Kate Sinipostolova

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to the tenant's failure to attend the hearing. · to the landlord

• Rent deposit disputes
• Illegal charges or collection

The tribunal dismissed the tenant's application alleging the landlord unlawfully retained deposits and owed deposit interest. The adjudicator found that the tenant's payments were prepaid rent and overpayments credited to rent underpayments rather than illegally held deposits.

• The tenant's application for a rebate of illegally collected or retained money is dismissed as not proved. · to the landlord

• Substantial interference
• Safety concerns

The tenant's request to review an earlier eviction order was denied because the tenant failed to attend the hearing on time. The previous order remains in effect and the stay of eviction is lifted.

• The tenant's request to review order LTB-L-050743-24 is denied for abandonment due to non-attendance, confirming the eviction order and lifting the stay. · to the landlord

• Illegal entry

The tenant's application alleging illegal entry was dismissed as abandoned after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing and the application was found abandoned. · to the landlord

• Substantial interference

The tribunal terminated the tenancy and ordered the tenant evicted due to substantial interference with the landlord's reasonable enjoyment. The tenant was also ordered to pay $186.00 for the landlord's application filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed because the Tenant did not attend the hearing. · to the landlord

• Substantial interference

The tribunal granted the landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant due to substantial interference with other tenants' reasonable enjoyment caused by smoking with the door open. The tenant was ordered to vacate the rental unit and reimburse the landlord's filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant and landlord reached a consent agreement resolving the tenant's rights and maintenance claims. The landlord agreed to credit the tenant $3,157.20, which completely set off the tenant's existing rent arrears so that neither party owed any money.

• Arrears · $3,157 · to the landlord

• Settlement amount agreed by the landlord in resolution of the tenant's T2 and T6 applications, set off against rent arrears · $3,157

• Maintenance issues

The tenant withdrew their maintenance application at the hearing. The Landlord and Tenant Board consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.

• Maintenance issues
• Substantial interference

The parties reached a consent agreement to terminate the tenancy on September 1, 2026. Under the terms of the agreement, the landlord will pay the tenant $10,000.00 upon receiving vacant possession on or before that date.

• Landlord shall pay the Tenant $10,000.00 upon return of vacant possession on or before September 1, 2026 · $10,000

• Maintenance issues
• Substantial interference

The parties reached a consensual settlement resolving the tenant's applications. The tenancy will terminate on September 1, 2026, with the landlord paying $10,000 to the tenant upon return of possession.

• Landlord to pay the tenant if the rental unit is vacated on or before September 1, 2026 · $10,000

• Substantial interference
• Safety concerns

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant for substantial interference was dismissed. The tribunal found that the landlord failed to prove that storing a mat and broom in assigned parking spaces caused any safety issue or substantial interference.

• The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant is dismissed because the landlord failed to prove the grounds for termination on a balance of probabilities.

• Maintenance issues
• Illegal entry

The tenant's applications regarding maintenance and illegal entry were dismissed as abandoned after the tenant left the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned after the tenant left the hearing. · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues
• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant's application regarding illegally collected or retained money was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The tenant's request for review of an earlier eviction and arrears order was granted because the tenant missed the initial hearing by mistake. However, the original order terminating the tenancy and ordering payment of arrears was confirmed and remains unchanged.

• The original order terminating the tenancy and ordering arrears is confirmed and unchanged, and the stay of the order is lifted. · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tenant withdrew their maintenance application to raise the issues under section 82 of the Act in the landlord's application. The Board closed the file.

• The tenant's application was withdrawn and the Board's file is closed.

• Substantial interference
• Breach of conditions

The landlord housing co-operative applied to end the member's occupancy and evict them for allegedly breaching a condition of a previous order regarding disturbances. The tribunal dismissed the application because the co-operative failed to prove that the member breached the condition.

• The co-op's application to terminate occupancy and evict the member is dismissed for insufficient evidence of a breach.

• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant for substantial interference and undue damage. The tribunal granted the application, terminating the tenancy and ordering the tenant to pay repair costs and application fees.

• Deposit returned · $99
• Damages · $2,266 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Daily compensation for use and occupation of the rental unit starting July 1, 2026 · $5 · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tenant and the landlord reached a consent agreement resolving the tenant's maintenance application. The landlord agreed to perform air quality testing, exterior flashing repairs, and mould remediation, and to provide a $500 rent abatement for July 2026.

• Repair order
• Repair order
• Repair order
• Rent abatement · $500

• Maintenance issues
• Utility costs

The tribunal dismissed the tenant's maintenance application concerning a leaking toilet and increased water bill because it was filed past the statutory one-year limitation period.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as out of time under subsection 29(2) of the Act.

• Maintenance issues
• Vital services
• Illegal charges or collection
• Substantial interference

The tenant and landlord resolved the tenant's rights and maintenance applications through a consent agreement. The landlord agreed to pay the tenant $500.

