoned because neither party attended the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed due to abandonment/non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord withdrew their non-payment of rent application after the hearing, and the tribunal closed the file.

• The Landlord's application is withdrawn at their request, and the Board's file is closed.

• Illegal entry
• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant's application regarding illegal charges was resolved and withdrawn following reimbursement by the landlords. The tenant's application regarding illegal entry was dismissed for lack of sufficient particulars and failing to state a remedy.

• The T1 application is resolved and withdrawn
• The Tenant's T2 application is dismissed for lack of particulars and failure to identify a remedy