Ontario Landlord and Tenant Board
Nersi Makki
MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntarioBeta
Rulings, compared with the board
1.16× the board's rate against tenantsDecided against tenants more often than the board does on comparable applications — 1.16× the board's rate (95% interval 1.03–1.29), across 235 contested orders.
Orders are grouped by who applied and what they applied for, and this member’s record is compared with the board’s on that same mix. Withdrawn, settled and non-attendance dismissals are excluded. It measures how these decisions differ from the board’s on cases of the same type.
Dismissals, compared with the board
Bars tenants and landlords about as oftenDismissed tenants' and landlords' applications as not proved, out of jurisdiction or barred on procedure at rates that do not differ once the kind of application is accounted for, across 25 such dismissals of tenants' applications and 21 of landlords'.
Counts only dismissals the member ruled on — not proved, outside the board’s jurisdiction, or barred on procedure. Applications withdrawn, settled or dismissed because nobody attended are excluded, as they are above. The two sides are compared on this member’s own docket, against the board’s rate on the same kinds of application. It does not measure whether any decision was right.
Orders
Showing 151–200 of 352- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedMarch 20, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tribunal dismissed the tenant's maintenance application after finding that the landlord acted promptly and reasonably to fix a backed-up kitchen sink.
- The tenant's T6 application is dismissed for failure to prove a maintenance breach. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMarch 19, 2026
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application was dismissed as abandoned after neither party attended the case conference.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed because the Tenant did not appear to support their application.
- No finding against either partyMarch 19, 2026$1,648 Rent abatement
- Non-payment of rent
- Maintenance issues
The parties resolved the dispute on consent. The landlord agreed to pay the tenant a rent abatement of $1,648.19.
- Rent abatement · $1,648
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMarch 19, 2026
- Illegal entry
The tenant's illegal entry application was dismissed as abandoned after neither party attended the case conference.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed because the Tenant did not appear to support their application.
LTB-T-064098-25 · T2Landlord and Tenant BoardWaterloo Premium Property ManagementRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnMarch 18, 2026
- Substantial interference
The tenant withdrew their application after resolving the dispute with the landlord, and the file was closed.
- The Tenant's application is withdrawn and the file is closed.
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · withdrawnMarch 18, 2026
- Personal use eviction
The landlord withdrew the application to terminate the tenancy for personal use. The Board consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.
- The application having been withdrawn, the LTB's file is closed
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMarch 17, 2026
- Assignment or sublet
The tenant's application regarding an assignment or sublet was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed because the Tenant did not appear to support the application.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMarch 17, 2026
- Illegal entry
- Vital services
The tenants' application was dismissed as abandoned after neither party attended the case conference.
- The Tenants' application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMarch 17, 2026
- Illegal entry
The tenant's application alleging illegal entry was dismissed as abandoned after the tenant failed to attend the case conference.
- The tenant's T2 application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMarch 16, 2026
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application alleging substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment was dismissed as abandoned after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMarch 16, 2026
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application alleging substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment was dismissed as abandoned after the tenant failed to attend the case conference.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned.
- Decision against tenantMarch 13, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tenant's motion to set aside an ex parte eviction order was granted, allowing the tenancy to continue under a revised payment plan for $4,160.49 in arrears and costs.
- Arrears · $4,160 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyMarch 12, 2026$2,800
- Personal use eviction
- Vital services
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The parties settled the landlord's personal-use application and the tenants' rights application on consent. The tenancy terminates on March 31, 2026, and the landlord was ordered to pay compensation.
- Damages · $610
- Compensation owing under section 48.1 of the Act payable by the landlord to the tenants · $2,800
- Daily compensation of $92.05 starting April 1, 2026 until the tenants vacate · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyMarch 12, 2026$2,800
- Personal use eviction
- Vital services
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy for personal use and the tenants applied regarding harassment, enjoyment, and vital services, with the parties resolving all issues through a consent order.
- Compensation owing under section 48.1 of the Act · $2,800
- Payment in full and final satisfaction of all claims raised in application · $610
- Daily compensation of $92.05 per day starting April 1, 2026 until the Tenants move out · to the landlord
- Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord did not meet the Act's requirementsMarch 11, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Maintenance issues
- Rent increase disputes
The Board granted the tenants' request for review, cancelling the previous eviction and arrears order because the tenants were improperly denied the opportunity to raise disrepair issues under section 82. The landlord's arrears claim was ordered to be reheard.
- The request to review order LTB-L-048622-25 is granted, and the order is cancelled and cannot be enforced.
- The Tenants shall pay ongoing rent to the Landlord by the day it is due until the matter is resolved. · to the landlord
- Decision against landlordMarch 10, 2026$1,100 Rent abatement
- Vital services
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
- Safety concerns
The tribunal found that the landlord withheld heat during the winter and failed to respond adequately to a fire in the complex. The landlord was ordered to pay $1,541.00 in rent abatement and compensation.
