Ontario Landlord and Tenant Board
Jack Jamieson
MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntarioBeta
Rulings, compared with the board
Too few orders to compareFewer than 20 contested orders have been processed for this member, which is too few to compare with the board.
Dismissals, compared with the board
Too few dismissals to compareFewer than 5 such dismissals have been processed for one or both sides, which is too few to compare them.
Orders
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 30, 2026
- Bad faith eviction
The tenant's application alleging a bad faith notice of termination was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
LTB-T-012843-26 · T5Landlord and Tenant BoardToronto Community Housing CorporationRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 29, 2026
- Bad faith eviction
The tenant's bad faith notice application was dismissed as abandoned because neither party attended the hearing.
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedJune 25, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Personal use eviction
- Bad faith eviction
The tenants' application alleging a bad faith eviction under an N12 notice was dismissed. The tribunal found the tenants vacated due to sheriff enforcement of an eviction order for rent arrears rather than as a result of the N12 notice.
- The Tenants' T5 bad faith eviction application is dismissed as not proved. · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedJune 25, 2026
- Personal use eviction
- Bad faith eviction
The tenants applied for remedies claiming the landlord served an N12 notice in bad faith. The tribunal dismissed the application because the tenants vacated due to an eviction order for rent arrears rather than the N12 notice.
- The tenants' T5 application alleging bad faith termination is dismissed as not proved. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyJune 15, 2026
- Personal use eviction
The landlord and the tenant agreed on consent to terminate the tenancy on December 31, 2026. If the tenant does not vacate by that date, an eviction may be enforced through the Sheriff.
- Daily compensation for use and occupation of the rental unit starting January 1, 2027 if the tenant does not vacate. · $35 · to the landlord
LTB-L-020800-26 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord did not meet the Act's requirementsJune 15, 2026
- Personal use eviction
The landlord's application to evict the tenants for personal use was dismissed because the landlord failed to disclose prior termination notices given for other units in the complex. The tenants were ordered to return the statutory compensation previously paid by the landlord.
- The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenants is dismissed.
- The Tenants shall repay the sum of $867.00 in N12 compensation to the Landlord by June 30, 2026. · $867 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · not provedJune 12, 2026
- Personal use eviction
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy for a purchaser's own use, but the application was dismissed because the notice of termination was invalid. The tenancy continues.
- The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenants is dismissed because the Landlord did not prove the grounds for termination.
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedMay 28, 2026
- Rent deposit disputes
- Illegal charges or collection
- Whether the Act applies
The tribunal dismissed the tenant's application for the return of a rent deposit. The tribunal found the tenant failed to provide proper statutory notice to terminate the tenancy, allowing the landlord to apply the deposit to the final rental period.
- The tenant's T1 application for a rebate of the rent deposit is dismissed for lack of merit. · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · outside the board's jurisdictionMay 27, 2026
- Rent deposit disputes
- Illegal charges or collection
- Whether the Act applies
The tribunal dismissed the tenant's application for a rebate of their rent deposit. It found that the Residential Tenancies Act does not apply because the landlord lives in the rooming house and shares bathroom and kitchen facilities with tenants.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction under s. 5(i) of the Act. · to the landlord
- Decision against landlordMay 26, 2026$2,400 Deposit returned
- Rent deposit disputes
- Illegal charges or collection
The tribunal granted the tenant's application and ordered the landlord to pay the remaining balance of the rent deposit, key deposit, deposit interest, and the application filing fee.
- Deposit returned · $2,400
- Deposit returned · $300
- Deposit returned · $60
- Filing fee · $48
- Decision against landlordMay 25, 2026$1,000 Deposit returned
- Rent deposit disputes
- Illegal charges or collection
The landlord was ordered to pay $1,348 to the tenants to refund an illegal deposit, return an unreturned key deposit, and reimburse the application filing fee.
- Deposit returned · $1,000
- Deposit returned · $300
- Filing fee · $48
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMay 21, 2026
- Illegal charges or collection
The tenant's application regarding alleged illegal charges or money collected was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
- The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord
- Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord did not meet the Act's requirementsFebruary 17, 2026
- Personal use eviction
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for personal use was dismissed because the rental unit is owned by a corporation rather than an individual.
- The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy is dismissed as the unit is not owned by an individual under section 48(5) of the Act.
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · withdrawnFebruary 17, 2026
- Personal use eviction
The landlord withdrew the application to end the tenancy for personal use. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.
- The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy was withdrawn and the file is closed.
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · withdrawnFebruary 17, 2026
- Personal use eviction
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy for personal use but withdrew the application at the hearing. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.
- The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for personal occupation was withdrawn.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnFebruary 2, 2026
- Vital services
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenants requested to withdraw their application at the hearing, and the tribunal consented and closed the file.
- The Tenant's application was withdrawn and the file is closed.
- Decision against landlordJanuary 9, 2026$1,995 Rent abatement
- Maintenance issues
- Tenant rights
- Safety concerns
The tenant's maintenance application was granted. The landlord was ordered to repair streetlights, potholes, and drainage ditches, and to pay the tenant $1,995.00 in rent abatement.
- Repair order
- Repair order
- Repair order
- Rent abatement · $1,995
- The Tenant’s obligation to pay rent is suspended from April 1, 2026 if the Landlord has not, by March 31, 2026, obtained written information from MPAC with respect to the value of the mobile home and provided that information to the Tenant.
- Decision against landlordJanuary 7, 2026$6,000 Rent abatement
- Maintenance issues
- Substantial interference
The Board granted the tenants' applications after finding the landlord failed to address a persistent raccoon and rodent infestation in the attic. The landlord was ordered to pay $7,568.39, consisting of a rent abatement, moving costs, and filing fee reimbursement.
- Rent abatement · $6,000
- Damages · $1,472
- Filing fee · $96
- Decision against landlordJanuary 7, 2026$2,914 Rent abatement
- Maintenance issues
- Vital services
- Safety concerns
The tenant's maintenance application was granted in part. The landlord was ordered to pay $2,962.32 in rent abatement and application fee reimbursement for failing to maintain the windows and plumbing.
- Rent abatement · $2,914
- Filing fee · $48
- Decision against tenantJanuary 7, 2026
- Renovation and demolition
- Bad faith eviction
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy for demolition under an N13 notice following a municipal Order to Comply requiring removal of the basement kitchen. The Board found the landlord proved the demolition in good faith with the required permits and terminated the tenancy, postponing eviction to March 31, 2026.
- The tenancy is terminated and the Tenant must move out of the rental unit on or before March 31, 2026. · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedJanuary 7, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tenant's application alleging that the landlord failed to repair a broken dishwasher was dismissed. The tribunal found that the dishwasher was operational and that the tenant had failed to prove the maintenance claim.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed.