Ontario Landlord and Tenant Board
Brett Lockwood
MembreLandlord and Tenant BoardOntarioBeta
Rulings, compared with the board
About the board's rate against tenantsDecided against tenants about as often as the board does on comparable applications, across 369 contested orders.
Orders are grouped by who applied and what they applied for, and this member’s record is compared with the board’s on that same mix. Withdrawn, settled and non-attendance dismissals are excluded. It measures how these decisions differ from the board’s on cases of the same type.
Dismissals, compared with the board
Bars tenants and landlords about as oftenDismissed tenants' and landlords' applications as not proved, out of jurisdiction or barred on procedure at rates that do not differ once the kind of application is accounted for, across 37 such dismissals of tenants' applications and 20 of landlords'.
Counts only dismissals the member ruled on — not proved, outside the board’s jurisdiction, or barred on procedure. Applications withdrawn, settled or dismissed because nobody attended are excluded, as they are above. The two sides are compared on this member’s own docket, against the board’s rate on the same kinds of application. It does not measure whether any decision was right.
Orders
Showing 1–50 of 473- No finding against either partyJune 30, 2026
- Illegal act
- Assignment or sublet
The landlord's application was resolved by a consent order allowing the tenancy to continue under specific conditions. The tenant agreed not to advertise, assign, or sublet the unit without the landlord's written consent and to pay the $186 filing fee.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 30, 2026
- Safety concerns
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy over safety concerns. The application was dismissed as abandoned after neither party attended the hearing.
- The landlord's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.
- No finding against either partyJune 30, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord and the tenant resolved the application through an informed consent agreement. The tenancy terminated retroactively as of December 31, 2023, with the landlord waiving any remaining balance owing.
- The tenancy was terminated on consent effective December 31, 2023, and the landlord waived any remaining amounts owing.
- Decision against tenantJune 26, 2026$699 Deposit returned
- Property damage
- Illegal act
The tribunal terminated the tenancy and ordered the tenant's eviction due to illegal acts and wilful damage to property. The tenant was ordered to pay compensation and application costs, less the held rent deposit and interest.
- Deposit returned · $699
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Compensation for the use and occupation of the rental unit from March 1, 2026 to June 23, 2026 · $2,892 · to the landlord
- Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord did not meet the Act's requirementsJune 26, 2026
- Property damage
- Illegal act
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and claim repair costs was dismissed because the N6 Notice of Termination lacked required details and was legally defective.
- The Landlord's L2 application is dismissed due to a defective N6 Notice of Termination.
LTB-L-024560-26 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardCity of Cornwall, Housing Services DepartmentRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyJune 26, 2026
- Safety concerns
The landlord's eviction application was resolved through a consent agreement. The tenancy continues subject to specified behavioural conditions.
- The tenancy continues on consent subject to behavioural conditions, with the landlord permitted to apply under section 78 if conditions are breached.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 22, 2026
- Rent reduction
The tenant's rent reduction application was dismissed after neither party attended the hearing.
- The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnJune 18, 2026
- Rent reduction
The tenants withdrew their application for a rent reduction at the hearing, and the tribunal closed the file.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 18, 2026
- Rent reduction
The tenant applied for a rent reduction due to a reduction or discontinuance of services or facilities. The application was dismissed because neither party attended the hearing.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned. · to the landlord
LTB-T-013537-26 · T3Landlord and Tenant Board247 Durand Street Holding Corp, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedJune 18, 2026
- Maintenance issues
- Rent reduction
The tenant's application for a rent reduction due to an elevator outage was dismissed. The tribunal found the outage was temporary, the repair duration was reasonable, and the landlord took appropriate steps to assist residents.
- The tenant's T3 application for a rent reduction is dismissed because the elevator service reduction was temporary and the duration of repair was reasonable.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 17, 2026
- Rent reduction
The tenant's application for a rent reduction was dismissed because the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to the Tenant's failure to attend the hearing. · to the landlord
LTB-T-089886-25 · T3Landlord and Tenant BoardAnchor Property Managers Inc, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantJune 16, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tenant's motion to void the eviction order was granted conditionally on paying the $243.00 sheriff enforcement fee. If the tenant fails to pay by June 22, 2026, the stay will be lifted and the landlord may enforce the eviction.
- Sheriff enforcement fee payable by the tenant to void the eviction order · $243 · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · a procedural barJune 15, 2026
- Personal use eviction
- Rent deposit disputes
- Illegal charges or collection
The tenants' application for the return of part of their rent deposit and statutory compensation was dismissed because it was filed past the one-year limitation period.
- The T1 application is dismissed as it was filed beyond the one-year statutory deadline.
LTB-T-021532-26 · T1Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against landlordJune 15, 2026$2,000 Deposit returned
- Rent deposit disputes
- Illegal charges or collection
The tribunal found that the landlord collected an unlawful cleaning and damage deposit and failed to pay interest on the last month's rent deposit. The landlord was ordered to repay $2,171.74 to the tenants, including the deposits, interest, and filing fee reimbursement.
- Deposit returned · $2,000
- Deposit returned · $124
- Filing fee · $48
Unit 2803, 20 Edward Street, Toronto
LTB-T-021361-26 · T1Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 12, 2026
- Illegal charges or collection
The tenant's application alleging the landlord collected or retained money illegally was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
- The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyJune 11, 2026$310
- Rent increase disputes
- Illegal charges or collection
The parties settled the tenant's T1 application on consent, agreeing to a $309.75 credit to the tenant's ledger and establishing the lawful rent.
- The landlord shall pay/credit $309.75 to the tenant's ledger to resolve the issues raised in the T1 application · $310
- Decision against tenantJune 11, 2026
- Breach of conditions
The tribunal granted the tenant's motion to set aside an ex parte eviction order. The eviction order was set aside, and the tenant was ordered to immediately comply with the parties' mediated settlement regarding unit cleanliness.
- Order LTB-L-030027-26, issued on April 13, 2026, is set aside and cannot be enforced
- The mediated settlement signed on January 14, 2026 remains in force and must be immediately complied with by the Tenant · to the landlord
LTB-L-030027-26 · L4Landlord and Tenant BoardBarrie Municipal Non-Profit HousingRead the order (PDF) - Decision against landlordJune 11, 2026$184 Deposit returned
- Rent deposit disputes
- Illegal charges or collection
The tribunal ordered the landlord to return $183.79 of an unspent key deposit to the tenant, plus $48.00 for the application filing fee.
- Deposit returned · $184
- Filing fee · $48
- No finding against either partyJune 10, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tenant's motion to set aside a previous eviction order was granted on consent. The parties agreed to terminate the tenancy effective May 31, 2026, with the tenant repaying $4,500.00 in rent arrears in monthly instalments.
- Arrears · $4,500 · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantJune 9, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tribunal dismissed the tenants' motion to set aside a previous eviction order after finding they breached the conditional payment plan and failed to pay rent on time.
- The tenant's motion to set aside the eviction order is denied, the stay of the order is lifted as of June 30, 2026, and the eviction order remains in effect. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyJune 8, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tenant successfully voided a prior eviction order by paying all outstanding rent arrears, additional rent, NSF charges, and filing fees. The eviction order is void and cannot be enforced.
- Order LTB-L-079761-25 is void and cannot be enforced by the landlord.
- No finding against either partyJune 5, 2026
- Tenant agreed termination
The parties reached a consent agreement to terminate the tenancy on July 5, 2026, resolving the tenant's motion to set aside an earlier order. The tenant was ordered to reimburse the landlord's $186 application fee.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
LTB-L-031186-26 · L3Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against landlordJune 5, 2026$208 Damages
- Vital services
- Tenant rights
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tribunal found that the landlord substantially interfered with the tenant's reasonable enjoyment by failing to restore access to the laundry room after another tenant changed the locks. The landlord was ordered to pay the tenant rent abatement, out-of-pocket laundromat expenses, and application fee reimbursement.
- Rent abatement · $109
- Damages · $208
- Filing fee · $48
- No finding against either partyJune 5, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tenant's motion to set aside a previous eviction order was granted on consent. The parties agreed to a repayment plan for $39,168.00 in rent arrears and costs.
- Arrears · $39,168 · to the landlord
- Ex parte order LTB-L-020000-26 is set aside and previous order cancelled and replaced on consent
- No finding against either partyJune 5, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tribunal granted the tenant's motion to set aside an ex parte eviction order, finding the breach of payment conditions was unintentional and promptly corrected. The eviction order was cancelled and the previous payment plan remains in effect.
- Ex parte eviction order LTB-L-029509-26 is set aside and cannot be enforced; previous order LTB-L-103690-25 remains in force
LTB-L-029509-26 · L4Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyJune 5, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tenant's motion to set aside an earlier eviction order was denied on consent of both parties. The stay of the eviction order was ordered lifted on June 15, 2026.
- The motion to set aside order LTB-L-029475-26 is denied and the stay of the order is lifted on June 15, 2026 · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · outside the board's jurisdictionJune 5, 2026
- Lockout and illegal eviction
- Illegal entry
- Vital services
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
- Whether the Act applies
The tribunal dismissed the tenant's application after finding that the Residential Tenancies Act does not apply to the living arrangement.
- The tenant's T2 application is dismissed because the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 does not apply and the Board lacks jurisdiction. · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · outside the board's jurisdictionJune 5, 2026
- Lockout and illegal eviction
- Illegal entry
- Vital services
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
- Whether the Act applies
The tribunal determined that the Residential Tenancies Act does not apply to the living arrangement because the occupant shared kitchen and bathroom facilities with the property owner. The tenant's application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
- The tenant's T2 application is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the Act does not apply. · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantJune 5, 2026$69 Deposit returned
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant for non-payment of rent. The tribunal granted the eviction, ordering the tenancy terminated unless the tenant pays $1,006.00 to void the order, alongside per diem compensation and costs.
- Deposit returned · $69
- Arrears · $820 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Daily compensation for use and occupation of the rental unit starting May 12, 2026 until the tenant vacates · $27 · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedJune 4, 2026
- Personal use eviction
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
- Safety concerns
The tenants' application alleging substantial interference and harassment by the landlord was dismissed. The tribunal found insufficient evidence that the landlord breached the legislation regarding an upstairs occupant's dog, door locks, laneway conditions, or the delivery of termination notices.
- The tenants' T2 application is dismissed because the claims were not proved. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyJune 4, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tribunal granted the tenant's set-aside motion on consent and established an agreed payment plan for rent arrears. The previous ex parte eviction order was set aside.
- Arrears · $4,007 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyJune 4, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tenant's motion to set aside an eviction order was granted on consent. The parties agreed to a payment plan for rent arrears and costs totaling $7,347.90.
- Arrears · $7,348 · to the landlord
- Order LTB-L-023677-26 issued on March 23, 2026 is set aside and cannot be enforced
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 4, 2026
- Breach of conditions
The tenant's motion to set aside an earlier eviction order was denied after the tenant failed to attend the hearing. The stay of the eviction order was lifted immediately.
- The tenant's motion to set aside order LTB-L-030527-26 was denied as abandoned due to non-attendance, and the stay of the order was lifted. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyJune 3, 2026
- Breach of conditions
The tenant's motion to set aside an earlier eviction order was denied on consent of the parties. The stay on the original order was lifted and the order remains in effect.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 2, 2026
- Maintenance issues
- Tenant rights
The tenant's applications regarding maintenance obligations and tenant rights were dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
- The tenant's T2 and T6 applications are dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 2, 2026
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment was dismissed as abandoned after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
- The tenant's application is dismissed due to the tenant's failure to attend the hearing. · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedJune 2, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tenant's request to re-open their maintenance application was denied. The original consent order remains in effect.
- The tenant's request to re-open the application is denied, and the original order remains in force
- No finding against either partyJune 2, 2026$6,000 Damages
- Tenant agreed termination
- Maintenance issues
- Vital services
- Substantial interference
The tenant's rights and maintenance applications were resolved by a consent order terminating the tenancy. The landlord agreed to provide rent forgiveness and pay $6,000.00 in compensation to the tenant.
- Rent abatement · $4,125
- Damages · $6,000
- Tenancy terminated on consent on a non-voidable basis effective June 15, 2026 · to the landlord
LTB-T-043110-26 · T2;T6Landlord and Tenant Board1838107 Ontario Ltd., Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 2, 2026
- Vital services
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant's rights application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
- Decision against landlordJune 1, 2026$9,500 Illegal rent refunded
- Maintenance issues
- Illegal entry
- Illegal charges or collection
- Substantial interference
- Safety concerns
The tribunal ordered the landlord to refund $9,500.00 in excess prepaid rent and $48.00 for the application fee because the tenancy terminated early and the landlord failed to mitigate losses. The tenant's claims for maintenance issues and unauthorized entry were dismissed.
- Illegal rent refunded · $9,500
- Filing fee · $48
Basement, 68 Carl Crescent, Toronto
LTB-T-104401-24 · T1;T2;T6Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMay 29, 2026
- Tenant rights
- Substantial interference
The tenant's rights application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
- The tenant's application is dismissed due to non-attendance and abandonment. · to the landlord
LTB-T-098760-24 · T2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedMay 28, 2026
- Property damage
- Maintenance issues
- Illegal entry
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tribunal ordered the tenant to pay $410.85 for a replacement thermostat and the landlord's filing fee. Eviction was denied, and the tenant's applications alleging harassment, illegal entry, and maintenance failures were dismissed.
- Damages · $225 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- The Tenant's T2 and T6 applications are dismissed as breaches of the Act were not proven · to the landlord
LTB-L-091008-23 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedMay 28, 2026
- Property damage
- Maintenance issues
- Illegal entry
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tribunal dismissed the tenant's maintenance and rights applications and ordered the tenant to pay $410.85 to the landlord for the replacement cost of a thermostat and application fee reimbursement.
- Damages · $225 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- The tenant's T2 and T6 applications are dismissed · to the landlord
LTB-T-085347-23 · T2;T6Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · settled by agreementMay 28, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Tenant agreed termination
The landlord and tenant resolved the applications on consent after the tenant moved out of the rental unit. The tenant agreed to pay $4,717.00 in outstanding rent arrears and application fees after deducting the rent deposit and interest.
- Arrears · $4,717 · to the landlord
- The landlord's L3 application is dismissed on consent
- No finding against either partyMay 27, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tenant's motion to set aside the eviction order was granted after paying all required rent arrears and costs. The prior eviction order is void and cannot be enforced.
- Eviction order declared void and unenforceable following the tenant's full payment of arrears and costs under subsection 74(11)
- No finding against either partyMay 27, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tribunal granted the tenant's motion to void a previous eviction order after confirming the tenant paid all required rent arrears and fees. The eviction order is void and cannot be enforced.
- Order LTB-L-099236-25 is void and cannot be enforced by the Landlord
- Decision against tenantLandlord's application dismissed · withdrawnMay 25, 2026$29 Deposit returned
- Non-payment of rent
- Tenant agreed termination
The landlord's L1 application for rent arrears and eviction was granted after the tenant failed to attend the hearing. The tenancy was terminated and the landlord's L3 application was withdrawn.
- Deposit returned · $29
- Arrears · $15,525 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- The landlord's L3 application is withdrawn
- Daily compensation for use and occupation starting May 21, 2026 until vacant possession · $57 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · settled by agreementMay 25, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
On consent of both parties, the tribunal set aside an earlier eviction order after the tenant paid all outstanding arrears and fees, and the landlord's application was discontinued.
- Order LTB-L-027622-26 set aside and application discontinued on consent following payment of all arrears and fees
LTB-L-027622-26 · L4Landlord and Tenant BoardKingston & Frontenac Housing CorporationRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyMay 25, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tribunal granted the tenant's motion on consent to set aside a prior eviction order, allowing the tenant to void termination of the tenancy by paying outstanding arrears.
- Arrears · $5,330 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMay 25, 2026
- Property damage
- Breach of conditions
The tribunal dismissed the tenant's motion to set aside an earlier order because the tenant failed to attend the hearing. As a result, the stay on the prior eviction order was lifted immediately.
- The tenant's motion to set aside order LTB-L-027445-26 is denied due to abandonment for non-attendance, and the stay of the order is lifted · to the landlord