Dale Whitmore

• Personal use eviction

The tribunal granted the landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for personal use by the landlord's son. The tenants were ordered to vacate the rental unit and pay compensation for use and occupation.

• Arrears · $11,219 · to the landlord

• Daily compensation for use and occupation from June 25, 2026 until the tenants vacate · $64 · to the landlord

• Renovation and demolition

The tenants' request for a review of a previous order requiring them to return $3,390.00 in compensation to the landlord was denied. The previous order remains unchanged.

• The tenants' request to review order LTB-L-022597-26 is denied, confirming the original order. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The tenants' request to review a previous order was denied. The original order terminating the tenancy and evicting the tenants for non-payment of rent remains confirmed.

• The tenants' request to review order LTB-L-032450-26 is denied, and the order is confirmed and remains unchanged. · to the landlord

• Personal use eviction

The tribunal denied the tenant's request to review a previous eviction order granted for landlord's personal use. The original order terminating the tenancy remains confirmed and unchanged.

• The tenant's request to review order LTB-L-021917-26 is denied, and the original order is confirmed and remains unchanged · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy for non-payment of rent, but the parties resolved the dispute through a consent agreement. The tenant agreed to pay $9,536.00 in rent arrears and costs according to an installment schedule.

• Arrears · $9,536 · to the landlord

• Tenant rights
• Rent reduction
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant requested a review of an earlier order that dismissed their application alleging harassment, substantial interference, and failure to accommodate a disability through a rent reduction. The tribunal denied the review request and confirmed the original dismissal.

• The tenant's request to review order LTB-T-009618-25 is denied and the original dismissal of the tenant's application on the merits is confirmed. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The tenant's request to review an eviction order for non-payment of rent was denied. The original order terminating the tenancy and evicting the tenant remains confirmed and in effect.

• The tenant's request to review order LTB-L-016152-26 is denied, and the order is confirmed and remains unchanged. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The landlord's request to review an earlier order was denied. The original order requiring the tenant to pay rent arrears up to the date they vacated the unit remains in effect.

• The Landlord's request to review order LTB-L-026498-26 is denied, and the order is confirmed and remains unchanged.

• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The tenant's request to review a previous eviction and compensation order was denied. The tribunal confirmed the original order after finding no serious error in the proceeding.

• The tenant's request to review order LTB-L-087020-25 is denied and the order remains confirmed. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The tenant's request to review an eviction and arrears order was denied. The original order remains confirmed and unchanged.

• The tenant's request to review order LTB-L-025090-26 is denied and the original order is confirmed · to the landlord

• Rent deposit disputes
• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant's review request was denied, confirming the dismissal of their application. The landlord was entitled to retain the rent deposit because the tenant unilaterally cancelled the tenancy before moving in.

• The tenant's request to review order LTB-T-012402-26 is denied and the order dismissing the application is confirmed.

• Property damage
• Substantial interference

The tenant's request to review a previous order terminating the tenancy for substantial interference and damage was denied. The original order remains confirmed and unchanged.

• The tenant's request to review order LTB-L-069222-25 is denied, and the order is confirmed and remains unchanged. · to the landlord

• Substantial interference
• Breach of conditions
• Safety concerns

The tenant's request to review an eviction order was denied. The tribunal confirmed that the tenant breached a prior consent order after the tenant's dog was repeatedly unleashed in common areas and attacked other residents.

• The tenant's request to review order LTB-L-007548-26 is denied, and the order terminating the tenancy is confirmed. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Rent deposit disputes

The tenants' request to review a previous eviction and rent arrears order was denied. The original order remains confirmed and in full effect.

• Tenant rights
• Illegal charges or collection
• Substantial interference

The tribunal denied the tenant's review request, confirming the previous order that dismissed the tenant's application for substantial interference and rent return.

• Non-payment of rent
• Persistent late payment

The tenant's request to review an eviction order for non-payment of rent and persistent late payment was denied. The original order terminating the tenancy remains confirmed.

• The tenant's request to review order LTB-L-020316-26 is denied and the original order is confirmed · to the landlord

• Tenant rights
• Illegal charges or collection
• Substantial interference

The tenant's request to review a previous decision was denied, confirming the dismissal of their application. The tribunal upheld that the landlords did not substantially interfere with reasonable enjoyment and the tenant was not entitled to a rent refund after unilaterally vacating.

• The tenant's request to review the order was denied, and the original order confirming the dismissal of the tenant's application remains unchanged. · to the landlord

• Unauthorized occupants
• Assignment or sublet

The tenant requested a review of an earlier order terminating the tenancy and evicting unauthorized occupants. The tribunal denied the review request and confirmed the termination order.

• The tenant's request to review order LTB-L-030649-25 is denied, and the original order terminating the tenancy is confirmed and remains unchanged. · to the landlord

• Personal use eviction
• Bad faith eviction

The tribunal denied the tenants' request to review an earlier order that dismissed their bad-faith eviction application. The original decision in favour of the landlord remains confirmed.

• The tenants' request to review order LTB-T-087953-25 is denied and the original order is confirmed. · to the landlord

• Illegal entry

The tenant withdrew their application regarding alleged illegal entry, and the Landlord and Tenant Board closed the file.

• Maintenance issues
• Illegal charges or collection
• Substantial interference

The tenant's request to review an earlier order dismissing their T1, T2, and T6 applications as abandoned was denied. The original order dismissing the applications stands.

• The tenant's request for review is denied and the original dismissal order stands confirmed. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent
• Breach of conditions

The tribunal denied the tenant's request to review an earlier order that refused to set aside an eviction order. The underlying eviction order remains confirmed and unchanged.

• The tenant's request to review order LTB-L-016901-26-SA is denied, and the order remains confirmed and unchanged. · to the landlord

• Illegal act
• Substantial interference

The landlord's and tenants' applications were resolved by a consent order. The parties agreed to terminate the tenancy effective July 31, 2026, with the landlord paying the tenants a $5,000.00 rent refund.

• Refund of rent paid by the landlord to the tenants · $5,000
• Daily compensation for use and occupation of the rental unit starting August 1, 2026 until tenants vacate · $82 · to the landlord

• Breach of conditions
• Safety concerns

The landlord's application was resolved on consent with conditions requiring the tenant not to smoke inside the unit and to keep the stovetop clear of debris.

• On consent, the tenant must not smoke inside the unit and must keep the stovetop free of debris and garbage for the remainder of the tenancy, subject to section 78 eviction provisions upon breach. · to the landlord

• Illegal act
• Substantial interference

The landlord and tenants reached a consent agreement to terminate the tenancy and resolve both applications. The landlord agreed to refund $5,000.00 in rent to the tenants.

• The landlord shall pay the tenants a refund of rent paid on consent · $5,000

• Non-payment of rent

The tenant requested a review of a consent order regarding rent arrears. The tribunal denied the request and confirmed the original order.

• The tenant's request to review order LTB-L-016982-26 is denied, and the order is confirmed and remains unchanged. · to the landlord

• Lockout and illegal eviction
• Illegal entry
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tribunal denied the tenant's request to review an interim order that stayed an earlier decision and referred the landlord's review to a hearing. The interim order remains in effect because the tribunal's rules do not permit review of an interim decision.

• The Tenant's request to review order LTB-T-079192-23-RV-IN is denied

• Illegal act
• Substantial interference
• Safety concerns

The landlord and the tenant resolved the application on consent, agreeing to end the tenancy and allow the landlord to dispose of any remaining belongings. The landlord also agreed to provide the tenant with a positive reference letter.

• The landlord shall give the tenant a support letter stating that he is a good tenant and has no arrears

• Substantial interference

The co-op's request to review an earlier order was denied, upholding the dismissal of its application to terminate occupancy. The tribunal confirmed that a member failing to vacate after membership termination does not constitute substantial interference under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006.

• The co-op's request to review order LTB-C-080188-25 is denied, and the original order is confirmed and remains unchanged

• Lockout and illegal eviction
• Illegal entry
• Vital services
• Tenant rights
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant requested to withdraw their application against the landlords, and the tribunal consented and closed the file.

• The tenant's application is withdrawn at the tenant's request and the file is closed.

• Substantial interference

The co-op's request to review an earlier order refusing to terminate the members' occupancy was denied. The tribunal confirmed that failing to vacate after membership rights are terminated does not constitute substantial interference under the Residential Tenancies Act.

• The landlord's request for review of order LTB-C-080239-25 is denied and the order is confirmed.

• Non-payment of rent

The tenant's request to review a previous consent order terminating the tenancy for rent arrears was denied. The original order remains in effect.

• The tenant's request to review order LTB-L-022121-26 is denied, and the order is confirmed and remains unchanged. · to the landlord

• Property damage
• Substantial interference
• Safety concerns

The tenant's request for review of an eviction order was denied. The original order terminating the tenancy and ordering compensation for damage to the building's door lock remains confirmed.

• The tenant's request to review order LTB-L-005264-26 is denied, and the original order terminating the tenancy and ordering compensation remains confirmed. · to the landlord

• Illegal act
• Safety concerns

The tribunal granted the landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant due to an illegal act and seriously impairing the safety of others following an unprovoked assault.

• Compensation for the use of the unit from April 1, 2026 to May 26, 2026, plus $4.57 per day thereafter · $256 · to the landlord

• Illegal act
• Safety concerns

The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for an illegal act was granted after a tenant assaulted the property manager during an inspection. The tribunal ordered the tenancy terminated and required the tenants to pay compensation for the use of the unit plus filing fees.

• Arrears · $2,695 · to the landlord
• Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The tenant's request to review an eviction and rent arrears order was denied. The original order remains confirmed and in full effect.

• Property damage
• Substantial interference
• Utility costs

The landlord's remaining claim for compensation regarding washing machine damage was dismissed because the landlord failed to provide admissible evidence.

• The remainder of the landlord's application claiming compensation for damage to a washing machine is dismissed for lack of admissible evidence.

• Lockout and illegal eviction
• Illegal entry
• Vital services
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application regarding tenant rights was dismissed as abandoned after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned because the Tenant failed to attend the hearing. · to the landlord

• Substantial interference
• Safety concerns

The landlords' application to terminate the tenancy and evict was dismissed as moot because the tenants had already vacated the unit.

• The Landlords' application is dismissed as moot because the tenancy had already ended.

• Rent deposit disputes

The tenants' application for the return of their rent deposit was dismissed. The tribunal found that the landlord took reasonable steps to minimize losses after receiving the tenants' invalid termination notice.

• The tenants' application for the return of the rent deposit is dismissed on the merits. · to the landlord

• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment was dismissed as abandoned because neither party attended the hearing.

• The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned for non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Substantial interference

The landlord's application for termination based on substantial interference was resolved on consent with behavioral conditions. The tenant agreed not to make excessive noise until May 22, 2027, subject to section 78 enforcement if breached.

• On consent, the tenant and her household shall not make excessive noise substantially interfering with other residents' reasonable enjoyment until May 22, 2027, with the landlord permitted to apply under section 78 upon breach. · to the landlord

• Illegal charges or collection

The tenant's application alleging the landlord collected or retained money illegally was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Non-payment of rent

The tenant's request to review an eviction and rent arrears order was denied. The original order remains in effect and unchanged.

• Property damage
• Bad faith eviction
• Rent deposit disputes
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tribunal dismissed the tenants' applications for compensation for flood-damaged belongings and the return of their rent deposit. The tenants failed to establish any contravention of the Residential Tenancies Act by the landlord.

• The tenants' T2 and T5 applications are dismissed as no contravention of the Act was established. · to the landlord

• Illegal entry
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging illegal entry, substantial interference, and harassment was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to the tenant's failure to attend the hearing. · to the landlord

• Lockout and illegal eviction
• Illegal entry
• Harassment
• Substantial interference

The tenant's application alleging illegal entry, lock changes, substantial interference, and harassment was dismissed as abandoned because neither party attended the hearing.

• The tenant's application is dismissed due to abandonment for non-attendance. · to the landlord

• Maintenance issues

The tenants' maintenance application regarding cockroach and bedbug infestations was dismissed. The tribunal found that the landlord responded promptly to complaints and followed a reasonable program of pest maintenance.

• The Tenants' T6 application is dismissed as the claim was not proved on the merits. · to the landlord