Ontario Landlord and Tenant Board
Carrie Bertrand
MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntarioBeta
Rulings, compared with the board
About the board's rate against tenantsDecided against tenants about as often as the board does on comparable applications, across 251 contested orders.
Orders are grouped by who applied and what they applied for, and this member’s record is compared with the board’s on that same mix. Withdrawn, settled and non-attendance dismissals are excluded. It measures how these decisions differ from the board’s on cases of the same type.
Dismissals, compared with the board
Bars landlords 2.44× as often as tenantsDismissed landlords' applications as not proved, out of jurisdiction or barred on procedure 2.44× as often as tenants', relative to the board's rate on comparable applications (95% interval 1.59–3.85), across 70 such dismissals of landlords' applications and 15 of tenants'.
Counts only dismissals the member ruled on — not proved, outside the board’s jurisdiction, or barred on procedure. Applications withdrawn, settled or dismissed because nobody attended are excluded, as they are above. The two sides are compared on this member’s own docket, against the board’s rate on the same kinds of application. It does not measure whether any decision was right.
Orders
Showing 251–300 of 302- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · withdrawnJanuary 22, 2026
- Personal use eviction
The landlord withdrew the application to terminate the tenancy for personal use at the hearing. The file was closed without an order against either party.
- The landlord's application was withdrawn and the file closed.
- Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord was in serious breachJanuary 22, 2026
- Personal use eviction
- Bad faith eviction
- Rent increase disputes
- Tenant rights
The tribunal dismissed the landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for personal use, finding that the landlord failed to prove good faith and that the application was filed in retaliation for the tenant asserting their rights against an illegal rent increase.
- The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant is dismissed.
- Decision against tenantJanuary 21, 2026
- Persistent late payment
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy due to persistent late payment of rent. The tribunal found the grounds proven but granted relief from eviction, ordering the tenancy to continue on condition that the tenant pays rent on time for 12 months.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
LTB-L-089885-25 · L2Landlord and Tenant Board2231284 Ontario Inc. o/a Oasis Trailer ParkRead the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantJanuary 20, 2026
- Persistent late payment
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment was resolved with a conditional order allowing the tenancy to continue provided the tenant pays rent on time for 12 months. Funds paid into the Board's trust account were ordered released to the landlord.
- Arrears · $1,153 · to the landlord
- The tenancy continues conditionally on the tenant paying full monthly rent on or before the first of each month from February 1, 2026 to January 31, 2027 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyJanuary 20, 2026$1,100
- Personal use eviction
- Rent deposit disputes
- Illegal charges or collection
The tenant's application regarding monies owed was resolved by a consent order. The landlord agreed to pay the tenant $1,358.15 for N12 termination compensation, last month's rent deposit interest, and the filing fee.
- Deposit returned · $210
- Filing fee · $48
- N12 notice of termination compensation · $1,100
- Decision against tenantJanuary 20, 2026
- Property damage
- Safety concerns
The landlord's application to evict the tenants for safety impairment was conditionally denied, allowing the tenancy to continue on conditions that the tenants cease hunting on the property and properly dispose of animal carcasses.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Eviction denied on condition that the tenants do not hunt on the residential property and safely remove and cease storing dead carcasses · to the landlord
- Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord did not meet the Act's requirementsJanuary 19, 2026
- Personal use eviction
The landlords' application to terminate the tenancy for personal use was dismissed because they failed to pay the required statutory compensation to the tenant.
- The Landlords' application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant is dismissed for failure to pay the required compensation under section 48.1.
LTB-L-076502-25 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJanuary 19, 2026
- Illegal charges or collection
The tenant's application claiming the landlord collected or retained money illegally was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJanuary 19, 2026
- Illegal charges or collection
The tenant's application alleging that the landlord collected or retained money illegally was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed.
- Decision against tenantJanuary 19, 2026$2,650 Deposit returned
- Non-payment of rent
- Property damage
- Substantial interference
The Landlords' applications for rent arrears and property damage were granted after the Tenants vacated the unit. The Tenants were ordered to pay $26,100.62 in outstanding rent, damages, and filing costs, offset by their rent deposit and interest.
- Deposit returned · $2,650
- Deposit returned · $56
- Arrears · $13,250 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Damages · $15,370 · to the landlord
LTB-L-082111-25 · L1;L2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantJanuary 16, 2026
- Persistent late payment
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy due to persistent late payment of rent. The tribunal found the grounds proven, ordered the tenancy terminated with eviction postponed to February 28, 2026, and ordered the tenant to pay the filing fee.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnJanuary 16, 2026
- Illegal charges or collection
The tenant withdrew their application claiming the landlord collected or retained money illegally, and the Landlord and Tenant Board closed the file.
- The Tenant's application was withdrawn and the file is closed.
- Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord did not meet the Act's requirementsJanuary 16, 2026
- Persistent late payment
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy based on persistent late payment of rent. The tribunal dismissed the application because the notice of termination contained an incorrect termination date and was legally invalid.
- The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy is dismissed due to an invalid notice of termination.
- Decision against tenantJanuary 16, 2026
- Persistent late payment
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment of rent. The tribunal found the grounds proven but granted relief from eviction on condition that the tenant pay rent on time for 12 months and pay the filing fee.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- The tenant shall pay monthly rent on or before the first day of each month from February 1, 2026 to January 31, 2027 · to the landlord
- Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord did not meet the Act's requirementsJanuary 16, 2026
- Persistent late payment
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment of rent was dismissed because the required notice of termination was not included with the application.
- The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy is dismissed.
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · withdrawnJanuary 15, 2026
- Personal use eviction
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy for a purchaser's own use, but withdrew the application at the hearing. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.
- The landlord's application is withdrawn and the file is closed.
LTB-L-080587-25 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardLMMD Inc., LMMD Property ManagementRead the order (PDF) - Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord did not meet the Act's requirementsJanuary 15, 2026
- Personal use eviction
The landlords' application to end the tenancy for personal use was dismissed because the termination date on the notice was invalid.
- The Landlords' application is dismissed because the notice of termination does not comply with section 48(2) of the Act.
23 Tall Pines Trail, East Gwillimbury
LTB-L-073018-25 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyJanuary 15, 2026
- Persistent late payment
The landlord and tenant resolved the application on consent, agreeing that the tenancy continues on condition that the tenant pays monthly rent on time through January 31, 2027, and reimburses the filing fee.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Tenancy continues on condition that the tenant pays full monthly rent on or before the first day of each month from February 1, 2026 to January 31, 2027 · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantJanuary 15, 2026$2,116 Deposit returned
- Persistent late payment
The landlord's application was granted to terminate the tenancy due to persistent late payment of rent. The tenant was ordered to vacate the unit and pay outstanding compensation and costs.
- Deposit returned · $2,116
- Arrears · $2,426 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyJanuary 14, 2026$4,795 Deposit returned
- Rent deposit disputes
- Illegal charges or collection
The parties reached a consent agreement resolving the tenant's application for the return of money. The landlord agreed to pay the tenant $4,929.44 covering the last month's rent deposit, accrued interest, and the application fee.
- Deposit returned · $4,795
- Deposit returned · $86
- Filing fee · $48
- Decision against tenantJanuary 14, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Personal use eviction
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy for non-payment of rent and for personal use by their son. The tribunal granted the application, terminated the tenancy, and ordered the tenant to pay $21,389.03 in rent arrears and application fees.
- Arrears · $21,203 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Decision against landlordJanuary 14, 2026$470
- Illegal charges or collection
The tribunal found that the landlord illegally demanded and collected a $470 fee from the tenant to allow him to retrieve his possessions after vacating. The landlord was ordered to repay the $470 fee plus the $48 application fee.
- Filing fee · $48
- repayment of illegal charge collected to retrieve possessions · $470
- Decision against tenantJanuary 13, 2026
- Persistent late payment
The landlord established grounds to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment of rent. The tribunal granted relief from eviction on condition that the tenants pay rent on time each month for 12 months and reimburse the landlord's application filing fee.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord's grounds were not provedJanuary 13, 2026
- Substantial interference
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and recover expenses based on an N5 notice alleging the tenant smoked cigarettes in the rental unit. The tribunal dismissed the application because the tenant voided the notice by not repeating the conduct during the statutory seven-day correction period.
- The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy, evict the Tenant, and collect out-of-pocket expenses is dismissed.
- Decision against landlordJanuary 13, 2026$875 Deposit returned
- Rent deposit disputes
- Illegal charges or collection
The tenant applied for the return of their rent deposit after the landlord refused to apply it to the final month's rent and failed to refund it. The tribunal granted the application and ordered the landlord to repay the deposit along with the tenant's filing fee.
- Deposit returned · $875
- Filing fee · $48
- Decision against tenantJanuary 13, 2026
- Persistent late payment
The landlord's application was granted to terminate the tenancy due to persistent late payment of rent. The tenant was ordered to vacate by January 31, 2026, and to reimburse the landlord's $186 filing fee.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
LTB-L-087564-25 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardOne225 York Mills Apartments LimitedRead the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantLandlord's application dismissed · a procedural barJanuary 13, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Personal use eviction
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for personal use was dismissed due to an unsigned notice. However, the landlord's non-payment of rent application was granted, ordering the tenant to pay arrears or face eviction.
- Arrears · $21,203 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- The L2 application is dismissed due to the invalid N12 notice of termination.
- Daily compensation for use of the rental unit starting December 18, 2025 until the tenant moves out · $30 · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantJanuary 12, 2026
- Persistent late payment
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy due to persistent late payment of rent. The tribunal found the grounds proven and ordered the tenancy terminated with eviction.
- Tenancy terminated and tenants ordered to vacate the rental unit on or before January 23, 2026 · to the landlord
LTB-L-089712-25 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardB.P.M. (Mill St.) Developments LimitedRead the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantJanuary 9, 2026
- Personal use eviction
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy for purchaser's own use so the purchasers' son could occupy the rental home. The tribunal found the application was made in good faith and ordered the tenancy terminated with an eviction date postponed to February 20, 2026.
- Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord was in serious breachJanuary 9, 2026
- Personal use eviction
- Rent increase disputes
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancies for personal use by the landlord's son. The tribunal dismissed the application because it was brought in retaliation after the tenants refused an illegal rent increase.
- The Landlord's application is dismissed.
- Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord was in serious breachJanuary 9, 2026
- Personal use eviction
- Bad faith eviction
- Rent increase disputes
- Tenant rights
The landlord applied to evict the tenants for personal use by her son, but the tribunal dismissed the application because it was brought in retaliation for the tenants refusing an illegal rent increase.
- The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenants is dismissed under section 83(3)(c) of the Act.
- Decision against landlordLandlord's application dismissed · not provedJanuary 9, 2026
- Persistent late payment
- Renovation and demolition
The tribunal dismissed the landlord's application to evict the tenants for demolition, granting discretionary relief from eviction, and ordered that the tenancy continue on condition that the tenants pay rent on time for 12 months. The tenants were ordered to reimburse the landlord's $186 application filing fee.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- The tenancy continues on condition that the tenants pay monthly rent on or before the first day of each month from February 1, 2026 to January 31, 2027
- The landlord's N13 demolition application is dismissed
- Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord did not meet the Act's requirementsJanuary 9, 2026
- Personal use eviction
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for a caregiver's personal use was dismissed. The landlord failed to comply with statutory disclosure requirements by omitting a prior notice of termination given within the past two years.
- The Landlord's application is dismissed for failure to comply with section 71.1(3) disclosure requirements.
- No finding against either partyJanuary 9, 2026
- Substantial interference
- Safety concerns
The landlord's eviction application was resolved by a consent order allowing the tenancy to continue on conditions. The tenant agreed to keep the dog leashed and muzzled in common areas, stop the dog from urinating on the balcony, and reimburse the landlord's application fee.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Tenancy continues on condition that the tenant keeps the dog leashed and muzzled in common areas and stops the dog from urinating on the balcony, failing which the landlord may apply under section 78 within 30 days to terminate and evict. · to the landlord
LTB-L-044509-25 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardToronto Community Housing CorporationRead the order (PDF) - Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord was in serious breachJanuary 9, 2026
- Personal use eviction
- Bad faith eviction
- Rent increase disputes
- Tenant rights
The tribunal dismissed the landlord's application to evict the tenants for personal use. Eviction was refused because the landlord brought the application in retaliation for the tenants refusing an illegal rent increase.
- The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenants is dismissed pursuant to section 83(3)(c) of the Act.
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · nobody attendedJanuary 8, 2026
- Safety concerns
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for safety concerns was dismissed as abandoned after neither party attended the hearing.
- The Landlord's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.
- Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord did not meet the Act's requirementsJanuary 8, 2026
- Persistent late payment
- Substantial interference
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy based on N5 and N8 notices was dismissed. The tribunal found both notices of termination to be invalid.
- The Landlord's application is dismissed.
- Decision against tenantJanuary 8, 2026$2,000 Deposit returned
- Non-payment of rent
- Persistent late payment
- Substantial interference
- Utility costs
The tribunal terminated the tenancy as of the date the tenants moved out and ordered them to pay $4,102.22 for outstanding rent, unpaid utilities, and filing costs, after crediting their rent deposit and interest.
- Deposit returned · $2,000
- Deposit returned · $50
- Arrears · $5,500 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Unpaid utility costs · $466 · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantJanuary 8, 2026
- Personal use eviction
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for personal use was granted. The tenants were ordered to vacate the rental unit by January 31, 2026.
- The tenancy is terminated and the tenants must vacate the rental unit on or before January 31, 2026. · to the landlord
LTB-L-073367-25 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord did not meet the Act's requirementsJanuary 7, 2026
- Property damage
- Safety concerns
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and collect repair costs for alleged impaired safety and property damage. The Landlord and Tenant Board dismissed the application because the notice of termination lacked sufficient detail.
- The Landlord's application is dismissed because the N7 notice of termination was deficient in detail.
- Decision against landlordJanuary 7, 2026$2,238 Rent abatement
- Maintenance issues
The tenants applied for an abatement after the building's shared washer and dryer remained broken for more than 17 months. The Landlord and Tenant Board found the landlord breached its maintenance obligations and ordered it to pay the tenants $2,237.84 in rent abatement plus $48.00 for the filing fee.
- Rent abatement · $2,238
- Filing fee · $48
- Decision against tenantJanuary 7, 2026
- Personal use eviction
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy for personal use (N12). The Landlord and Tenant Board found the landlord had a good faith intention to occupy the unit and ordered the tenant evicted with compensation.
- Compensation for use and occupation of the rental unit from November 1, 2025 to December 3, 2025 · $1,296 · to the landlord
- Daily compensation of $39.26 per day from December 4, 2025 until the tenant vacates · to the landlord
- Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord's grounds were not provedJanuary 7, 2026
- Personal use eviction
- Bad faith eviction
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy for purchaser's own use. The tribunal dismissed the application because the landlord failed to prove the purchaser had a good faith intention to occupy the rental unit.
- The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant is dismissed.
- No finding against either partyJanuary 7, 2026
- Safety concerns
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for impaired safety was resolved by a consent order. The tenancy continues on the condition that the tenant keeps the hydro account current to maintain connected fire alarms.
- The tenancy continues on condition that the tenant keeps the London Hydro Inc. account current to ensure hydro is connected at all times; the landlord may apply under section 78 without notice if breached · to the landlord
LTB-L-078425-25 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardLondon and Middlesex Community HousingRead the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantJanuary 6, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Persistent late payment
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment of rent and non-payment was granted. The tenants were ordered to vacate by January 17, 2026, and pay $8,818.35 in rent arrears and filing costs.
- Arrears · $8,632 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Daily compensation for use of the rental unit until vacated · $47 · to the landlord
LTB-L-077234-25 · L1;L2Landlord and Tenant BoardBloom Property Management, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord did not meet the Act's requirementsJanuary 6, 2026
- Illegal act
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for an alleged illegal act was dismissed because the N6 notice of termination lacked required dates, times, and specific details.
- The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant is dismissed due to an invalid N6 notice.
- Decision against tenantJanuary 6, 2026
- Property damage
The landlord applied for eviction and compensation for property damage. Because the tenants had already moved out under a prior order, the tribunal addressed only the damage claim, ordering the tenants to pay $15,689.52.
- Damages · $15,690 · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantJanuary 6, 2026
- Persistent late payment
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment of rent. The tribunal found the grounds proved but granted conditional relief from eviction, requiring the tenant to pay rent on time for 12 months.
- The tenancy continues on condition that the tenant pay full monthly rent on or before the first day of each month from January 1, 2026 to December 31, 2026; failure to comply permits the landlord to apply under section 78 for eviction without notice. · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantJanuary 6, 2026$2,400 Deposit returned
- Non-payment of rent
- Property damage
- Persistent late payment
The landlord's application was granted after the tenants vacated the unit. The tribunal terminated the tenancy as of the vacate date and ordered the tenants to pay rent arrears, filing costs, and repair damages.
- Deposit returned · $2,400
- Arrears · $5,292 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Damages · $15,820 · to the landlord
- Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord did not meet the Act's requirementsJanuary 5, 2026
- Safety concerns
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for impaired safety was dismissed because the N7 notice of termination lacked sufficient detail.
- The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant is dismissed due to an invalid and deficient N7 notice.