Susan Priest

• Maintenance issues

The tenant withdrew their maintenance application at the case conference, and the Landlord and Tenant Board closed the file.

• The Tenant's application was withdrawn and the file closed.

• Maintenance issues

The tenant withdrew their maintenance application during the case conference, and the Board closed the file.

• The tenant's T6 application was withdrawn and the file is closed.

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the case conference.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Tenant rights

The tenant's application regarding access to property after eviction was dismissed as abandoned after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned.

• Non-payment of rent
• Property damage
• Maintenance issues
• Bad faith eviction
• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant and the landlords both withdrew their respective applications at the case conference. The Board consented to the withdrawals and closed the files.

• The Landlords' L10 application was withdrawn.
• The Tenant's T1, T5, and T6 applications were withdrawn.

• Non-payment of rent
• Property damage
• Maintenance issues
• Bad faith eviction
• Illegal charges or collection

Both the tenant and the landlords withdrew their respective applications at the adjudicative case conference, and the Board closed the files.

• The Landlords' L10 application was withdrawn.
• The Tenant's T1, T5, and T6 applications were withdrawn.

• Illegal entry
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application regarding illegal entry, substantial interference, and harassment was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to failure to attend.

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and collect rent arrears was dismissed because the notice of termination was invalid and the documentation contained multiple errors. The tenant's request to raise section 82 issues was also denied due to lack of disclosure and diligence.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed due to an invalid N4 notice and inconsistent arrears records.

• Utility costs

The tenants' suite meter application was dismissed because the tenants did not attend the hearing.

• The Tenants' application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Whether the Act applies

The tenant's application to determine whether the Residential Tenancies Act applies was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Property damage
• Vital services
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The landlord's eviction application was dismissed because the notice of termination lacked necessary particulars and was unduly vague. The tenants' rights application was also dismissed because it failed to plead sufficient material facts.

• The Landlord's L2 application is dismissed as the notice of termination lacked required particulars and was invalid.
• The Tenants' T2 application is dismissed for failure to plead sufficient material facts and particulars.

• Property damage
• Vital services
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

Both the landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and the tenants' application alleging interference, harassment, and vital services issues were dismissed for procedural deficiencies.

• Landlord's L2 application to terminate the tenancy and for compensation is dismissed.
• Tenants' T2 application regarding tenant rights and vital services is dismissed.

• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The landlord applied to evict the tenant based on an N5 notice alleging substantial interference. The tribunal dismissed the application because the notice filed with the Board was altered and invalid.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant is dismissed due to an invalid N5 notice of termination.

45 Oakmount Road, Toronto

• Substantial interference

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy was granted due to substantial interference, specifically excessive clutter and repeated failure to prepare for or allow pest control treatments. The tenant was ordered to vacate by February 28, 2026, and pay the landlord outstanding compensation and costs.

• Deposit returned · $997
• Arrears · $3,201 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Daily compensation per day starting January 28, 2026 until the tenant vacates · $32 · to the landlord

• Personal use eviction

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for personal use was granted. The tribunal postponed the eviction date to June 30, 2026, to accommodate the tenant's family circumstances, and ordered daily compensation.

• Arrears · $4,262 · to the landlord

• Daily compensation for use of the unit starting December 5, 2025 until the tenant vacates · $125 · to the landlord

• Bad faith eviction

The tenants' application alleging a bad faith eviction notice was dismissed because it was filed after the statutory one-year limitation period had expired.

• The Tenants' application is dismissed as it was not brought within the statutory limitation period.

• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The landlords' application to evict the tenant for alleged damage and substantial interference was dismissed. The tribunal found the second notice of termination was legally invalid and the application was filed too late to rely on the first notice.

• The Landlords' application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant is dismissed because the second N5 notice is invalid and the application was filed out of time for the first N5 notice.

• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant applied for an order regarding money allegedly collected or retained illegally by the landlord. The tenant failed to attend the hearing, so the application was deemed abandoned and dismissed.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Non-payment of rent

The tenant's request to review an earlier order was denied. The underlying eviction order stands because the tenant failed to exercise reasonable diligence to attend the scheduled hearing.

• The Tenant's request to review the order issued on November 27, 2025 is denied and the order is confirmed.
• The interim stay order issued on December 29, 2025 is cancelled and the stay is lifted immediately. · to the landlord

• Unauthorized occupants
• Substantial interference

The landlords' application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant for substantial interference and overcrowding was dismissed. The tribunal determined that the initial notice of termination was invalid because it omitted the mandatory seven-day remedy period.

• The Landlords' application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant is dismissed due to an invalid N5 notice of termination.

• Bad faith eviction

The tenants did not attend the hearing for their application alleging a bad faith notice of termination. As a result, the application was treated as abandoned and dismissed.

• The tenants' application alleging a notice of termination in bad faith is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Substantial interference

The tribunal terminated the tenancy and ordered the tenant evicted due to substantial interference caused by offensive pet odours and waste. The tenant was ordered to pay compensation and application costs, less the held rent deposit and interest.

• Deposit returned · $1,514
• Arrears · $4,673 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Daily compensation of $44.93 per day starting January 28, 2026 until the tenant vacates · to the landlord

• Substantial interference
• Utility costs

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant for substantial interference due to unpaid hydro bills and removing their name from the utility account, as well as to recover utility costs. The tribunal granted conditional relief from eviction, allowing the tenancy to continue if the tenant pays $638.22 in outstanding hydro expenses and puts the account back in their name by February 28, 2026.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Tenant shall pay out-of-pocket utility expenses incurred by the Landlord · $638 · to the landlord
• Tenant shall put the hydro account in their name and provide proof to the Landlord on or before February 28, 2026 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord's review was granted and the earlier order cancelled. On rehearing the landlord's application, the tribunal ordered the tenancy terminated for rent arrears unless the tenants pay the amount required to void the eviction.

• Deposit returned · $60
• Arrears · $8,997 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Bank fees and administration charges for returned NSF payments · $90 · to the landlord

• Property damage
• Safety concerns
• Utility costs

The landlord's claim for eviction was moot because the tenancy had already ended, but the tribunal ordered the tenants to pay $2,484.80 for unpaid water utility costs plus filing fees.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Tenants shall pay reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred for unpaid water utility costs · $2,485 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord's review request was granted and a consent order was issued to resolve the rent arrears application. The tenancy will terminate unless the tenant voids the order by paying the outstanding arrears and costs.

• Deposit returned · $1,322
• Deposit returned · $16
• Arrears · $15,647 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Daily compensation for use of the unit starting January 23, 2026 until vacating · $43 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The Board issued an order on consent resolving the landlord's application, terminating the tenancy unless the tenant pays the required amount to void the eviction.

• The Tenant may void the termination order by paying $1,682.85 on or before January 31, 2026, or $3,190.50 on or before February 20, 2026 · to the landlord

• Property damage

The landlord's application for property damage costs was withdrawn after the parties reached an agreement outside the tribunal. The previous order was cancelled and the file was closed.

• The application was withdrawn and the file closed.

• Non-payment of rent

The tenant's request for review was granted and the previous order was cancelled, but on rehearing the landlord's application for non-payment of rent was granted. The tenancy was ordered terminated with eviction delayed to February 28, 2026, which the tenant may void by paying the outstanding arrears and costs.

• Deposit returned · $191
• Deposit returned · $1,900
• Arrears · $10,230 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Personal use eviction

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for a purchaser's own use was dismissed after review. The landlord failed to pay the required compensation and did not file the purchaser's declaration with the application.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy is dismissed.

• Maintenance issues
• Tenant rights
• Substantial interference

The tenant withdrew her tenant rights and maintenance applications before a final decision was made. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.

• The tenant's applications were withdrawn and the file was closed.

• Non-payment of rent
• Property damage

The landlord's application against the former sub-tenant was granted. The former tenant was ordered to pay rent arrears, key replacement costs, and the application filing fee.

• Arrears · $860 · to the landlord
• Damages · $100 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Property damage

The tribunal ordered the former tenant to pay the landlord $6,747.30 for property damage and $186.00 to reimburse the application filing fee.

• Damages · $6,747 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Illegal entry
• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant withdrew their applications regarding illegal entry and illegal charges. The Board consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.

• The Tenant withdrew the T1 and T2 applications and the file is closed.

• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenants' application was dismissed after they failed to attend the hearing.

• The Tenants' application is dismissed for non-attendance.

• Maintenance issues
• Rent reduction

The tenants' maintenance and rent reduction applications were resolved by a consent order. The landlord agreed to pay the tenants $1,500.00 in full and final settlement of all claims.

• Landlord shall pay $1,500.00 to the Tenants pursuant to consent agreement · $1,500

• Non-payment of rent
• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The landlords applied to recover rent arrears, damage compensation, and costs related to substantial interference from the former tenants. The tribunal ordered the former tenants to pay $8,948.94 in outstanding rent, junk removal expenses, and the application filing fee, after deducting the rent deposit and accrued interest.

• Deposit returned · $2,311
• Arrears · $10,074 · to the landlord
• Damages · $1,000 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed after neither party attended the scheduled case conference.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed.

• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for substantial interference was resolved on consent of the parties. The tenancy continues subject to behavioural conditions and the tenant reimbursing the landlord's application filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Tenancy continues conditionally on the Tenant refraining from harassment, racial slurs, uttering threats, and threatening behaviour for one year · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed because the tenant failed to prove the landlord agreed to reimburse refrigerator repair costs or had reasonable notice to repair the appliance.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed because the claim was not proved on a balance of probabilities.

• Property damage

The landlord's application to evict the tenant and collect compensation for alleged damage was dismissed. The tribunal found that the notice of termination was invalid because it failed to provide sufficient details of the allegations.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and for compensation is dismissed due to an invalid N5 notice.

Apartment 702, 2757 Kipling Avenue, Toronto

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant for non-payment of rent. The tribunal ordered the tenancy terminated and eviction postponed to February 28, 2026, unless the tenant pays the required amount to void the order.

• Arrears · $20,805 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord requested to withdraw the application for rent arrears and eviction. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.

• The Landlord's application is withdrawn and the LTB file is closed.

• Non-payment of rent

The tribunal granted the tenant's request for review, set aside a previous eviction order, and amended the landlord's application to collect rent arrears only. The tenant was ordered to pay $3,900.00 in arrears and $186.00 to reimburse the landlord's application fee.

• Arrears · $3,900 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Vital services
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging harassment, substantial interference, and issues with vital services was dismissed after neither party attended the hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed.

• Non-payment of rent

The tenant's request to review an earlier eviction order was denied. The Board confirmed the original order and lifted the stay of enforcement.

• The Tenant's request to review order LTB-L-050069-25 is denied and the order is confirmed
• The interim stay order is cancelled and the stay of order LTB-L-050069-25 is lifted immediately · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The tribunal granted the tenants' review request, set aside the previous eviction order, and ordered relief from eviction conditional upon the tenants paying $12,186.00 in rent arrears and application costs through a 13-month payment plan.

• Arrears · $12,000 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Tenant agreed termination
• Rent deposit disputes

The Board denied the tenant's motion to set aside an ex parte eviction order, finding that the parties had entered into a valid agreement to terminate the tenancy. The eviction order remains in effect and the stay was lifted immediately.

• The Tenant's motion to set aside Order LTB-L-089466-25 is denied
• Order LTB-L-089466-25 remains unchanged and the stay of the order is lifted immediately · to the landlord