Ontario Landlord and Tenant Board
Panagiotis P. Roupas
MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntarioBeta
Rulings, compared with the board
1.60× the board's rate against tenantsDecided against tenants more often than the board does on comparable applications — 1.60× the board's rate (95% interval 1.49–1.70), across 345 contested orders.
Orders are grouped by who applied and what they applied for, and this member’s record is compared with the board’s on that same mix. Withdrawn, settled and non-attendance dismissals are excluded. It measures how these decisions differ from the board’s on cases of the same type.
Dismissals, compared with the board
Bars tenants and landlords about as oftenDismissed tenants' and landlords' applications as not proved, out of jurisdiction or barred on procedure at rates that do not differ once the kind of application is accounted for, across 10 such dismissals of tenants' applications and 19 of landlords'.
Counts only dismissals the member ruled on — not proved, outside the board’s jurisdiction, or barred on procedure. Applications withdrawn, settled or dismissed because nobody attended are excluded, as they are above. The two sides are compared on this member’s own docket, against the board’s rate on the same kinds of application. It does not measure whether any decision was right.
Orders
Showing 501–509 of 509- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · nobody attendedJanuary 9, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord applied to collect rent and daily compensation from the former tenant. Neither party attended the hearing, so the Board dismissed the application as abandoned.
- The Landlord's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.
- Decision against tenantLandlord's application dismissed · not provedJanuary 9, 2026$1,100 Deposit returned
- Non-payment of rent
- Persistent late payment
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant for non-payment of rent and persistent late payment. The tribunal dismissed the persistent late payment claim but ordered termination for arrears, postponing eviction to February 28, 2026, and permitting the tenant to void the order by paying the arrears.
- Deposit returned · $1,100
- Deposit returned · $117
- Arrears · $5,532 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Landlord's L2 application for persistent late payment dismissed
- Daily compensation of $47.67 for use and occupation of the rental unit from October 30, 2025 until vacating · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · nobody attendedJanuary 8, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord applied to collect rent and compensation from the former tenants. The tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned because neither party attended the hearing.
- The Landlord's application is dismissed as abandoned.
- Decision against tenantJanuary 8, 2026$1,550 Deposit returned
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and recover rent arrears. The tribunal found that the tenant had vacated the rental unit and ordered the tenant to pay $8,595.54, reflecting rent arrears and the application fee less the rent deposit and accrued interest.
- Deposit returned · $1,550
- Deposit returned · $60
- Arrears · $10,019 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · nobody attendedJanuary 8, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord's application for rent arrears and daily compensation was dismissed after the landlord failed to attend the hearing.
- The Landlord's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.
- Decision against tenantJanuary 7, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord applied to evict the tenant for non-payment of rent. The tribunal granted relief from eviction conditional on the tenant paying $6,860.00 in arrears and $186.00 in costs under an 18-month payment plan.
- Arrears · $6,860 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · withdrawnJanuary 7, 2026
- Property damage
- Substantial interference
The landlords applied to end the tenancy and claim damages for undue damage and substantial interference. The application was dismissed as withdrawn after the landlords requested to withdraw it.
- The Landlords' L2 application is dismissed as withdrawn.
LTB-L-064935-25 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantJanuary 7, 2026
- Property damage
- Substantial interference
The landlord established that the tenant substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment of staff and other residents by yelling and exhibiting aggressive behaviour. The tribunal granted relief from eviction, ordering that the tenancy may continue on the condition that the tenant cease all aggressive outbursts for 12 months.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Tenancy continues conditionally on the tenant ceasing all aggressive behaviour, specifically yelling and screaming directed at other tenants, staff, or agents of the landlord, for 12 months · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantJanuary 7, 2026
- Substantial interference
- Safety concerns
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for substantial interference due to extreme clutter and uncleanliness was granted conditionally. The tenant was granted relief from eviction on condition of restoring the unit to a clean and safe condition, maintaining it for two years, permitting inspections, and reimbursing the landlord's filing fee.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- The Tenant shall restore the rental unit and balcony to a safe, clean, and reasonable living condition by February 15, 2026, and maintain it for two years subject to quarterly inspections · to the landlord
LTB-L-065486-25 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardToronto Community Housing CorporationRead the order (PDF)