Madeline Ntoukas

• Maintenance issues
• Rent deposit disputes
• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant's application for the return of a $1,800 rent deposit under section 107 was dismissed because the landlord was willing to provide possession of the unit. The tribunal noted the tenant's maintenance and habitability complaints should have been brought under a maintenance application rather than a deposit rebate application.

• The tenant's T1 application is dismissed. · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues
• Illegal entry
• Illegal charges or collection
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application regarding maintenance, tenant rights, illegal entry, harassment, and illegal charges was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to the tenant's failure to attend the hearing. · to the landlord

• Rent deposit disputes
• Illegal charges or collection

The tenants' application for the return of an illegal key deposit was dismissed. The tribunal found that the application was filed more than one year after the charge was collected and was therefore out of time.

• The Tenants' application is dismissed as out of time under section 135(4) of the Act.

• Illegal charges or collection

The tenants' application for a rebate of illegally collected or retained money was dismissed after neither party attended the scheduled hearing.

• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging harassment and issues retrieving property following eviction was dismissed as abandoned because the tenant failed to attend the hearing on time.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned. · to the landlord

• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant's application alleging the landlord collected or retained money illegally was dismissed as abandoned because the tenant did not attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed due to non-attendance and deemed abandoned. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Property damage
• Persistent late payment
• Substantial interference
• Safety concerns

The landlord's application was granted, terminating the tenancy due to persistent late payment of rent and ordering the tenant to pay outstanding rent arrears. The landlord's claim for property damage was dismissed without prejudice.

• Deposit returned · $1,500
• Deposit returned · $68
• Arrears · $4,730 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
• Arrears · $49 · to the landlord

• Landlord's wilful/negligent damage claim dismissed without prejudice

• Substantial interference

The tribunal found that the tenant substantially interfered with the landlord's rights by failing to provide access for required flood repairs. The tenancy was permitted to continue on the condition that the tenant provide unobstructed access for repairs and reimburse the landlord's filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• The tenancy continues on condition that the Tenant provide unobstructed access to the unit for flood-related repairs by June 15, 2026, and allow access upon 24 hours' written notice. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Tenant agreed termination

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and collect rent arrears was granted. The tenants were ordered to vacate the rental unit by July 3, 2026, and pay $2,386.00 in rent arrears and application fees.

• Arrears · $2,200 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Persistent late payment
• Maintenance issues

The tribunal granted the landlords' application to terminate the tenancy due to persistent late payment of rent. The tenants were ordered to vacate the unit and pay daily compensation along with filing fee costs.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Daily compensation of $188.71 per day from May 21, 2026 until the tenants vacate the unit · to the landlord

• Persistent late payment

The tribunal terminated the tenancy and ordered the eviction of the tenants due to persistent late payment of rent. The tenants were ordered to pay daily compensation until vacating and reimburse the landlord's application filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Daily compensation of $86.17 per day starting June 1, 2026 until the tenants vacate the unit · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues
• Substantial interference

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for substantial interference was granted conditionally after the tenant failed to prepare the unit for pest control. The tenant was ordered to comply with pest control preparation instructions and reimburse the landlord's application filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Persistent late payment

The landlord's application to end the tenancy for persistent late payment was dismissed because the notice of termination was invalid.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy is dismissed due to an invalid termination date on the N8 notice.

• Persistent late payment

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment was dismissed because the landlord failed to attend the hearing.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed as abandoned due to the Landlord's failure to attend the hearing.

• Tenant agreed termination

The landlord withdrew its application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant. The Landlord and Tenant Board approved the withdrawal and closed the file.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant is withdrawn.

• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant's application regarding money alleged to have been collected or retained illegally was dismissed as abandoned after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant's application claiming the landlord collected or retained money illegally was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing. · to the landlord

• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant's application claiming the landlord collected or retained money illegally was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to the tenant's failure to attend the hearing. · to the landlord

• Illegal charges or collection
• Whether the Act applies

The tenant's application was dismissed because the tribunal lacks jurisdiction under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006. The tenant shared a kitchen with the landlord who is the owner living in the accommodation.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction under section 5(i) of the Act. · to the landlord

• Illegal charges or collection
• Whether the Act applies

The tribunal dismissed the tenant's application for lack of jurisdiction because the tenant shared a kitchen with the landlord who owned the unit.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

• Rent increase disputes
• Illegal charges or collection

The tribunal dismissed the tenant's application alleging illegal rent collection. Rent increases that exceeded guideline amounts became lawful under the Act because the tenant paid them for twelve consecutive months without challenging them within one year.

• The Tenant's application for a rebate of alleged illegal rent is dismissed as not proved pursuant to section 135.1 of the Act. · to the landlord

• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant's application for a rebate of illegally collected money was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Illegal charges or collection

The tenants' application for a rebate of money allegedly collected or retained illegally was dismissed after they failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenants' application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Illegal charges or collection

The landlord and tenants reached a consent agreement resolving the tenant application. The landlord agreed to pay the tenants $4,864.59.

• On consent, the landlord shall pay $4,864.59 to the tenants on or before May 8, 2026, with interest accruing on any unpaid balance starting May 9, 2026. · $4,865

• Rent increase disputes
• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant applied for a determination that the landlord collected or retained money illegally. The tribunal dismissed the application because a T1 application cannot be used to challenge or set aside orders issued in previous proceedings.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed.

• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant's application alleging the landlord collected or retained money illegally was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• Assignment or sublet

The tenant's application regarding assignment or subletting consent was dismissed as abandoned after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• Assignment or sublet

The tenant's application to evict subtenants for overholding was dismissed as abandoned after neither party attended the hearing.

• Personal use eviction
• Bad faith eviction

The tenants' application alleging bad faith termination for personal use was dismissed. The tribunal found the landlord demonstrated a genuine change in circumstances preventing them from moving into the unit.

• The tenants' bad faith application is dismissed on the merits as bad faith was not proved. · to the landlord

• Illegal charges or collection

The tenants' application regarding illegal charges or retained money was dismissed after they failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenants' T1 application was dismissed due to abandonment for non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant's application alleging illegal charges was dismissed after neither party attended the hearing.

• The tenant's T1 application is dismissed due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant's application for a rebate of illegally collected or retained money was dismissed after neither party attended the scheduled hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Rent increase disputes
• Illegal charges or collection

The tenants applied for a determination of lawful rent based on an alleged Order Prohibiting Rent Increase. The tribunal dismissed the application because no evidence of such an order was provided.

• The tenants' application seeking a determination of lawful rent was dismissed as no evidence of an Order Prohibiting Rent Increase was provided. · to the landlord

• Rent deposit disputes
• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant's application for a rebate of an illegal $1,000 damage deposit was dismissed because it was filed more than one year after the charge was collected.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as it was filed outside the one-year limitation period.

• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant applied for the return of an illegal $300 furniture deposit collected by the landlord. The tribunal dismissed the application because it was filed more than one year after the money was collected.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as it was filed out of time.

• Rent deposit disputes
• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant's application for the return of an illegal security deposit was dismissed because it was filed more than one year after the deposit was collected.

• The Tenant's application for a rebate of an illegal charge is dismissed as it was filed more than one year after collection.

• Personal use eviction
• Bad faith eviction

The tribunal dismissed the tenants' bad faith eviction application after finding that the landlord occupied the rental unit in good faith following an N12 notice.

• The tenants' T5 application alleging bad faith eviction is dismissed as not proved. · to the landlord

• Personal use eviction
• Bad faith eviction

The tribunal dismissed the tenant's application alleging that the landlords gave an N12 notice of termination in bad faith. The tribunal determined that the landlords moved into the rental unit within a reasonable timeframe following necessary renovations.

• The tenant's T5 application is dismissed as the tenant failed to prove bad faith. · to the landlord

• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenants withdrew their application at the hearing. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.

• The Tenants' application is withdrawn and the Board's file is closed.

• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's rights application was resolved through a consent agreement under which the landlord agreed to pay $3,000.00 to settle all claims.

• The Landlords shall pay $3,000.00 to the Tenants on or before February 28, 2026 to settle all issues regarding the tenancy. · $3,000

• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging harassment and substantial interference was dismissed because the tenant had already vacated the unit and only sought an order for the landlord to stop the behaviour.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as moot because the Tenant had vacated the rental unit and sought only injunctive relief.

• Maintenance issues
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging landlord harassment, interference, and maintenance failures regarding mold was dismissed. The tribunal declined to hear the tenant rights claims due to a lack of particulars and found insufficient evidence of a maintenance breach.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed.

• Bad faith eviction
• Substantial interference

The tenant's applications concerning substantial interference and bad faith notice of termination were resolved through a consent agreement. The landlords agreed to pay the tenant $27,000.00 in scheduled installments.

• Damages · $27,000