Fabio Quattrociocchi

• Bad faith eviction
• Rent deposit disputes
• Illegal charges or collection

A duplicate bad faith application was withdrawn by the tenant, and the remaining applications were adjourned to be heard together on a future date.

• Tenant application LTB-T-109386-25 is withdrawn as duplicative

• Property damage
• Safety concerns

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy due to impaired safety and wilful property damage. The tribunal granted the application, ordering the tenant to vacate and reimburse the landlord's application filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Bad faith eviction

The tenant's bad faith eviction application was dismissed because it was filed more than one year after the tenant vacated the rental unit.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as statute-barred.

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed. · to the landlord

• Property damage
• Substantial interference
• Utility costs

The tribunal ordered the tenant to pay compensation for unpaid utility charges and property damage to the shed, garage door, kitchen cabinets, and drywall. The tenant was ordered to pay a total of $7,489.04 to the landlord.

• Damages · $5,903 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Unpaid utility costs incurred during the tenancy · $1,400 · to the landlord

• Substantial interference

The tenant withdrew their application claiming substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment, and the tribunal closed the file.

• The tenant's application was withdrawn and the file is closed.

• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The landlord withdrew their application to terminate the tenancy for substantial interference and property damage. The Landlord and Tenant Board consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.

• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant and the landlord reached a consent agreement resolving the tenant's applications. The landlord agreed to investigate and address concerns regarding harassment, smoking, and pet policy compliance.

• The landlord undertakes to investigate and address the tenant's concerns regarding harassment from other residents, smoking in the complex, and pet policy compliance.

• Illegal entry

The tenant and landlord resolved the tenant's illegal entry application through a mutual consent agreement. The landlord agreed to enter the rental unit only in accordance with the Residential Tenancies Act.

• The landlord and/or their authorized agents undertake to only enter the rental unit in accordance with sections 26 and 27 of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006

• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant and the landlord reached a mutual agreement to resolve the tenant's applications on consent. The landlord undertook to investigate and address the tenant's complaints regarding other residents.

• The landlord undertakes to investigate and address the tenant's concerns if deemed appropriate regarding harassment, smoking, and pet policy compliance by other residents

• Vital services

The tenant withdrew their application concerning vital services, and the tribunal closed the file.

• Lockout and illegal eviction
• Tenant rights

The tenant's application alleging the landlord altered the locks without providing replacement keys was dismissed after neither party attended the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues
• Substantial interference

The parties reached a mutual settlement resolving the tenant's maintenance and tenant rights applications. On consent, the landlord agreed to pay the tenant $1,346.00, representing a rent abatement and application fee reimbursement.

• Rent abatement · $1,250
• Filing fee · $96

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues
• Substantial interference

The tenant and landlord reached a consent agreement to resolve applications regarding maintenance and substantial interference. The landlord was ordered on consent to pay the tenant $1,346.00 for rent abatement and filing costs.

• Rent abatement · $1,250
• Filing fee · $96

• Non-payment of rent
• Rent increase disputes

The tribunal denied the tenants' request to review a previous eviction and arrears order. The stay of the original order was lifted and the termination of tenancy and arrears were confirmed.

• The request to review the order issued on November 17, 2025 is denied, the order is confirmed, and the stay is lifted immediately. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord withdrew both applications for non-payment of rent at the hearing. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and denied the tenant's request for costs.

• Landlord application LTB-L-040209-25 is withdrawn · to the landlord
• Landlord application LTB-L-071847-25 is withdrawn · to the landlord
• Tenant's request for costs is denied · to the landlord

• Property damage
• Bad faith eviction
• Utility costs

The landlord's L10 application and the tenant's T5 application were both withdrawn on consent. The consent order resolves all issues between the parties.

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord's application for rent arrears and NSF charges was discontinued on consent after the parties agreed no arrears were owed as of March 31, 2026.

• The Landlord's application is discontinued to March 31, 2026 on consent.

• Persistent late payment
• Utility costs

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment of rent was granted. The tenants were ordered to vacate the rental unit by March 31, 2026, and pay $186 to reimburse the filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Property damage
• Bad faith eviction
• Utility costs

The landlord's L10 application and the tenant's T5 application were both withdrawn on consent following a mutual agreement between the parties.

• The landlord's L10 application is withdrawn on consent.
• The tenant's T5 application is withdrawn on consent. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord's applications for non-payment of rent were withdrawn, and the tenant's request for an award of costs against the landlord was denied.

• The landlord's applications LTB-L-040209-25 and LTB-L-071847-25 were withdrawn at the landlord's request

• Safety concerns

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for impaired safety was dismissed because the landlord failed to prove the allegations on a balance of probabilities.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy is dismissed as the grounds for termination were not proven on a balance of probabilities.

• Property damage
• Substantial interference
• Utility costs

The landlord's application was granted, and the tenancy was terminated. The tenant was ordered to pay $45,861.43 comprising property damage repair costs, out-of-pocket expenses from substantial interference, and application fee reimbursement.

• Damages · $42,488 · to the landlord
• Damages · $3,187 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tenant withdrew their maintenance application at the hearing, and the file was closed.

• Property damage

The landlord's application for compensation for property damage against the former tenants was granted in part. The former tenants were ordered to pay $3,629.56 for front entrance door damage caused by movers, plus the application filing fee.

• Damages · $3,630 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Tenant abandons property

The tribunal found that the tenant had abandoned the rental unit and terminated the tenancy effective September 30, 2025. The tenant was ordered to reimburse the landlord's application filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Substantial interference

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for alleged noise disturbances was dismissed because the landlord failed to prove the allegations.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed.

• Illegal entry

The tenant's application regarding alleged illegal entry was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Substantial interference

The tenant withdrew their application concerning substantial interference, and the tribunal closed the file.

• The tenant withdrew the application. · to the landlord

• Illegal act
• Substantial interference
• Safety concerns

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant based on an illegal act was granted. The tenancy is terminated effective June 30, 2026, and the tenant was ordered to pay daily compensation and application costs.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
• Arrears · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues
• Tenant rights
• Illegal charges or collection
• Harassment

The tenants' application for maintenance remedies was dismissed after they failed to prove any maintenance breaches on the merits. The tenants withdrew their remaining claims regarding illegal charges and tenant rights.

• The tenants' application (T1, T2, T6) was dismissed; T1 and T2 were withdrawn and T6 was dismissed for lack of evidence. · to the landlord

• Lockout and illegal eviction

The tenants' application concerning altered locks was dismissed after they failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenants' application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed as abandoned after neither party attended the hearing.

• Substantial interference
• Breach of conditions

The landlord and tenant resolved the landlord's substantial interference application through a consent order allowing the tenancy to continue under agreed property and cleanliness conditions. The tenant agreed to reimburse the landlord's filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Tenancy continues subject to the tenant meeting specified maintenance, storage, and cleanliness conditions · to the landlord

• Vital services
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant filed an application regarding substantial interference, harassment, and vital services. The parties resolved the matter through a consent order, with the landlord agreeing to investigate the tenant's complaints regarding a neighbouring tenant's conduct.

• The landlord undertakes to investigate the tenant's complaints regarding the basement tenant and file an LTB application if appropriate.

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed after neither party attended the scheduled hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Tenant rights

The tenant applied for an order determining whether the landlord allowed 72 hours to remove property post-eviction. The application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Illegal entry
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging illegal entry, substantial interference, and harassment was dismissed because neither party attended the hearing.

• The tenant's T2 application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Illegal entry
• Vital services
• Tenant rights
• Substantial interference

The tenant withdrew their application regarding illegal entry, substantial interference, and vital services. The tribunal granted the request and closed the file.

• Substantial interference
• Breach of conditions
• Safety concerns

The landlord and tenant resolved the landlord's application by entering into a consent agreement. The tenancy continues on the condition that the tenant maintains unit cleanliness and permits access for inspections and pest control over a 24-month period.

• Illegal entry
• Tenant rights
• Substantial interference

The tenant withdrew their application during the hearing. The tribunal permitted the withdrawal and closed the file.

• Tenant agreed termination
• Vital services
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenants and landlord reached a consent agreement resolving the tenant rights application. The tenancy will terminate on September 30, 2026, with tiered compensation payable by the landlord if the tenants vacate prior to that date.

• Landlord to pay early vacate compensation ranging from $741.50 to $4,449.00 depending on move-out date prior to September 30, 2026

• Safety concerns

The landlord's application was dismissed as abandoned because neither party attended the hearing.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant failed to attend the tribunal hearing regarding their application about tenant rights and harassment. The tribunal determined the application was abandoned and dismissed it.

• The tenant's application is dismissed due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Substantial interference

The landlord's application was resolved by a consent order allowing the tenancy to continue. The tenant agreed to refrain from smoking inside the rental unit.

• The tenant, occupants, and permitted guests shall refrain from smoking inside the rental unit, failing which the landlord may apply under section 78 to terminate the tenancy. · to the landlord