Ontario Landlord and Tenant Board
Susan Priest
MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntarioBeta
Rulings, compared with the board
1.31× the board's rate against tenantsDecided against tenants more often than the board does on comparable applications — 1.31× the board's rate (95% interval 1.09–1.53), across 85 contested orders.
Orders are grouped by who applied and what they applied for, and this member’s record is compared with the board’s on that same mix. Withdrawn, settled and non-attendance dismissals are excluded. It measures how these decisions differ from the board’s on cases of the same type.
Dismissals, compared with the board
Bars tenants and landlords about as oftenDismissed tenants' and landlords' applications as not proved, out of jurisdiction or barred on procedure at rates that do not differ once the kind of application is accounted for, across 15 such dismissals of tenants' applications and 14 of landlords'.
Counts only dismissals the member ruled on — not proved, outside the board’s jurisdiction, or barred on procedure. Applications withdrawn, settled or dismissed because nobody attended are excluded, as they are above. The two sides are compared on this member’s own docket, against the board’s rate on the same kinds of application. It does not measure whether any decision was right.
Orders
Showing 201–209 of 209- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · nobody attendedJanuary 8, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Property damage
- Utility costs
The landlord applied to collect rent arrears, utility costs, and property damage from the former tenants. The application was dismissed as abandoned because neither party attended the hearing.
- The Landlord's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · nothing left to decideJanuary 8, 2026
- Persistent late payment
The tenants' request to review an eviction order for persistent late payment of rent was denied as moot because the tenancy had already ended under a separate order. The original order terminating the tenancy and evicting the tenants was confirmed.
- The Tenants' request to review order LTB-L-026107-25 is denied as moot and the order is confirmed
- The interim stay of order LTB-L-026107-25 is cancelled and lifted immediately · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedJanuary 8, 2026
- Illegal act
- Substantial interference
- Safety concerns
The tribunal denied the tenant's request for review of an earlier eviction order and confirmed the termination of the tenancy. The stay of the eviction order was ordered lifted on February 28, 2026.
- Tenant's request to review order LTB-L-036467-25 is denied
- Stay of eviction order LTB-L-036467-25 is lifted effective February 28, 2026 · to the landlord
- Decision against landlordLandlord's application dismissed · outside the board's jurisdictionJanuary 8, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Whether the Act applies
The landlord's application to evict the tenant for non-payment of rent was dismissed because the applicant was actually a tenant renting out the basement to a roommate, meaning the tribunal lacked jurisdiction.
- The Landlord's L1 application is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · nobody attendedJanuary 7, 2026
- Utility costs
The landlords' application for utility costs against the former tenant was dismissed as abandoned because neither party attended the hearing.
- The Landlords' application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.
LTB-L-073956-24 · L10Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord's grounds were not provedJanuary 6, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tribunal granted the tenants' request for review, cancelled the previous eviction order, and reheard the matter. On rehearing, the tribunal found the tenants did not breach the payment conditions of the prior order and dismissed the landlord's application.
- The Landlord's L4 application to terminate the tenancy is dismissed as the Tenants did not breach the prior order.
- Decision against landlordLandlord's application dismissed · a procedural barJanuary 5, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tenants' review request was granted and the previous order was cancelled. Upon rehearing, the landlord's application for rent arrears was dismissed because the tenants were no longer in possession of the rental unit when the application was filed.
- The Landlord's L9 application is dismissed as the Tenants were not in possession of the rental unit when it was filed.
- Outcome unclearLandlord's application dismissed · not provedJanuary 5, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord requested a review of an earlier order that resolved its application to evict the tenant for non-payment of rent. The tribunal denied the review request because the landlord failed to prove they were not reasonably able to participate in the original hearing.
- The Landlord's request to review order LTB-L-068452-25 is denied and the order is confirmed
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · nobody attendedJanuary 5, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Property damage
- Substantial interference
The landlord's application for rent arrears, property damage, and out-of-pocket costs was dismissed after the landlord failed to attend the hearing.
- The Landlord's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.