Renterly

Ontario Landlord and Tenant Board

Renée Lang

Vice ChairLandlord and Tenant BoardOntarioBeta

Orders listed18533 against the landlord
Awarded to tenants$167,133avg $903
Awarded to landlords$284,266avg $1,537
Fines to the board$0none ordered
Applications dismissed91grounds on each order

Rulings, compared with the board

1.30× the board's rate against tenants

Decided against tenants more often than the board does on comparable applications — 1.30× the board's rate (95% interval 1.15–1.45), across 173 contested orders.

Orders are grouped by who applied and what they applied for, and this member’s record is compared with the board’s on that same mix. Withdrawn, settled and non-attendance dismissals are excluded. It measures how these decisions differ from the board’s on cases of the same type.

Dismissals, compared with the board

Bars tenants and landlords about as often

Dismissed tenants' and landlords' applications as not proved, out of jurisdiction or barred on procedure at rates that do not differ once the kind of application is accounted for, across 53 such dismissals of tenants' applications and 26 of landlords'.

Counts only dismissals the member ruled on — not proved, outside the board’s jurisdiction, or barred on procedure. Applications withdrawn, settled or dismissed because nobody attended are excluded, as they are above. The two sides are compared on this member’s own docket, against the board’s rate on the same kinds of application. It does not measure whether any decision was right.

Orders

Showing 101–150 of 185
  • Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedMarch 18, 2026
    • Non-payment of rent
    • Whether the Act applies

    The tribunal denied the tenant's review request without a hearing, confirming the previous order that terminated the tenancy and ordered the tenant to pay rent arrears.

    LTB-L-078844-25 · L1Landlord and Tenant Board1000 Elgin East Inc.Read the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantMarch 17, 2026
    • Non-payment of rent

    The tenant requested a review of an order terminating the tenancy for non-payment of rent, asserting they could not attend the hearing due to poor health. The tribunal denied the review request and confirmed the original order because the tenant failed to provide sufficient details explaining how their health prevented them from participating.

    LTB-L-107021-25 · L1Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantMarch 16, 2026
    • Non-payment of rent

    The tenant's request to review an earlier eviction order was denied, confirming the order that terminates the tenancy for non-payment of rent unless voided by payment.

    • Arrears · $4,763 · to the landlord
    • Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
    • Daily compensation of $79.66 for use of the rental unit starting February 24, 2026 until the tenant vacates · to the landlord
    LTB-L-101373-25 · L1Landlord and Tenant BoardMetCap Living Management Inc.Read the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantMarch 16, 2026
    • Non-payment of rent

    The tribunal denied the tenant's request for review, confirming the amended order that terminated the tenancy and ordered the tenant to pay $113.05.

    • Filing fee · $113 · to the landlord
    LTB-L-093520-25 · L1Landlord and Tenant BoardNovi PropertiesRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantMarch 13, 2026
    • Non-payment of rent
    • Persistent late payment

    The tenant's request to review the eviction order was denied, confirming the termination of the tenancy and eviction for persistent late payment and rent arrears. The tenant was ordered to pay the outstanding rent arrears, daily compensation, and the landlord's application filing fee.

    • Arrears · $5,639 · to the landlord
    • Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
    • Daily compensation of $108.39 starting February 27, 2026 until the tenant vacates the rental unit · to the landlord
    LTB-L-001683-26 · L1;L2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantMarch 13, 2026
    • Property damage

    The landlord's review request was denied, confirming the earlier order. Under the confirmed order, the tenant was granted conditional relief from eviction on terms requiring payment of $266.00 for door repairs and the application filing fee.

    • Damages · $80 · to the landlord
    • Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
    LTB-L-071483-25 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardPort Hope Non-Profit Housing CorporationRead the order (PDF)
  • No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMarch 13, 2026
    • Substantial interference

    The tenants' request to review a previous order was denied, confirming the dismissal of their application. The application had been dismissed as abandoned after the tenants failed to attend the hearing.

    • The Tenants' request to review order LTB-T-104444-24 is denied.
    • The Tenants' application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.
    LTB-T-104444-24 · T2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantMarch 12, 2026
    • Non-payment of rent

    The tenant's request for review was denied, confirming the original order that terminated the tenancy and ordered the tenant to pay outstanding rent arrears and costs.

    • Arrears · $30,786 · to the landlord
    • Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
    LTB-L-099234-25 · L1Landlord and Tenant BoardEaglehill Capital Inc.Read the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · a procedural barMarch 12, 2026
    • Maintenance issues
    • Illegal entry
    • Harassment
    • Substantial interference

    The tenant's request for review was denied, confirming the dismissal of the tenant's rights and maintenance applications. The applications were dismissed because the tenant failed to file and serve the required schedules detailing their claims.

    • The Tenant's request to review order LTB-T-053012-24 is denied and the earlier order is confirmed.
    • The Tenant's T2 and T6 applications are dismissed.
    LTB-T-053012-24 · T2;T6Landlord and Tenant BoardMaple Leaf Property ManagementRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantMarch 9, 2026
    • Non-payment of rent
    • Maintenance issues

    The tenant's request for review was denied, confirming the prior order terminating the tenancy for non-payment of rent. The tenant was ordered to pay rent arrears and daily compensation or vacate the unit.

    • Arrears · $8,197 · to the landlord
    • Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
    • Daily compensation of $55.89 per day starting February 26, 2026 until the tenant vacates · to the landlord
    LTB-L-106955-25 · L1Landlord and Tenant BoardRpms Property Management Services IncRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · outside the board's jurisdictionMarch 6, 2026
    • Harassment
    • Substantial interference
    • Whether the Act applies

    The tenant's request to review an earlier dismissal order was denied. The Board confirmed it lacks jurisdiction over the application because the tenant occupies a member unit of a non-profit housing co-operative.

    • The request to review order LTB-T-090220-25 is denied, confirming the dismissal of the tenant's application for lack of jurisdiction.
    LTB-T-090220-25 · T2Landlord and Tenant BoardThe Shefford Heritage Housing Co-operative Inc., Lsm Services, The Shefford Heritage Housing Co-perative Inc.Read the order (PDF)
  • Outcome unclearMarch 6, 2026
    • Property damage

    The landlord's request to review an earlier order regarding property damage claims against the former tenants was denied. The original order was confirmed and remains unchanged.

    • The Landlord's request to review order LTB-L-023513-25 is denied, and the order is confirmed and remains unchanged.
    LTB-L-023513-25 · L10Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · nobody attendedMarch 6, 2026
    • Non-payment of rent
    • Property damage

    The landlord's request to review an earlier order was denied because the landlord did not show they were unable to attend the hearing. The original order dismissing the landlord's applications stands.

    • The landlord's request to review order LTB-L-068653-25 is denied, confirming the original order dismissing the landlord's applications.
    LTB-L-068653-25 · L1;L2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against landlordLandlord's application dismissed · not provedMarch 5, 2026
    • Illegal entry
    • Substantial interference

    The landlord's request for review was denied, confirming the original order that found the residential complex is not a care home. As a result, the landlord must follow standard statutory notice rules before entering the rental unit.

    • The Landlord's request to review order LTB-T-057227-24 is denied and the order is confirmed unchanged.
    • The residential complex is determined not to be a care home, requiring the Landlord to comply with sections 26 and 27 of the Act when seeking entry.
    LTB-T-057227-24 · T2Landlord and Tenant BoardAbiona Centre For Infant and Early Mental HealthRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord did not meet the Act's requirementsMarch 5, 2026
    • Non-payment of rent

    The landlord's request to review an earlier order was denied. The underlying application to evict the tenant for non-payment of rent remains dismissed because the notice of termination was invalid.

    • The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and collect arrears is dismissed because the N4 notice was invalid due to an insufficient notice period.
    LTB-L-104804-25 · L1Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantMarch 4, 2026
    • Unauthorized occupants
    • Assignment or sublet

    The unauthorized occupant's request to review an earlier order was denied. The original order directing the unauthorized occupant to pay $7,995.02 in compensation to the landlord remains confirmed.