• The landlord shall pay the tenant $500 on or before August 31, 2026, on consent · $500

• Substantial interference

The parties settled the tenant's application by consent, agreeing to a $425.00 rent abatement for July 2026.

• Rent abatement · $425

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed due to non-attendance (abandonment).

• Maintenance issues

The tribunal endorsed a consent agreement between the parties resolving the tenant's maintenance application. The tenancy will terminate on September 30, 2026, with the landlord paying $4,500.00 and granting a $150.00 monthly rent reduction until termination.

• Rent abatement · $450

• The landlord shall pay $4,500.00 to the tenant on or before September 30, 2026. · $4,500

• Tenant rights

The tenant's rights application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Property damage
• Substantial interference
• Safety concerns

The landlord's application was resolved by a consent order. The tenant agreed to pay the landlord $395.50 by August 31, 2026.

• Damages · $396 · to the landlord

• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant withdrew their application alleging harassment and substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment. The Landlord and Tenant Board consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.

• The Tenant's application is withdrawn and the file is closed.

• Substantial interference
• Utility costs

The tribunal terminated the tenancy and ordered the tenants to be evicted for failing to pay utility costs and failing to maintain the yard. The tenants were ordered to pay daily compensation, utility arrears, municipal cleanup costs, and the filing fee.

• Arrears · $10,585 · to the landlord
• Arrears · $77 · to the landlord
• Damages · $300 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Out-of-pocket expenses incurred for unpaid water utility costs · $993 · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's maintenance application was resolved on consent, with the parties agreeing to a $1,200.00 rent abatement applied at $100.00 monthly over 12 months.

• Rent abatement · $1,200

• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The landlord withdrew their application for eviction and compensation for damage and substantial interference. The Landlord and Tenant Board consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.

• Illegal act
• Substantial interference
• Safety concerns

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy for substantial interference, illegal acts, and safety concerns. The parties consented to an agreement ending the tenancy on August 31, 2026, with the tenant paying the filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Tenancy terminated on consent effective August 31, 2026 · to the landlord

• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment was dismissed because the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Substantial interference

The landlord withdrew its application to terminate the tenancy for substantial interference, and the tribunal closed the file.

• The landlord's application was withdrawn and the file was closed · to the landlord

• Substantial interference
• Utility costs

The landlord withdrew their application to terminate the tenancy for substantial interference and to recover unpaid utility costs. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.

• The landlord's application was withdrawn at the landlord's request.

• Property damage
• Substantial interference
• Safety concerns

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant over allegations of substantial interference, property damage, and safety concerns. At the hearing, the landlord withdrew the application and the file was closed.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy, evict the Tenant, and collect compensation was withdrawn at the Landlord's request.

• Illegal entry
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging illegal entry, substantial interference, and harassment was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Property damage
• Safety concerns

The landlord's application for compensation regarding property damage was dismissed after neither party attended the hearing, resulting in the application being deemed abandoned.

• The landlord's application is dismissed due to abandonment for non-attendance.

• Property damage

The landlord's application for termination and compensation for damage was dismissed after the landlord failed to attend the hearing.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Property damage

The landlord's application for compensation for undue property damage was granted following a review and de novo hearing. The tenant was ordered to pay $2,563.53 for repair costs plus $186.00 for the filing fee.

• Damages · $2,564 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment was dismissed as abandoned because the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The landlord withdrew their application for termination of the tenancy and compensation for damages. The tribunal permitted the withdrawal and closed the file.

• Persistent late payment

The landlord withdrew its application to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment of rent. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.

• The landlord's application was withdrawn at the landlord's request and the file was closed.

• Breach of conditions

The tenant failed to attend the hearing for their motion to set aside an eviction order. The tribunal found the motion abandoned, denied it, and lifted the stay of the eviction order.

• The tenant's motion to set aside order LTB-L-000866-26 is denied and declared abandoned due to non-attendance, and the stay of the order is lifted immediately. · to the landlord

• Property damage

The landlord withdrew their application to terminate the tenancy for alleged damage, and the Landlord and Tenant Board closed the file.

• The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for property damage was withdrawn and the file closed.

• Persistent late payment

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment was granted conditionally, ordering the tenant to pay ongoing rent on time for 12 months to avoid eviction. The tenant was also ordered to reimburse the landlord's $186 application filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Substantial interference

The landlord withdrew its application to terminate the tenancy for substantial interference. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.

• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The landlord withdrew their application to terminate the tenancy due to a defect in the notice of termination.

• The landlord's application was withdrawn due to a defect in the notice of termination and the file was closed.

• Persistent late payment

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment was granted with conditions. The tribunal ordered the tenancy to continue on the condition that the tenant pays rent on time for 12 months and reimburses the landlord's $186 filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord