Jeremy Henderson

• Harassment
• Substantial interference
• Whether the Act applies

The tribunal determined that the Residential Tenancies Act applies to the basement rental unit. However, the tenant's application alleging harassment and substantial interference by the landlord was dismissed for lack of sufficient evidence.

• The tenant's T2 application alleging substantial interference and harassment is dismissed as not proved. · to the landlord

• Illegal act

The tribunal found that the tenant committed an illegal act by stealing personal items from the laundry room. Eviction was conditionally refused, allowing the tenancy to continue provided the tenant refrains from further theft and pays the landlord's filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Harassment
• Substantial interference
• Whether the Act applies

The tribunal determined that the Residential Tenancies Act applied to the basement unit, but dismissed the tenant's application alleging harassment and substantial interference.

• The tenant's T2 application alleging substantial interference and harassment is dismissed as not proved. · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues
• Vital services
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Substantial interference
• Utility costs

The tribunal terminated the tenancy and ordered the tenants evicted for substantial interference due to unpaid utility bills. The tenants were ordered to pay outstanding utility costs and the filing fee, offset by their rent deposit and interest.

• Deposit returned · $2,255
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred for unpaid utility costs · $1,976 · to the landlord

• Tenant abandons property

The landlord's application to end the tenancy due to abandonment was dismissed after the landlord failed to attend the hearing.

• The landlord's application is dismissed due to non-attendance.

• Breach of conditions

The tenant's motion to set aside a previous eviction order was denied because the tenant did not attend the hearing. The stay of the eviction order was lifted.

• The tenant's motion to set aside the order is denied and the stay is lifted due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Property damage
• Breach of conditions

The tribunal denied the tenant's motion to set aside an eviction order after the tenant breached a payment condition from a previous order. The eviction stay was extended to October 31, 2026, to give the tenant time to secure alternative housing.

• The tenant's motion to set aside the eviction order is denied, and the stay of the order is lifted on October 31, 2026. · to the landlord

• Tenant agreed termination

The tribunal denied the tenant's motion to set aside a previous eviction order. The stay of eviction was lifted immediately because the tenant had agreed to terminate the tenancy.

• The tenant's motion to set aside order LTB-L-036759-26 is denied, the stay of the eviction order is lifted immediately, and the eviction order remains unchanged. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The tenants successfully voided a previous eviction order after paying all outstanding rent arrears and fees in full. The eviction order is void and cannot be enforced.

• Order LTB-L-098390-25 is void and cannot be enforced by the landlord

• Illegal entry
• Substantial interference

The tenant requested to withdraw their application regarding alleged illegal entry and substantial interference. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.

• The tenant's application was withdrawn at the tenant's request with the consent of the tribunal. · to the landlord

• Vital services
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application regarding substantial interference from secondhand smoke was resolved through a consent order. The landlords agreed to take enforcement steps, up to eviction, against the basement occupant if smoking issues persist.

• On consent, the landlords agreed to take steps to remedy cigarette smoke complaints from the basement unit, up to issuing an N5 notice and filing an eviction application if necessary.

• Maintenance issues
• Vital services
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application was dismissed as abandoned after neither party attended the scheduled hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed because the Tenant did not attend the hearing. · to the landlord

• Tenant agreed termination

The tribunal dismissed the tenant's motion to set aside an earlier eviction order based on an agreed termination notice. The stay of eviction was lifted effective July 31, 2026.

• The tenant's motion to set aside Order LTB-L-023607-26 is denied and the stay of eviction is lifted on July 31, 2026. · to the landlord

• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant's application alleging the landlord collected or retained money illegally was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to the Tenant's failure to attend the hearing. · to the landlord

• Breach of conditions

The tenant failed to attend the hearing for their motion to set aside an earlier eviction order. As a result, the tribunal deemed the motion abandoned, denied it, and lifted the stay of eviction.

• The tenant's motion to set aside order LTB-L-037075-26 is denied due to abandonment for non-attendance, and the stay of the order is lifted immediately. · to the landlord

• Illegal charges or collection
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tribunal dismissed the tenant's application alleging harassment and substantial interference by the landlord, finding the interactions were routine tenancy communications.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed. · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues
• Illegal entry
• Illegal charges or collection
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenants withdrew their application at the hearing. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.

• The tenants' application was withdrawn upon their request and the file is closed. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tenants' motion to set aside a previous eviction order was denied after they failed to attend the hearing. The stay on the eviction order was lifted immediately.

• The tenants' motion to set aside Order LTB-L-029682-26 is denied and the stay is lifted due to abandonment for non-attendance · to the landlord

• Rent deposit disputes
• Illegal charges or collection

The tenants' application seeking the return of their rent deposit was dismissed. The tribunal found that the tenants vacated the rental unit without providing proper notice under the Act, entitling the landlords to apply the last month's rent deposit to the remaining rent owed.

• The Tenants' application for the return of their rent deposit is dismissed because they failed to prove that the Landlords retained it illegally. · to the landlord

• Tenant agreed termination
• Unauthorized occupants

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy was granted after the tenant gave notice to terminate but left an occupant behind. The tenant was ordered to vacate and reimburse the landlord's $186 application fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The tribunal terminated the tenancy due to non-payment of rent and ordered the tenant to pay the outstanding arrears and filing fee, less the rent deposit and accrued interest.

• Deposit returned · $1,308
• Deposit returned · $16
• Arrears · $3,978 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Daily compensation for use of the rental unit starting May 1, 2026 until vacant possession · $44 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Persistent late payment
• Substantial interference

The tribunal conditionally terminated the tenancy due to rent arrears, persistent late payment, and substantial interference. The tenant was ordered to pay the outstanding arrears and filing fee to preserve the tenancy and must comply with behavioural conditions.

