Ontario Landlord and Tenant Board
Christina Budweth
MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntarioBeta
Rulings, compared with the board
1.56× the board's rate against tenantsDecided against tenants more often than the board does on comparable applications — 1.56× the board's rate (95% interval 1.29–1.83), across 81 contested orders.
Orders are grouped by who applied and what they applied for, and this member’s record is compared with the board’s on that same mix. Withdrawn, settled and non-attendance dismissals are excluded. It measures how these decisions differ from the board’s on cases of the same type.
Dismissals, compared with the board
Bars tenants and landlords about as oftenDismissed tenants' and landlords' applications as not proved, out of jurisdiction or barred on procedure at rates that do not differ once the kind of application is accounted for, across 14 such dismissals of tenants' applications and 11 of landlords'.
Counts only dismissals the member ruled on — not proved, outside the board’s jurisdiction, or barred on procedure. Applications withdrawn, settled or dismissed because nobody attended are excluded, as they are above. The two sides are compared on this member’s own docket, against the board’s rate on the same kinds of application. It does not measure whether any decision was right.
Orders
Showing 101–110 of 110- Decision against tenantJanuary 7, 2026
- Tenant agreed termination
- Breach of conditions
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy after an agreement of purchase and sale for the condominium unit failed to close. The tribunal terminated the tenancy and ordered the tenants to vacate and pay daily compensation and the filing fee.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Daily compensation of $140.00 per day for use of the unit starting February 1, 2026 until the tenants vacate · $140 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · nobody attendedJanuary 7, 2026
- Persistent late payment
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment of rent. Because neither party attended the hearing, the tribunal treated the application as abandoned and dismissed it.
- The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.
LTB-L-084385-25 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyJanuary 6, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Persistent late payment
The landlord's application was resolved through a mediated consent order allowing the tenancy to continue conditionally. The tenants agreed to pay outstanding arrears by December 31, 2025, and pay rent on time each month through December 1, 2027.
- Arrears · $2,523 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyJanuary 6, 2026
- Persistent late payment
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment of rent was resolved on consent of the parties. The tenancy is terminated effective January 31, 2026, and the tenant was ordered to pay the application filing fee.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantJanuary 6, 2026
- Persistent late payment
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment of rent was granted. The tenant was ordered to vacate the rental unit by January 17, 2026, and pay the landlord's filing fee.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
LTB-L-083214-25 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardMinto Apartment Limited PartnershipRead the order (PDF) - Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord did not meet the Act's requirementsJanuary 5, 2026
- Persistent late payment
The landlords' application to end the tenancy for persistent late payment of rent was dismissed. The tribunal found the notice of termination was legally deficient because it failed to provide specific dates or details of the alleged late payments.
- The Landlords' application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenants is dismissed.
11 Sailors Landing, Clarington
LTB-L-084251-25 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantJanuary 5, 2026
- Persistent late payment
The landlord established grounds to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment of rent, but the tribunal granted conditional relief from eviction allowing the tenancy to continue if the tenants pay rent on time for twelve months. The tenants were also ordered to pay the landlord's filing fee.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- The tenancy continues on the condition that the tenants pay lawful monthly rent on or before the first day of each month from February 1, 2026 to January 1, 2027. · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantJanuary 5, 2026
- Persistent late payment
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment was granted conditionally. The tenancy continues on condition that the tenant pays rent on time each month through January 2027, and the tenant must pay the landlord's $186 filing fee.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- The Tenant shall pay lawful monthly rent by the 1st day of each month from February 1, 2026 until January 1, 2027, or face termination under section 78. · to the landlord
LTB-L-079891-25 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardNipissing District Housing CorporationRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyJanuary 5, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Persistent late payment
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment was resolved by a consent order allowing the tenancy to continue on conditions. The tenant agreed to pay outstanding rent arrears and make on-time monthly rent payments through December 2027.
- Arrears · $1,611 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord's grounds were not provedJanuary 5, 2026
- Persistent late payment
The landlords' application to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment of rent was dismissed because paying late three times in eight months was found not to constitute persistent late payment.
- The Landlords' application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenants for persistent late payment is dismissed because the grounds were not proven.
Apartment 6, 329 Northlake Drive, Waterloo
LTB-L-095832-25 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF)