Ontario Landlord and Tenant Board
Terri van Huisstede
MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntarioBeta
Rulings, compared with the board
About the board's rate against tenantsDecided against tenants about as often as the board does on comparable applications, across 161 contested orders.
Orders are grouped by who applied and what they applied for, and this member’s record is compared with the board’s on that same mix. Withdrawn, settled and non-attendance dismissals are excluded. It measures how these decisions differ from the board’s on cases of the same type.
Dismissals, compared with the board
Bars landlords 1.45× as often as tenantsDismissed landlords' applications as not proved, out of jurisdiction or barred on procedure 1.45× as often as tenants', relative to the board's rate on comparable applications (95% interval 1.06–2.00), across 28 such dismissals of landlords' applications and 27 of tenants'.
Counts only dismissals the member ruled on — not proved, outside the board’s jurisdiction, or barred on procedure. Applications withdrawn, settled or dismissed because nobody attended are excluded, as they are above. The two sides are compared on this member’s own docket, against the board’s rate on the same kinds of application. It does not measure whether any decision was right.
Orders
Showing 1–50 of 277- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 30, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tenants did not attend the hearing for their motion to set aside an earlier eviction order. The tribunal found the motion abandoned, denied it, and lifted the stay of the order.
- The tenants' motion to set aside the order is denied as abandoned for non-attendance, and the stay of order LTB-L-036033-26 is lifted immediately · to the landlord
LTB-L-036033-26 · L4Landlord and Tenant BoardNorthumberland County Housing CorporationRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnJune 30, 2026
- Tenant rights
- Illegal charges or collection
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant withdrew their application concerning tenant rights and illegal charges, and the tribunal closed the file.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 30, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tenants' maintenance application was dismissed as abandoned because they failed to attend the hearing.
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 29, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tenant failed to attend the hearing to set aside an earlier eviction order. The tribunal dismissed the tenant's motion as abandoned and lifted the stay of the eviction order.
- The tenant's motion to set aside order LTB-L-035722-26 is denied and dismissed as abandoned for non-attendance. · to the landlord
LTB-L-035722-26 · L4Landlord and Tenant BoardSkyline Real Estate Holdings Inc., c/o Skyline LivingRead the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantJune 29, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tribunal denied the tenants' request to review an earlier eviction order for non-payment of rent. The original order was confirmed, and the stay of eviction was ordered lifted on July 15, 2026.
- The request to review order LTB-L-107041-25 is denied, the original order is confirmed, and the stay is lifted effective July 15, 2026. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnJune 26, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tenant withdrew their maintenance application on consent during an adjudicative case conference. The tribunal closed the file with no findings against either party.
- The tenant's application is withdrawn on consent and the file is closed. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · settled by agreementJune 26, 2026
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
- Utility costs
The tenant's application regarding harassment and substantial interference was resolved through a consent agreement. The tenant withdrew the application with no monetary orders or findings against either party.
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedJune 26, 2026
- Tenant rights
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment regarding a neighbour's off-leash dog was dismissed. The tribunal found that the landlord took reasonable steps and the interference did not reach the threshold of substantial.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed. · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantJune 26, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tenant's motion to void an eviction order for non-payment of rent was granted on condition that the tenant pay $335.00 in sheriff enforcement costs by July 10, 2026. The tribunal ordered that the $2,889.10 in arrears and fees previously paid into the Board be paid out to the landlord.
- Arrears · $2,889 · to the landlord
- Tenant shall pay to the LTB for the landlord's non-refundable sheriff enforcement costs · $335 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 25, 2026
- Rent reduction
The tenant did not attend the scheduled hearing. The tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.
- The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord
LTB-T-002587-26 · T3Landlord and Tenant BoardStrongback Property Management Quinte DivisionRead the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantJune 25, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tribunal ordered the tenancy terminated due to substantial rent arrears and ordered the tenant to pay $27,652.90 in outstanding rent and filing costs, plus daily compensation. Discretionary relief was granted to postpone eviction until August 16, 2026.
- Arrears · $27,467 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Daily compensation of $43.45 per day for use of the unit from June 12, 2026 until the tenant vacates · $43 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 24, 2026
- Rent reduction
The tenant's application for a rent reduction was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
- The tenant's application for a rent reduction is dismissed due to non-attendance. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyBoth applications dismissed · withdrawnJune 22, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Maintenance issues
The tenant's maintenance application and the landlord's non-payment of rent application were both withdrawn on consent. The files are closed with no orders made against either party.
- The landlord's L1 application for rent arrears and eviction is withdrawn on consent
- The tenant's T6 maintenance application is withdrawn on consent · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyBoth applications dismissed · settled by agreementJune 22, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Maintenance issues
The tenant's maintenance application and the landlord's non-payment application were both withdrawn on consent.
- The tenant's T6 maintenance application and the landlord's L1 non-payment application were withdrawn on consent.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · settled by agreementJune 17, 2026$150
- Vital services
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application regarding tenant rights was resolved on consent with the landlord paying $150.00, and the application was withdrawn.
- Payment to the tenant in full and final satisfaction of all issues relating to the application and tenancy · $150
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 15, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
- The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to the tenant's failure to attend the hearing. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 15, 2026
- Maintenance issues
- Illegal entry
- Vital services
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application regarding maintenance, harassment, illegal entry, vital services, and substantial interference was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
- The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnJune 15, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tenant withdrew their maintenance application following a mutual release agreement with the landlord. The Landlord and Tenant Board closed the file.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 12, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tenant did not attend the hearing for their maintenance application. As a result, the tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.
- The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord
LTB-T-098780-25 · T6Landlord and Tenant BoardToronto Community Housing CorporationRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyJune 12, 2026$3,400 Damages
- Maintenance issues
- Substantial interference
The parties resolved the tenant's maintenance and substantial interference claims on consent. The landlord agreed to pay the tenants $3,400.00 in compensation.
- Damages · $3,400
- No finding against either partyJune 11, 2026$35 Rent abatement
- Maintenance issues
- Rent increase disputes
The landlord and the tenants reached a consent agreement resolving the maintenance application. The landlord agreed to complete specified repairs by June 30, 2026, failing which the tenants are authorized to deduct $34.63 monthly from their rent.
- Repair order
- Rent abatement · $35
- No finding against either partyJune 11, 2026$352 Rent abatement
- Maintenance issues
The tenant's maintenance application was resolved on consent. The landlord agreed to investigate and complete necessary repairs and provide a $400.00 rent deduction inclusive of the filing fee.
- Repair order
- Rent abatement · $352
- Filing fee · $48
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 11, 2026
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
- The tenant's application is dismissed due to abandonment/non-attendance. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyJune 11, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
On consent of both parties, the tribunal granted the tenant's motion to set aside a prior eviction order after confirming the tenant cleared the outstanding rent balance.
- The tenant's motion to set aside order LTB-L-026088-26 is granted on consent, and the order is set aside and cannot be enforced
- No finding against either partyJune 11, 2026$40,000
- Tenant agreed termination
- Lockout and illegal eviction
- Illegal entry
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application regarding tenant rights was resolved by a consent order terminating the tenancy and setting agreed compensation payments.
- Damages · $10,000
- Landlord to pay additional settlement funds to the tenant conditional upon vacant possession being provided · $40,000
- No finding against either partyJune 10, 2026$500 Rent abatement
- Illegal entry
The tenant's application alleging illegal entry was resolved on consent, with the landlord agreeing to a $500 rent reduction.
- Rent abatement · $500
- Decision against landlordLandlord's application dismissed · not provedJune 10, 2026
- Renovation and demolition
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant for major repairs or renovations was dismissed. The tribunal found the landlord failed to prove that the required statutory compensation of three months' rent was paid to the tenant.
- The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant is dismissed because the landlord failed to prove that the required statutory compensation was paid.
- Decision against tenantJune 10, 2026
- Maintenance issues
- Substantial interference
- Breach of conditions
The tribunal granted the tenant's motion to set aside an eviction order but found the tenant had breached a previous consent order by restricting access for inspections. The tenancy was reinstated with an added condition prohibiting the tenant from limiting entry to one person at a time.
- Ex parte eviction order LTB-L-027805-26 is set aside and previous consent order is amended to require the tenant not to restrict entry to one person at a time. · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 9, 2026
- Vital services
- Tenant rights
The tenant's application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing. The tenant was ordered to pay $50 in costs to the landlord.
- Tenant's application dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance · to the landlord
- Tenant ordered to pay costs to the landlord for hearing preparation · $50 · to the landlord
- Decision against landlordLandlord's application dismissed · not provedJune 9, 2026
- Renovation and demolition
The landlord's application to evict the tenant for major renovations was dismissed. The tribunal found that the landlord failed to prove the required statutory compensation was paid to the tenant by the termination date.
- The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant is dismissed because the Landlord failed to prove the required statutory compensation was paid.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 9, 2026
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application alleging substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed due to abandonment following the Tenant's failure to attend the hearing. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · settled by agreementJune 9, 2026$300
- Lockout and illegal eviction
- Illegal entry
- Vital services
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant and the landlord reached a consent agreement resolving the tenant's rights application. The landlord agreed to pay $300 for moving expenses, and the application was withdrawn.
- Landlord agreed on consent to pay the tenant for the return of money paid for movers · $300
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 9, 2026
- Tenant rights
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant's rights application was dismissed because the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · withdrawnJune 8, 2026
- Renovation and demolition
The landlord withdrew the application to terminate the tenancy for major repairs or renovations because the tenant passed away. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.
