Renterly

Ontario Landlord and Tenant Board

Madeline Ntoukas

MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntarioBeta

Orders listed6811 against the landlord
Awarded to tenants$62,551avg $920
Awarded to landlords$26,618avg $391
Fines to the board$2,000on 1 order
Applications dismissed48grounds on each order

Rulings, compared with the board

1.72× the board's rate against tenants

Decided against tenants more often than the board does on comparable applications — 1.72× the board's rate (95% interval 1.32–2.12), across 39 contested orders.

Orders are grouped by who applied and what they applied for, and this member’s record is compared with the board’s on that same mix. Withdrawn, settled and non-attendance dismissals are excluded. It measures how these decisions differ from the board’s on cases of the same type.

Dismissals, compared with the board

Too few dismissals to compare

Fewer than 5 such dismissals have been processed for one or both sides, which is too few to compare them.

Orders

Showing 51–68 of 68
  • Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedFebruary 20, 2026
    • Lockout and illegal eviction
    • Harassment
    • Substantial interference

    The tenant applied alleging the landlords altered the unit's locks and engaged in harassment. The tribunal dismissed the application because the tenant failed to establish the allegations on a balance of probabilities.

    • The Tenant's application is dismissed as the claims were not proved on a balance of probabilities.
    LTB-T-057890-24 · T2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedFebruary 18, 2026
    • Maintenance issues
    • Lockout and illegal eviction
    • Illegal entry
    • Vital services
    • Harassment
    • Substantial interference

    The tenants' application was dismissed after they failed to attend the hearing. The tribunal found the application had been abandoned.

    • The Tenants' application is dismissed as abandoned due to the Tenants' failure to attend the hearing.
    LTB-T-068156-24 · T2;T6Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against landlordTenant's application dismissed · a procedural barFebruary 12, 2026$3,017 Rent abatement
    • Maintenance issues
    • Illegal charges or collection
    • Substantial interference

    The tenant's application regarding maintenance was granted after the landlord failed to reasonably address a persistent ceiling leak and mold in the bathroom. The landlord was ordered to pay a 30% rent abatement totaling $3,017.24 plus the application filing fee.

    • Rent abatement · $3,017
    • Filing fee · $48
    • The tenant's T1 application is withdrawn.
    • The tenant's T2 application is dismissed as duplicate of the maintenance claim.

    Unit 805, 3900 Confederation Parkway, Mississauga

    LTB-T-084257-24 · T1;T2;T6Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantFebruary 10, 2026
    • Property damage
    • Utility costs

    The landlord's application for compensation from the former tenants was granted in part. The former tenants were ordered to pay $6,175.00 for carpet damage plus the application filing fee.

    • Damages · $6,175 · to the landlord
    • Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
    LTB-L-084583-24 · L10Landlord and Tenant Board2627408 Ontario LimitedRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against landlordLandlord's application dismissed · not provedFebruary 9, 2026
    • Property damage

    The landlord's application seeking compensation from the former tenants for carpet replacement was dismissed. The tribunal found the landlord failed to prove the tenants caused undue damage or that it took reasonable steps to mitigate its losses.

    • The Landlord's application for compensation for property damage is dismissed.
    LTB-L-087391-24 · L10Landlord and Tenant BoardDrewlo Holdings Inc.Read the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantFebruary 5, 2026$890 Deposit returned
    • Non-payment of rent

    The landlord's application for rent arrears against the former tenant was granted. The former tenant was ordered to pay $2,186.32, which reflects the arrears and filing fee offset by the retained rent deposit and interest.

    • Deposit returned · $890
    • Arrears · $2,875 · to the landlord
    • Filing fee · $201 · to the landlord
    LTB-L-046358-25 · L10Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantFebruary 2, 2026
    • Non-payment of rent

    The landlord's application for money owed by a former tenant was granted. The former tenant was ordered to pay $8,900.00 in rent arrears and daily compensation, plus $186.00 to reimburse the filing fee.

    • Arrears · $8,900 · to the landlord
    • Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
    LTB-L-041311-25 · L10Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · withdrawnJanuary 26, 2026
    • Persistent late payment

    The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment of rent but subsequently requested to withdraw the application. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.

    • The landlord's application was withdrawn and the file is closed.
    LTB-L-100371-25 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardElm Place Inc.Read the order (PDF)
  • No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnJanuary 26, 2026
    • Illegal entry
    • Harassment
    • Substantial interference

    The tenant withdrew their application alleging illegal entry, substantial interference, and harassment. The Landlord and Tenant Board consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.

    • The Tenant's application was withdrawn at the Tenant's request and the file is closed.
    LTB-T-047328-25 · T2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJanuary 23, 2026
    • Maintenance issues
    • Illegal entry
    • Vital services
    • Illegal charges or collection
    • Harassment
    • Substantial interference

    The tenants did not attend the hearing for their applications concerning maintenance, illegal charges, and tenant rights. The tribunal determined the applications were abandoned and dismissed them.

    • The Tenants' application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.
    LTB-T-083950-24 · T1;T2;T6Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnJanuary 23, 2026
    • Assignment or sublet

    The tenants requested to withdraw their application concerning consent to assign or sublet the rental unit. The Landlord and Tenant Board consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.

    • The tenants' application was withdrawn and the file closed.
    LTB-T-018879-24 · A2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · withdrawnJanuary 23, 2026
    • Non-payment of rent

    The landlord requested to withdraw the application to terminate the tenancy for non-payment of rent. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.

    • The Landlord's application was withdrawn and the file is closed.
    LTB-L-087854-25 · L1Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnJanuary 21, 2026
    • Maintenance issues

    The tenants requested to withdraw their maintenance application at the hearing, and the tribunal closed the file.

    • The Tenants' application was withdrawn with the consent of the Board and the file was closed.
    LTB-T-084246-24 · T6Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · withdrawnJanuary 20, 2026
    • Illegal act
    • Safety concerns

    The landlord withdrew its application to terminate the tenancy. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.

    • The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy is withdrawn and the file is closed.
    LTB-L-045068-23 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardFred Victor CentreRead the order (PDF)
  • No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJanuary 20, 2026
    • Illegal entry
    • Vital services
    • Tenant rights
    • Harassment
    • Substantial interference

    The tenant's application was dismissed as abandoned after they failed to attend the hearing.

    • The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned after the Tenant failed to attend the hearing.
    LTB-T-084224-24 · T2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJanuary 19, 2026
    • Harassment
    • Substantial interference

    The tenant did not attend the videoconference hearing to support their application alleging harassment and substantial interference. The Board found the application abandoned and dismissed it.

    • The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.
    LTB-T-084171-24 · T2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against landlordJanuary 8, 2026$344 Rent abatement
    • Maintenance issues

    The tenant applied for remedies regarding maintenance issues, including a water leak and cockroaches. The tribunal found the landlord breached maintenance obligations regarding the water leak and ordered the landlord to pay a rent abatement and filing fee reimbursement.

    • Rent abatement · $344
    • Filing fee · $48

    Apartment 107, 55 Triller Avenue, Toronto

    LTB-T-064828-24 · T6Landlord and Tenant BoardMetCapRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · outside the board's jurisdictionJanuary 7, 2026
    • Illegal entry
    • Harassment
    • Substantial interference
    • Whether the Act applies

    The tenant's application alleging tenant rights violations was dismissed because the rental accommodation is a seasonal campground site exempt from the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006.

    • The Tenant's application is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
    LTB-T-064015-24 · T2Landlord and Tenant BoardLakeside Campground & Rental Inc, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)