- Rent abatement · $1,100
- Damages · $105
- Damages · $336
Unit 202, 551 Hale Street, London
LTB-T-070033-25 · T2Landlord and Tenant BoardAble Property Management, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMarch 10, 2026
- Illegal entry
- Vital services
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application was dismissed as abandoned after neither party attended the case conference.
- The application is dismissed as abandoned for failure to attend.
LTB-T-066403-25 · T2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantMarch 10, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tribunal cancelled a previous ex parte order and issued a consent order terminating the tenancy. The tenants were ordered to pay outstanding rent arrears and compensation to the landlord.
- Arrears · $5,224 · to the landlord
- Arrears · $1,389 · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantMarch 10, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tribunal issued a consent order terminating the tenancy and requiring the tenants to pay outstanding rent arrears and compensation.
- Arrears · $5,224 · to the landlord
- Arrears · $1,389 · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMarch 9, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Maintenance issues
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for non-payment of rent was granted. The tenant was ordered to pay the arrears and costs or face eviction, while the tenant's section 82 disrepair issues were dismissed as abandoned.
- Arrears · $11,434 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Daily compensation of $69.19 per day for use of the unit starting February 7, 2026 until the tenant vacates · to the landlord
- Tenant's issues raised under section 82 dismissed as abandoned
LTB-L-062362-24 · L1Landlord and Tenant BoardMinto Management Ltd, 37 Lord Seaton Road LimitedRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMarch 9, 2026
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application was dismissed as abandoned because the tenant failed to appear at the case conference.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned because the Tenant did not appear.
- Decision against landlordMarch 6, 2026$1,500 Rent abatement
- Maintenance issues
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tribunal found the landlord breached maintenance obligations regarding a malfunctioning HVAC system. The landlord was ordered to pay a rent abatement and hire technicians to investigate and report on the system.
- Rent abatement · $1,500
- Filing fee · $48
- Repair order
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMarch 6, 2026
- Illegal entry
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant's rights application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the scheduled hearing.
- The Tenant's T2 application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.
- Decision against landlordMarch 5, 2026$3,998 Rent abatement
- Rent increase disputes
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tribunal found that the landlords harassed the tenants and substantially interfered with their reasonable enjoyment by demanding illegal rent increases and threatening eviction. The landlords were ordered to pay a rent abatement of $3,997.50 and reimburse the tenants' filing fee.
- Rent abatement · $3,998
- Filing fee · $48
Unit 1711, 4090 Living Arts Drive, Mississauga
LTB-T-079957-24 · T2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyMarch 2, 2026$1,400
- Maintenance issues
The tenant's maintenance application was resolved by a consent order at a case conference. The landlord agreed to pay the tenant $1,400.00 in full and final satisfaction of all issues.
- The Landlord shall pay the Tenant $1,400.00 by e-transfer on or before March 27, 2026 in full and final satisfaction of all issues in the tenancy. · $1,400
- No finding against either partyMarch 2, 2026$900
- Maintenance issues
The tenant's maintenance application was resolved by a consent order at a case conference. The landlord agreed to pay the tenant $900.00 by March 27, 2027, and $100.00 monthly until February 28, 2031, or until the tenancy ends.
- The Landlord shall pay the Tenant $900.00 on or before March 27, 2027 · $900
- The Landlord shall pay the Tenant $100.00 by e-transfer on March 31, 2026 and on the last day of every calendar month thereafter until February 28, 2031, or until the tenancy ends, whichever is sooner · $100
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedFebruary 27, 2026
- Tenant rights
The tenants' application was dismissed as abandoned after neither party attended the scheduled videoconference hearing.
- The Tenants' application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedFebruary 26, 2026
- Illegal entry
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
- Whether the Act applies
The tenants applied for an order alleging illegal entry, substantial interference, and harassment, seeking only an administrative fine against the landlord. The tribunal dismissed the application, finding that an administrative fine was not warranted.
- The Tenants' application is dismissed as the requested administrative fine was not warranted on the merits.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedFebruary 26, 2026
- Lockout and illegal eviction
- Tenant rights
The tenant's application was dismissed after neither party attended the scheduled hearing.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · a procedural barFebruary 25, 2026
- Lockout and illegal eviction
The tenants' application was dismissed because it was filed more than one year after the alleged lockout, making it statute-barred.
- The Tenants' application is dismissed as statute-barred.
- No finding against either partyFebruary 25, 2026$4,000
- Lockout and illegal eviction
- Illegal entry
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The parties consented to resolve the tenant's rights application without a contested hearing. The landlord agreed to pay the tenant $4,000 in full and final satisfaction of all claims.
- Payment on consent in full and final satisfaction of all claims raised in the application · $4,000
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · a procedural barFebruary 25, 2026
- Tenant rights
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application was dismissed because the requested order to bar the landlord from holding a key to the rental unit is not an available remedy under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed because it does not disclose a reasonable cause of action.
- No finding against either partyFebruary 25, 2026$1,786
- Lockout and illegal eviction
The tenants applied alleging the landlord altered the locks without providing replacement keys. The parties resolved the dispute on consent, with the landlord agreeing to pay the tenants $1,785.89.
- The Landlord shall pay the Tenant $1,785.89 on consent in full and final satisfaction of all issues raised in the application. · $1,786
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedFebruary 25, 2026
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application alleging substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
- The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedFebruary 24, 2026
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application was dismissed after neither party attended the scheduled hearing.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.
- Decision against tenantFebruary 23, 2026
- Harassment
- Safety concerns
The landlord established that the tenant seriously impaired safety by barricading her door, threatening staff, and striking her roommate. The tribunal granted relief from eviction on condition that the tenant refrain from repeating safety-impairing conduct for one year.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Tenancy continues conditionally on the tenant not committing any act or omission that seriously impairs safety between February 24, 2026 and February 23, 2027 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnFebruary 20, 2026
- Lockout and illegal eviction
- Illegal entry
- Vital services
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
- Whether the Act applies
The tenant withdrew their rights application after the parties agreed that the Landlord and Tenant Board lacked jurisdiction. The file was closed with no findings or orders made against either party.
- The Tenant's application was withdrawn and the file is closed.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnFebruary 20, 2026
- Tenant rights
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant withdrew their application after the landlord agreed to apply payments as directed, and the tribunal closed the file.
- The tenant's application was withdrawn and the file is closed.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedFebruary 20, 2026
- Tenant rights
The tenant's application was dismissed as abandoned after neither party attended the hearing.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · withdrawnFebruary 20, 2026
- Unauthorized occupants
- Whether the Act applies
The landlord applied to determine whether the Residential Tenancies Act applies to the rental unit. At the hearing, the landlord requested to withdraw the application and the tribunal closed the file.
- The Landlord's application to determine whether the Act applies is withdrawn and the file is closed.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedFebruary 19, 2026
- Lockout and illegal eviction
- Illegal entry
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application concerning illegal entry, changed locks, substantial interference, and harassment was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned.
- No finding against either partyFebruary 19, 2026$2,000 Damages
- Maintenance issues
The parties reached a settlement on consent resolving the tenant's maintenance application. The order terminates the tenancy effective September 30, 2025, and requires the landlord to pay the tenant $2,000.00 in full satisfaction of all claims.
- Damages · $2,000
- The tenancy between the Landlord and the Tenant is terminated effective September 30, 2025. · to the landlord
LTB-T-081607-25 · T6Landlord and Tenant Board2690220 ontario inc c/o exclusive RentalsRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyFebruary 18, 2026$15,000
- Property damage
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for alleged damage was resolved by a consent order. The parties agreed to terminate the tenancy effective June 30, 2026, with the landlord waiving four months of rent and paying the tenants $15,000.00.
- The landlord forgives and waives rent owing for the period from February 1, 2026 to May 31, 2026
- The landlord shall pay the tenants $15,000.00 in certified funds on or before May 1, 2026 · $15,000
LTB-L-088935-25 · L2Landlord and Tenant Board1001117058 Ontario Inc., Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyFebruary 18, 2026
- Tenant rights
- Illegal charges or collection
The tenants and the landlord resolved the application on consent at a case conference. The landlord agreed to pay the tenants a settlement sum to fully resolve all claims.
- The Landlord shall pay the Tenants in full and final satisfaction of all claims raised in the application pursuant to the consent agreement.
- No finding against either partyFebruary 18, 2026
- Safety concerns
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for impaired safety was resolved by a consent order. The tenancy will continue subject to the tenant complying with specified fire safety and unit conditions.
- Tenancy continues subject to the tenant complying with fire safety, inspection, and cleanliness conditions through February 10, 2027.
- No finding against either partyFebruary 17, 2026
- Property damage
- Illegal act
- Safety concerns
The landlord's application was resolved by a consent order terminating the tenancy on May 31, 2026. The tenant agreed to pay $2,500.00 for undue damages and filing costs by February 17, 2027.
- Damages · $2,500 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyFebruary 17, 2026
- Illegal act
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for an alleged illegal act was resolved by a consent order. The tenancy continues on the condition that the tenant refrains from the specified activities and reimburses the filing fee.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
LTB-L-092721-25 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardSkyline Real Estate Holdings Inc., C/O Skyline LivingRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyFebruary 17, 2026$450 Damages
- Illegal entry
- Tenant rights
- Substantial interference
The parties resolved the application on consent during a case conference. The landlord agreed to pay the tenant $450.00 in full and final satisfaction of all issues.
- Damages · $450
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedFebruary 17, 2026
- Illegal entry
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenants' application alleging illegal entry, substantial interference, and harassment was dismissed as abandoned because the tenants did not appear at the hearing.
- The Tenants' application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.
- Decision against tenantFebruary 13, 2026
- Property damage
- Safety concerns
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy after discovering a dismantled smoke detector. The tribunal granted the application, terminated the tenancy effective February 18, 2026, and ordered the tenant to pay the $186 application filing fee.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord