Ontario Landlord and Tenant Board
Nancy Morris
MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntarioBeta
Rulings, compared with the board
1.37× the board's rate against tenantsDecided against tenants more often than the board does on comparable applications — 1.37× the board's rate (95% interval 1.25–1.49), across 251 contested orders.
Orders are grouped by who applied and what they applied for, and this member’s record is compared with the board’s on that same mix. Withdrawn, settled and non-attendance dismissals are excluded. It measures how these decisions differ from the board’s on cases of the same type.
Dismissals, compared with the board
Bars tenants and landlords about as oftenDismissed tenants' and landlords' applications as not proved, out of jurisdiction or barred on procedure at rates that do not differ once the kind of application is accounted for, across 31 such dismissals of tenants' applications and 13 of landlords'.
Counts only dismissals the member ruled on — not proved, outside the board’s jurisdiction, or barred on procedure. Applications withdrawn, settled or dismissed because nobody attended are excluded, as they are above. The two sides are compared on this member’s own docket, against the board’s rate on the same kinds of application. It does not measure whether any decision was right.
Orders
Showing 101–150 of 368- Decision against tenantApril 23, 2026$50 Deposit returned
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenants for non-payment of rent was granted. The tenants were ordered to pay rent arrears and the application filing fee, or vacate the unit by May 4, 2026.
- Deposit returned · $50
- Deposit returned · $0
- Arrears · $6,772 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · settled by agreementApril 23, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord's eviction application for non-payment of rent was discontinued after the tenants paid all outstanding rent arrears and the application fee prior to the hearing.
- The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenants for arrears of rent is discontinued following full payment.
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · withdrawnApril 22, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant for non-payment of rent. The application was discontinued because the tenant paid all rent arrears and the application filing fee prior to the hearing.
- The landlord's application for an order terminating the tenancy and evicting the tenant is discontinued as all arrears and fees were paid prior to the hearing.
- Decision against tenantApril 22, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tribunal ordered the tenant to pay $207.36 for outstanding rent arrears and application costs. The landlord did not seek termination after the tenant's rent subsidy was restored.
- Arrears · $21 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
LTB-L-011515-26 · L1Landlord and Tenant BoardPark Street United Church Non-Profit c/o M.F Arnsby Property Management Ltd.Read the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · withdrawnApril 22, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord applied to evict the tenant for non-payment of rent. Because the tenant paid all rent arrears and the filing fee prior to the hearing, the application was discontinued.
- The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant for non-payment of rent is discontinued following full payment of arrears and fees.
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · withdrawnApril 22, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord's eviction application for non-payment of rent was discontinued because the tenant paid all arrears and the filing fee in full prior to the hearing.
- The landlord's application for an order terminating the tenancy and evicting the tenant is discontinued to April 30, 2026, because the tenant paid all arrears, upcoming rent, and filing fees in full prior to the hearing.
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · withdrawnApril 22, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord withdrew their application to terminate the tenancy for non-payment of rent, and the tribunal closed the file.
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · withdrawnApril 22, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord's application to evict the tenant for non-payment of rent was discontinued after the tenant paid all outstanding arrears and the filing fee prior to the hearing.
- Decision against tenantApril 22, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tribunal ordered the tenancy terminated and evicted the tenant for non-payment of rent unless voided by payment. The tenant was ordered to pay rent arrears, daily compensation, and application costs.
- Arrears · $2,764 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Daily compensation for use and occupation starting April 17, 2026 · $26 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · nobody attendedApril 22, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant for non-payment of rent was dismissed because the landlord failed to attend the hearing.
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · nobody attendedApril 22, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and collect rent arrears was dismissed after neither party attended the hearing.
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · settled by agreementApril 21, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tribunal granted the tenant's review request on consent, cancelling the previous eviction order. The landlord's application was discontinued on consent.
- The landlord's application is discontinued to February 28, 2026 on consent.
- No finding against either partyApril 21, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tenants' motion to set aside an ex parte eviction order was granted. The eviction order was set aside, allowing the tenants to maintain their tenancy under the previous conditional payment order.
- Order LTB-L-003714-26 issued on January 19, 2026 is set aside and cannot be enforced, and the previous order issued on December 15, 2025 continues in force
- Decision against tenantApril 21, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant for non-payment of rent was granted. The tenant was ordered to pay arrears and application costs or vacate the rental unit unless the order is voided by payment.
- Arrears · $897 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Daily compensation for use and occupation of the rental unit starting April 17, 2026, until the tenant vacates · $58 · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantApril 21, 2026$89 Deposit returned
- Non-payment of rent
The tribunal ordered the tenancy terminated for non-payment of rent unless the tenant pays the required amounts to void the eviction by the specified dates.
- Deposit returned · $89
- Arrears · $2,160 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyApril 20, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tribunal granted a review request on consent, amending a previous order to remove an individual as a named tenant while confirming the remainder of the order.
- Decision against tenantApril 17, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tenants' motion to set aside an eviction order was denied after the tribunal found they breached a previous conditional consent order by failing to pay rent on time. The stay of the eviction order was ordered lifted on April 30, 2026.
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · settled by agreementApril 17, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tribunal granted the tenant's review request on consent, cancelling the previous eviction order. The landlords' non-payment application was discontinued on consent to April 30, 2026.
- The previous order and interim stay order are cancelled, and the landlords' application is discontinued to April 30, 2026 on consent of the parties.
LTB-L-067610-25 · L1Landlord and Tenant BoardOntario Aboriginal Housing Support Services Corporation, Infinity Property Services an Agency of the Metis Nation of OntarioRead the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantApril 17, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Persistent late payment
- Breach of conditions
The tribunal denied the tenant's motion to set aside a previous ex parte eviction order. The stay of eviction was lifted and the original termination order remains in effect.
- The tenant's motion to set aside order LTB-L-000419-26 is denied and the stay of eviction is lifted immediately. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyApril 17, 2026
- Lockout and illegal eviction
- Illegal entry
- Tenant rights
- Substantial interference
The landlord requested a review of an earlier decision, and the parties reached a consent agreement at the review hearing. The tribunal cancelled the previous orders and recorded the parties' agreement regarding tenancy termination and the removal of belongings.
- On consent, previous orders are cancelled, the tenancy is confirmed terminated as of November 11, 2025, and the tenant is granted agreed-upon time to remove belongings from the complex.
- Decision against tenantApril 17, 2026
- Illegal act
- Safety concerns
The tribunal terminated the tenancy and ordered the tenant's eviction due to illegal drug trafficking activity in the rental unit. The tenant was also ordered to pay the landlord's application filing fee.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Daily compensation for use and occupation of the rental unit from April 23, 2026 until the tenant vacates · $5 · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantApril 16, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tenants' request to review a previous eviction and rent arrears order was denied. The Board lifted the stay of the eviction order, confirming the original decision.
- The request to review order LTB-L-075297-25 is denied and the original order is confirmed. · to the landlord
- The interim stay of order LTB-L-075297-25 is cancelled and lifted immediately. · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedApril 15, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Persistent late payment
- Breach of conditions
The tribunal denied the tenant's motion to set aside a previous eviction order issued after the tenant breached a mediated payment plan. The stay of the eviction order is lifted on April 30, 2026.
- The tenant's motion to set aside order LTB-L-104425-25 is denied, and the stay of the eviction order is lifted on April 30, 2026 · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantApril 9, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tribunal granted the tenant's motion to set aside a prior eviction order after the tenant paid all outstanding rent arrears. The tenancy continues subject to the condition that the tenant pays rent on time each month for 12 months.
- The tenants shall pay rent in full on or before the first day of each month for a 12-month period from May 2026 to April 2027. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · outside the board's jurisdictionApril 9, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Substantial interference
- Safety concerns
- Whether the Act applies
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and collect alleged arrears was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The tribunal found that the occupant is a family member residing in a single-family home sharing facilities with the owner, meaning no tenancy existed under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006.
- The landlord's application is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006.
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedApril 9, 2026
- Personal use eviction
- Bad faith eviction
The tenant's application alleging a bad faith eviction was dismissed after the tenant failed to prove that the landlord's mother did not move into the unit. The tribunal also found that the application was filed past the statutory one-year limitation period.
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedApril 8, 2026
- Rent increase disputes
- Rent deposit disputes
- Illegal charges or collection
The tenants' application for a rebate of an unlawful rent increase and the return of their rent deposit was dismissed. Although the landlord owed certain amounts for the rent overpayment and deposit interest, the landlord had already returned more than the total amount owed.
- The tenants' application is dismissed on the merits because the landlord had already over-reimbursed the tenants. · to the landlord
- Decision against landlordApril 7, 2026$1,424 Deposit returned
- Non-payment of rent
- Rent deposit disputes
- Assignment or sublet
The tribunal granted the tenants' review request and cancelled an earlier eviction and arrears order. Because the landlord knew the tenants had vacated and failed to challenge the remaining occupant's status, the tenancy was deemed assigned, and the landlord was ordered to return $1,424.37 from the tenants' rent deposit.
- Deposit returned · $1,424
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · withdrawnApril 2, 2026
- Tenant agreed termination
- Unauthorized occupants
- Assignment or sublet
The landlord withdrew its application concerning an unauthorized occupant because the parties signed an agreement to terminate the tenancy. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.
- The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the unauthorized occupant is withdrawn at the Landlord's request. · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantApril 2, 2026
- Property damage
- Utility costs
The former tenant's request to review an earlier order was denied after the tribunal found they were properly served with notice of the original hearing. The original order in favour of the landlord remains in effect and the stay of enforcement is lifted.
- The former tenant's request to review order LTB-L-062170-24 is denied, the order is confirmed unchanged, and the stay is lifted. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · withdrawnApril 2, 2026
- Unauthorized occupants
- Assignment or sublet
The landlord withdrew its application regarding an unauthorized occupancy because the tenant and occupants had already moved out. The file is closed.
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · nobody attendedApril 1, 2026
- Unauthorized occupants
- Assignment or sublet
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict an unauthorized occupant due to an unauthorized transfer of occupancy. The application was dismissed after the landlord failed to attend the hearing.
- The Landlord's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.
- Decision against tenantApril 1, 2026
- Breach of conditions
- Utility costs
The landlord's application for reimbursement of unpaid utility costs was granted. The former tenants were ordered to pay $2,005.16 for utility expenses and $186.00 for the application filing fee.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Reimbursement for unpaid utility costs incurred by the landlord · $2,005 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · nobody attendedMarch 30, 2026
- Unauthorized occupants
- Assignment or sublet
The landlords' application to terminate the tenancy and evict an unauthorized occupant was dismissed as abandoned because neither party attended the hearing.
- The landlords' application is dismissed for non-attendance.
LTB-L-076111-25 · A2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyMarch 30, 2026$2,649 Deposit returned
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and recover rent arrears. The parties consented to terminate the tenancy effective April 30, 2026, and agreed on the payment of arrears minus the rent deposit and interest.
- Deposit returned · $2,649
- Deposit returned · $36
- Arrears · $24,292 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantMarch 30, 2026
- Substantial interference
- Breach of conditions
The landlord applied following an N5 notice because the tenant failed to provide required proof of tenant liability insurance. The tribunal found the tenant breached the lease obligations and ordered the tenant to reimburse the landlord's $186 application filing fee.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · withdrawnMarch 30, 2026
- Tenant agreed termination
- Substantial interference
- Safety concerns
The landlord withdrew its application to terminate the tenancy after the parties signed an agreement to end the tenancy. The Landlord and Tenant Board closed the file.
- The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant was withdrawn upon request.
- No finding against either partyMarch 30, 2026
- Tenant agreed termination
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy following the end of the tenant's employment as superintendent. The parties consented to an order terminating the tenancy on April 30, 2026.
LTB-L-045961-25 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardWest-Bridge District Inc., Valour Management Inc.Read the order (PDF) - Decision against landlordTenant's application dismissed · not provedMarch 30, 2026$1,329 Rent abatement
- Vital services
- Tenant rights
- Substantial interference
- Assignment or sublet
The tribunal ordered the landlord to pay the tenants $1,377.06, consisting of a $1,329.06 rent abatement for excessive construction noise and utility shut-offs plus $48.00 in filing fee reimbursement. The tenants' claims regarding accessibility misrepresentation and unreasonable refusal of lease assignment were dismissed.
- Rent abatement · $1,329
- Filing fee · $48
Apartment 909, 812 King Street West, Kitchener
LTB-T-016363-24 · A2Landlord and Tenant BoardBoardwalk Real Estate Investment TrustRead the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantMarch 27, 2026
- Substantial interference
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy based on substantial interference, including repeated theft of common area items and recurring debris. The tribunal granted the application, ordering the tenancy terminated and requiring the tenant to pay the filing fee.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
LTB-L-067280-25 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardStamford Kiwanis Non-Profit Homes Inc., Shabri Properties LimitedRead the order (PDF) - Decision against landlordMarch 27, 2026$6,000 Damages
- Personal use eviction
- Bad faith eviction
The tribunal determined that the landlord issued an N12 notice of termination in bad faith. The landlord was ordered to pay the tenant $6,298.00 for rent differential, moving expenses, and filing fee reimbursement.
- Damages · $6,000
- Damages · $250
- Filing fee · $48
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · outside the board's jurisdictionMarch 26, 2026
- Maintenance issues
- Lockout and illegal eviction
- Illegal entry
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
- Whether the Act applies
The tenant's multiple rights and maintenance applications were dismissed with prejudice because a prior binding decision determined that the Residential Tenancies Act does not apply to the parties' relationship.
- The tenant's applications are dismissed with prejudice as the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 does not apply to the relationship. · to the landlord
- Decision against landlordMarch 26, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tribunal granted the tenant's motion to set aside an ex parte eviction order after the landlord failed to attend the hearing. The eviction order was cancelled and the original mediated order remains in force.
- Order LTB-L-013666-26 issued on February 17, 2026 is set aside and cancelled
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · outside the board's jurisdictionMarch 26, 2026
- Maintenance issues
- Lockout and illegal eviction
- Illegal entry
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
- Whether the Act applies
The tenant's T2 and T6 applications were dismissed because the Residential Tenancies Act does not apply to the relationship between the parties.
- Tenant's applications dismissed with prejudice as the Residential Tenancies Act does not apply to the relationship between the parties. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · outside the board's jurisdictionMarch 26, 2026
- Maintenance issues
- Lockout and illegal eviction
- Illegal entry
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
- Whether the Act applies
The tribunal dismissed the tenant's applications with prejudice because a prior binding decision established that the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 does not apply to the relationship between the parties.
- The tenant's applications are dismissed with prejudice due to lack of jurisdiction under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006. · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantMarch 26, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Persistent late payment
- Breach of conditions
The tribunal denied the tenant's motion to set aside an ex parte eviction order, finding that the tenant failed to comply with a previous payment plan order. The stay of the eviction order was lifted effective April 30, 2026.
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · withdrawnMarch 26, 2026
- Renovation and demolition
The landlord requested to withdraw an application to end the tenancy for demolition of the rental unit. The tribunal granted the request and closed the file.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · outside the board's jurisdictionMarch 26, 2026
- Maintenance issues
- Lockout and illegal eviction
- Illegal entry
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
- Whether the Act applies
The tribunal dismissed the tenant's applications because a prior binding decision established that the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 does not apply to the relationship between the parties.
- The tenant's T2 and T6 applications were dismissed with prejudice as the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 does not apply to the relationship between the parties. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMarch 26, 2026
- Breach of conditions
reached a decision on the tenants' motion to set aside a previous order. Because the tenants failed to attend the hearing, the tribunal found the motion was abandoned, denied it, and lifted the stay on the original order.
- The tenants' motion to set aside order LTB-L-010268-26 was denied for non-attendance, and the stay of the order was lifted. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · outside the board's jurisdictionMarch 26, 2026
- Maintenance issues
- Lockout and illegal eviction
- Illegal entry
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
- Whether the Act applies
The tribunal dismissed the tenant's applications because a prior final decision established that the Residential Tenancies Act does not apply to the relationship between the parties.
- clean The tenant's applications are dismissed with prejudice because the Residential Tenancies Act does not apply. · to the landlord