- Decision against landlordLandlord's application dismissed · not provedJune 8, 2026
- Renovation and demolition
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant for major repairs or renovations. The tribunal dismissed the application because the landlord failed to prove that the required statutory compensation was paid to the tenant.
- The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant is dismissed because the landlord failed to prove that required statutory compensation was paid.
- Decision against landlordLandlord's application dismissed · not provedJune 8, 2026
- Renovation and demolition
The tribunal dismissed the landlord's application to end the tenancy for extensive renovations because the landlord failed to prove the required statutory compensation was paid to the tenant. As a result, the eviction application was denied.
- The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant for renovations is dismissed because the landlord failed to prove that the required statutory compensation was paid.
- No finding against either partyJune 8, 2026$600 Damages
- Tenant agreed termination
- Maintenance issues
- Vital services
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenants' application was resolved by a consent order. The parties agreed to terminate the tenancy and the landlord agreed to pay $600.00 in general compensation.
- Damages · $600
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · not provedJune 5, 2026
- Renovation and demolition
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for major repairs or renovations was dismissed. The tribunal found that the landlord failed to prove the required statutory compensation was paid to the tenants.
- The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenants is dismissed for failure to prove that the required statutory compensation was paid.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 5, 2026
- Tenant rights
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application alleging harassment and substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing.
- The tenant's application is dismissed due to abandonment after failing to attend the hearing. · to the landlord
LTB-T-090009-25 · T2Landlord and Tenant BoardParkdale Apartment Nominee 1 Inc., Dms Property ManagementRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyJune 5, 2026$3,000
- Substantial interference
The parties reached a settlement on consent, with the landlord agreeing to pay the tenants $3,000.00 without admission of liability.
- Payment on consent by the landlord to the tenants in full satisfaction of all issues without admission of liability · $3,000
- Decision against landlordLandlord's application dismissed · not provedJune 5, 2026
- Renovation and demolition
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant for major renovations was dismissed. The tribunal found that the landlord failed to prove the required statutory compensation was paid to the tenant.
- The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant is dismissed because the Landlord failed to prove payment of the required statutory compensation.
- Decision against landlordLandlord's application dismissed · not provedJune 4, 2026
- Renovation and demolition
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant for renovations was dismissed because the landlord failed to prove the required statutory compensation was paid.
- The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant is dismissed for failure to pay the required compensation.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnJune 4, 2026
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant withdrew their application alleging harassment and substantial interference. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.
- The tenant's application was withdrawn and the file was closed · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantJune 4, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tribunal denied the tenant's motion to set aside an earlier eviction order after finding the tenant breached a previous repayment order. The stay of eviction was lifted effective July 15, 2026.
- The tenant's motion to set aside Order LTB-L-025347-26 is denied and the stay of eviction is lifted on July 15, 2026 · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantJune 4, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Property damage
- Safety concerns
The tribunal granted the landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant due to willful property damage and safety risks caused by unattended fires. The tenant was ordered to pay daily compensation until vacating the unit.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Daily compensation for use and occupation of the rental unit starting April 15, 2026 until the tenant vacates · $26 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · not provedJune 4, 2026
- Renovation and demolition
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for major renovations was dismissed. The landlord failed to establish that the required statutory compensation had been paid to the tenants.
- The landlord's application is dismissed for failure to prove that the required statutory compensation was paid to the tenants.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 4, 2026
- Tenant rights
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application alleging substantial interference was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
- The tenant's application is dismissed due to non-attendance. · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantJune 3, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tenant's motion to set aside a previous eviction order was denied on consent. The stay of the eviction order will be lifted on June 30, 2026.
- The tenant's motion to set aside order LTB-L-024846-26 is denied and the stay of the eviction order is lifted on June 30, 2026 · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantJune 2, 2026
- Tenant agreed termination
The tenant's motion to set aside an earlier eviction order was denied after they failed to attend the hearing on time. The stay of the eviction order was lifted, leaving the termination of the tenancy in effect.
- The tenant's motion to set aside the eviction order is denied and the stay of Order LTB-L-029613-26 is lifted immediately. · to the landlord
- Decision against landlordJune 1, 2026
- Lockout and illegal eviction
- Illegal entry
- Vital services
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The landlord's request to review an earlier order in favour of the tenant was denied. The tribunal confirmed the original decision and lifted the stay of execution.
- The request to review order LTB-T-035539-24 - LTB-T-038858-24 is denied, the order is confirmed and remains unchanged, and the stay of the order is lifted immediately.
Main, 114 Mitchell Street, Port Colborne
LTB-T-035539-24 · T2Landlord and Tenant Board2776405 Ontario Corp, Apex Property Management, Extend FinancialRead the order (PDF)