Ontario Landlord and Tenant Board
Robert Patchett
Vice ChairLandlord and Tenant BoardOntarioBeta
Rulings, compared with the board
About the board's rate against tenantsDecided against tenants about as often as the board does on comparable applications, across 153 contested orders.
Orders are grouped by who applied and what they applied for, and this member’s record is compared with the board’s on that same mix. Withdrawn, settled and non-attendance dismissals are excluded. It measures how these decisions differ from the board’s on cases of the same type.
Dismissals, compared with the board
Bars landlords 2.04× as often as tenantsDismissed landlords' applications as not proved, out of jurisdiction or barred on procedure 2.04× as often as tenants', relative to the board's rate on comparable applications (95% interval 1.35–3.13), across 24 such dismissals of landlords' applications and 13 of tenants'.
Counts only dismissals the member ruled on — not proved, outside the board’s jurisdiction, or barred on procedure. Applications withdrawn, settled or dismissed because nobody attended are excluded, as they are above. The two sides are compared on this member’s own docket, against the board’s rate on the same kinds of application. It does not measure whether any decision was right.
Orders
Showing 201–210 of 210- No finding against either partyJanuary 13, 2026$2,000
- Lockout and illegal eviction
- Tenant rights
- Substantial interference
The tenant's rights application was resolved by a consent order between the parties. Under the agreed terms, the mortgagee-in-possession agreed to pay the tenant $2,000.00 to settle all claims.
- Tribecca Capital Corporation shall pay $2,000.00 to the tenant pursuant to the consent agreement · $2,000
- Interim preservation order issued November 21, 2025 is cancelled
LTB-T-096653-25 · T2Landlord and Tenant BoardTribecca Capital Corp c/o MFS Property Services Inc., Sign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · nothing left to decideJanuary 8, 2026
- Personal use eviction
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy for personal use. Because the tenants had already moved out, the tribunal dismissed the application as moot.
- The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenants is dismissed as moot.
- Decision against tenantJanuary 8, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for non-payment of rent was granted. The tenant was ordered to pay outstanding rent arrears and application costs, or vacate the rental unit by January 19, 2026.
- Arrears · $21,320 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Daily compensation for use and occupation of the rental unit starting December 19, 2025 until the tenant vacates · $79 · to the landlord
- Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord did not meet the Act's requirementsJanuary 7, 2026
- Personal use eviction
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for personal use was dismissed. The tribunal found that the landlord could not read English and had filed an English-only declaration without a certified translation, meaning the application could not proceed.
- The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant is dismissed.
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedJanuary 7, 2026
- Maintenance issues
- Substantial interference
The tenant's applications regarding maintenance issues and substantial interference were dismissed for lack of proof.
- The Tenant's T2 and T6 applications are dismissed as not proved.
LTB-T-067787-23 · T2;T6Landlord and Tenant BoardVJ Property Inc, TK Property ManagementRead the order (PDF) - Decision against landlordLandlord's application dismissed · a procedural barJanuary 6, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord's application to collect rent arrears and compensation from former tenants was dismissed. The tribunal found that the landlord failed to serve the notice of hearing on the former tenants as required by law.
- The Landlord's application is dismissed.
- Decision against tenantJanuary 6, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy was granted after the tenant failed to meet the payment conditions of a previous order. The tenant was ordered to vacate the unit by January 17, 2026, and pay $11,862.78 in rent arrears plus daily compensation.
- Arrears · $11,863 · to the landlord
- Daily compensation for use and occupation of the rental unit starting January 7, 2026 until vacating · $44 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · nobody attendedJanuary 6, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord's application to collect rent arrears and compensation from the former tenant was dismissed because neither party attended the hearing.
- The Landlord's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.
- Decision against tenantJanuary 5, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The landlord's section 78 application was granted ex parte after the tenant breached the payment conditions of a previous order. The tenancy was terminated and the tenant was ordered to pay rent arrears and daily compensation.
- Arrears · $6,110 · to the landlord
- Daily compensation of $92.81 per day starting January 6, 2026 until the tenant vacates · to the landlord
- Decision against landlordLandlord's application dismissed · a procedural barJanuary 5, 2026
- Property damage
The landlord's application for property damage against the former tenants was dismissed because the landlord failed to serve the notice of hearing.
- The Landlord's application is dismissed for failure to serve the Notice of Hearing on the Former Tenants.