Michelle Tan

• Property damage
• Unauthorized occupants

The tribunal dismissed the tenants' request to review a previous order because the tenants failed to attend the review hearing. The stay of the earlier order was lifted.

• The tenants' request to review the order issued on November 14, 2025 is denied as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Non-payment of rent

The tenant's request to review an earlier eviction order for non-payment of rent was denied after the tenant failed to attend the hearing. The stay of eviction was lifted and the original voidable eviction order remains in effect.

• The Tenant's request to review order LTB-L-069840-25 is denied for abandonment

• Non-payment of rent

The tenant's motion to set aside an eviction order was granted. The tenancy continues on condition that the tenant pay $1,520.75 in outstanding arrears across two installments and pay regular rent on time.

• Arrears · $1,521 · to the landlord

• The L4 eviction order issued on November 17, 2025 is set aside and cannot be enforced.

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The parties agreed on consent to cancel a previous eviction order and terminate the tenancy effective January 3, 2026. The tenant agreed to pay $260.00 in daily compensation.

• Arrears · $260 · to the landlord

• Order LTB-L-094664-25 issued on November 18, 2025 is cancelled, unenforceable, and replaced

• Non-payment of rent

The tribunal cancelled the previous dismissal and issued a consent order on review. The tenant agreed to pay $1,185.83 in rent arrears and the $186 filing fee under a four-month repayment schedule to continue the tenancy.

• Arrears · $1,186 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

On consent, the previous eviction order was set aside and the landlord's eviction application was denied on conditions. The tenant agreed to pay lawful monthly rent and $3,800.00 in arrears and costs by January 31, 2026.

• Arrears · $3,800 · to the landlord

• The earlier eviction order is set aside and the eviction application is denied on payment conditions.

• Non-payment of rent

The tenant's motion to set aside an eviction order was granted on consent after the tenant paid all rent arrears and costs. The landlord's application was discontinued and the file was closed.

• L4 eviction order set aside and cannot be enforced
• Landlord's L1 application discontinued following full payment of arrears and costs

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tribunal issued a consent order setting aside a previous eviction order and establishing a 20-month payment plan for rent arrears. The landlord's application to evict is denied on condition that the tenants maintain the repayment schedule and pay monthly rent on time.

• Arrears · $9,343 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• The previous L4 eviction order is set aside, cannot be enforced, and is replaced by this consent order

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tenant's motion to set aside an eviction order was granted on consent after all outstanding rent arrears and costs were paid. The eviction order was set aside and the landlord's non-payment application was discontinued.

• The L4 eviction order LTB-L-096226-25 issued on November 24, 2025 is set aside on consent and cannot be enforced
• The Landlord's L1 application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant is discontinued on consent

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tenant brought a motion to set aside an earlier ex parte eviction order, and the parties resolved the matter on consent. The previous eviction order was set aside and the landlord's eviction application was denied on the condition that the tenant pay outstanding arrears.

• Arrears · $2,012 · to the landlord

• The ex parte order LTB-L-097573-25 issued on November 25, 2025 is set aside, cannot be enforced, and is replaced by this order

• Property damage
• Unauthorized occupants
• Substantial interference
• Safety concerns

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenants for substantial interference, property damage, and safety concerns. The tribunal found substantial interference was proven due to unaddressed garbage and disturbances, and ordered the tenancy terminated.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Landlord shall apply the last month's rent deposit of $1,550.00 plus any interest owing to the last month of the tenancy · $1,550

• Non-payment of rent

The Board set aside an earlier ex-parte eviction order and discontinued the landlord's application on consent, as the tenants paid all outstanding rent arrears and costs.

• The L4 eviction order issued on November 18, 2025 is set aside and cannot be enforced
• The Landlord's L1 application to terminate the tenancy and evict for rent arrears is discontinued as arrears were paid

• Safety concerns

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for impaired safety was dismissed because the notice of termination was back-dated, short-served, and had become void before the application was filed.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy is dismissed due to a defective and void notice of termination.

• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The landlord's application for damages was dismissed because the application did not provide sufficient details about the claims. Eviction was no longer sought because the tenant had already moved out.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed because it failed to provide adequate details about the damage claims.

• Property damage
• Safety concerns
• Utility costs

The landlords' application to terminate the tenancy, evict the tenants, and collect compensation for damages was dismissed. The tribunal found that the notice of termination and the damage claims lacked required details and particulars.

• The Landlords' application for termination, eviction, damages, and utility costs is dismissed due to a defective N7 notice lacking adequate particulars.

Unit 2204, 4099 Brickstone Mews, Mississauga

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord and tenant resolved the matter on consent, agreeing to cancel an earlier eviction order and replace it with a voidable eviction order extended to January 31, 2026. The tenant may continue the tenancy by paying the outstanding rent arrears and filing fee.