• Deposit returned · $825
• Deposit returned · $11
• Arrears · $4,279 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Daily compensation for use and occupation of the rental unit starting April 17, 2026 until the tenant vacates · $31 · to the landlord

• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging substantial interference was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's maintenance application was resolved on consent with agreed terms for flooring repairs and unit access.

• Repair order

• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging harassment and interference was dismissed as abandoned after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Illegal entry
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant withdrew their application regarding tenant rights and illegal entry at the hearing. The Board closed the file with no findings or remedies ordered.

• The tenant's application is withdrawn at the tenant's request and the file is closed

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed as abandoned after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• Non-payment of rent

The tribunal terminated the tenancy effective January 31, 2026, and ordered the tenants to pay $11,587.50 in net rent arrears and filing fee costs. The balance reflects total arrears and costs less payments made, the last month's rent deposit, and accrued deposit interest.

• Deposit returned · $3,600
• Deposit returned · $456
• Arrears · $15,457 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Whether the Act applies

The tribunal dismissed the landlord's application and the tenant's claims for lack of jurisdiction because the living arrangement is exempt from the Act due to shared kitchen facilities with the landlord.

• The landlord's application is dismissed because the Act does not apply pursuant to the section 5(i) exemption.
• The tenant's claims under section 82 of the Act are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord's application was granted, terminating the tenancy and evicting the tenant for non-payment of rent unless the tenant pays the required amount to void the order. The tenant was credited with payments made, the last month's rent deposit, and deposit interest against the arrears and filing fee.

• Deposit returned · $1,600
• Arrears · $1,716 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Interest owed on the last month's rent deposit credited towards amounts owing · $145
• Daily compensation for use and occupation starting May 12, 2026 until the tenant vacates · $56 · to the landlord

• Breach of conditions
• Utility costs

The Landlord's application was granted after the Tenant failed to attend the hearing. The Tenant was ordered to pay $1,397.27 for unpaid water utility costs plus $186.00 to reimburse the Landlord's filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Compensation for unpaid water utility costs incurred by the Landlord · $1,397 · to the landlord

• Property damage
• Substantial interference
• Safety concerns

The tribunal found that the tenant substantially interfered with reasonable enjoyment and wilfully damaged the property due to excessive clutter and illicit substances in common areas. Eviction was conditionally granted under section 83, allowing the tenancy to continue provided the tenant clears the debris and adheres to strict conduct conditions.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Conditional order requiring the tenant to remove all debris and drug paraphernalia by June 30, 2026, and refrain from cluttering or using common areas for illicit substances to maintain the tenancy · to the landlord

• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The tribunal ordered the tenancy terminated and evicted the tenant for substantial interference with the reasonable enjoyment of other residents. The tenant was also ordered to pay daily compensation and reimburse the landlord's application filing fee.

• Arrears · $5,715 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• The landlord's claim for compensation under section 89 was withdrawn · to the landlord

• Persistent late payment

The tribunal found that the tenant persistently paid rent late and issued a conditional order requiring timely rent payments for 12 months to avoid eviction. The tenant was also ordered to pay the landlord's $186 application filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Substantial interference

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for substantial interference was dismissed as abandoned because neither party attended the hearing.

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord's application was resolved by a consent order terminating the tenancy, waiving all rent arrears, and requiring the landlord to pay $500.00 to the tenant.

• The Landlord shall pay $500.00 to the Tenant on consent without admission of liability. · $500

• Maintenance issues

The tenants' maintenance application was dismissed as abandoned after the tenant failed to unmute and participate in the hearing.

• The Tenants' application is dismissed as abandoned. · to the landlord

• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The tribunal found that the tenant substantially interfered with reasonable enjoyment by repeatedly denying entry or failing to prepare the unit for pest control treatments. A conditional order was issued allowing the tenancy to continue provided the tenant complies with future pest control notices, and the tenant was ordered to pay the application filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• The Landlord's claim for compensation under section 89 of the Act is dismissed because the charges do not constitute wilful or negligent damage.

• Non-payment of rent

The Landlord and Tenant Board ordered the tenancy terminated and evicted the tenant for non-payment of rent unless the tenant paid the outstanding arrears and filing fee. The tenant was ordered to pay the landlord $5,371.23 after deducting the last month's rent deposit and accrued interest.

• Deposit returned · $1,550
• Deposit returned · $25
• Arrears · $6,761 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Substantial interference
• Utility costs

The tribunal ordered the tenancy terminated for non-payment of rent unless the tenant pays the required arrears to void the eviction. The tenant was also ordered to pay outstanding utility costs, application costs, and daily compensation.

• Arrears · $9,651 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for unpaid utility costs · $862 · to the landlord

• Substantial interference
• Breach of conditions

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy was granted after the tenant breached the conditions of a prior mediated settlement regarding noise disturbances and smoking in common areas. The tenant was ordered to vacate the unit and pay daily compensation until moving out.

• Daily compensation of $3.78 per day from April 9, 2026 to the date the tenant vacates the rental unit · to the landlord

• Personal use eviction

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for personal use was dismissed because the landlord failed to prove a genuine good-faith intention to occupy the unit. The tenant was ordered to repay any statutory compensation previously received from the landlord.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant for personal use is dismissed because the Landlord did not prove a good-faith intention to occupy the rental unit.
• The Tenant shall repay any compensation received under section 48.1 of the Act to the Landlord within 30 days. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for non-payment of rent was withdrawn at the landlord's request.

• The landlord's application was withdrawn at the landlord's request.