    • Damages · $7,995 · to the landlord
    • The unauthorized occupant's request to review order LTB-L-082843-23 is denied.
    LTB-L-082843-23 · A2Landlord and Tenant BoardGykan Enterprises Inc.Read the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantMarch 4, 2026
    • Non-payment of rent

    The tribunal denied the tenant's request for review, confirming the earlier order that terminated the tenancy for non-payment of rent. The tenant was ordered to pay outstanding rent arrears and application costs to void the eviction or upon vacating.

    • Arrears · $13,921 · to the landlord
    • Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
    • Daily compensation of $30.25 per day for use of the unit starting February 5, 2026 until the tenant moves out · to the landlord
    LTB-L-098823-25 · L1Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • Outcome unclearTenant's application dismissed · not provedMarch 4, 2026
    • Property damage

    The tenant requested a review of an earlier order resolving the landlord's property damage claim. The tribunal denied the review request, finding no serious error or admissible new evidence, and confirmed the earlier order.

    • The tenant's request to review order LTB-L-020804-25 is denied and the order is confirmed.
    LTB-L-020804-25 · L10Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantMarch 3, 2026$1,735 Deposit returned
    • Non-payment of rent

    The tribunal denied the tenant's request to review an eviction order for non-payment of rent, confirming the termination of the tenancy while temporarily staying enforcement until March 13, 2026.

    • Deposit returned · $1,735
    • Deposit returned · $81
    • Arrears · $9,759 · to the landlord
    • Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
    • The tenant's request to review order LTB-L-064319-25 is denied and the order is confirmed.
    • Daily compensation for occupation from December 17, 2025 until vacating. · $57 · to the landlord
    LTB-L-064319-25 · L1Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord did not meet the Act's requirementsMarch 3, 2026
    • Personal use eviction

    The landlord's request to review an earlier order dismissing their eviction application was denied. The original decision refusing eviction stands because the landlord failed to establish payment of the required statutory compensation.

    • The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant is dismissed

    240 Orton Park Road, Toronto

    LTB-L-068689-25 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against landlordMarch 3, 2026$6,500 Damages
    • Personal use eviction
    • Bad faith eviction

    The tribunal denied the landlord's review request and confirmed an earlier order finding that the landlord gave an N12 notice of termination in bad faith. The landlord was ordered to pay the tenant $12,048.00 in compensation for increased rent, moving costs, general compensation, and the application filing fee.

    • Damages · $6,500
    • Damages · $500
    • Damages · $5,000
    • Filing fee · $48

    Apartment PH1, 36 Hess Street South, Hamilton

    LTB-T-042932-25 · T5Landlord and Tenant BoardIntrilectual Investments Inc. c/o Pocrnic Realty Advisors Inc.Read the order (PDF)
  • Outcome unclearMarch 3, 2026
    • Non-payment of rent
    • Personal use eviction
    • Maintenance issues
    • Vital services
    • Harassment
    • Substantial interference

    The landlords' request for review of an earlier decision concerning eviction, rent arrears, and tenant rights applications was denied. Because the review order does not disclose the operative terms or findings of the confirmed order, the substantive outcome remains unclear.

    • The landlords' request to review order LTB-L-052212-24 is denied and the order is confirmed.
    LTB-T-021402-24 · T2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • Outcome unclearLandlord's application dismissed · not provedMarch 3, 2026
    • Non-payment of rent
    • Personal use eviction
    • Vital services
    • Harassment
    • Substantial interference

    The landlords' request to review an earlier Board order was denied after a preliminary review found no serious error in the order or proceedings. The underlying order was confirmed and remains unchanged.

    • The landlords' request to review order LTB-L-052212-24 is denied, and the order is confirmed and remains unchanged
    LTB-L-080094-23 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • Outcome unclearTenant's application dismissed · not provedMarch 3, 2026
    • Non-payment of rent
    • Maintenance issues
    • Harassment
    • Substantial interference

    The tenant requested a review of an earlier consent order resolving applications concerning rent arrears, maintenance, and tenant rights. The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the review request and confirmed the order.

    • The Tenant's request to review order LTB-T-092260-25/LTB-L-099062-25 is denied.
    LTB-L-099062-25 · L1Landlord and Tenant Board1174739 Ontario LTDRead the order (PDF)
  • No finding against either partyBoth applications dismissed · settled by agreementMarch 3, 2026
    • Non-payment of rent
    • Maintenance issues
    • Harassment
    • Substantial interference

    The tenant requested a review of a consent order that resolved both parties' applications following mediation. The tribunal denied the review request, finding that second thoughts about consenting do not justify overturning a settlement.

    • The tenant's request to review order LTB-T-092260-25/LTB-L-099062-25 is denied and the order is confirmed.
    LTB-T-092260-25 · T2;T6Landlord and Tenant Board1174739 Ontario LTDRead the order (PDF)
  • Outcome unclearMarch 3, 2026
    • Non-payment of rent
    • Personal use eviction
    • Vital services
    • Harassment
    • Substantial interference

    The landlords applied for a review of an earlier order that resolved their applications for personal use eviction and rent arrears together with the tenant's rights application. The tribunal denied the review request without a hearing, confirming the previous order unchanged.

    • The Landlords' request to review order LTB-L-052212-24 is denied, and the order is confirmed and remains unchanged.
    LTB-L-052212-24 · L9Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against landlordLandlord's application dismissed · not provedMarch 2, 2026
    • Personal use eviction
    • Property damage
    • Substantial interference
    • Utility costs

    The landlords' application for termination of the tenancy and for compensation was dismissed. The tenant had already vacated the unit, and the landlords failed to prove any out-of-pocket expenses or property damages.

    • The Landlords' application is dismissed.
    LTB-L-047973-24 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against landlordLandlord's application dismissed · not provedMarch 2, 2026
    • Substantial interference

    The landlords applied to terminate the tenancy for substantial interference and sought monetary compensation. The tribunal dismissed the application because the tenant had already moved out and the landlords failed to prove their monetary claims.

    • The Landlords' application is dismissed.
    LTB-L-010705-24 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · nothing left to decideMarch 2, 2026
    • Lockout and illegal eviction
    • Breach of conditions

    The landlord applied for an order determining whether the tenant altered the locking system without consent. The tribunal dismissed the application as moot because the tenant had already vacated the rental unit.

    • The Landlord's application is dismissed as moot because the Tenant vacated the rental unit.
    LTB-L-000805-24 · L8Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedFebruary 27, 2026
    • Substantial interference
    • Breach of conditions

    The tenant's request to review an earlier eviction order was denied. The original order terminating the tenancy and evicting the tenant for substantial interference stands unchanged.

    • Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
    • The Tenant's request to review order LTB-L-091255-25 is denied
    LTB-L-091255-25 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardLaskey PropertiesRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantFebruary 27, 2026
    • Non-payment of rent

    The tenant's request to review an eviction order was denied, confirming the original order terminating the tenancy for non-payment of rent. The tenant was ordered to pay rent arrears and application costs to void the eviction or vacate by February 9, 2026.

    • Arrears · $2,700 · to the landlord
    • Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
    LTB-L-093637-25 · L1Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against landlordFebruary 26, 2026$2,090 Deposit returned
    • Non-payment of rent
    • Rent deposit disputes

    The tribunal denied the landlords' review request, confirming the earlier order that found the tenants owed no arrears and ordered the landlords to pay interest on the rent deposit.

    • Deposit returned · $2,090
    • Deposit returned · $42
    • Arrears · $2,090 · to the landlord
    LTB-L-097877-25 · L1Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • No finding against either partyFebruary 26, 2026
    • Property damage
    • Substantial interference

    The parties settled the landlord's application on consent, agreeing that the tenancy would terminate and the tenant would pay for damages and rent. The tenant later requested a review but withdrew it, leaving the consent order in effect.

    • Damages · $6,500 · to the landlord
    • Arrears · $2,591 · to the landlord
    • Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
    LTB-L-038179-25 · L2Landlord and Tenant Board35 Valley Woods Road Apartments Limited c/o Realstar Corp.Read the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantFebruary 26, 2026
    • Non-payment of rent

    The tenant's request for review was denied, confirming the original order that terminated the tenancy for non-payment of rent unless voided by paying the required arrears and costs.

    • Arrears · $3,392 · to the landlord
    • Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
    • The request to review order LTB-L-089257-25 is denied.
    LTB-L-089257-25 · L1Landlord and Tenant BoardVenice Park Developments LtdRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedFebruary 26, 2026
    • Non-payment of rent

    The tenant's request to review an earlier eviction order was denied without a hearing. The original order terminating the tenancy for non-payment of rent and ordering the tenant to pay arrears and costs remains in effect.

    • Arrears · $23,150 · to the landlord
    • Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
    • The Tenant's request to review order LTB-L-020997-25 is denied
    LTB-L-020997-25 · L1Landlord and Tenant Board528 Lancaster Street West Inc.Read the order (PDF)
  • Decision against landlordLandlord's application dismissed · not provedFebruary 25, 2026$895 Deposit returned
    • Non-payment of rent
    • Rent deposit disputes

    The landlord's request to review an earlier order was denied, confirming the decision that the landlord failed to mitigate losses after the tenant vacated. After applying the tenant's rent deposit and accrued interest against one month of rent arrears, the landlord was ordered to pay the tenant the remaining balance.

    • Deposit returned · $895
    • Deposit returned · $128
    • Arrears · $938 · to the landlord
    • The Landlord's request to review order LTB-L-082267-25 is denied and the order is confirmed unchanged
    LTB-L-082267-25 · L9Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantFebruary 25, 2026
    • Non-payment of rent

    The tenant's review request was denied, confirming the original order that terminated the tenancy for non-payment of rent. The tenant must pay the outstanding arrears and application fee to void the eviction or vacate the rental unit.

    • Arrears · $3,145 · to the landlord
    • Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
    • Tenant's request to review order LTB-L-086746-25 is denied and the order is confirmed
    LTB-L-086746-25 · L1Landlord and Tenant BoardRoyal Rose Apartments LimitedRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedFebruary 24, 2026
    • Non-payment of rent

    The tribunal denied the tenant's request to review an earlier eviction order, confirming the termination of the tenancy and an order to pay rent arrears.

    • Arrears · $12,329 · to the landlord
    • Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
    • The Tenant's request to review order LTB-L-099889-25 is denied.
    • Daily compensation for use and occupation of the rental unit from February 6, 2026 until the Tenant vacates. · $66 · to the landlord
    LTB-L-099889-25 · L1Landlord and Tenant BoardPark Property Management Inc.Read the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantFebruary 24, 2026$33 Deposit returned
    • Non-payment of rent

    The tribunal confirmed an earlier order terminating the tenancy for non-payment of rent, which allows the tenant to void the eviction by paying the outstanding arrears by February 28, 2026. The landlord's request for review was denied.

    • Deposit returned · $33
    • Arrears · $1,980 · to the landlord
    • Filing fee · $201 · to the landlord
    • Bank fees incurred for NSF cheque · $20 · to the landlord
    LTB-L-099046-25 · L1Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedFebruary 24, 2026
    • Harassment
    • Substantial interference

    The tenants' request to review an earlier order was denied without a hearing. The earlier order dismissing the tenants' application regarding secondhand smoke and harassment remains confirmed.

    • The tenants' application is dismissed as the claims of substantial interference and harassment were not proved.
    LTB-T-062630-24 · T2Landlord and Tenant Board2 Secord Inc.Read the order (PDF)
  • No finding against either partyFebruary 23, 2026
    • Non-payment of rent
    • Breach of conditions

    The landlord's request to review an earlier consent order was denied. The confirmed order set aside an eviction order on consent and established a conditional payment plan for rent arrears.

    • Arrears · $625 · to the landlord
    • Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
    LTB-L-094493-25 · L4Landlord and Tenant BoardThe Windermere Apartments Inc.Read the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantFebruary 23, 2026
    • Property damage
    • Safety concerns

    The tenant's request to review an eviction order was denied, confirming the termination of the tenancy and eviction for seriously impairing safety. The tenant was also ordered to pay the landlord's application filing fee.

    • Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
    • Tenant's request to review order LTB-L-054950-25 is denied and the order is confirmed
    LTB-L-054950-25 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardYMCA Hamilton Brantford BurlingtonRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantFebruary 17, 2026$2,850 Deposit returned
    • Non-payment of rent
    • Maintenance issues
    • Utility costs

    The tenants' request to review an eviction order for non-payment of rent was denied. The original order terminating the tenancy and requiring payment of rent arrears and daily compensation remains in effect.

    • Deposit returned · $2,850
    • Deposit returned · $223
    • Arrears · $32,431 · to the landlord
    • Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
    • Daily compensation for use and occupation starting November 4, 2025 until vacating · $94 · to the landlord
    LTB-L-065327-25 · L1Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantFebruary 13, 2026
    • Non-payment of rent

    The tribunal denied the tenant's request for a review, confirming the earlier eviction order for non-payment of rent. The tenant was ordered to pay rent arrears and filing fees or face eviction.

    • Arrears · $9,308 · to the landlord
    • Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
    • Daily compensation for use and occupation of the rental unit starting December 23, 2025 · $82 · to the landlord
    LTB-L-084573-25 · L1Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedFebruary 12, 2026
    • Non-payment of rent

    The tenant's request to review an eviction order was denied, confirming the earlier order that terminated the tenancy for non-payment of rent and ordered payment of arrears.

    • Arrears · $893 · to the landlord
    • Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
    • The Tenant's request to review order LTB-L-087721-25 is denied
    LTB-L-087721-25 · L1Landlord and Tenant BoardMynikker Holdings IncRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against landlordFebruary 12, 2026$156
    • Non-payment of rent
    • Illegal charges or collection

    On an LTB-initiated review, the Board found that the previous order improperly required the tenants to pay process server fees in addition to the non-refundable Sheriff's fee to void an eviction order. The Board declared the eviction order void and ordered the landlord to reimburse the tenants $155.88 for the overpayment.

    • Repayment of process server fee overpaid to the landlord to void the eviction order · $156

    Main, 88 Rockport Crescent, Richmond Hill

    LTB-L-105038-24 · L1Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantLandlord's application dismissed · not provedFebruary 12, 2026$5,500 Deposit returned
    • Non-payment of rent
    • Persistent late payment
    • Rent increase disputes

    The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for non-payment of rent was granted, and the tenants' review request was denied. The tenants were ordered to pay rent arrears or vacate the rental unit.

    • Deposit returned · $5,500
    • Deposit returned · $533
    • Arrears · $18,194 · to the landlord
    • Filing fee · $202 · to the landlord
    • Landlord's L2 application for persistent late payment dismissed
    LTB-L-092622-25 · L1;L2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord's grounds were not provedFebruary 11, 2026
    • Illegal act

    The tribunal denied the landlord's review request and upheld the dismissal of the landlord's eviction application. The landlord failed to prove that the tenants engaged in illegal drug trafficking.

    • The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy is dismissed as the allegations were not proved.
    LTB-L-012072-24 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardHomestead Land Holdings LimitedRead the order (PDF)
  • Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedFebruary 10, 2026
    • Non-payment of rent
    • Breach of conditions

    The tribunal denied the tenants' request to review an earlier order that terminated the tenancy and required the tenants to pay rent owed. The eviction order was confirmed and remains unchanged.

    • Arrears · to the landlord
    • The Tenants' request to review order LTB-L-082875-25 issued on December 22, 2025 is denied and the order is confirmed
    LTB-L-082875-25 · L4Landlord and Tenant Board11922297 Canada Inc.Read the order (PDF)
  • Decision against landlordLandlord's application dismissed · a procedural barFebruary 10, 2026
    • Property damage

    The landlord's request to review an earlier order was denied, confirming the dismissal of their claim for property damage costs. The application was dismissed because it was filed beyond the one-year statutory deadline after the tenants vacated.

    • The landlord's review request is denied and the underlying application remains dismissed.
    LTB-L-085847-23 · L10Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)