• Arrears · $2,642 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Daily compensation for use of the unit starting February 1, 2026 until the tenant vacates if not voided · $35 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The parties agreed on consent to set aside a previous ex parte eviction order and deny eviction on the condition that the tenant pay $11,559.50 in rent, arrears, and costs by January 16, 2026.

• Arrears · $11,560 · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues
• Illegal entry
• Vital services
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenants and landlords reached a consent agreement to resolve the tenants' T2 and T6 applications. The landlords agreed to pay the tenants $500.00 in full and final settlement of all issues.

• Agreed payment from the Landlords to the Tenants to resolve the application on consent · $500

• Assignment or sublet

The landlord's review request was granted due to a serious error in the initial order, which was cancelled. On rehearing the tenants' application, the tribunal dismissed it, finding the landlord properly refused consent to assignment in general.

• The Tenants' A2 application alleging unreasonable withholding of consent to assignment is dismissed.

• Renovation and demolition

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy to convert the rental unit to non-residential use. The tribunal dismissed the application because the landlord failed to pay the required statutory compensation by the termination date.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant is dismissed.

Unit 207, 60 King Road, Richmond Hill

• Personal use eviction

The Board granted the tenants' request for review in part to specify that daily compensation owed to the landlord must be reduced by rent already paid. The original order terminating the tenancy for personal use was confirmed.

• Arrears · $37,429 · to the landlord

• Unauthorized occupants
• Assignment or sublet

The tribunal denied the unauthorized occupant's request for review, confirming the original order that terminated the tenancy and ordered eviction.

• The unauthorized occupant's review request is denied and order LTB-L-098001-24 is confirmed unchanged
• The stay of order LTB-L-098001-24 is lifted and the interim review order is cancelled · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues
• Substantial interference

The tenant's applications alleging substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment and failure to repair were dismissed on a preliminary basis. The tribunal found that the applications failed to disclose a cause of action or adequately particularize the claims against the landlords.

• Tenant's T2 and T6 applications dismissed for failure to disclose a cause of action and inadequate particulars

• Maintenance issues
• Lockout and illegal eviction
• Vital services
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application regarding maintenance, vital services, locks, and substantial interference was dismissed after neither party attended the scheduled hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Unauthorized occupants
• Substantial interference
• Whether the Act applies

The tenant's application alleging substantial interference was dismissed because the tribunal found it had no jurisdiction to order the landlord to evict the tenant's occupant.

• The Tenant's T2 application is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

• Tenant rights
• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant's T1 and T2 applications were dismissed because the application forms contained no claims or particulars.

• The Tenant's T1 and T2 applications are dismissed for lack of particulars.

• Maintenance issues
• Illegal entry
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The landlord and tenant resolved the tenant's rights and maintenance applications by mutual consent. The landlord agreed to pay the tenant a total of $16,500 and the tenancy will terminate on February 28, 2026.

• Damages · $16,500

• Property damage

The landlord withdrew their application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant. The Landlord and Tenant Board consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.

• The landlord's application was withdrawn and the file was closed.

• Illegal act
• Safety concerns

The tenant's review request was granted on consent, cancelling an earlier eviction order. By mutual agreement, the landlord's applications to terminate the tenancy were denied on conditions governing who the tenant may allow into the rental unit.

• The eviction applications are denied on consent on the condition that the tenant not permit a named individual into the unit and that her fiancée maintain good behaviour

• Illegal act
• Safety concerns

The landlord and the tenant resolved the landlord's eviction applications by mutual agreement. The tribunal cancelled an earlier eviction order and allowed the tenancy to continue on conditions regarding visitors.

• The previous eviction order is cancelled and the landlord's applications to terminate the tenancy are denied on consent, subject to visitor and conduct conditions

• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant's T1 application was dismissed as abandoned because neither party attended the hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Safety concerns

The landlord withdrew its application to end the tenancy for safety concerns after issues were raised regarding the termination notice and service. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.

• The Landlord's application was withdrawn and the file was closed.

• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant withdrew their application regarding alleged illegal charges before the hearing on the merits commenced. The tribunal permitted the withdrawal, denied the landlord's request for costs, and closed the file.

• The Tenant's T1 application was withdrawn and the file is closed.

• Maintenance issues
• Illegal charges or collection
• Substantial interference

The tenant's request for review was denied because their written review submissions were filed past the deadline without explanation. The earlier order dismissing the tenant's T1, T2, and T6 applications as an abuse of process remains confirmed.

• The Tenant's request for review is denied and the order dismissing the T1, T2, and T6 applications as an abuse of process is confirmed.

• Whether the Act applies

The tenant's application to determine whether the Residential Tenancies Act applies was dismissed as abandoned because neither party attended the hearing.

• The Tenant's A1 application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.