Jana Rozehnal

• Personal use eviction
• Tenant agreed termination
• Bad faith eviction

The tribunal dismissed the tenants' bad faith eviction application. It found that the tenants vacated the rental unit pursuant to a mutually agreed termination rather than the landlord's notice.

• The tenants' T5 application alleging a bad faith notice of termination is dismissed as not proved.

• Persistent late payment

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment of rent was dismissed. The tribunal found the termination notice was defective because it lacked specific dates and details.

• The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy is dismissed without prejudice because the Form N8 notice of termination was defective and the grounds were not proven.

• Substantial interference

The tribunal dismissed the landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for substantial interference because the landlord failed to file the required statutory documentation.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed.

• Non-payment of rent
• Utility costs

The landlord's applications were granted after the tenant failed to attend the hearing. The tenancy was terminated as of the date the tenant moved out, and the tenant was ordered to pay rent arrears, utility expenses, and the application filing fee.

• Arrears · $4,553 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Out-of-pocket expenses incurred due to unpaid electricity and water/sewage utility costs · $2,031 · to the landlord

• Persistent late payment
• Tenant agreed termination

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment of rent, but the parties signed a mutual agreement (N11) to end the tenancy. On consent, the tribunal ordered the tenancy terminated as of September 30, 2026, and ordered the tenants to reimburse the landlord's $186 filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Substantial interference

The landlord withdrew its application to terminate the tenancy for substantial interference. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.

• Personal use eviction
• Bad faith eviction

The tribunal dismissed the tenant's bad-faith eviction application. The evidence showed the landlord's son genuinely moved into the home within a reasonable time following the N12 notice.

• The tenant's application is dismissed. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Persistent late payment
• Maintenance issues
• Breach of conditions

The tenant's motion to set aside an eviction order was denied because the tenant breached a previous consent order by failing to pay rent on time and in full.

• The tenant's motion to set aside order LTB-L-009542-26 is denied and the stay of eviction is lifted on May 25, 2026. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Persistent late payment
• Breach of conditions

The tribunal dismissed the tenant's motion to set aside a previous ex parte eviction order. The stay of the eviction order was lifted after finding that the tenant breached a conditional order by failing to pay rent on time.

• The tenant's motion to set aside the eviction order is denied and the stay of the order is lifted. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tribunal granted the tenants' motion to set aside an ex parte eviction order after finding that a one-day delay in rent and arrears payment was caused by a postal strike affecting disability cheques.

• The motion to set aside order LTB-L-009540-26 is granted, the eviction order is set aside, and the mediated settlement dated May 8, 2025 remains in effect

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tenants' motion to set aside an earlier eviction order was denied after they breached the payment terms of a prior order. The stay of the eviction order was lifted immediately.

• The tenants' motion to set aside order LTB-L-010426-26 is denied and the stay is lifted immediately · to the landlord

• Lockout and illegal eviction
• Harassment
• Substantial interference
• Safety concerns

The tenant's application alleging that the landlords altered the locks, harassed the tenant, and substantially interfered with reasonable enjoyment was dismissed. The tribunal found that the tenant failed to prove the claims on a balance of probabilities.

• The Tenant's T2 application is dismissed for lack of proof. · to the landlord

• Rent increase disputes
• Illegal charges or collection

The tenants' application alleging illegal rent charges was dismissed because it was filed after the one-year limitation period. Under the Residential Tenancies Act, claims for illegal money collected must be brought within one year of collection.

• The Tenants' application is dismissed as statute-barred.

• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The tribunal granted the landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant based on substantial interference and property damage. The tenant was ordered to pay $7,542.70 for repair costs plus the filing fee.

• Damages · $7,543 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Illegal charges or collection

The tribunal dismissed the tenant's application after neither party attended the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant's application for a rebate of illegally collected or retained money was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tenant failed to attend the hearing for their motion to set aside a previous order. Consequently, the tribunal determined the motion was abandoned, denied the request, and lifted the stay of the eviction order.

• The tenant's motion to set aside the order was denied and abandoned due to the tenant's failure to attend the hearing, and the stay of the previous order was lifted. · to the landlord

• Breach of conditions

The tribunal denied the tenant's motion to set aside a previous eviction order after the tenant failed to attend the hearing. As a result, the stay of the prior order was lifted immediately.

• The tenant's motion to set aside the order was denied due to non-attendance, and the stay of order LTB-L-002717-26 was lifted immediately. · to the landlord

• Illegal charges or collection

The tribunal dismissed the tenants' application after neither party attended the hearing, finding the application to be abandoned.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Breach of conditions

The tribunal denied the tenants' motion to set aside a previous eviction order because the tenants failed to attend the hearing. As a result, the stay of the eviction order was lifted.

