Ontario Landlord and Tenant Board
Fabio Quattrociocchi
MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntarioBeta
Rulings, compared with the board
About the board's rate against tenantsDecided against tenants about as often as the board does on comparable applications, across 164 contested orders.
Orders are grouped by who applied and what they applied for, and this member’s record is compared with the board’s on that same mix. Withdrawn, settled and non-attendance dismissals are excluded. It measures how these decisions differ from the board’s on cases of the same type.
Dismissals, compared with the board
Bars tenants and landlords about as oftenDismissed tenants' and landlords' applications as not proved, out of jurisdiction or barred on procedure at rates that do not differ once the kind of application is accounted for, across 17 such dismissals of tenants' applications and 13 of landlords'.
Counts only dismissals the member ruled on — not proved, outside the board’s jurisdiction, or barred on procedure. Applications withdrawn, settled or dismissed because nobody attended are excluded, as they are above. The two sides are compared on this member’s own docket, against the board’s rate on the same kinds of application. It does not measure whether any decision was right.
Orders
Showing 251–265 of 265- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedJanuary 15, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tribunal denied the tenants' motion to set aside an eviction order issued after they breached a repayment plan. The stay of the eviction order was extended and will be lifted on February 15, 2026.
- The Tenants' motion to set aside order LTB-L-102287-25 is denied as not proved.
- The stay of eviction order LTB-L-102287-25 is lifted February 15, 2026. · to the landlord
LTB-L-102287-25 · L4Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantJanuary 14, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The Board denied the tenants' motion to set aside an ex-parte eviction order after finding they breached a consent rent repayment plan. The stay of eviction was ordered lifted on February 15, 2026 to allow the tenants time to find alternative housing.
- The motion to set aside Order LTB-L-092255-25, issued on November 17, 2025, is denied
- The stay of order LTB-L-092255-25 is lifted February 15, 2026 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyJanuary 14, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The parties agreed on consent to resolve the review request. The earlier order was cancelled and the eviction order was declared void as of November 30, 2025 because the tenant paid the required amount.
- The request to review order LTB-L-043715-25-NL is granted, and the order is cancelled and replaced.
- Order LTB-L-043715-25 is void as of November 30, 2025, and cannot be enforced by the Landlord.
- Decision against landlordJanuary 14, 2026$414
- Non-payment of rent
- Tenant rights
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The landlord's eviction application was resolved with an order requiring the landlord to pay $414.00 to the tenants. On review, the order was varied on consent to further require the landlord to provide mailbox keys and refrain from harassment and interference.
- Landlord ordered to pay Tenants under section 82 claims · $414
- Landlord shall provide Tenants with a key and/or access to the mailboxes
- Landlord and authorized agents shall refrain from engaging in harassment or substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment
- No finding against either partyJanuary 14, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tenant's motion to set aside an earlier eviction order was granted with the landlord's consent after all outstanding rent arrears were paid. The previous eviction order is set aside and cannot be enforced.
- The motion to set aside Order LTB-L-101666-25 is granted; the order is set aside and cannot be enforced
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · settled by agreementJanuary 14, 2026
- Tenant agreed termination
- Breach of conditions
The tenants' motion to set aside an earlier eviction order was denied on consent, and the stay of the eviction order was ordered lifted.
- The Tenants' motion to set aside order LTB-L-103976-25 is denied on consent
- The stay of order LTB-L-103976-25 is lifted January 22, 2026 · to the landlord
- Decision against landlordLandlord's application dismissed · not provedJanuary 12, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Unauthorized occupants
- Substantial interference
- Utility costs
The landlord's application seeking rent arrears, utilities, and out-of-pocket expenses from the former tenant was dismissed. The tribunal found that the tenancy lawfully ended pursuant to an agreement to terminate and the former tenant was not liable for delays or costs caused by a former occupant after vacating.
- The Landlord's application is dismissed.
- Decision against landlordJanuary 9, 2026$160 Rent abatement
- Maintenance issues
The tenant applied for remedies regarding a bathroom leak, mice, and bedbugs. The tribunal found the landlords breached their maintenance obligations regarding pest issues and ordered them to pay the tenant $207.78 in rent abatement and filing fee reimbursement.
- Rent abatement · $160
- Filing fee · $48
Apartment 207, 308 Randolph Avenue, Windsor
LTB-T-039799-22 · T6Landlord and Tenant BoardCIP308 Randolph Inc., Marda Management Inc.Read the order (PDF) - Decision against landlordJanuary 8, 2026$4,130 Rent abatement
- Non-payment of rent
- Maintenance issues
- Substantial interference
The landlord's application for rent arrears and the tenant's applications regarding maintenance and tenant rights were heard together. The tribunal found the landlord breached its maintenance obligations and substantially interfered with the tenant's enjoyment regarding cockroaches, bathtub disrepair, and electrical issues, awarding a rent abatement and fee reimbursement offset against the tenant's rent arrears.
- Rent abatement · $4,130
- Deposit returned · $60
- Filing fee · $53
- Arrears · $6,774 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnJanuary 8, 2026
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant withdrew their application regarding harassment and substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment, and the tribunal closed the file.
- The tenant's application was withdrawn.
- Decision against tenantJanuary 8, 2026
- Property damage
- Illegal act
- Substantial interference
- Breach of conditions
The tribunal granted the tenant's motion to set aside a previous ex-parte eviction order, allowing the tenancy to continue on conditions for one year. The tenant must allow lawful entry, maintain ordinary cleanliness, and refrain from illegal acts.
- The ex-parte eviction order issued on June 11, 2025 is set aside and cannot be enforced; tenancy continues on conditions for one year.
LTB-L-045678-25 · L4Landlord and Tenant BoardToronto Community Housing CorporationRead the order (PDF) - Decision against landlordJanuary 7, 2026$5,901 Rent abatement
- Maintenance issues
- Tenant rights
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tribunal found that the landlord breached maintenance obligations and substantially interfered with the tenant's reasonable enjoyment regarding laundry appliances, snow removal, parking access, and advertising the unit for rent while occupied. The landlord was ordered to pay the tenant $8,327.32 in rent abatement, compensation for out-of-pocket parking expenses, and filing fees.
- Rent abatement · $5,901
- Damages · $2,330
- Filing fee · $96
- Decision against landlordJanuary 6, 2026$10,000 Damages
- Personal use eviction
- Bad faith eviction
The tribunal determined that the purchaser gave an N12 notice of termination for personal use in bad faith, as neither the purchaser nor their family moved in. The purchaser was ordered to pay the tenant $22,287.82 in rent differential, moving expenses, general compensation, and application fees.
- Damages · $9,600
- Damages · $2,635
- Damages · $10,000
- Filing fee · $53
LTB-T-054303-22 · T5Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against landlordLandlord's application dismissed · not provedJanuary 6, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
- Utility costs
The landlord applied to recover rent arrears and utility costs incurred after the tenants vacated the unit prior to the end of their fixed term. The tribunal dismissed the application because the landlord failed to take reasonable steps to mitigate losses.
- The Landlord's application is dismissed.
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedJanuary 5, 2026
- Property damage
The former tenant's request for review was denied without a hearing. The earlier order confirming the former tenant's liability for property damages remains in effect.
- The former tenant's request to review order LTB-L-056343-24-RV is denied and the order is confirmed.