Sandra Macchione

• Tenant rights
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging that the landlord substantially interfered with reasonable enjoyment by failing to address noise from a neighbouring unit was dismissed. The tribunal found that the landlord took reasonable steps to investigate and that the noise did not exceed ordinary daily living.

• The tenant's application alleging substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment is dismissed because the allegations were not proved. · to the landlord

• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging harassment and substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment was dismissed. The tribunal found that the tenant failed to prove the landlord stole or damaged a camera, made false police reports, or engaged in harassment.

• The tenant's T2 application is dismissed because the claims were not proved on the merits. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Rent deposit disputes

The landlord's application for rent arrears was granted. The tenants were ordered to pay the outstanding rent and application fee, less the held rent deposit and accrued deposit interest.

• Deposit returned · $3,900
• Deposit returned · $192
• Arrears · $11,993 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The tribunal determined that the tenants abandoned their request to amend an earlier consent order after failing to attend the hearing. The stay was cancelled, leaving the original order in full effect.

• The stay of order LTB-L-102510-24-AM-IN is cancelled and order LTB-L-102510-24 remains in effect · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues
• Illegal entry
• Vital services
• Substantial interference
• Safety concerns

The tenant's application alleging maintenance issues, lack of heat, and illegal entry was dismissed. The tribunal found that the claims were either out of time or not proven on a balance of probabilities.

• The tenant's application regarding vital services, maintenance obligations, and tenant rights is dismissed as unproven and partly out of time. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The Board cancelled a previous consent order on its own review after finding it was issued to the wrong parties due to an administrative error. The landlord's application was closed because the application fee was never paid.

• Order LTB-L-000137-25 issued on March 4, 2026 is cancelled due to administrative error
• The Landlord's application file is closed because the application was incomplete and the filing fee was not paid

• Personal use eviction

The landlord's personal use application was resolved by a consent order agreed to by both parties. The tenancy will terminate on June 28, 2026, with the last month's rent deposit applied to the final rental period.

• Personal use eviction

The landlord withdrew the application to end the tenancy for personal use because the tenant had already vacated the rental unit. The tribunal closed the file.

• Personal use eviction

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for personal use was dismissed because the landlord failed to pay the required one month's rent compensation by the termination date.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant is dismissed.

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The parties agreed on a consent order establishing a monthly payment plan for the tenant to repay $9,974.00 in rent arrears and previous filing costs.

• Arrears · $9,974 · to the landlord

• Personal use eviction

The landlord withdrew the application to terminate the tenancy for personal use because the tenants had already vacated. The Landlord and Tenant Board closed the file.

• Personal use eviction

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for personal use was granted. The tribunal found the landlord requires the rental unit in good faith to create a single-family home, and ordered the tenancy terminated with eviction enforcement if necessary.

• Property damage

The tribunal ordered the former tenants to pay the landlord $1,320.00 for damage to walls, plus the application filing fee.

• Damages · $1,320 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Property damage
• Utility costs

The landlord's application against the former tenants was granted in part. The former tenants were ordered to pay $533.99 for unpaid utility costs, refrigerator damage, and the application filing fee, while the landlord's claim for rent arrears was dismissed.

• Damages · $250 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Outstanding electricity and water utility costs · $98 · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tribunal denied the tenant's request for review of a prior order regarding maintenance obligations. The original order remains confirmed and unchanged.

• The tenant's request to review order LTB-T-033525-25 was denied and the original order was confirmed. · to the landlord

• Renovation and demolition
• Substantial interference

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy was dismissed. The tribunal found the N5 notice was void because the landlord required vacant possession for extensive renovations rather than serving the proper notice under section 50 of the Act.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy is dismissed

• Property damage
• Illegal act
• Substantial interference
• Safety concerns

The tribunal dismissed the landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and claim for repair costs. The landlord failed to prove that the tenant caused undue damage to the kitchen countertop.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and for compensation for damage is dismissed as the grounds were not proven.

• Maintenance issues

The tenant withdrew their application regarding maintenance obligations, and the tribunal closed the file.

• The Tenant's application was withdrawn and the file closed.

• Substantial interference
• Breach of conditions
• Utility costs

The tribunal dismissed the landlord's request for eviction due to a premature and invalid notice, but granted the landlord's claim for unpaid utility expenses, ordering the tenants to pay $2,618.26 plus the filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• The landlord's application for eviction is dismissed because the N5 notice was invalid and filed after the application.
• Reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the landlord for unpaid electricity costs · $2,618 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Property damage
• Substantial interference
• Utility costs

The tribunal ordered the former tenants to pay the landlord $18,710.03 for rent arrears and unpaid utility charges after crediting deposit interest, plus $186.00 for the application fee.

• Arrears · $17,826 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Out-of-pocket utility costs for hot water tank rental and EVR charges · $884 · to the landlord

• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging substantial interference was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Illegal entry

The tenant's application alleging illegal entry was dismissed as abandoned after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned after the Tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• Substantial interference

The tenants withdrew their application regarding substantial interference because the issues were resolved. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.

• The Tenant's application is withdrawn and the file is closed.

• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Rent reduction
• Substantial interference

The parties agreed on consent to convert the application to a rent reduction claim and reduce the lawful monthly rent by $50.00 to $817.59 due to the discontinuation of the deck.

• The Landlord shall reduce the monthly rent charge by $50.00 starting March 1, 2026 rent period · $50

• Non-payment of rent
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The landlord's eviction application for non-payment of rent was discontinued and dismissed after the tenant paid all arrears and fees. The tenant's request to review the earlier dismissal of their withdrawn tenant-rights application was denied.

• Landlord's application LTB-L-066911-22 to terminate the tenancy and evict for rent arrears is discontinued and dismissed as all arrears and fees were paid.
• Tenant's request to review order LTB-T-056210-22-AM is denied and the withdrawal of the tenant's application is confirmed.

• Non-payment of rent
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The landlord's eviction application for non-payment of rent was dismissed because the tenant paid all outstanding arrears and costs. The tenant's request to review the dismissal of their tenant-rights application was denied as the tenant had previously withdrawn it.

• Landlord's application LTB-L-066911-22 is discontinued and dismissed
• Tenant's request to review the dismissal of application LTB-T-056210-22 is denied

• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment was dismissed as abandoned because the tenant did not attend the hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The parties resolved the application on consent, agreeing to terminate the tenancy on March 31, 2026, with the landlord paying the tenant $23,820.00. The tenant's request to review an earlier order was dismissed following withdrawal.

• Landlord shall pay the Tenant $23,820.00 in guaranteed funds on or before March 31, 2026 or upon vacancy · $23,820
• Landlord shall apply the last month rent deposit to the Tenant's March 2026 rent charges
• The Tenant's request to review order LTB-L-076740-25 is dismissed

• Non-payment of rent
• Rent increase disputes
• Illegal charges or collection
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tribunal dismissed the landlord's eviction application because the notice for non-payment of rent contained serious errors and was void. The tribunal also dismissed the tenant's application concerning rent-geared-to-income calculations, harassment, and reasonable enjoyment.

• The Landlord's L1 application to terminate the tenancy and evict for non-payment of rent is dismissed.
• The Tenant's T2 application regarding tenant rights, harassment, and interference is dismissed.

110 Unity Road, Toronto

• Illegal entry

The parties resolved the tenant's application regarding alleged illegal entry through a consent order requiring the landlord to pay the tenant $500.00.

• Damages · $500

• Harassment
• Substantial interference
• Safety concerns

The parties reached a comprehensive consent agreement resolving the tenant's rights application and the review of the landlord's eviction application. On consent, the tenancy is terminated effective March 31, 2026, and the landlord is ordered to pay the tenant $23,820.00.

• The Landlord shall pay the Tenant $23,820.00 in guaranteed funds on or before March 31, 2026 or upon vacancy. · $23,820
• The Landlord shall apply the last month rent deposit to the Tenant's March 2026 rent charges.
• The request to review order LTB-L-076740-25 is dismissed on consent.

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord's application was granted. The tenancy was terminated effective April 30, 2024, and the tenants were ordered to pay $12,086.00 for rent arrears and filing costs.

• Arrears · $11,900 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenants' application alleging harassment and substantial interference by the landlord was dismissed. The tribunal found that the tenants failed to prove their claims on a balance of probabilities.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed because the allegations were not proved.

• Maintenance issues
• Illegal charges or collection
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The landlord and the tenant resolved the tenant's applications on consent. The landlord agreed to pay the tenant $870.50 in full settlement of all tenancy issues.

• The Landlord shall pay the Tenant $870.50 on or before March 1, 2026, to settle all tenancy issues. · $871

• Substantial interference

The tribunal granted conditional relief from eviction, ordering the tenant to remove an unauthorized shipping container from the property by May 31, 2026. If the tenant fails to remove it by that date, the landlord may apply to terminate the tenancy and evict.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Tenant shall remove the shipping container off the Landlord's property on or before May 31, 2026 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The tribunal denied the tenant's request to review an earlier eviction and rent arrears order, confirming the original decision.

• Arrears · to the landlord

• The Tenant's request to review order LTB-L-079929-25 is denied and the order is confirmed.

• Non-payment of rent

The tenants' request to review a previous eviction order was denied because they failed to demonstrate a serious error or that they were prevented from attending the hearing. The original eviction order for non-payment of rent, terminating the tenancy and ordering payment of arrears, was confirmed.

• Deposit returned · $2,100
• Deposit returned · $320
• Arrears · $7,303 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Tenants' request to review order LTB-L-079620-25 denied and dismissed

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed because it was filed after the one-year statutory limitation period had expired.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as it was filed outside the one-year limitation period.

• Maintenance issues

The landlord's request to review an earlier order regarding the tenant's maintenance application was denied after one of the landlords failed to attend the review hearing. The earlier order was confirmed unchanged, but its substantive outcome is not disclosed in this decision.

• The landlord's request to review order LTB-T-067228-24 is denied and abandoned.

Unit 2, 5 Daphne Crescent, Barrie

• Maintenance issues
• Safety concerns

The landlord's request to review an earlier order was denied after the landlord failed to attend the review hearing. Because the decision does not disclose the terms or outcome of the earlier order, the final substantive outcome is unclear.

• The landlord's request to review order LTB-T-041876-24 is denied and the order of December 17, 2025 remains confirmed and unchanged.

Unit 2, 5 Daphne Crescent, Barrie

• Non-payment of rent

The tenant's request to review an eviction order was denied, confirming the original order terminating the tenancy for rent arrears and awarding the landlord arrears and costs.

• Arrears · $5,586 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tenants' request to review an order upholding an eviction order was denied after the tenants failed to attend the hearing. The stay of eviction was lifted and the previous order stands.

• The request to review order LTB-L-096811-25-SA is denied and the order is confirmed.
• The stay of order LTB-L-096811-25 is lifted immediately. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The tenant's review request was granted and the previous eviction order was cancelled. On consent of both parties, the tenancy was ordered terminated on February 28, 2026, unless the tenant pays $3,470.00 to void the order and continue the tenancy.

• Arrears · $3,284 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The tenants requested a review of an order terminating the tenancy and ordering rent arrears, claiming they did not receive the notice of hearing due to mailbox issues. The tribunal denied the review request and confirmed the original order.

• Arrears · to the landlord

• Tenants' request to review order LTB-L-087917-25 is denied and the original order is confirmed