Jitewa Edu

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tribunal denied the tenant's motion to set aside an eviction order after finding that the tenant failed to comply with payment conditions from a previous order. The stay of the eviction order was lifted.

• The tenant's motion to set aside order LTB-L-041200-26 is denied, confirming the eviction order, and the stay of eviction is lifted effective July 10, 2026. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tribunal dismissed the tenant's motion to set aside a previous eviction order because the tenant failed to attend the hearing. The stay of the earlier order was lifted.

• The tenant's motion to set aside order LTB-L-038798-26 was denied as abandoned due to non-attendance, and the stay of the order was lifted immediately. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord requested to withdraw the application and neither party attended the review hearing. The Board dismissed the application.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed following the Landlord's request to withdraw.

• Non-payment of rent

The tenant's motion to set aside an eviction order was granted without opposition after the tenant paid all rent arrears and fees. The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy was discontinued.

• The previous eviction order was set aside and cancelled, and the landlord's application to terminate the tenancy was discontinued.

• Non-payment of rent
• Persistent late payment
• Breach of conditions

The tenant's motion to set aside an ex parte eviction order was denied after the tenant failed to make timely rent payments required by a prior order. The eviction order is confirmed and the stay is lifted effective July 31, 2026.

• The tenant's motion to set aside order LTB-L-042003-26 is denied, confirming the eviction order and lifting the stay on July 31, 2026 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The tribunal terminated the tenancy due to substantial rent arrears and ordered the tenant to pay the outstanding amounts, with eviction postponed to September 30, 2026.

• Arrears · $24,617 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Daily compensation per day for use of the unit starting June 17, 2026 until the tenant vacates · $54 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tribunal dismissed the tenants' motion to set aside a previous eviction order issued after they breached a mediated payment plan. The eviction order was confirmed and the stay of enforcement was lifted.

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tribunal dismissed the tenant's motion to set aside a previous eviction order after the tenant failed to pay substantial rent arrears required by an earlier order. The stay of eviction was lifted immediately.

• The tenant's motion to set aside order LTB-L-029204-26 is denied on the merits, confirming the original order and immediately lifting the stay of eviction · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tenant's motion to set aside an earlier eviction order was denied. The tribunal confirmed the eviction order and lifted the stay of enforcement.

• The tenant's motion to set aside the eviction order is denied, and the order is confirmed. · to the landlord
• The stay of the eviction order is lifted on July 3, 2026. · to the landlord

• Personal use eviction

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy for purchaser's own use. On consent of the parties, the tribunal ordered the tenancy terminated as of April 30, 2026.

• The tenancy between the landlord and the tenant is terminated as of April 30, 2026 on consent. · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tenants' maintenance application was dismissed as abandoned after they failed to attend the case conference.

• Lockout and illegal eviction
• Illegal entry
• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's rights application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the case conference.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tenant's motion to set aside an earlier eviction order was denied because the tenant breached payment conditions and had no viable plan to pay ongoing rent and arrears. The stay of the eviction order was lifted.

• Personal use eviction

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for personal use was dismissed because the landlord failed to prove a genuine good-faith intention to occupy the unit. The tenant was ordered to return the one month's rent compensation previously paid by the landlord.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for personal use is dismissed because the grounds were not proven.
• The Tenant shall return the compensation of $1,057.00 paid by the Landlord. · $1,057 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tribunal denied the tenants' motion to set aside a previous eviction order after finding they breached payment conditions. The stay of the eviction order was lifted.

• The tenants' motion to set aside the eviction order is denied and the stay of the eviction order is lifted · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tribunal denied the tenant's motion to set aside an earlier eviction order. The eviction order was confirmed and the stay of enforcement was lifted.

• The tenant's motion to set aside order LTB-L-028787-26 is denied, confirming the eviction order, and the stay of the order is lifted on June 22, 2026. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

On consent of the parties, the tribunal granted the tenant's motion to set aside an earlier eviction order, rendering it unenforceable. The tribunal ordered that the parties' previous conditional order remains in effect.

• The motion to set aside Order LTB-L-030565-26 is granted on consent and cannot be enforced; the previous order continues in effect.

• Tenant agreed termination

The tenant's motion to set aside an eviction order based on an agreement to terminate was dismissed after neither party attended the hearing.

• The tenant's motion to set aside the order is dismissed as abandoned for failure to attend the hearing. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tribunal granted the tenant's motion to set aside a previous eviction order on consent of both parties. The tenant agreed to pay outstanding rent arrears by a specified date, conditionally avoiding eviction.

• Arrears · $4,068 · to the landlord

• Vital services

The tenant's application alleging interference with vital services was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to the tenant's failure to attend the hearing. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tenant's motion to set aside a previous ex-parte eviction order was granted on consent of both parties. The parties agreed to a payment plan for outstanding arrears and costs totalling $8,034.60.

• Arrears · $8,035 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Substantial interference
• Safety concerns

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for non-payment of rent was granted, and the tenant was ordered to pay $798.50 by June 30, 2026, to void the eviction. The landlord's separate application to evict for substantial interference and impairing safety was dismissed.

• Arrears · $613 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• The Landlord's L2 application is dismissed because the N5 notice was voided by the tenant and the N7 safety impairment allegations were not proved.

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tenants' motion to set aside an earlier eviction order was denied because they breached repayment conditions by missing rent and arrears payments.

• The motion to set aside order LTB-L-028922-26 is denied, the eviction order is confirmed, and the stay of the order is lifted on July 3, 2026. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

On consent of the parties, the tenant's motion to set aside a previous eviction order was denied, and the stay of the order was directed to lift on July 2, 2026.

• On consent of the parties, the motion to set aside the previous order is denied, confirming the order, and the stay of enforcement is lifted on July 2, 2026 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

On consent of both parties, the tribunal granted the tenants' motion to set aside an earlier eviction order. A previous conditional order remains in effect.

• The motion to set aside order LTB-L-033029-26 is granted on consent, rendering it unenforceable, and the previous order of May 9, 2025 remains in effect.

• Non-payment of rent
• Maintenance issues

The Landlord's application was granted after the Tenant accumulated rent arrears, and the tenancy was terminated as of May 1, 2024. The Tenant's maintenance claims raised under section 82 were dismissed, and the Tenant was ordered to pay arrears and application costs.

• Arrears · $3,230 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Illegal act
• Substantial interference
• Safety concerns

The tribunal granted the member's review request, setting aside a prior eviction order, but found that grounds for eviction were established due to fire and safety incidents. The member was granted conditional relief from eviction subject to strict behavioural conditions and ordered to pay the co-op's application fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The tribunal granted the tenant's motion to void an earlier eviction order after confirming that the tenant had paid all outstanding rent arrears and associated fees in full.

• Order LTB-L-092287-25 is void and cannot be enforced by the landlord

• Lockout and illegal eviction
• Tenant rights
• Substantial interference

The tenants' application regarding lock changes, substantial interference, and property retrieval after eviction was dismissed after they requested to withdraw and did not attend the hearing.

• The tenants' application is dismissed after the tenants submitted a request to withdraw and did not attend the hearing. · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tenants' maintenance application was dismissed because they did not attend the hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed because the Tenant did not appear at the case conference and abandoned the application. · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tenant withdrew their maintenance application during the case conference. The tribunal granted the request and dismissed the application.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed following the Tenant's request to withdraw it. · to the landlord

• Illegal act
• Safety concerns

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant alleging an illegal act and impaired safety following an altercation in the building. The tribunal dismissed the application after finding the landlord failed to prove the allegations.

• The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant is dismissed because the landlord failed to prove the alleged illegal acts and safety impairment on a balance of probabilities.

• Tenant rights
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application claiming substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the case conference.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed due to abandonment following the Tenant's failure to attend the case conference.

• Maintenance issues
• Vital services
• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's applications regarding tenant rights and maintenance were dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the case conference.

• The tenant's T2 and T6 applications are dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Property damage
• Maintenance issues
• Illegal entry
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant and landlord reached a mutual agreement to withdraw their respective claims on consent and terminate the tenancy without any order for payment.

• Property damage
• Maintenance issues
• Illegal entry
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The landlord and tenants reached a mutual consent agreement to resolve and withdraw both cross-applications, formally ending the tenancy with no findings against either party.

• Lockout and illegal eviction
• Illegal entry

The parties resolved the tenant's application by mutual agreement on consent, with the landlord agreeing to pay the tenant $3,000.00 with no admission of liability.

• Consensual settlement payment by the landlord to the tenant to resolve the application · $3,000

• Illegal act

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenants for an alleged illegal act. The tribunal dismissed the application because the landlord failed to prove the notice of termination was validly served.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy is dismissed for failure to prove valid service of the notice of termination.

• Non-payment of rent
• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The tribunal terminated the tenancy as the tenants had already vacated and ordered them to pay $16,212.93 in outstanding rent arrears and application costs, after crediting the last month's rent deposit and interest. The landlord's separate application for damages and substantial interference was dismissed as abandoned.

• Deposit returned · $1,600
• Arrears · $17,705 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Interest on last month's rent deposit applied to arrears · $78

• Tenant rights
• Substantial interference

The tenants' application alleging substantial interference with their reasonable enjoyment regarding parking spots was dismissed due to a lack of particulars.

• The Tenants' application is dismissed due to lack of particulars

• Property damage

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and recover repair costs for alleged damage from an internet cable installation was dismissed. The tribunal found that minor scraping on exterior cinder blocks did not constitute wilful undue damage.

• The Landlord's application for termination of the tenancy and compensation for damage is dismissed for failure to prove the grounds.

• Vital services
• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application regarding tenant rights, harassment, substantial interference, and vital services was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Illegal act
• Safety concerns

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant for illegal acts and safety concerns was dismissed. The tribunal found that the landlord failed to prove the allegations on a balance of probabilities.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant is dismissed because the grounds were not proven.

• Personal use eviction
• Bad faith eviction

The tenant's bad faith eviction application was dismissed. The tribunal found insufficient evidence to prove that the landlord failed to occupy the rental unit within a reasonable time after issuing an N12 notice.

• The tenant's T5 bad faith eviction application is dismissed as not proved. · to the landlord