Kate Sinipostolova

• Persistent late payment

The landlord established grounds to terminate the tenancy due to persistent late payment of rent. The tribunal granted conditional relief from eviction, requiring the tenant to pay rent on time for 12 months and reimburse the landlord's $186 filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Lockout and illegal eviction
• Illegal entry
• Harassment
• Substantial interference
• Whether the Act applies

The landlord's review request was granted, establishing that the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 does not apply because the tenant shared a kitchen with the owner who lived in the home. As a result, the tenant's rights application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

• The tenant's application is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 does not apply pursuant to section 5(i). · to the landlord

• Lockout and illegal eviction
• Illegal entry
• Harassment
• Substantial interference
• Whether the Act applies

The tribunal granted the landlords' review request, finding that the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 does not apply because the parties shared a kitchen. The tenant's application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

• The tenant's application is dismissed because the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 does not apply to the living accommodation pursuant to section 5(i). · to the landlord

• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application was dismissed as abandoned because the tenant failed to attend the scheduled hearing after a request to reschedule was denied.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Unauthorized occupants
• Substantial interference

The landlord withdrew the application to terminate the tenancy due to a defect in the notice of termination. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.

• Non-payment of rent
• Tenant agreed termination

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and collect rent arrears was dismissed following a review hearing. The tribunal found that the parties had entered into a binding agreement to waive arrears and withdraw the application once the tenant vacated.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed as an abuse of process following an agreement to withdraw.

• Property damage

The tribunal denied the former tenant's request to review an earlier order regarding property damage. The original order remains confirmed and the stay of enforcement is lifted.

• Persistent late payment

The landlord's application for persistent late payment was resolved by a consent order allowing the tenancy to continue under specified payment conditions.

• Filing fee · $185 · to the landlord

• Personal use eviction
• Property damage
• Unauthorized occupants

The landlord and tenant reached a consent agreement to terminate the tenancy, requiring the tenant and occupants to vacate the unit by May 28, 2026.

• Non-payment of rent
• Substantial interference
• Utility costs

The tribunal terminated the tenancy and ordered the tenant to pay rent arrears, unpaid utility costs, and the application filing fee.

• Arrears · $1,836 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the landlord for unpaid water utility costs · $2,706 · to the landlord

• Property damage
• Substantial interference
• Safety concerns

The parties settled the landlord's applications through a consent order allowing the tenancy to continue conditionally. The tenant agreed to behavioral conditions and a payment plan of $1,248.65 for property damage repairs.

• Damages · $1,249 · to the landlord

• Property damage
• Substantial interference
• Safety concerns

The landlord and the tenant resolved two applications through a consent agreement. The tenancy continues on condition that the tenant adheres to specific behavioural rules and pays $1,248.65 in repair costs over an instalment schedule.

• Damages · $1,249 · to the landlord

• Illegal entry
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging illegal entry, substantial interference, and harassment was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed due to abandonment following the Tenant's failure to attend the hearing. · to the landlord

• Safety concerns

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for impaired safety was dismissed after the landlord failed to attend the hearing.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The tenant's rights application and the landlord's property damage claim were both dismissed on consent. Neither party was ordered to pay any money.

• The landlord's L10 application is dismissed on consent.
• The tenant's T2 application is dismissed on consent. · to the landlord

• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application regarding substantial interference and the landlord's application for property damage costs were both dismissed on consent with no money owed by either party.

• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The tribunal found that the tenant was responsible for damage caused to the intercom system by an occupant. The tenant was granted relief from eviction conditional on paying the remaining repair and security costs totaling $7,916.73 on a monthly payment plan, plus the filing fee.

• Damages · $7,917 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Substantial interference
• Utility costs

The landlord's L1 and L2 applications were granted after the tenant failed to attend the hearing. The tenancy was terminated due to substantial interference and unpaid utility costs, and the tenant was ordered to pay rent arrears, utilities, and application costs.

• Deposit returned · $4,000
• Deposit returned · $195
• Arrears · $18,961 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $201 · to the landlord

• Unpaid utility costs incurred by the landlord · $5,984 · to the landlord

• Substantial interference

The tribunal ordered the tenancy terminated and the tenant evicted for substantial interference due to a failure to maintain cleanliness and interfering with pest control treatments. The tenant was ordered to pay daily compensation and the landlord's application fee, offset against the rent deposit and accrued interest.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Daily compensation for use and occupation of the rental unit starting June 1, 2026 until the unit is vacated. · $51 · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's applications regarding tenant rights and maintenance were dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The tribunal granted the review on consent but dismissed the tenant's motion to void the eviction order because the tenant had already used their one permitted motion to void during this tenancy. The original order terminating the tenancy was confirmed and the stay of eviction was lifted.

• The tenant's motion to void the eviction order is dismissed

• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant's application regarding illegally collected or retained money was dismissed as abandoned because neither party attended the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed due to abandonment for non-attendance.

• Vital services
• Harassment
• Substantial interference
• Whether the Act applies

The tenant's application alleging harassment, substantial interference, and withholding of vital services was dismissed after failing to prove that the landlord deliberately interfered with heat or hot water.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed. · to the landlord

• Lockout and illegal eviction
• Vital services
• Illegal charges or collection
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenants' application was dismissed as abandoned after they failed to attend the scheduled hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed due to abandonment/non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant withdrew their application because they had already moved out of the rental unit. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.

• Non-payment of rent

The tenant's review request was granted, cancelling the previous eviction order. Upon rehearing, eviction was denied due to improper service of the notice, but the tenant was ordered to pay $8,000.00 in rent arrears plus the application filing fee.

• Arrears · $8,000 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Illegal charges or collection

The tenants' application alleging the landlords collected or retained money illegally was dismissed after the tenants failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's T1 application is dismissed as abandoned due to the tenant's failure to attend the hearing. · to the landlord

• Personal use eviction

The tenant's request to review an earlier eviction order for personal use was denied after the tribunal found the tenant failed to act diligently in attending the original hearing.

• Property damage
• Illegal act
• Substantial interference

The tenant's request for review of an eviction order was denied. The Board confirmed the original order terminating the tenancy and lifted the stay of enforcement.

• Property damage
• Illegal act
• Substantial interference
• Safety concerns

The landlord applied to evict the tenant and claim compensation for alleged damages, illegal acts, impaired safety, and substantial interference. The tribunal dismissed the application because the landlord failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove the allegations.

• The landlord's application for termination, eviction, and compensation is dismissed.

• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant's application alleging the landlord collected or retained money illegally was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• Non-payment of rent
• Persistent late payment

The co-op and the member resolved the non-payment and persistent late payment applications through a consent order setting out a payment plan.

• Arrears · $453 · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues
• Illegal entry
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's applications regarding tenant rights and maintenance were resolved on consent. The landlord agreed, without acknowledging wrongdoing, to provide a $1,000.00 rent abatement for June 2026.

• Rent abatement · $1,000

• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant's application regarding alleged illegal charges or retained money was dismissed as abandoned because the tenant did not attend the hearing.

• The tenant's T1 application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenants' application alleging harassment and interference was dismissed as abandoned after they failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Tenant agreed termination
• Rent deposit disputes
• Illegal charges or collection

The tribunal dismissed the tenant's application seeking the return of their last month's rent deposit. It found that the parties did not mutually agree to terminate the fixed-term tenancy early, entitling the landlord to apply the deposit to rent arrears for November 2025.

• The Tenant's application for the return of money alleged to have been illegally retained is dismissed as not proved. · to the landlord

• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application was resolved by a consent order establishing accommodation procedures and requirements prior to any future compliance applications by the landlord.

• The parties consented to procedural terms governing notice of entry, pest treatment preparation, accommodation requests under the Human Rights Code, and preconditions for filing future L4 applications.

• Non-payment of rent

The tribunal found that the member owed housing charge arrears and ordered a repayment schedule for the arrears and application fee, granting conditional relief from eviction.

• Arrears · $5,947 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Illegal charges or collection

The tenants' application alleging the landlord collected or retained money illegally was dismissed after the tenants failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's T1 application is dismissed due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Personal use eviction
• Whether the Act applies

The tribunal granted the landlords' application to terminate the tenancy for personal use. The tenants were ordered to vacate the rental unit by June 15, 2026.

• Rent deposit disputes
• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant's application alleging that the landlord collected or retained money illegally was dismissed. The tribunal found that the landlord had provided vacant possession of the rental unit and was not required to return the rent deposit.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as the claims were not proved. · to the landlord

• Personal use eviction

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for personal use was withdrawn after the parties resolved the matter amicably. The LTB consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.

• Property damage
• Substantial interference
• Safety concerns

The tribunal terminated the co-op member's occupancy and ordered eviction because the member seriously impaired safety by tampering with fire alarms and preventing replacement. The member was ordered to pay daily compensation and application fee costs, offset by refundable deposits.

• Deposit returned · $700
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Daily compensation of $3.85 per day starting May 7, 2026 until vacating the unit · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tenants' maintenance application was dismissed as the issues had already been resolved in an earlier Board order and were res judicata.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as res judicata.

• Non-payment of rent

The tribunal terminated the co-op member's occupancy and ordered eviction due to arrears of housing charges unless the member pays the required amounts to void the order.

• Arrears · $9,825 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Daily compensation for use of the unit starting May 7, 2026 until the unit is vacated · $35 · to the landlord

• Property damage
• Safety concerns

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant based on an N7 notice for impaired safety and undue damage. The tribunal dismissed the application because the landlord served the notice by posting it on the door, which is an invalid method of service.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant is dismissed due to invalid service of the N7 Notice.

• Non-payment of rent

The Landlord's application was granted. The tenancy was terminated effective August 25, 2025, and the Tenant was ordered to pay rent arrears, NSF charges, and filing fee costs.

• Arrears · $24,140 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Reimbursement for NSF administration charges · $20 · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tenants' maintenance application was resolved on consent following a review hearing. The landlord agreed to close a hole in the wall around the electrical panel by May 15, 2026.

• Repair order