Vanessa Davies

• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant's application alleging the landlord collected or retained money illegally was dismissed after neither party attended the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant withdrew their application regarding illegally collected or retained money after the parties reached a prior consent agreement. The Landlord and Tenant Board consented to the request and closed the file.

• The tenant's application is withdrawn because the parties reached a prior consent agreement · to the landlord

• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant's application regarding illegally collected or retained money was dismissed after neither party attended the hearing.

• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The parties settled the application on consent, agreeing to terminate the tenancy on June 30, 2026. The tenant agreed to vacate the rental unit by that date.

• Daily compensation of $48.26 for use of the unit starting July 1, 2026 until the tenant vacates · $48 · to the landlord

• Illegal entry
• Vital services
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tribunal denied the tenant's adjournment request for an interpreter and dismissed the tenant's application because the tenant was unprepared to present evidence.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as the tenant failed to establish the allegations. · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues
• Illegal entry
• Vital services
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenants' application alleging illegal entry and substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment was dismissed. The tribunal found that the tenants failed to prove their claims on a balance of probabilities.

• The Tenants' application is dismissed because the allegations were not proven on a balance of probabilities. · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tribunal dismissed the tenant's maintenance application regarding mold issues. It found that the landlord acted promptly and reasonably to investigate and remediate the problem.

• The Tenant's T6 maintenance application is dismissed as the allegations were not proved. · to the landlord

• Property damage
• Harassment
• Substantial interference
• Safety concerns

The landlords applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenants based on an N7 notice. The application was dismissed because the notice of termination was vague, lacked required particulars, and was invalid.

• The Landlords' application is dismissed because the N7 notice of termination is invalid.

• Illegal entry
• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tribunal dismissed the tenants' application alleging illegal entry, harassment, and substantial interference. The tribunal found that the landlord provided proper notice or received consent to enter to address maintenance issues, and that serving eviction notices did not constitute harassment or substantial interference.

• The Tenants' application is dismissed.

• Lockout and illegal eviction
• Illegal entry
• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference
• Whether the Act applies

The tenant's application alleging tenant rights violations was dismissed because the tribunal found the tenancy was not bona fide and the Residential Tenancies Act does not apply.

• The tenant's application is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as the Act does not apply. · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues
• Substantial interference

The tribunal dismissed the tenants' maintenance and rights applications regarding a flooded basement, finding that the landlords responded promptly to an unforeseeable storm event. The landlords were found not to have breached their statutory maintenance obligations.

• The tenants' T2 and T6 applications are dismissed.

• Rent deposit disputes
• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant's application for the return of their last month's rent deposit was dismissed. The tribunal found that the tenant failed to provide lawful 60 days' notice to terminate the tenancy and did not prove the landlord mitigated losses.

• The tenant's application alleging the landlord illegally retained the last month's rent deposit is dismissed as not proved. · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues
• Substantial interference

The tenants' applications claiming maintenance failures and substantial interference following a basement flood were dismissed. The tribunal found the flood was caused by an unforeseeable severe storm and the landlords responded promptly and appropriately.

• The Tenants' applications are dismissed.

• Personal use eviction
• Bad faith eviction

The tenant's application alleging that the landlord gave a notice of termination in bad faith was dismissed. The tribunal found the landlord had a genuine intention to occupy the rental unit at the time of the notice.

• The tenant's T5 application alleging bad-faith eviction is dismissed because the tenant failed to prove bad faith on a balance of probabilities.

• Whether the Act applies

The tribunal dismissed the tenant's application after finding that the Residential Tenancies Act does not apply because the tenant shared a kitchen with the landlord.

• The tenant's application is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction under section 5(i) of the Act. · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues
• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging harassment and interference with reasonable enjoyment was dismissed. The tribunal found the application lacked the necessary particulars and specific factual details required to allow the landlord to know the case to be met.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed for lack of particulars.

• Non-payment of rent
• Illegal charges or collection

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenants for non-payment of rent. The tribunal dismissed the application because the notice of termination misstated the arrears and was therefore invalid.

• The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict for non-payment of rent is dismissed as the N4 notice is invalid.

• Maintenance issues
• Bad faith eviction
• Tenant rights

The tenant's application alleging a bad faith notice of termination was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing. · to the landlord

• Illegal entry
• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the scheduled hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Property damage
• Unauthorized occupants
• Substantial interference

The landlord's application was granted in part. The tenancy was terminated as the tenants had already vacated, and the tenants were ordered to pay outstanding rent arrears and application costs, while the landlord's claim for property damage was dismissed.

• Arrears · $1,284 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• The landlord's L2 application for damage compensation is dismissed as not proved

• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Persistent late payment

The landlord established that the tenants persistently paid rent late, but the tribunal granted relief from eviction on condition that rent is paid on time for 12 months. The tenants were ordered to reimburse the landlord's filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord's application for rent arrears against a former tenant was dismissed because neither party attended the hearing.

• The landlord's application is dismissed because the landlord failed to attend the hearing.

• Property damage
• Substantial interference
• Utility costs

The tribunal terminated the tenancy and ordered the tenant to pay $9,904.68 for property damage, unpaid utilities, and the application filing fee.

• Damages · $7,435 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Unpaid utilities · $635 · to the landlord
• Water cost · $789 · to the landlord

• Property damage

The tribunal dismissed the landlord's application for property damage costs relating to a sewage pump backup. The landlord failed to prove that the tenants wilfully or negligently caused the damage.

• The Landlord's application for repair and cleaning costs is dismissed because undue damage caused by the Tenants was not proved.

• Persistent late payment

The tribunal found that the tenant was persistently late in paying rent but granted relief from eviction on condition that rent is paid on time through December 2026. The tenant was ordered to reimburse the landlord's application filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Substantial interference

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant for non-payment of rent was granted. The tenant was ordered to pay rent arrears and daily compensation or vacate the rental unit.

• Arrears · $17,009 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• The landlord's L2 application is withdrawn and the file is closed
• Daily compensation for use and occupation of the unit starting April 29, 2026 until the unit is vacated · $47 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Utility costs

The landlord's applications regarding non-payment of rent and utility costs were dismissed after neither party attended the hearing.

• The Landlord's L1 and L2 applications are dismissed due to abandonment/non-attendance.

• Utility costs

The landlords applied to recover unpaid utility expenses from the tenants. The application was dismissed because the landlords failed to attend the hearing.

• The landlord's application to recover utility expenses is dismissed due to non-attendance.

• Substantial interference

The landlord's application to evict the tenant for substantial interference was dismissed because the notices of termination lacked necessary details and were legally invalid.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant is dismissed because the notices of termination were invalid.

• Personal use eviction

The landlord withdrew the application to end the tenancy for personal use because the tenant had already vacated the rental unit.

• The landlords' application for termination and eviction was withdrawn. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord's application to collect rent arrears from the former tenants was dismissed after the landlord failed to attend the hearing.

• The landlord's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tribunal dismissed the tenant's application alleging substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment related to neighbour disputes. The landlord was found to have taken reasonable steps to investigate and address the situation.

• The tenant's application is dismissed because the claim of substantial interference was not proved. · to the landlord

• Lockout and illegal eviction
• Illegal entry
• Rent increase disputes
• Vital services
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant withdrew their tenant rights application during the hearing after the tribunal identified procedural defects. The file was closed without any findings or substantive orders.

• Substantial interference
• Utility costs

The landlord's application for utility costs was granted after the tenant vacated the rental unit. The tenant was ordered to pay $1,012.06 in outstanding water bills plus the application filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Unpaid water utility costs · $1,012 · to the landlord

• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tribunal dismissed the tenant's application alleging harassment and substantial interference by the landlord following an altercation with another resident.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Rent increase disputes
• Rent deposit disputes

The landlord's application for rent arrears was granted after the tenant withheld rent disputing several rent increases. The tribunal found the notices of rent increase valid and ordered the tenant to pay outstanding arrears after applying the last month's rent deposit and interest.

• Deposit returned · $890
• Deposit returned · $128
• Arrears · $4,564 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant's application for a rebate of illegally collected or retained money was dismissed as abandoned after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• Non-payment of rent

The tribunal ordered the tenancy terminated and evicted the tenant for non-payment of rent. The tenant was ordered to pay the outstanding rent arrears and application fee, less the credited rent deposit and interest, unless the eviction order was voided by full payment.

• Deposit returned · $1,195
• Deposit returned · $26
• Arrears · $8,766 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Property damage

The landlord's applications to terminate the tenancy for non-payment of rent and property damage were granted. The tenant was ordered to vacate and pay rent arrears, filing fees, and property damage costs.

• Arrears · $12,000 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
• Damages · $2,495 · to the landlord

• Daily compensation for use of the unit from April 1, 2026 until the tenant vacates · $66 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord's application was granted due to substantial rent arrears. The tenancy was terminated unless the tenants pay the outstanding amounts to void the eviction.

• Deposit returned · $3,500
• Deposit returned · $57
• Arrears · $20,651 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
• Arrears · $115 · to the landlord

• Lockout and illegal eviction
• Illegal entry
• Vital services
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application was dismissed as abandoned after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's T2 application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord