Anthony Bruno

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for non-payment of rent was granted. The tenant was ordered to pay $1,947.00 by January 31, 2026, to void the eviction order and continue the tenancy.

• Arrears · $1,761 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Substantial interference
• Utility costs

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy for substantial interference and recover unpaid utilities. The tribunal granted relief from eviction, ordering the tenancy to continue on condition that the tenant pay $1,817.00 in utility expenses and pay future utilities on time.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Tenant to pay landlord out-of-pocket utility expenses · $1,817 · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues
• Illegal entry
• Vital services
• Rent reduction
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging harassment, illegal entry, maintenance issues, and reduction of services was dismissed. The tribunal denied the tenant's adjournment request and dismissed the application because the tenant failed to comply with an interim disclosure order and presented no evidence.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed.

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant due to rent arrears. The tribunal ordered the tenancy terminated with eviction postponed to January 31, 2026, granting the tenant the opportunity to void the order by paying the arrears.

• Deposit returned · $121
• Deposit returned · $2
• Arrears · $5,237 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues
• Illegal entry
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging illegal entry, substantial interference, and maintenance failure was dismissed as abandoned after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Property damage
• Persistent late payment
• Substantial interference

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenants due to substantial interference, severe property damage caused by an excessive number of cats, and persistent late payment of rent. The tribunal terminated the tenancy, postponed eviction to January 31, 2026, and ordered the tenants to pay $50,186.00 for damages, compensation, and the filing fee.

• Damages · $50,000 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord's application was granted. The tenancy was terminated as of the date the tenant vacated, and the tenant was ordered to pay outstanding rent arrears and costs after deducting the rent deposit and deposit interest.

• Deposit returned · $1,860
• Deposit returned · $35
• Arrears · $14,880 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord's application for eviction and rent arrears was dismissed because the N4 notice of termination was defective and failed to clearly state the rental periods and amounts owing.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed due to a defective N4 notice.

Unit 823, 250 Manitoba Street, Toronto

• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenants withdrew their application regarding harassment and substantial interference, and the Board closed the file.

• The tenant's application was withdrawn and the file is closed.

• Non-payment of rent

The tribunal found the tenants jointly liable for rent arrears under a single joint tenancy. The tenancy was terminated as of the date the rental unit was vacated, and the tenants were ordered to pay the outstanding rent arrears and application fee after deducting the deposit and interest.

• Deposit returned · $3,100
• Deposit returned · $16
• Arrears · $6,506 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant for substantial interference and property damage, seeking $2,000 for repair costs. The tribunal dismissed the application because the notice of termination was voided and the landlord failed to prove the damage claim.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed.

Basement, 107 Tourmaline Drive, Toronto

• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment was dismissed. The tribunal denied an adjournment request and dismissed the matter after the tenant failed to upload evidence or comply with an interim disclosure order.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed for failure to comply with disclosure deadlines in the interim order and failure to advance the application.

• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The tribunal terminated the tenancy and ordered the tenant evicted for causing property damage when police had to break down the door after the tenant barricaded themselves inside. The tenant was also ordered to pay repair costs and compensation for use and occupation of the rental unit.

• Damages · $1,921 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Compensation for the use and occupation of the unit from August 1, 2025 to October 16, 2025 · $5,177 · to the landlord

• Property damage
• Safety concerns

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant based on an N7 notice alleging safety impairment and property damage. The tribunal dismissed the application because the landlord failed to provide sufficient evidence, specific dates, or corroboration to prove the allegations.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant is dismissed.

Unit 220, 640 Hillview Road, Cambridge

• Substantial interference

The landlord's eviction application was dismissed because neither party attended the hearing, leading the tribunal to consider the matter abandoned.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed as abandoned.

• Non-payment of rent
• Property damage

The landlord's application for rent arrears and damage costs against the former tenants was dismissed as abandoned because neither party attended the hearing.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed as abandoned.

• Non-payment of rent

The tribunal ordered the tenancy terminated for non-payment of rent unless the tenants pay the outstanding arrears and costs by January 18, 2026. If the order is not voided, the tenants must vacate and pay the outstanding balance after deducting the rent deposit and interest.

• Deposit returned · $1,599
• Deposit returned · $17
• Arrears · $4,850 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Daily compensation for use of the unit starting August 2, 2025 until the tenants vacate · $53 · to the landlord

• Unauthorized occupants
• Substantial interference
• Utility costs

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant, but failed to attend the hearing. The Board found the application abandoned and dismissed it.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed as abandoned.

• Illegal act
• Unauthorized occupants
• Breach of conditions

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy was granted after finding the tenants knowingly misrepresented their income, property ownership, and household occupants for subsidized housing. The tenants were ordered to vacate the unit and pay $50,000.00 in compensation for misrepresented income plus daily compensation and the filing fee.

• Damages · $50,000 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Compensation for the use of the unit from May 15, 2025, to October 16, 2025 · $10,681 · to the landlord
• Daily compensation starting October 17, 2025, until the unit is vacated · $69 · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tribunal dismissed the tenants' maintenance application regarding flooring and dishwasher issues, finding that the landlord acted reasonably and that the tenants failed to establish any breach.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as the alleged maintenance breaches were not proved.

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord's application was granted in part, ordering the tenant to pay $1,807.90 in rent arrears plus the $186.00 filing fee. The Board granted relief from eviction on condition that the tenant pays the arrears in monthly instalments through December 2026 alongside regular rent.

• Arrears · $1,808 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Whether the Act applies

The Landlord and Tenant Board determined that the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 does not apply to the property because its predominant purpose is agricultural and business-related.

• Order declaring that the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 does not apply pursuant to section 5(j) · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Substantial interference
• Utility costs

The landlord's application was granted. The tribunal ordered the tenancy terminated with eviction scheduled for January 18, 2026 unless the tenant voids the order by paying the outstanding rent arrears and application fee, and ordered the tenant to pay rent arrears, daily compensation, and unpaid utility expenses.

• Arrears · $18,830 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
• Damages · $1,293 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant for non-payment of rent. The tribunal ordered eviction and payment of arrears, with the eviction being voidable if the tenant pays the required amount by January 18, 2026.

• Arrears · $3,918 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Daily compensation for use and occupation starting August 2, 2025 until vacating · $18 · to the landlord

• Utility costs

The landlord applied to recover utility expenses from the tenant using an L2 application. The tribunal dismissed the application because the tenant had already vacated the unit prior to or on the date of filing, requiring the claim to be pursued through an L10 application instead.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed without prejudice as improperly filed under section 88.2.

• Substantial interference
• Breach of conditions

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant for substantial interference, alleging the tenant failed to provide proof of insurance required by the lease. The tribunal dismissed the application because the landlord presented insufficient evidence and no firsthand witnesses.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and for compensation is dismissed for lack of proof.

Apartment 1205, 235 Rebecca Street, Hamilton

• Substantial interference

The landlord's eviction application was dismissed as abandoned because neither party attended the hearing.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Personal use eviction

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for personal use by their child was granted. The tribunal postponed eviction to March 31, 2026, to allow the tenant time to secure alternative housing.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Property damage
• Persistent late payment
• Renovation and demolition
• Substantial interference
• Safety concerns

The landlord's application for rent arrears and eviction was granted, while the landlord's claims to terminate the tenancy on other grounds were dismissed.

• Arrears · $16,900 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Landlord's L2 application (N5, N7, N8, and N13) dismissed

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord's application to collect rent and daily compensation from former tenants was dismissed as abandoned because neither party attended the hearing.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Non-payment of rent
• Unauthorized occupants
• Substantial interference
• Utility costs

The tribunal terminated the tenancy effective October 20, 2025, and ordered the tenants to pay $2,552.44 for outstanding utility costs plus the $186 application filing fee. The landlord withdrew its application regarding rent arrears.

• Damages · $2,552 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Landlord's L1 application withdrawn

• Illegal entry
• Harassment
• Substantial interference
• Whether the Act applies

The tenant applied alleging illegal entry, harassment, and substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment. The tribunal dismissed the application for lack of jurisdiction because the tenant shared kitchen and bathroom facilities with the landlord.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction under section 5(i) of the Act.

• Substantial interference
• Safety concerns

The tenant's application alleging substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment was dismissed. The tribunal found the tenant's safety concerns and vehicle theft stemmed from third-party criminal activity outside the landlord's control.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed.