Karen Gonçalves

• Personal use eviction
• Bad faith eviction

The tribunal dismissed the tenant's application alleging a bad faith eviction. The tenant failed to establish that the landlord did not move into the rental unit after the tenancy ended.

• The tenant's bad faith eviction application is dismissed for lack of proof.

• Unauthorized occupants
• Assignment or sublet

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict unauthorized occupants was dismissed after the landlord failed to attend the hearing.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tribunal granted the tenant's motion to set aside an eviction order and established a revised payment plan for outstanding rent arrears. The tenant was ordered to pay $4,906.95 in arrears according to a scheduled repayment plan.

• Arrears · $4,907 · to the landlord

• Unauthorized occupants
• Assignment or sublet

The landlord withdrew its application regarding an unauthorized transfer of occupancy, and the file was closed.

• Unauthorized occupants
• Assignment or sublet

The landlord withdrew its application concerning an unauthorized occupancy and transfer of the rental unit.

• The landlord's application is withdrawn at the landlord's request.

• Non-payment of rent
• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The tribunal terminated the tenancy and ordered the tenant evicted due to substantial interference from storing excessive junk, debris, and motorcycles on the property resulting in municipal fines. The landlord's non-payment application was dismissed because the notice of termination incorrectly stated the lawful monthly rent.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Reimbursement of municipal by-law inspection fine incurred due to tenant's substantial interference · $189 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tenant's motion to set aside an earlier eviction order was denied because the tenant breached a previous consent order by failing to pay rent. The stay of the eviction order was ordered lifted on April 30, 2026.

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tribunal granted the tenant's motion on consent, setting aside a previous eviction order and establishing an amended payment schedule for rent arrears.

• Arrears · $10,436 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tribunal denied the tenant's motion to set aside a previous order on consent and ordered the stay of the eviction order to be lifted.

• The tenant's motion to set aside Order LTB-L-009867-26 is denied and the stay of the order is lifted on April 1, 2026. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tribunal denied the tenant's motion to set aside an order terminating the tenancy for failing to meet payment conditions under a prior settlement. The stay of the eviction order was lifted immediately.

• Non-payment of rent
• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The landlord's L1 application for rent arrears was resolved by a consent order requiring the tenant to pay $656.00 in arrears and filing fees. The landlord's L2 application to terminate the tenancy for substantial interference and damage was dismissed as not proven.

• Arrears · $470 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Landlord's L2 application to terminate the tenancy and collect compensation was dismissed as grounds were not proven

• Tenant abandons property

The tribunal granted the landlord's application to terminate the tenancy on the grounds that the tenants abandoned the rental unit and ordered the tenants to pay the application filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Breach of conditions

The tribunal granted the tenant's motion to set aside a previous eviction order on consent of both parties.

• Non-payment of rent
• Property damage
• Utility costs

The landlord requested to withdraw its applications for termination, eviction, arrears, damages, and utility costs. The tribunal granted the request and ordered the application withdrawn.

• The landlord's application was withdrawn at the landlord's request.

• Non-payment of rent

The tribunal granted the tenant's motion on consent, declaring the previous eviction order void and unenforceable.

• Order LTB-L-072646-25 is declared void and cannot be enforced by the landlord.

• Breach of conditions

The tribunal granted the tenant's motion to set aside a prior ex-parte order on consent of both parties. The previous order governing the tenancy remains unchanged.

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tenant withdrew their motion to set aside a previous tribunal order. The stay of the underlying order was lifted effective March 31, 2026.

• The tenant's motion to set aside order LTB-L-010002-26 is withdrawn and the stay of that order is lifted effective March 31, 2026. · to the landlord

• Rent increase disputes
• Illegal charges or collection

The tribunal dismissed the tenants' application claiming the landlord collected illegal rent through preauthorized withdrawals. The tribunal found that the landlord properly served the notice of rent increase.

• The tenants' application claiming illegal rent collection was dismissed as not proved. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tribunal granted the tenant's motion on consent to set aside a previous eviction order. The tenant was ordered to pay $1,260.17 in rent arrears under a payment schedule.

• Arrears · $1,260 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The tribunal granted the tenant's review request on consent, cancelling the previous eviction order and replacing it with a payment plan requiring the tenant to pay $757.00 in rent arrears and costs.

• Arrears · $757 · to the landlord

• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The tribunal denied the tenant's request to review a previous order because the tenant failed to appear at the review hearing. The stay of the original order was cancelled and lifted immediately.

• The tenant's request to review the prior order was denied and abandoned due to the tenant's failure to attend the hearing, and the stay of the prior order was lifted. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The tribunal granted the tenant's review request on consent, replacing the prior order with a consent order that terminates the tenancy on May 3, 2026. The tenant was ordered to pay $18,560.65 in rent arrears, NSF charges, and costs under a payment schedule.

• Arrears · $18,561 · to the landlord

• Property damage
• Safety concerns

The tribunal dismissed the landlord's application to end the tenancy and claim property damage costs. The landlord failed to prove that the tenant impaired safety or damaged the rental unit.

• Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and for compensation for undue damage dismissed for lack of proof.

• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The tribunal issued a consent order resolving the landlord's application. The tenancy will continue provided the tenant pays $350.00 for damages and costs by April 15, 2026.

