Ontario Landlord and Tenant Board
Dawn Carr
MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntarioBeta
Rulings, compared with the board
1.34× the board's rate against tenantsDecided against tenants more often than the board does on comparable applications — 1.34× the board's rate (95% interval 1.23–1.44), across 344 contested orders.
Orders are grouped by who applied and what they applied for, and this member’s record is compared with the board’s on that same mix. Withdrawn, settled and non-attendance dismissals are excluded. It measures how these decisions differ from the board’s on cases of the same type.
Dismissals, compared with the board
Bars tenants and landlords about as oftenDismissed tenants' and landlords' applications as not proved, out of jurisdiction or barred on procedure at rates that do not differ once the kind of application is accounted for, across 18 such dismissals of tenants' applications and 14 of landlords'.
Counts only dismissals the member ruled on — not proved, outside the board’s jurisdiction, or barred on procedure. Applications withdrawn, settled or dismissed because nobody attended are excluded, as they are above. The two sides are compared on this member’s own docket, against the board’s rate on the same kinds of application. It does not measure whether any decision was right.
Orders
Showing 51–100 of 496- Decision against tenantJune 10, 2026$2,300 Deposit returned
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and collect rent arrears after the tenants vacated the rental unit. The tribunal ordered the tenants to pay $26,949.76 in outstanding rent and application fees, after crediting the rent deposit and interest.
- Deposit returned · $2,300
- Deposit returned · $307
- Arrears · $29,371 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
LTB-L-027426-26 · L1Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantJune 10, 2026$2,100 Deposit returned
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and collect rent arrears. The tribunal terminated the tenancy as the tenant had already vacated and ordered the tenant to pay outstanding arrears and costs minus the rent deposit and interest.
- Deposit returned · $2,100
- Deposit returned · $13
- Arrears · $4,102 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantJune 10, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tribunal ordered the tenants to pay the landlord $10,516.23 for rent arrears and application filing costs.
- Arrears · $10,330 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
LTB-L-026986-26 · L1Landlord and Tenant BoardBlackstar 2220 & 2222 Weston Limited PartnershipRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 10, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and collect rent arrears was dismissed after neither party attended the hearing.
- The landlord's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 10, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tribunal denied the tenant's request for review after the tenant failed to attend the hearing. The original eviction order was confirmed, the stay was lifted, and the tenant was ordered to pay $100 in costs to the landlord.
- Costs payable by the tenant to the landlord for preparing for and attending the review hearing · $100 · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantJune 10, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord's application was granted. The tenancy was ordered terminated for non-payment of rent unless the tenant pays the full arrears and filing fee.
- Arrears · $17,305 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Daily compensation for use of the unit starting June 4, 2026 until vacating · $56 · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantJune 10, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord's application was granted after the tenants failed to attend the hearing. The tenancy was terminated effective the date the tenants vacated, and the tenants were ordered to pay rent arrears and application costs.
- Arrears · $2,023 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantJune 10, 2026$2,700 Deposit returned
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and recover rent arrears. The tribunal terminated the tenancy as the tenants had already moved out and ordered the tenants to pay remaining arrears and the filing fee after applying the rent deposit and interest.
- Deposit returned · $2,700
- Deposit returned · $67
- Arrears · $4,289 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Decision against landlordJune 9, 2026
- Maintenance issues
- Illegal entry
- Rent reduction
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tribunal denied the landlord's request to review a previous order concerning tenant rights and maintenance issues, confirming the original decision and lifting the stay.
- The landlord's request to review order LTB-T-067133-25 is denied, the order is confirmed, and the stay is lifted.
- No finding against either partyJune 9, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tribunal granted the tenant's request for review and cancelled the prior eviction order. The parties then resolved the non-payment application on consent through an agreed payment plan.
- Arrears · $1,696 · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantJune 8, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord's application for non-payment of rent was granted following a review hearing. The tenant was granted relief from eviction conditional on adhering to a payment plan for rent arrears and filing costs.
- Arrears · $3,291 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $244 · to the landlord
- Decision against landlordJune 8, 2026$2,156 Rent abatement
- Tenant rights
- Substantial interference
The tribunal found that the landlord substantially interfered with the tenants' reasonable enjoyment by revoking access to on-site laundry and parking spots. The landlord was ordered to pay a rent abatement, out-of-pocket expenses, and reimburse the application filing fee.
- Rent abatement · $2,156
- Damages · $779
- Filing fee · $48
- Decision against landlordJune 8, 2026$4,740 Damages
- Personal use eviction
- Bad faith eviction
- Illegal charges or collection
The tribunal found that the landlord served an N12 notice of termination in bad faith and failed to pay the required statutory compensation. The landlord was ordered to pay the tenants $11,668.00 for rent differential, moving and storage expenses, unpaid compensation, and application costs.
- Damages · $4,740
- Damages · $4,380
- Damages · $2,500
- Filing fee · $48
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnJune 5, 2026
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenants' request for review was granted, and the underlying tenant rights application was withdrawn on consent as part of a full and final resolution.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 5, 2026
- Bad faith eviction
The tenants' bad faith eviction application was dismissed as abandoned because neither party attended the hearing.
- The tenants' application is dismissed because the tenants did not attend the hearing to support their application. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 5, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tenant requested a review of a previous order but failed to attend the hearing. The tribunal dismissed the review as abandoned and confirmed the previous order.
- The tenant's review request is denied and dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance, confirming order LTB-L-009870-26 and lifting the stay. · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantJune 5, 2026$1,854 Deposit returned
- Non-payment of rent
The tribunal terminated the tenancy for non-payment of rent and ordered the tenant to pay outstanding arrears, unless the order is voided by paying the required amount by June 16, 2026.
- Deposit returned · $1,854
- Deposit returned · $42
- Arrears · $8,406 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $302 · to the landlord
- Daily compensation for use of the unit starting June 2, 2026 until the tenant moves out · $62 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 4, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Persistent late payment
The tenant failed to attend the review hearing, leading the tribunal to determine the review was abandoned. The request for review was denied, confirming the original eviction order and lifting the stay.
- The tenant's request to review order LTB-L-010888-26 is denied for abandonment due to non-attendance, the order is confirmed, and the stay is lifted. · to the landlord
LTB-L-010888-26 · L1;L2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyJune 4, 2026
- Property damage
- Tenant agreed termination
- Substantial interference
The parties consented to resolve the review application by cancelling the previous order and agreeing to terminate the tenancy on June 15, 2026. Under the consent order, the tenant agreed to pay the landlord $8,000.00 for property damages and the application fee.
- Damages · $8,000 · to the landlord
LTB-L-102067-25 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardMarathon Municipal Non-Profit Housing CorporationRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyJune 2, 2026$2,700
- Maintenance issues
The parties reached a consent agreement resolving the tenant's maintenance application. The landlord agreed to pay the tenant $2,700.00 in full and final resolution of all issues.
- The Landlord shall pay the Tenant $2,700.00 by May 31, 2026 · $2,700
- Decision against landlordJune 2, 2026$1,800 Rent abatement
- Maintenance issues
The tribunal found that the landlords breached their maintenance obligations by failing to properly repair septic fumes and a sewage backup. The landlords were ordered to pay the tenant an $1,800.00 rent abatement.
- Rent abatement · $1,800
LTB-T-080282-24 · T6Landlord and Tenant Board1881 Investment Ltd., Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Findings both waysJune 2, 2026$1,800 Deposit returned
- Non-payment of rent
- Tenant rights
- Rent deposit disputes
- Breach of conditions
The landlord applied for rent arrears following the tenants' departure, asserting the lease had automatically renewed for 12 months. The tribunal found the renewal clause unenforceable, determined rent owed to the vacating date, offset held deposits and interest, and ordered the landlord to pay the net balance to the tenants.
- Deposit returned · $1,800
- Deposit returned · $104
- Deposit returned · $200
- Arrears · $1,906 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · service not provedJune 1, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Utility costs
The landlord's application for rent arrears and utility costs was dismissed because the landlord failed to prove proper service of the application and notice of hearing on the former tenants.
- The Landlord's application is dismissed because service of the application and Notice of Hearing was not proved.
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · nobody attendedMay 29, 2026
- Property damage
- Breach of conditions
The tenants' motion to set aside a previous ex-parte eviction order was granted. Because the landlord failed to attend the hearing, the landlord's application was treated as abandoned and the previous order was set aside.
- Order LTB-L-025069-26 issued on March 27, 2026 is set aside and cannot be enforced; landlord's application is treated as abandoned for non-attendance
- No finding against either partyMay 29, 2026
- Property damage
- Breach of conditions
The tenant's motion to set aside a previous eviction order was granted on consent. The parties agreed to new conditional terms to maintain the tenancy, including guest restrictions and an installment payment plan for outstanding damages.
- Damages · $750 · to the landlord
LTB-L-020100-26 · L4Landlord and Tenant BoardKingston & Frontenac Housing CorporationRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyMay 28, 2026
- Illegal act
- Breach of conditions
- Safety concerns
The tenant's motion to set aside an ex parte eviction order was granted after the tribunal found that the tenant acted in self-defence during an altercation. The previous eviction order was set aside and cannot be enforced.
- The ex parte order terminating the tenancy and evicting the tenant is set aside and cannot be enforced
LTB-L-017007-26 · L4Landlord and Tenant BoardToronto Community Housing CorporationRead the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantMay 28, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Property damage
- Substantial interference
- Utility costs
The tribunal ordered the former tenant to pay the landlord $812.37 for unpaid utility costs, property damage repairs, and the application filing fee.
- Damages · $507 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Unpaid utility costs (hydro) · $119 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · service not provedMay 28, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Property damage
- Utility costs
The landlord's application for rent arrears, utilities, and property damage was dismissed because the landlord failed to prove that the former tenant was served with the application and notice of hearing.
- The Landlord's application is dismissed because service of the application and Notice of Hearing was not proved.
- Decision against tenantMay 28, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tenant's request to review an earlier eviction order for non-payment of rent was denied. The original order was confirmed and the stay of eviction was lifted effective May 31, 2026.
- The tenant's request to review order LTB-L-105257-25 is denied, the order is confirmed, and the stay is lifted effective May 31, 2026 · to the landlord
LTB-L-105257-25 · L1Landlord and Tenant BoardBDO Canada LTD Receiver of 1000000152 Ont Inc c/o RAS Inc.Read the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · not provedMay 27, 2026
- Personal use eviction
The Board granted the tenant's review request and dismissed the landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for personal use because the property is corporate-owned. The tenant was ordered to return an uncashed compensation cheque to the landlord.
- The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for personal use is dismissed because the rental unit is owned by a corporation.
- The Tenant shall return the uncashed compensation cheque to the Landlord within 14 days of this order. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · service not provedMay 26, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Property damage
- Substantial interference
- Utility costs
The landlord applied to collect rent arrears, utility costs, property damage, and other out-of-pocket expenses from the former tenants. The tribunal dismissed the application because the landlord failed to prove proper service of the application and notice of hearing.
- The Landlord's L10 application is dismissed because service of the application and Notice of Hearing was not proved.
LTB-L-009853-25 · L10Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMay 25, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed as abandoned after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
- The tenant's T6 maintenance application is dismissed due to non-attendance and abandonment. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyMay 25, 2026
- Substantial interference
The tribunal granted the tenant's request for review on consent, cancelling a previous eviction order. The parties agreed to conditional terms to continue the tenancy, requiring the tenant to maintain the balcony and pay the landlord's application fee.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
LTB-L-093382-25 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardRPMS Property Management Services IncRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMay 25, 2026
- Lockout and illegal eviction
- Illegal entry
- Vital services
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant failed to attend the hearing to support their application. The tribunal determined the application was abandoned and dismissed it.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed because the Tenant did not attend the hearing and the application was found abandoned. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMay 25, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tenants' maintenance application was dismissed as abandoned after they failed to attend the hearing.
- The tenants' application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyBoth applications dismissed · settled by agreementMay 22, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Illegal entry
- Vital services
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant and landlord resolved their respective applications on consent. Both applications were withdrawn and the landlord agreed to provide a letter of apology to the tenant.
- The landlord shall forward a letter of apology to the tenant regarding interactions with the landlord's former agent.
LTB-T-082542-23 · T2Landlord and Tenant BoardCan-Ram Corporation Number One And TwoRead the order (PDF) - Decision against landlordMay 22, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tribunal found that the landlords breached their maintenance obligations by failing to address a cockroach infestation, a broken oven, malfunctioning air conditioning, and damaged window screens. The landlords were ordered to complete specified inspections and repairs by set deadlines.
- Repair order
Apartment 201, 112 Saint Joseph's Drive, Hamilton
LTB-T-084040-25 · T6Landlord and Tenant Board112 St. Joseph’s Inc., Multifamily Management Group Inc.Read the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyBoth applications dismissed · withdrawnMay 22, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Illegal entry
- Vital services
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The landlord and tenant resolved their respective applications on consent, agreeing to withdraw all claims with the landlord providing a letter of apology.
- The landlord shall forward a letter of apology to the tenant regarding interactions with the landlord's former agent.
LTB-L-034620-24 · L10Landlord and Tenant BoardCan-Ram Corporation Number One And TwoRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyMay 22, 2026$2,500
- Maintenance issues
- Substantial interference
The tenant's rights and maintenance applications were resolved by a consent order requiring the landlord to pay the tenants $2,500.00 in full and final settlement.
- Payment by the landlord to the tenants on consent in full and final settlement of all tenancy issues · $2,500
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMay 21, 2026
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application claiming substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment was dismissed after neither party attended the hearing.
- The tenant's application is dismissed for non-attendance.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMay 21, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tenants' maintenance application was dismissed after they failed to attend the hearing.
- The tenants' application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyMay 20, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tribunal granted the tenants' motion on consent to set aside an earlier eviction order. The parties agreed to a payment schedule for rent arrears to allow the tenants to continue their tenancy.
- Arrears · $7,338 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyMay 20, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tenant paid all outstanding rent arrears and required fees before the eviction order was enforced. The tribunal ordered that the previous eviction order is void and cannot be enforced.
- Order LTB-L-072175-25 is declared void and unenforceable
- No finding against either partyMay 20, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tenant's motion to set aside an ex parte eviction order was granted on consent. The parties agreed to a payment plan for the tenant to pay $3,322.86 in rent arrears.
- Arrears · $3,323 · to the landlord
LTB-L-020792-26 · L4Landlord and Tenant BoardRPMS Property Management Services IncRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · withdrawnMay 19, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tenant's motion to set aside a previous ex parte order was granted on consent. The landlord withdrew the L4 application regarding a breach of a mediated settlement.
- Order LTB-L-023273-26 is set aside and the landlord's L4 application is withdrawn on consent.
- No finding against either partyMay 19, 2026
- Property damage
- Substantial interference
- Breach of conditions
- Safety concerns
The tribunal granted the tenants' motion on consent, setting aside a previous ex parte eviction order. The parties agreed to maintain the tenancy under specified behavioural and rehousing conditions.
- The ex parte eviction order LTB-L-004361-26 is set aside on consent and cannot be enforced
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMay 19, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tenants did not attend the hearing for their motion to set aside a previous order. As a result, the tribunal deemed the motion abandoned, denied the request to set aside the order, and lifted the stay of eviction.
- The tenants' motion to set aside order LTB-L-024033-26 is denied as abandoned and the stay of the order is lifted. · to the landlord
LTB-L-024033-26 · L4Landlord and Tenant BoardWindsor Essex Community Housing CorporationRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyMay 19, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tenants' motion to set aside an eviction order was granted on consent after they paid all required arrears and fees under the Act. The previous eviction order was declared void and unenforceable.
- Order LTB-L-071513-25 is void and cannot be enforced by the landlord
- No finding against either partyMay 19, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
On consent of both parties, the tribunal granted the tenant's motion to set aside a previous ex parte eviction order and established an amended payment schedule to void the termination of the tenancy.
- Arrears · $24,002 · to the landlord
- Daily compensation for use and occupation of the rental unit starting if order is not voided · $36 · to the landlord
LTB-L-026521-26 · L4Landlord and Tenant BoardThe Regional Municipality of WaterlooRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyMay 19, 2026$4,000
- Tenant agreed termination
The tenant's motion to set aside a previous eviction order was granted on consent. The parties agreed to terminate the tenancy on August 1, 2026, with compensation and moving costs paid by the landlord.
- Landlord to pay the tenant on request · $1,500
- Landlord to pay up to $4,000.00 directly to approved packing and moving vendors · $4,000