• Tenants' motion to set aside Order LTB-L-006475-26 was denied due to non-attendance, and the stay of the order was lifted immediately. · to the landlord

• Substantial interference

The tribunal found that the tenant substantially interfered with reasonable enjoyment by failing to maintain reasonable cleanliness and prepare the unit for cockroach treatment. The tribunal granted conditional relief from eviction, allowing the tenancy to continue provided the tenant complies with pest control instructions and pays the landlord's filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Substantial interference
• Breach of conditions

The tribunal granted the landlord's application to terminate the tenancy due to substantial interference caused by smoking in the rental unit. The tenant was ordered to vacate the unit by April 17, 2026, and pay daily compensation and filing fee costs.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
• Arrears · $53 · to the landlord

• Breach of conditions

The tribunal issued a consent order denying the tenant's motion to set aside a previous order. The stay of the previous order was ordered to be lifted on April 30, 2026.

• Non-payment of rent

The tenant's motion to set aside an earlier eviction order was granted on consent. The parties agreed to a payment plan for the rent arrears and filing fee.

• Arrears · $2,432 · to the landlord

• Previous eviction order set aside on consent and replaced with a repayment plan

• Substantial interference

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy for substantial interference. The tribunal dismissed the application because the landlord served an invalid notice of termination.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant is dismissed because the notices of termination were invalid.

• Substantial interference

The tribunal found that the landlord established grounds for termination of the tenancy due to cleanliness and pest control issues, but granted conditional relief from eviction allowing the tenancy to continue if the tenant complies with pest treatment reporting and instructions. The tenant was ordered to reimburse the landlord's filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Substantial interference

The tribunal found that the tenant substantially interfered with reasonable enjoyment, but granted conditional relief from eviction subject to behavioural conditions.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Tenant must comply with conduct conditions for twelve months or face an ex parte eviction application under section 78 · to the landlord

• Property damage

The tenants' motion to set aside the eviction order was denied on consent as the tenants were already vacating the rental unit.

• The motion to set aside order LTB-L-003750-26 is denied and the stay is lifted on consent. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord consented to the tenants' motion to set aside an ex parte eviction order. The eviction order was cancelled and the prior conditional order was restored.

• Order LTB-L-004199-26 set aside on consent and order LTB-L-060742-25 restored

• Non-payment of rent

The tenant's motion to set aside an eviction order was granted because the tenant paid all required arrears and costs to void the order.

• Order LTB-L-070307-25 is void and cannot be enforced by the Landlord

• Substantial interference
• Utility costs

The tribunal found that the tenant substantially interfered with the landlord's rights by failing to pay utilities on time, but granted conditional relief from eviction requiring timely utility payments.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Condition that the tenant pay utility bills on time as they come due for twelve consecutive months. · to the landlord

• Persistent late payment

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment of rent. The tribunal found the grounds proved but granted relief from eviction conditional on the tenants paying rent on time for twelve months and reimbursing the landlord's application filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the scheduled hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance

• Persistent late payment

The tribunal found grounds for eviction due to persistent late payment of rent, but granted conditional relief from eviction requiring the tenant to pay rent on time for 12 months. The tenant was ordered to reimburse the landlord's $186.00 application fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Substantial interference

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy due to substantial interference caused by severe pet odours and cleanliness issues. The tribunal found the landlord proved the grounds but granted relief from eviction conditional upon the tenant cleaning the unit, maintaining it, and allowing monthly inspections.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Tenancy continues conditionally on the tenant cleaning the unit and stopping foul odours by April 6, 2026, maintaining cleanliness thereafter, and permitting monthly landlord inspections · to the landlord

• Property damage

The landlord's application for property damage costs was dismissed after neither party attended the hearing.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenants for rent arrears was discontinued because the tenants paid all outstanding arrears and the application fee prior to the hearing.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenants based upon arrears of rent is discontinued following full payment of arrears and costs.

• Persistent late payment

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy due to persistent late payment of rent. The tribunal dismissed the application without prejudice, finding it premature and that the grounds were not proven.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and for compensation is dismissed without prejudice.

20 Graydon Hall Drive, Toronto

• Persistent late payment
• Substantial interference
• Utility costs

The landlord established grounds to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment of rent and unpaid utility costs. The tribunal granted conditional relief from eviction, allowing the tenancy to continue provided the tenants pay their monthly rent on time and pay $2,673.43 in utility arrears plus $186.00 in filing costs.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Tenants to pay landlord reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for unpaid water utility costs in installments · $2,673 · to the landlord

• Persistent late payment

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy alleging persistent late payment of rent. The tribunal dismissed the application after finding that the tenant paid rent on time and the alleged late payments were caused by the landlord's unauthorized pre-authorized debit attempts.

• The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment of rent is dismissed.

• Persistent late payment

The landlord's application to evict the tenant for persistent late payment of rent was dismissed as abandoned because neither party attended the hearing.

• The Landlord's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.

• Persistent late payment

The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment of rent was granted. The Tenants were ordered to vacate by February 28, 2026, and to pay daily compensation and the filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Tenants shall pay compensation of $129.73 per day for the use of the unit starting March 1, 2026 until vacating · to the landlord

• Persistent late payment

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy due to persistent late payment of rent. The tribunal granted relief from eviction on condition that the tenant pays rent on time for twelve months and reimburses the landlord's $186 filing fee.

• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord