Ontario Landlord and Tenant Board
Elena Jacob
MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntarioBeta
Rulings, compared with the board
About the board's rate against tenantsDecided against tenants about as often as the board does on comparable applications, across 90 contested orders.
Orders are grouped by who applied and what they applied for, and this member’s record is compared with the board’s on that same mix. Withdrawn, settled and non-attendance dismissals are excluded. It measures how these decisions differ from the board’s on cases of the same type.
Dismissals, compared with the board
Bars tenants and landlords about as oftenDismissed tenants' and landlords' applications as not proved, out of jurisdiction or barred on procedure at rates that do not differ once the kind of application is accounted for, across 9 such dismissals of tenants' applications and 12 of landlords'.
Counts only dismissals the member ruled on — not proved, outside the board’s jurisdiction, or barred on procedure. Applications withdrawn, settled or dismissed because nobody attended are excluded, as they are above. The two sides are compared on this member’s own docket, against the board’s rate on the same kinds of application. It does not measure whether any decision was right.
Orders
Showing 151–171 of 171- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnJanuary 26, 2026
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant withdrew their application concerning harassment and substantial interference. The Board consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.
- The Tenant's application is withdrawn and the Board's file is closed.
- No finding against either partyJanuary 23, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tenant paid the full amount required to void the eviction order before it became enforceable. The tribunal granted the tenant's motion and declared the eviction order void.
- Order LTB-L-078750-25 is void and cannot be enforced by the Landlord
LTB-L-078750-25 · L1Landlord and Tenant BoardPeel Housing Corp OP as Peel LivingRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyJanuary 23, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tenants' motion to void the eviction order was granted after they paid the required arrears, with a minor shortfall of eighty cents deemed de minimis. The prior eviction order is void and cannot be enforced.
- The motion to void order LTB-L-100866-25 is granted, and the order is void and cannot be enforced by the Landlord.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnJanuary 22, 2026
- Maintenance issues
- Substantial interference
The tenants requested to withdraw their maintenance and tenant rights applications. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.
- The Tenant's T2 and T6 applications are withdrawn and the Board's file is closed.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnJanuary 22, 2026
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenants requested to withdraw their application concerning substantial interference and harassment. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.
- The Tenant's application is withdrawn and the Board's file is closed.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnJanuary 22, 2026
- Rent reduction
The tenant withdrew their application for a rent reduction, and the Board closed the file.
- The Tenant's application is withdrawn and the Board's file is closed.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnJanuary 21, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tenant withdrew their maintenance application, and the Landlord and Tenant Board consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.
- The Tenant's application is withdrawn and the Board's file is closed.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnJanuary 19, 2026
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenants' application alleging substantial interference and harassment was withdrawn, and the tribunal closed the file.
- The application is withdrawn and the Board's file is closed
- No finding against either partyJanuary 16, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tenant paid the full amount required to void the eviction order before it became enforceable. The tribunal granted the motion to void the order, making the eviction unenforceable.
- The motion to void order LTB-L-082785-25 is granted and the eviction order is void and unenforceable
- No finding against either partyJanuary 16, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tenant paid the full amount required to void the eviction order before it became enforceable. The tribunal granted the motion to void, rendering the prior eviction order void and unenforceable.
- Motion to void order LTB-L-081128-25 is granted; the eviction order is void and cannot be enforced by the landlord
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedJanuary 16, 2026
- Personal use eviction
- Bad faith eviction
The tenants' application alleging a bad faith eviction was dismissed. The tribunal found the landlord had a genuine intention to occupy the unit and the delay in moving in was caused by his mother's terminal illness.
- The Tenants' application alleging bad faith termination is dismissed as not proved.
- No finding against either partyJanuary 16, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tenants paid the full amount required to void the eviction order before it became enforceable. The tribunal granted the motion and declared the previous eviction order void.
- Order LTB-L-085106-25 is void and cannot be enforced by the Landlord
- No finding against either partyJanuary 16, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tenant's motion to void the eviction order was granted after the tenant paid the full amount required before the order became enforceable.
- Motion to void order LTB-L-074781-25 is granted, and the order is void and cannot be enforced by the Landlord
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · withdrawnJanuary 15, 2026
- Renovation and demolition
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy for demolition but requested to withdraw the application. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.
- The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy is withdrawn and the Board's file is closed.
LTB-L-088388-24 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnJanuary 15, 2026
- Illegal charges or collection
- Substantial interference
The tenant withdrew their applications regarding substantial interference and illegal charges, and the tribunal closed the file.
- The Tenant's application is withdrawn, and the Board's file is closed.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnJanuary 14, 2026
- Rent reduction
The tenant withdrew their application for a rent reduction, and the Board closed the file.
- The Tenant's application is withdrawn and the file is closed.
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · withdrawnJanuary 14, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord withdrew its application to terminate the tenancy and collect rent arrears, and the file was closed.
- The Landlord's application is withdrawn and the file is closed.
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedJanuary 14, 2026
- Personal use eviction
- Bad faith eviction
The tenant applied for an order determining that the landlord gave a notice of termination in bad faith. The tribunal dismissed the application because the tenant vacated under an eviction order for rent arrears, not as a result of the personal-use notice.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed as the Tenant failed to establish that they vacated the rental unit as a result of the N12 notice.
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · a procedural barJanuary 13, 2026
- Bad faith eviction
The tenant's application alleging a bad faith notice of termination was dismissed because it was filed more than one year after vacating the unit.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed as out of time under subsection 57(2) of the Act.
LTB-T-056704-25 · T5Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against landlordJanuary 12, 2026$500 Damages
- Tenant rights
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tribunal found that the landlords interfered with the tenant by refusing to return the tenant's pantry and retaining it for use by incoming tenants. The landlords were ordered to pay $548 to the tenant for the replacement cost of the property and reimbursement of the filing fee.
- Damages · $500
- Filing fee · $48
Unit 2, 40 Lobraico Lane, Whitchurch-Stouffville
LTB-T-081231-24 · T2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnJanuary 12, 2026
- Illegal entry
- Illegal charges or collection
- Substantial interference
The tenants requested to withdraw their applications regarding illegal entry, substantial interference, and illegal charges. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.
- The Tenant's application is withdrawn, the Board's file is closed.