Diane Wade

• Illegal entry
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging illegal entry, substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment, and harassment was dismissed. The tribunal found insufficient evidence to prove the claims on a balance of probabilities.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed.

• Non-payment of rent

The tribunal granted a former tenant's review request to be removed from an earlier eviction and arrears order because they were not in possession at the time. The remainder of the order against the other tenant remains in effect.

• Arrears · $23,935 · to the landlord

• Requesting tenant removed from the order and the stay of the order lifted

• Rent increase disputes
• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant's application alleging illegal rent collection was dismissed after the tribunal found that the monthly rent of $1,000.00 was lawful.

• The Tenant's application alleging illegal rent collection is dismissed without prejudice as not proved.

• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant applied for an order alleging harassment and interference by the landlord, but neither party attended the hearing. The application was dismissed as abandoned.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Renovation and demolition

The landlord's applications to terminate the tenancies for demolition were dismissed because the landlord failed to pay the required three months' compensation by the termination date and gave notices with an incorrect address. The tenants agreed to return the one-month compensation they had already received.

• Landlord's applications dismissed without prejudice due to defective notices and failure to pay full statutory compensation by the termination date
• Tenants in file LTB-L-108800-25 to return one month of demolition compensation received · $950 · to the landlord
• Tenant in file LTB-L-109149-25 to return one month of demolition compensation received · $663 · to the landlord

• Renovation and demolition

The landlord's applications to terminate the tenancies for demolition were dismissed because the landlord failed to pay the required three months' statutory compensation and issued notices with non-existent addresses. The tenants were ordered to return the one month of compensation they had previously received.

• The Landlord's applications LTB-L-108800-25 and LTB-L-109149-25 are dismissed without prejudice.
• Tenants for file LTB-L-108800-25 shall return compensation received on or before February 28, 2026. · $950 · to the landlord
• Tenant for file LTB-L-109149-25 shall return compensation received on or before February 28, 2026. · $663 · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues
• Illegal charges or collection

The tribunal dismissed two tenant applications regarding maintenance standards and alleged illegal charges because the joint tenants had filed separate applications instead of a single joint application. An adjournment and request to merge additional remedies without consent were denied.

• The Tenants' applications (LTB-T-093549-24 and LTB-T-030755-25) are dismissed without prejudice.

• Maintenance issues
• Illegal charges or collection

The tenants' maintenance and illegal charge applications were dismissed because they were joint tenants who filed separate applications and could not properly consolidate their claims.

• The tenants' applications are dismissed without prejudice on procedural grounds for failure to file a joint application.

• Renovation and demolition

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for extensive repairs or renovations was granted. The tenancy was ordered terminated as of January 21, 2026, when the tenant vacated.

• The tenancy between the Landlord and the Tenant is terminated as of January 21, 2026 · to the landlord

• Property damage

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and claim compensation for alleged property damage was dismissed because the notice of termination lacked required specific details.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and claim compensation is dismissed due to a fatally flawed notice of termination.

• Property damage
• Harassment
• Safety concerns

The landlord's eviction application was resolved by consent, with the parties agreeing that the tenancy will continue subject to specific behavioral conditions for one year.

• The tenancy continues on consent subject to behavioral conditions from January 27, 2026 to January 26, 2027

• Illegal act

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant based on allegations of illegal drug trafficking. The tribunal dismissed the application because the landlord failed to prove the allegations on a balance of probabilities.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant is dismissed as not proved.

• Property damage
• Substantial interference
• Safety concerns

The landlord's application to evict the tenant for wilful damage and to claim compensation was dismissed because the landlord failed to prove the damages met the threshold required for an N7 notice.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and for compensation is dismissed.

• Property damage
• Illegal act
• Substantial interference
• Safety concerns

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant based on allegations of illegal acts, safety impairment, property damage, and substantial interference. The application was dismissed as abandoned because neither party attended the hearing.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Safety concerns

The landlord and the tenant agreed on consent to terminate the tenancy, with the tenant required to vacate by February 28, 2026.

• The tenancy is terminated on consent and the Tenant must vacate the rental unit on or before February 28, 2026. · to the landlord

• Illegal act

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy alleging an illegal act. By consent of both parties, the tenancy was terminated effective January 31, 2026.

• Tenancy terminated on consent, requiring the tenant to vacate on or before January 31, 2026 · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed as abandoned after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The landlord's application for termination and damages was granted conditionally. The tenant was ordered to pay $4,271.40 for vehicle-related damage to a guard railing and the filing fee by February 13, 2026, failing which the landlord may seek eviction.

• Damages · $4,271 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues
• Rent increase disputes
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant and landlord resolved the tenant's applications through a consent agreement. The tenant withdrew their tenant-rights application and certain repair claims, while the landlord agreed to inspect the unit and establish a timeline for remaining repairs.

• Landlord shall inspect the unit for listed maintenance issues and communicate agreed repairs and timeline to the tenant
• T2 application and portions of T6 application withdrawn on consent

• Non-payment of rent
• Maintenance issues
• Bad faith eviction
• Illegal entry
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The landlord's application for rent arrears was granted after the tenant moved out, while the tenant's multiple applications were dismissed because the tenant failed to attend the hearing. The tenant was ordered to pay outstanding rent arrears, application costs, and hearing costs.

• Deposit returned · $196
• Arrears · $27,901 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Tenant's applications dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance
• Costs awarded to the landlord for tenant's non-attendance without notice · $250 · to the landlord

Main, 89 Gainsborough Road, Toronto

• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenants' application alleging harassment and interference was dismissed as abandoned after they failed to attend the hearing.

• The Tenant's T2 application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Non-payment of rent
• Maintenance issues
• Bad faith eviction
• Lockout and illegal eviction
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The Board dismissed the tenant's multiple applications after the tenant failed to attend the hearing. The landlord's application was granted, terminating the tenancy as of the date the tenant vacated and ordering the tenant to pay $25,840.93 in rent arrears, costs, and the application filing fee, less the rent deposit and interest.

• Deposit returned · $2,300
• Arrears · $27,901 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Interest owing on the rent deposit from June 18, 2019 to July 4, 2024, credited against arrears · $196
• The Tenant's applications LTB-T-019085-25, LTB-T-029495-25 and LTB-T-029555-25 are dismissed.
• Costs awarded against the Tenant for non-attendance at the peremptory hearing · $250 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Maintenance issues
• Bad faith eviction
• Illegal entry
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tribunal dismissed the tenant's applications after they failed to attend the hearing and terminated the tenancy as of the date the tenant vacated. The tenant was ordered to pay rent arrears, hearing costs, and the application filing fee, less the credited rent deposit and interest.

• Deposit returned · $2,300
• Deposit returned · $196
• Arrears · $27,901 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Tenant's applications dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance
• Costs awarded against the tenant for non-attendance · $250 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Maintenance issues
• Bad faith eviction
• Illegal entry
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tribunal dismissed the tenant's applications because they failed to attend the hearing, and terminated the tenancy as the tenant had already vacated. The tenant was ordered to pay outstanding rent arrears, hearing costs, and the application filing fee, less the retained rent deposit and interest.

• Deposit returned · $2,300
• Deposit returned · $196
• Arrears · $27,901 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• The Tenant's applications LTB-T-019085-25, LTB-T-029495-25 and LTB-T-029555-25 are dismissed.
• Costs awarded against the Tenant for non-attendance · $250 · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed as abandoned because neither party attended the hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed due to non-attendance.

• Personal use eviction
• Bad faith eviction

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for personal use was resolved by a consent order. The tenant agreed to pay $7,000 in full settlement of all tenancy matters and withdraw their bad faith eviction application.

• Tenant to pay Landlord $7,000.00 in full and final settlement of all matters related to the tenancy · $7,000 · to the landlord
• Tenant's T5 application to be withdrawn pursuant to settlement

• Property damage
• Illegal act

The landlord's application was granted, requiring the former tenant to pay compensation for property damage caused during a police search warrant execution.

• Damages · $8,475 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Property damage

The landlord's application for compensation for property damage against the former tenant was granted. The former tenant was ordered to pay $700.00 for repairs and $186.00 for the application filing fee.

• Damages · $700 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Illegal act

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant for alleged drug trafficking was dismissed because the landlord did not prove the allegations on a balance of probabilities.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy is dismissed for lack of proof.

Apartment 371, 3680 Keele Street, Toronto

• Safety concerns

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy, alleging that the tenant permitted an individual into the building who seriously impaired the safety of other residents. The tribunal dismissed the application because the landlord failed to prove the allegations.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for impaired safety is dismissed as not proved.

Room 03, 33 Dundurn Street South, Hamilton