• Damages · $350 · to the landlord

• Substantial interference

The landlord's application was resolved by a consent order agreed to by both parties. The tenants agreed to remove a secondary lock from the unit door and pay the landlord's filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Maintenance issues

The tribunal granted the tenant's review request and issued a consent order replacing the previous default eviction order. Under the settlement, the landlord waived rent arrears and upcoming rent through June 2026 and agreed to repair the stove, with the tenancy terminating on June 1, 2026.

• Rent abatement · $8,343
• Repair order

• Non-payment of rent

The tenant's request for review of an eviction order for non-payment of rent was denied as abandoned because the tenant failed to attend the hearing on time. The stay of the original order was lifted and the original order was confirmed.

• The tenant's request to review order LTB-L-052907-25 was denied as abandoned due to non-attendance, confirming the original order and lifting the stay. · to the landlord

• Property damage
• Safety concerns

The landlord's application for compensation for cigarette smoke odour was dismissed because the landlord failed to prove the damage or the remediation costs.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed because the damage claim was not proved on the merits.

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's request to review an earlier dismissal order was denied after the tenant failed to attend the review hearing. The original order dismissing the tenant's maintenance application remains in effect.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned after the Tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• Non-payment of rent

The tenant's request to review the eviction order was denied after being abandoned. The original order terminating the tenancy for non-payment of rent and requiring the tenant to pay arrears stands confirmed.

• Arrears · $2,616 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Daily compensation of $41.10 starting January 16, 2026 until the tenant moves out · to the landlord

• Rent deposit disputes
• Illegal charges or collection
• Assignment or sublet

The tenant's application alleging illegal charges and improper retention of the last month's rent deposit was dismissed. The tribunal found the tenant broke the lease early and remained liable for rent, allowing the landlord to apply the deposit.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed

• Personal use eviction

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for personal use was withdrawn because the tenants had already moved out.

• The Landlord's application is withdrawn

• Personal use eviction

The landlord's personal use application was withdrawn after the tenants vacated the rental unit.

• The Landlords' application is withdrawn

• Personal use eviction

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for personal use was dismissed because the landlord failed to pay the required statutory compensation. The tenant was ordered to return an $18.19 partial compensation payment.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant is dismissed for failure to pay the required compensation by the termination date.
• The Tenant shall return the amount of $18.19 to the Landlord, which was paid towards compensation under section 48.1. · $18 · to the landlord

Unit 3, 4 Cameron Side Road West, Kingsville

• Personal use eviction

The tribunal issued a consent order terminating the tenancy effective July 1, 2026, following the landlord's application for personal use. If the tenant does not vacate by that date, the landlord may enforce the eviction through the Sheriff.

• The tenancy is terminated as of July 1, 2026, and vacant possession is ordered to the Landlord on or after July 2, 2026 · to the landlord

• Personal use eviction

The landlord's application for personal use eviction was withdrawn at the hearing because the notice of termination was unsigned.

• The Landlord’s application is withdrawn

• Unauthorized occupants
• Assignment or sublet

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict unauthorized occupants alleging an unauthorized transfer of occupancy. The tribunal dismissed the application after finding the tenant had not transferred occupancy or relinquished control of the unit.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict unauthorized occupants is dismissed.

• Substantial interference

The Landlord applied to terminate the tenancy based on substantial interference. At the hearing, the Landlord withdrew the application because the notice was invalid, and the matter was dismissed without findings.

• The Landlord's application is withdrawn on consent.

• Personal use eviction

The landlord's application was dismissed as abandoned because neither party attended the hearing.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance

• Property damage
• Substantial interference
• Whether the Act applies

The tribunal terminated the tenancy and ordered the tenant evicted due to substantial interference and undue property damage caused by a flood and unauthorized unit alterations. The tenant was ordered to pay repair costs and compensation.

• Damages · $10,566 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Compensation for use and occupation from November 15, 2025 to February 12, 2026 ($9,172.80) less the rent deposit and interest ($3,201.58) · $5,971 · to the landlord
• Daily compensation of $101.92 per day starting February 13, 2026 until the tenant vacates · to the landlord

• Substantial interference

The tribunal dismissed the landlord's application to terminate the tenancy, declining to order eviction where the landlord sought tenancy particulars under the Mortgages Act without pursuing remedy in Superior Court.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy is dismissed

• Substantial interference

The landlord withdrew the application because the notice contained an incorrect unit number, and the Board closed the matter.

• The Landlord’s application is withdrawn.

• Tenant abandons property

The tribunal terminated the tenancy after finding that the tenant had abandoned the rental unit.

• Non-payment of rent
• Maintenance issues

The landlord's application was granted, terminating the tenancy as of the date the tenant moved out and ordering the tenant to pay $3,895.94 in rent arrears and application costs. The tenant's maintenance and pest complaints raised under section 82 were dismissed.

• Arrears · $3,710 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• The Tenant's section 82 claims are dismissed

• Whether the Act applies

The landlord and the tenant resolved the application on consent, agreeing that the tenant will move out of the rental unit on or before May 1, 2026.

• The Tenant shall move out of the rental unit on or before May 1, 2026, failing which the Landlord may enforce eviction through the Sheriff. · to the landlord

• Substantial interference
• Safety concerns

The landlord established that the tenant substantially interfered with the landlord's lawful rights and created fire hazards by hoarding and cluttering the unit and balcony. The tribunal granted relief from eviction on conditions that the tenant clear hazards and comply with fire safety requirements, and ordered the tenant to pay the landlord's filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Tenancy continues conditionally upon the Tenant clearing combustible items and fire hazards by March 31, 2026, refraining from smoking in the unit, and maintaining safety devices · to the landlord