Jitewa Edu

• Non-payment of rent

The tenant requested a review of an earlier order resolving the landlord's non-payment application, but failed to attend the review hearing. The tribunal found the review abandoned, denied the request, and lifted the stay of the earlier order.

• The Tenant's request to review order LTB-L-100695-24 is denied, and the order is confirmed and remains unchanged.
• The interim order issued on February 2, 2026, is cancelled and the stay of order LTB-L-100695-24 is lifted immediately. · to the landlord

• Property damage
• Substantial interference
• Utility costs

The landlord withdrew their application to terminate the tenancy and claim damages and utility costs. The application was dismissed with no findings against either party.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed upon being withdrawn.

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenants for breaching an earlier order. The tribunal exercised its discretion to grant relief from eviction because all arrears and rent had been paid, and dismissed the landlord's application.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenants is dismissed.

• Personal use eviction

The tenant's request to review an eviction order for landlord's personal use was denied. The original order terminating the tenancy and evicting the tenant remains in effect.

• The tenant's request to review order LTB-L-033544-25 is denied and the order is confirmed

• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The landlord established that the tenant substantially interfered with another resident's reasonable enjoyment. The tribunal ordered the tenancy to continue on behavioral conditions for one year and ordered the tenant to pay the filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Tenancy continues subject to behavioral conditions refraining from threats, name-calling, or physical intimidation until March 2, 2027 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and collect rent arrears was dismissed because the notices to end tenancy were defective. The notices provided less than the required 14 days' notice under the Act.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and collect rent arrears is dismissed due to defective N4 notices.

• Substantial interference
• Utility costs

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy for substantial interference and to collect unpaid utility expenses. The Board ordered the tenancy terminated effective January 11, 2026, and ordered the tenants to pay $2,399.00 for unpaid utilities and the application filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Unpaid utility costs incurred as reasonable out-of-pocket expenses · $2,213 · to the landlord

• Substantial interference

The landlord withdrew their application to terminate the tenancy for substantial interference. As a result, the application was dismissed.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed upon withdrawal.

• Substantial interference

The tribunal found that the tenants substantially interfered with reasonable enjoyment through excessive dog barking and smoking odours, but granted conditional relief from eviction. The tenancy will continue provided the tenants abide by behavioural conditions for one year and reimburse the application fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Tenants ordered to restrain dog barking and refrain from smoking where odour reaches neighbours for one year · to the landlord

• Illegal entry
• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenants applied for remedies alleging illegal entry, harassment, and substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment regarding a towed vehicle and garage storage. The tribunal dismissed the application after finding the tenants failed to prove their claims for compensation.

• The Tenants' application is dismissed.

• Substantial interference
• Utility costs

The landlord withdrew its application to terminate the tenancy for substantial interference and to recover utility costs. The application was dismissed.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed upon being withdrawn.

• Substantial interference

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for substantial interference was dismissed. The landlord failed to prove that the tenant denied entry during the seven-day voiding period following the notice of termination.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant is dismissed because the grounds for termination were not proved.

• Property damage
• Substantial interference
• Utility costs

The tribunal terminated the tenancy and ordered the tenants evicted for substantial interference due to unpaid utilities and plumbing damage. The tenants were also ordered to pay $958.76 in out-of-pocket expenses and application costs.

• Deposit returned · $3,002
• Damages · $349 · to the landlord
• Damages · $424 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Substantial interference

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for substantial interference was dismissed after the landlord failed to attend the hearing. The tenancy continues.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

On consent of the parties, the tribunal granted the tenant's motion to set aside an earlier eviction order. The landlord's application to evict was conditionally denied under a payment plan requiring the tenant to pay $643.11 in arrears and costs over two installments.

• Arrears · $643 · to the landlord

• The tenant's motion to set aside order LTB-L-103485-25 is granted and the order cannot be enforced

• Tenant agreed termination

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant based on an alleged agreement to end the tenancy. The tribunal dismissed the application because the evidence did not show a valid agreement to terminate.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant is dismissed.

• Non-payment of rent
• Persistent late payment
• Substantial interference

On consent of both parties, the tenancy was terminated. The tenant agreed to vacate the rental unit on or before April 30, 2026.

• The tenancy is terminated on consent and the Tenant must move out on or before April 30, 2026. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Persistent late payment
• Substantial interference

The landlord and the tenant resolved the applications by consent, agreeing that the tenancy will terminate. The tenant must move out of the rental unit on or before April 30, 2026.

• Tenancy terminated on consent; tenant ordered to vacate on or before April 30, 2026 · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The landlord's request to review an earlier order resolving the tenant's maintenance application was denied, and the earlier order was confirmed. Because this decision does not disclose what the confirmed order decided, the substantive outcome is unclear.

• The Landlord's request to review order LTB-T-047152-24 is denied and the order is confirmed
• The stay of order LTB-T-047152-24 is lifted immediately and the interim order is cancelled

Unit 1406, 212 Eglinton Avenue East, Toronto

• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for undue damage was granted. The tenant was ordered to vacate the rental unit by March 6, 2026, and pay $186 in filing fee costs.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Vital services
• Illegal charges or collection
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application regarding harassment, substantial interference, vital services, and illegal charges was dismissed after neither party attended the case conference.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Maintenance issues

The tenants' maintenance application was resolved by a consent order. The landlord agreed to pay the tenants $700.00 by February 27, 2026.

• The Landlord shall pay to the Tenants $700.00 via etransfer on or before February 27, 2026 · $700

• Whether the Act applies

The tenant applied to determine whether the Residential Tenancies Act applies, but withdrew the application at the hearing. The tribunal granted the withdrawal and dismissed the application.

• The Tenant's application to determine whether the Act applies is dismissed upon the Tenant's request to withdraw it.

• Property damage
• Breach of conditions

The tenant's motion to set aside an earlier order was granted on consent of the parties. The previous orders were cancelled and the landlord's application was dismissed.

• The motion to set aside Order LTB-L-003060-26 is granted on consent, and the order cannot be enforced.
• The Landlord's application is dismissed on consent.

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tenants' motion to set aside an eviction order was denied after they failed to make required rent and arrears payments under a previous conditional order. The order terminating the tenancy and evicting the tenants was confirmed and the stay was lifted.

• The motion to set aside Order LTB-L-106127-25, issued on January 19, 2026, is denied, and the order is confirmed and remains unchanged
• The stay of order LTB-L-106127-25 is lifted immediately · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tenants' motion to set aside a previous eviction order was granted on consent. The parties agreed to a conditional order denying eviction subject to a long-term payment plan for $17,989.82 in rent arrears.

• Arrears · $17,990 · to the landlord

• Motion to set aside order LTB-L-079755-25 granted and earlier order cancelled on consent

• Illegal charges or collection
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application was dismissed after they failed to attend the scheduled case conference.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed for non-attendance.

• Illegal entry
• Rent deposit disputes
• Illegal charges or collection
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenants and the landlord reached a mutual agreement to resolve the tenant rights and rebate applications on consent. Under the terms of the settlement, the landlord agreed to pay the tenants $300.00.

• The Landlord shall pay to the Tenants $300.00 on consent in full and final settlement · $300

• Maintenance issues
• Substantial interference

The tenants and the landlord resolved the tenant rights and maintenance applications on consent. The landlord agreed to pay the tenants $500 by February 28, 2026.

• The Landlord shall pay $500.00 to the Tenants via e-transfer on or before February 28, 2026 · $500

• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenants' application was resolved on consent of the parties. It was ordered that the tenants are not required to pay rent for July 2024.

• The tenants shall not be required to pay rent for July 2024

• Maintenance issues
• Lockout and illegal eviction
• Illegal entry
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant withdrew their applications concerning maintenance and tenant rights at the hearing. The tribunal dismissed the applications on consent with no findings against either party.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed upon withdrawal.

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord's application for non-payment of rent was resolved on consent of the parties with a payment plan. Eviction was denied on the condition that the tenants pay the arrears and regular rent.

• Arrears · $2,050 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Renovation and demolition

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant to demolish the rental unit. The Landlord and Tenant Board dismissed the application because the landlord failed to pay the full mandatory three months' rent compensation by the termination date.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant is dismissed.
• The Landlord shall immediately cancel the compensation cheque of $1,076.00. · to the landlord

Basement, 282 Glenridge Avenue, St. Catharines

• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and collect repair costs for damage, but the application was dismissed because it was filed past the 30-day statutory deadline following the termination date in the notice.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and for compensation is dismissed because it was filed out of time under section 69(2).

• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for damage and substantial interference was resolved by a consent agreement. The tenancy will end on March 31, 2026, with the tenant relieved of rent for March 2026.

• Tenant is not required to pay rent for March 2026
• Landlord shall not pursue future claims for damages
• Tenancy terminated on consent; Tenant ordered to vacate on or before March 31, 2026 · to the landlord

• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The tribunal terminated the tenancy due to substantial interference caused by clutter in the rental unit and ordered the tenant to move out by March 10, 2026. The landlord's claim for cleaning costs was denied because cleaning does not constitute repair or replacement of damaged property.

• Deposit returned · $700
• Deposit returned · $67

• Illegal act
• Substantial interference
• Safety concerns

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy was resolved on consent with the tenancy continuing subject to behavioral conditions. The tenant was ordered to reimburse the landlord's application filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Property damage
• Substantial interference
• Utility costs

The tribunal terminated the tenancy as of the date the tenants moved out and ordered them to pay $3,255.52 in outstanding utility costs plus the application filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• outstanding utility costs · $3,256 · to the landlord

• Substantial interference

The landlord withdrew its application to terminate the tenancy for substantial interference, and the application was dismissed.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed upon withdrawal.

• Substantial interference

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for substantial interference was resolved by a consent order. The tenancy continues on behavioral conditions regarding noise and cleanliness through December 31, 2026.

• The tenant must comply with conduct conditions regarding noise and cleanliness until December 31, 2026, failing which the landlord may apply under section 78 to terminate the tenancy. · to the landlord

• Illegal entry
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant applied claiming the landlord entered illegally, harassed them, and substantially interfered with their reasonable enjoyment by towing a guest's vehicle from an assigned parking space. The tribunal dismissed the application after finding the tenant failed to prove the claims, as the tenancy agreement prohibited unregistered guest parking.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as the claims were not proved on a balance of probabilities.

• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's applications alleging harassment and substantial interference by the landlord were dismissed. The tribunal found that the tenant failed to prove the allegations on a balance of probabilities.

• The Tenant's applications alleging substantial interference and harassment are dismissed because the allegations were not proved.

• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's applications alleging harassment and substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment by the landlord and its agents were dismissed. The tribunal found that the tenant failed to establish the allegations on a balance of probabilities.

• The tenant's applications are dismissed because the claims were not proved on a balance of probabilities.

• Maintenance issues
• Vital services
• Safety concerns

The tenant's maintenance application regarding water leaks, electrical outlets, smoke detectors, basement sealing, and heating was dismissed.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as the claims were either time-barred or not proved on a balance of probabilities.

• Tenant abandons property
• Lockout and illegal eviction
• Illegal entry

The tribunal dismissed the tenant's application alleging an illegal entry and lockout following a new review hearing. It found that the tenant had not established that the landlord's temporary lock change had a meaningful impact, as the tenant was not occupying the subsidized unit at the time.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as the claims were not proved on a balance of probabilities.