Jitewa Edu

• Property damage
• Maintenance issues
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The parties agreed to settle their respective applications on consent, ending the tenancy on July 31, 2026. The landlord agreed to waive rent through the end of the tenancy, refund the last month's rent deposit, and provide a positive reference letter.

• Deposit returned · $1,175
• Rent abatement

• The Landlord will provide a positive reference letter to the Tenant within 10 days of request

• Property damage
• Maintenance issues
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The landlord's and tenant's applications were resolved on consent. The tenancy terminates on July 31, 2026, with the tenant paying no rent through July 2026 and the landlord returning the last month's rent deposit.

• Deposit returned · $1,175

• Tenant shall not pay rent for the remainder of the tenancy up to July 2026

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

On consent of the parties, the Board set aside an earlier ex parte eviction order and denied the landlord's eviction application on condition that the tenant pays full monthly rent on time from February 1, 2026 to November 1, 2026.

• The motion to set aside order LTB-L-055372-25-EX is granted and the order cannot be enforced.
• The landlord's eviction application is denied on condition that the tenant pays full monthly rent on or before the first day of each month from February 1, 2026 to November 1, 2026.

• Non-payment of rent

The tribunal denied the tenant's request to review an earlier order that terminated the tenancy for non-payment of rent. The original eviction order and rent arrears were confirmed and remain unchanged.

• Arrears · to the landlord

• Tenant's request to review order LTB-L-024732-25 is denied

• Maintenance issues

The tenant applied for an order finding the landlord failed to meet maintenance standards regarding moisture and mold in the rental unit. The tribunal dismissed the application on the merits, finding that the landlord responded promptly and did not breach its maintenance obligations.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as the allegations were not proven on a balance of probabilities.

• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenants' application regarding noise issues was resolved on consent of the parties. The landlord agreed to address the noise disturbances with the upper unit occupants.

• The Landlord shall speak with the occupants of the upper unit about the noise disturbances from their unit on or before February 2, 2026.
• The Landlord shall have a meeting with the Tenants and the occupants of the upper unit about a resolution on the noise disturbances on or before February 3, 2026.
• If the noise disturbances continue after February 3, 2026, the Landlord shall consider serving a notice of termination on the occupants of the upper unit.

• Maintenance issues

The tenant and landlord reached a mutual agreement on consent resolving the tenant's maintenance application. The landlord agreed to pay the tenant $500 by way of a deduction from February 2026 rent.

• Rent abatement · $500

• Non-payment of rent

The tenant's motion to void an earlier eviction order was granted on consent after the tenant paid all outstanding rent arrears and costs. The eviction order is void and unenforceable.

• Arrears · $5,651 · to the landlord

• Order LTB-L-063716-25 is void and cannot be enforced by the Landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The Board granted the tenants' review request on consent of the parties. The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for non-payment of rent was dismissed.

• The request to review order LTB-L-050284-25 is granted, and the Landlord's application is dismissed on consent.

• Maintenance issues

The tenant withdrew their maintenance application during the case conference. The tribunal granted the request and dismissed the application.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed upon withdrawal.

• Non-payment of rent

The landlords' request to review an earlier order was denied after they failed to attend the review hearing. The original order remains in effect, but its specific terms and outcome are not set out in the decision.

• The Landlords' request to review order LTB-L-106112-24 is denied and the order is confirmed unchanged.

• Non-payment of rent
• Tenant agreed termination
• Maintenance issues
• Vital services
• Substantial interference

The tenant's applications concerning maintenance, vital services, and reasonable enjoyment were resolved through a consent order. On agreement of both parties, the landlord waived $2,900.00 in rent arrears, agreed to inspect the heating, and the tenancy will terminate on April 30, 2026.

• Rent abatement · $2,900
• Repair order

• The last month's rent deposit shall be applied to April 2026
• The tenancy between the Landlord and the Tenant is terminated effective April 30, 2026 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The tenants' review request was resolved through a consent order establishing a payment plan for rent arrears. Eviction was conditionally denied provided the tenants maintain the agreed monthly payments.

• Arrears · $7,584 · to the landlord

• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The parties reached a consent agreement granting the tenant's review request and denying eviction on condition that the tenant pay $9,000.00 for unit damage and $186.00 in application fees through monthly installments.

• Damages · $9,000 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tenant failed to attend the hearing for their maintenance application. The tribunal found the application abandoned and dismissed it.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Vital services
• Illegal charges or collection

The tenants' application regarding vital services and alleged illegal charges was dismissed because neither party attended the hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Personal use eviction

The tenant's request to review an eviction order for personal use was resolved by mutual agreement. On consent of the parties, the review request was denied and the stay of eviction was ordered lifted on June 30, 2026.

• Tenant's request to review order LTB-L-014410-25 is denied on consent and the order is confirmed
• Interim order cancelled and stay of order LTB-L-014410-25 lifted on June 30, 2026 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tribunal granted the tenant's motion to set aside an earlier eviction order on consent of the parties. The landlord's application was dismissed.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed on consent.

• Personal use eviction

The tenant's request to review an eviction order was denied. The original order terminating the tenancy for purchaser's personal use remains in effect.

• The Tenant's request to review order LTB-L-046388-25 is denied and the order is confirmed.

• Non-payment of rent

The tenant's request to review an earlier order was denied as abandoned after the tenant failed to appear at the scheduled time. The earlier order remains in effect.

• The Tenant's request to review order LTB-L-028183-25 is denied as abandoned and the earlier order is confirmed.

• Maintenance issues
• Lockout and illegal eviction
• Illegal entry
• Vital services
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenants' applications alleging maintenance issues, illegal lockout, harassment, and illegal entry were dismissed after they failed to prove their claims on a balance of probabilities.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed.

• Maintenance issues

The tenant failed to attend the hearing to support their maintenance application. The tribunal treated the application as abandoned and dismissed it.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Maintenance issues
• Tenant rights

The tenant's applications regarding tenant rights and maintenance were dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Personal use eviction
• Bad faith eviction

The landlords' application to evict the tenants for personal use of their son was dismissed. The tribunal found the landlords failed to prove a genuine good faith intention to occupy the rental unit.

• The Landlords' application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenants is dismissed because the grounds were not proven.

415 Haresfield Court, Ottawa

• Non-payment of rent
• Illegal entry
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The parties reached a consent agreement resolving the tenant's rights application and the landlord's payment application. The landlord agreed to pay the tenant $4,000.00, and the landlord's application was dismissed.

• The Landlord shall pay the Tenant $4,000.00 on consent · $4,000
• The Landlord's application is dismissed on consent

• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenants' application alleging the landlord harassed them and substantially interfered with their reasonable enjoyment by disclosing their rent arrears was dismissed. The tribunal found that the disclosure did not cause actual harm or significant disruption amounting to substantial interference.

• The Tenants' application is dismissed.

• Illegal entry
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging illegal entry, substantial interference, and harassment was dismissed because it was filed more than one year after the alleged conduct occurred.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as it was filed more than one year after the alleged conduct occurred.

• Non-payment of rent
• Illegal entry
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The parties settled all matters on consent, with the landlord agreeing to pay the tenant $4,000.00 and the landlord's application being dismissed.

• The Landlord shall pay the Tenant $4,000.00 in two installments pursuant to the consent agreement · $4,000
• The Landlord's application is dismissed on consent

• Personal use eviction
• Bad faith eviction

The tenants' application alleging a bad faith eviction under an N12 notice was dismissed. The tribunal found the tenants did not prove that the landlord's daughter failed to occupy the rental unit within a reasonable time.

• The Tenants' application alleging bad faith termination is dismissed.

• Property damage
• Breach of conditions

On consent of the parties, the tenant's motion to set aside the eviction order was granted. The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy was dismissed.

• Motion to set aside order LTB-L-096970-25 is granted on consent and order cannot be enforced
• Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and for compensation is dismissed on consent

• Non-payment of rent
• Tenant agreed termination
• Maintenance issues
• Illegal entry

The tribunal determined that the tenancy terminated on December 31, 2024, holding the tenants liable for two months of rent arrears and the filing fee. After crediting garnished wages and the rent deposit with interest, the landlord was ordered to refund the excess balance of $20.80 to the tenants.

• Deposit returned · $21
• Arrears · $5,100 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tribunal granted the tenant's motion to set aside an earlier ex parte eviction order and denied the landlord's eviction application on condition that the tenant pay $3,051.49 in rent arrears and costs according to a specified payment schedule.

• Arrears · $3,051 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The tenant successfully moved to void an eviction order after paying all outstanding arrears, fees, and rent prior to enforcement. The eviction order was declared void on condition that the tenant pay $330.00 to reimburse the landlord's Sheriff enforcement fees.

• The Tenant shall pay $330.00 into the LTB to be paid out to the Landlord for Sheriff enforcement costs · $330 · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues
• Lockout and illegal eviction
• Illegal entry
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's applications alleging maintenance issues (mold and sewage backup), illegal entry, harassment, and an illegal lockout were dismissed. The tribunal found the tenant failed to prove the allegations on a balance of probabilities.

• The tenant's T2 and T6 applications are dismissed as the claims were not proved.

• Maintenance issues
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging maintenance failures, substantial interference, and harassment was dismissed. The tribunal found that the landlord responded to the water leak repairs within a reasonable time and did not substantially interfere with the tenant's reasonable enjoyment.

• The Tenant's T2 and T6 applications are dismissed because the claims were not proved.

• Non-payment of rent
• Utility costs

The tenant paid the amount required under the Residential Tenancies Act to void an earlier eviction order before enforcement. The tribunal confirmed the eviction order is void and cannot be enforced.

• Order LTB-L-050094-25 is void and cannot be enforced by the Landlord
• On consent, the Landlord shall apply the excess payment of $2,449.00 to the outstanding utility costs · $2,449 · to the landlord

• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenants' applications alleging substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment and harassment were dismissed. The tribunal found that the changes to common areas and building policies constituted minor inconveniences rather than substantial interference.

• The Tenants' applications are dismissed.

• Non-payment of rent
• Unauthorized occupants
• Breach of conditions

The tribunal denied the tenant's motion to set aside an earlier eviction order, confirming the termination of the tenancy. The tenant breached conditions of a previous order by failing to pay rent and had vacated the unit while leaving an unauthorized occupant.

• Tenant's motion to set aside Order LTB-L-093023-25 is denied and the order is confirmed
• Stay of order LTB-L-093023-25 is lifted immediately · to the landlord

• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenants' applications alleging substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment and harassment were dismissed. The tribunal found that changes to common areas and building policies did not constitute substantial interference.

• The Tenants' applications alleging substantial interference and harassment are dismissed.

• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenants applied alleging substantial interference and harassment over changes made to common areas and building policies. The tribunal dismissed the applications, finding the issues amounted to minor inconveniences rather than substantial interference.

• The tenants' applications alleging substantial interference and harassment are dismissed for lack of proof.

• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenants' applications alleging harassment and substantial interference with their reasonable enjoyment were dismissed. The tribunal found that the landlord's changes to common areas and building policies were minor inconveniences that did not establish substantial interference.

• The Tenants' applications are dismissed.

• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tribunal dismissed the tenants' applications alleging substantial interference and harassment. It found that the landlord's changes to common room furnishings and building policies were minor inconveniences rather than substantial interference.

• The Tenants' applications are dismissed.

• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenants applied for an order finding that the landlord substantially interfered with their reasonable enjoyment and harassed them through changes to building amenities and policies. The tribunal dismissed the applications because the tenants failed to prove their claims.

• The Tenants' applications are dismissed.

• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenants applied to the Board alleging substantial interference and harassment resulting from changes to common areas and building policies. The Board dismissed the applications, finding the claims unproven.

• The Tenants' applications are dismissed on the merits.

• Non-payment of rent
• Harassment
• Breach of conditions

The tenant's motion to set aside an eviction order was denied after the tenant failed to make required rent payments under a previous order. The previous order terminating the tenancy and evicting the tenant remains in effect.

• The Tenant's motion to set aside order LTB-L-096823-25 is denied, confirming the order and lifting the stay of eviction.

• Breach of conditions

The tribunal denied the tenant's motion to set aside an earlier eviction order on consent of the parties. The earlier order terminating the tenancy is confirmed, with the stay of eviction lifted on March 15, 2026.

• The Tenant's motion to set aside Order LTB-L-092164-25 is denied on consent and the order is confirmed
• The stay of order LTB-L-092164-25 is lifted on March 15, 2026 · to the landlord

• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenants' application alleging harassment and substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment was dismissed. The tribunal found that the landlord's changes to common area furniture, decor, and policies were minor inconveniences rather than substantial interference.

• The tenants' applications alleging substantial interference and harassment are dismissed as not proved.

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tenant's motion to set aside a previous eviction order was granted after the landlord consented to the motion and withdrew its application. The eviction order was cancelled and the application dismissed.

• The motion to set aside order LTB-L-093001-25 is granted and the order cannot be enforced
• The Landlord's application is dismissed following withdrawal