Ontario Landlord and Tenant Board
Alexandre Traboulsi
MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntarioBeta
Rulings, compared with the board
1.25× the board's rate against tenantsDecided against tenants more often than the board does on comparable applications — 1.25× the board's rate (95% interval 1.12–1.39), across 198 contested orders.
Orders are grouped by who applied and what they applied for, and this member’s record is compared with the board’s on that same mix. Withdrawn, settled and non-attendance dismissals are excluded. It measures how these decisions differ from the board’s on cases of the same type.
Dismissals, compared with the board
Bars tenants and landlords about as oftenDismissed tenants' and landlords' applications as not proved, out of jurisdiction or barred on procedure at rates that do not differ once the kind of application is accounted for, across 25 such dismissals of tenants' applications and 14 of landlords'.
Counts only dismissals the member ruled on — not proved, outside the board’s jurisdiction, or barred on procedure. Applications withdrawn, settled or dismissed because nobody attended are excluded, as they are above. The two sides are compared on this member’s own docket, against the board’s rate on the same kinds of application. It does not measure whether any decision was right.
Orders
Showing 201–250 of 325- Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord's grounds were not provedTenant's application dismissed · not provedMarch 4, 2026$1,002 Damages
- Tenant agreed termination
- Maintenance issues
- Illegal entry
- Tenant rights
- Rent deposit disputes
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tribunal granted the tenant's motion to set aside an ex parte eviction order, finding that the landlord obtained an agreement to terminate in bad faith to circumvent the legislation's notice and compensation requirements for selling the property. The tribunal also ordered the landlord to pay $1,370.02 for rent deposit interest and stove repair costs pursuant to the parties' consent agreement.
- Deposit returned · $368
- Damages · $1,002
- Landlord ordered to refrain from preventing the tenant's representative from communicating and to refrain from preventing the tenant from paying lawful rent
- Ex parte eviction order LTB-L-013692-24 cancelled and unenforceable
- Tenant application T2 (LTB-T-097881-23) dismissed as not proved
- Tenant application T2 (LTB-T-095606-23) dismissed for disclosing no reasonable cause of action
LTB-L-013692-24 · L3Landlord and Tenant Board1851508 Ontario Inc., Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord's grounds were not provedTenant's application dismissed · not provedMarch 4, 2026$1,002 Damages
- Tenant agreed termination
- Maintenance issues
- Bad faith eviction
- Illegal entry
- Tenant rights
- Rent deposit disputes
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tribunal granted the tenant's motion to set aside an ex parte eviction order, finding the landlord had obtained an agreement to terminate in bad faith to circumvent statutory requirements for selling the property. By consent, the landlord was also ordered to pay the tenant $1,370.02 for deposit interest and repair expenses.
- Deposit returned · $368
- Damages · $1,002
- Landlord ordered to refrain from preventing tenant's representative from communicating and from preventing tenant from paying lawful rent, and to follow agreed email protocol
- Tenant's second and third T2 applications dismissed
LTB-T-095606-23 · T2Landlord and Tenant Board1851508 Ontario Inc., Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against landlordEviction refused · the landlord's grounds were not provedTenant's application dismissed · not provedMarch 4, 2026$1,002 Damages
- Tenant agreed termination
- Maintenance issues
- Bad faith eviction
- Illegal entry
- Rent deposit disputes
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tribunal set aside an earlier ex parte eviction order, finding the landlord acted in bad faith and circumvented the legislation by having the tenant sign an agreement to terminate instead of serving a proper notice with compensation. By consent, the landlord was ordered to pay the tenant $1,370.02 for rent deposit interest and stove repair costs, while two other tenant applications were dismissed.
- Deposit returned · $368
- Damages · $1,002
- L'ordonnance d'expulsion LTB-L-013692-24 rendue le 27 février 2024 est annulée
- Le locateur doit s'abstenir d'empêcher les communications avec le mandataire de la locataire et le paiement du loyer
- Deuxième requête T2 de la locataire rejetée (non prouvée)
- Troisième requête T2 de la locataire rejetée (absence de cause d'action raisonnable)
LTB-T-022408-24 · T6Landlord and Tenant Board1851508 Ontario Inc., Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnMarch 3, 2026
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant withdrew their application alleging substantial interference and harassment after the landlord brought a preliminary motion to dismiss. The Board consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.
- The Tenants' application was withdrawn and the file closed.
- Decision against tenantMarch 2, 2026
- Unauthorized occupants
- Assignment or sublet
The landlord's application was granted after the tribunal determined that the tenant transferred occupancy of the unit without consent. The tenancy was terminated, the unauthorized occupant was ordered to vacate by March 15, 2026, and ordered to pay daily compensation and application costs.
- Filing fee · $201 · to the landlord
- Compensation for the use and occupation of the rental unit from June 5, 2025, to January 15, 2026 · $5,234 · to the landlord
- Daily compensation for use and occupation of the unit from January 16, 2026, until vacant possession is given · $26 · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantMarch 2, 2026$258 Deposit returned
- Property damage
- Illegal act
- Harassment
- Safety concerns
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant was granted due to illegal acts, impaired safety, and willful or negligent property damage. The Tenant was ordered to pay $10,086.36 in damages, compensation, and application costs, net of the rent deposit.
- Deposit returned · $258
- Damages · $10,068 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Daily compensation for use and occupation of the rental unit from October 8, 2025 to January 8, 2026 · $91 · to the landlord
LTB-L-086400-25 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardLondon & Middlesex Community HousingRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMarch 2, 2026
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application alleging harassment and interference was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the case conference.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to failure to attend.
- No finding against either partyMarch 2, 2026$600 Damages
- Maintenance issues
The parties reached a consent agreement resolving the tenant's maintenance application. The landlord agreed to pay the tenant $600 in monthly installments for out-of-pocket expenses regarding a dryer issue and costs.
- Damages · $600
- Decision against tenantMarch 2, 2026
- Safety concerns
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for impaired safety was granted with conditional relief from eviction. The tenancy will continue provided the tenant complies with conditions prohibiting fireworks and dangerous driving through March 31, 2029, and reimburses the filing fee.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Tenancy continues conditionally on the tenant not operating fireworks or driving dangerously through March 31, 2029 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMarch 2, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed after neither party attended the scheduled conference.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed due to non-attendance.
- No finding against either partyFebruary 27, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tenant's maintenance application was resolved by a consent order requiring the landlord to inspect and treat for pests and investigate moisture issues.
- Repair order
- Repair order
- The tenant shall cooperate with pest control treatment efforts and follow preparation instructions. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyFebruary 27, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tenant and landlord resolved the tenant's maintenance application by consent. The landlord agreed to inspect and treat the unit for cockroaches, and the tenant agreed not to interfere with the work.
- Repair order
- The Tenant shall not interfere with the Landlord's reasonable efforts to inspect the rental unit and treat the cockroach infestation. · to the landlord
LTB-T-055119-25 · T6Landlord and Tenant BoardToronto Community Housing CorporationRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedFebruary 27, 2026
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application alleging substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · outside the board's jurisdictionFebruary 26, 2026
- Illegal charges or collection
- Whether the Act applies
The tenants' application for a rebate of illegally collected or retained money was dismissed because the Residential Tenancies Act does not apply to their temporary, short-term accommodation.
- The tenants' application is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction under section 5(a) of the Act.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnFebruary 26, 2026
- Substantial interference
The tenants requested to withdraw their T2 application at the case conference. The Board consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.
- The tenants' application was withdrawn and the file closed.
- No finding against either partyFebruary 26, 2026$50 Rent abatement
- Maintenance issues
The tenant's maintenance application was resolved through a consent agreement at an adjudicative case conference. The landlord agreed to pay the tenant $50.00, deducted from the March 2026 rent.
- Rent abatement · $50
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · a procedural barFebruary 26, 2026
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The landlord requested a review of an interim order that had adjourned the hearing of the tenants' application. The tribunal denied the review request because the interim order did not make a final determination of the parties' rights.
- The Landlord's request to review the interim order is denied.
LTB-T-002464-26 · T2Landlord and Tenant BoardLa Corporation des Comtés Unis de Prescott et RussellRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedFebruary 25, 2026
- Substantial interference
The tenant failed to attend the scheduled hearing, so their application alleging substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment was dismissed as abandoned.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedFebruary 25, 2026$4,650 Deposit returned
- Non-payment of rent
- Maintenance issues
The tribunal terminated the tenancy effective the date the tenant vacated and ordered the tenant to pay $5,752.39 in rent arrears and application fees, after deducting deposits and credits. The tenant's maintenance application regarding mold and a washing machine was dismissed.
- Deposit returned · $4,650
- Deposit returned · $49
- Deposit returned · $350
- Arrears · $10,839 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Agreed washing machine replacement credit applied against arrears · $224
- Tenant's T6 maintenance application dismissed on the merits
- Decision against landlordFebruary 24, 2026$622 Damages
- Substantial interference
The tribunal found that the landlord substantially interfered with the tenant's reasonable enjoyment by mistakenly having her vehicle towed from her assigned parking space. The landlord was ordered to pay $669.50 to reimburse the tenant's towing expenses and filing fee.
- Damages · $622
- Filing fee · $48
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedFebruary 24, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed as abandoned after neither party attended the hearing.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedFebruary 24, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the scheduled hearing.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to failure to attend the hearing.
- No finding against either partyFebruary 24, 2026$1,500
- Maintenance issues
- Illegal charges or collection
The tenants' maintenance application was resolved on consent during an adjudicative case conference. The landlord agreed to pay the tenants $2,000, comprising a rent abatement for air conditioning issues, return of funds retained contrary to the Act, and filing costs.
- Rent abatement · $452
- Filing fee · $48
- Amount retained in contravention of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 · $1,500
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnFebruary 23, 2026
- Substantial interference
The tenant withdrew their application claiming substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment, and the Board consented to close the file.
- The tenant's application was withdrawn and the file closed.
LTB-T-014282-26 · T2Landlord and Tenant BoardEquiton Residential Income Fund GP Inc., Equiton Residential Income Fund LP, Equiton LivingRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedFebruary 23, 2026
- Assignment or sublet
The tenant's application regarding an assignment or sublet was dismissed as abandoned after the tenant failed to attend the hearing. The landlord's request for costs was also denied.
- The tenant's A2 application is dismissed due to non-attendance.
- No finding against either partyFebruary 23, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord's L1 application was resolved on consent after the tenant's review request was granted. The parties agreed to a 24-month payment plan for rent arrears, allowing the tenancy to continue.
- Arrears · $8,673 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyFebruary 23, 2026$1,000
- Maintenance issues
The tenants' maintenance application was resolved through a consent order following an adjudicative case conference. The landlord agreed to pay the tenants $1,000.00 to settle all claims arising from the tenancy.
- Landlord ordered on consent to pay the Tenants $1,000.00 on or before March 19, 2026 to resolve all claims · $1,000
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedFebruary 23, 2026
- Bad faith eviction
The tribunal dismissed the tenant's application alleging a bad faith eviction because the landlord had never served an N12 or N13 notice of termination.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed.
- No finding against either partyFebruary 23, 2026$5,000
- Maintenance issues
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant's rights and maintenance applications were resolved by a consent order at a case conference. The parties agreed the landlord would pay $5,000 to the tenant, to be deducted from existing rent arrears owed under a prior order.
- The Landlord shall pay the Tenant $5,000.00, to be deducted from rent arrears owed under an earlier order · $5,000
- No finding against either partyFebruary 23, 2026$15,000 Damages
- Maintenance issues
The tenant's maintenance application was resolved by a consent order following an Adjudicative Case Conference. The landlord agreed to pay the tenant $15,000.00 and the tenancy will terminate on June 30, 2026.
- Damages · $15,000
- Tenancy terminated on consent as of June 30, 2026, and the tenant shall vacate on or before that date · to the landlord
- Tenant shall not interfere with the landlord's reasonable attempts to investigate maintenance issues or maintain the rental unit · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnFebruary 18, 2026
- Maintenance issues
- Substantial interference
The tenants requested to withdraw their maintenance and rights application at the hearing. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.
- The application was withdrawn and the file is closed.
- Decision against tenantFebruary 17, 2026$820 Deposit returned
- Personal use eviction
- Bad faith eviction
The tribunal granted the landlords' application to terminate the tenancy for personal use by the landlord's mother. Eviction was postponed to August 31, 2026 under section 83 of the Act.
- Deposit returned · $820
- Daily compensation for use and occupation from December 10, 2025 until the tenants vacate the rental unit. · $26 · to the landlord
LTB-L-087541-24 · L2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnFebruary 13, 2026
- Vital services
- Substantial interference
The tenants requested to withdraw their application concerning substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment and vital services. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.
- The tenants' application was withdrawn and the tribunal closed the file.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnFebruary 11, 2026
- Tenant rights
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant withdrew their application alleging harassment and interference, and the Board closed the file.
- The tenant's application was withdrawn and the file closed.
LTB-T-101866-24 · T2Landlord and Tenant BoardBello Horizonte Non Profit Homes CorpRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedFebruary 11, 2026
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application alleging harassment and interference was dismissed after neither party attended the scheduled proceeding.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed after being deemed abandoned due to non-attendance.
- Decision against tenantFebruary 11, 2026
- Tenant abandons property
The landlord's application was granted after the tribunal determined that the tenant had abandoned the rental unit. The tenancy was ordered terminated effective January 31, 2024.
- Tenancy terminated effective January 31, 2024 due to abandonment · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedFebruary 10, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed after neither party attended the scheduled hearing.
- The tenant's T6 application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnFebruary 10, 2026
- Maintenance issues
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant withdrew their applications concerning maintenance obligations and harassment. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the files.
- The tenant's T2 and T6 applications were withdrawn and the files closed
- Decision against landlordFebruary 10, 2026$35,000 Fine
- Bad faith eviction
The tribunal found that the landlord gave an N12 notice of termination in bad faith and re-rented the unit to another person. The landlord was ordered to pay the former tenant $7,757 in general compensation and filing fees, plus a $35,000 administrative fine to the tribunal.
- Damages · $7,704
- Filing fee · $53
- Fine · $35,000
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnFebruary 10, 2026
- Maintenance issues
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant withdrew both the tenant rights (T2) and maintenance (T6) applications prior to the hearing. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the files.
- The Tenant's T2 and T6 applications were withdrawn at the Tenant's request and the files were closed.
- Decision against tenantLandlord's application dismissed · withdrawnFebruary 10, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Substantial interference
The tribunal terminated the tenancy as of the date the tenant moved out and ordered the tenant to pay $5,526.16 in rent arrears and the application filing fee. The landlord's application regarding substantial interference was dismissed as withdrawn.
- Arrears · $5,340 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Landlord's L2 application dismissed as withdrawn
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · a procedural barFebruary 10, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed because it lacked sufficient detail and disclosed no reasonable cause of action. As the tenant had already moved out, any request for repair orders was also moot.
- The Tenant's T6 Application is dismissed.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedFebruary 10, 2026
- Substantial interference
The tenant did not attend the scheduled hearing. As a result, the tribunal considered the application abandoned and dismissed it.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed due to abandonment/non-attendance.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnFebruary 9, 2026
- Tenant rights
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant withdrew their application regarding tenant rights and harassment, and the Board closed the file.
- The Tenant's application was withdrawn and the file closed
- Decision against landlordLandlord's application dismissed · not provedFebruary 9, 2026
- Personal use eviction
- Property damage
- Persistent late payment
The landlord's application to evict the tenant for property damage was dismissed because the damage was not proved, and the personal-use eviction claim was withdrawn. The parties agreed on consent to continue the tenancy on condition that the tenant pays monthly rent on time through January 2027.
- The tenancy continues on condition that the tenant pays the lawful monthly rent in full and on time from February 1, 2026, through January 31, 2027, failing which the landlord may apply under section 78 for eviction.
- The landlord's claims to terminate the tenancy and for compensation for damage under the N5 notice are dismissed as not proved.
- The landlord's claim for termination for personal use under the N12 notice is dismissed following the landlord's amendment request.
- Decision against landlordFebruary 9, 2026$350 Rent abatement
- Maintenance issues
The tribunal found that the landlord failed to meet its maintenance obligations by not taking reasonable, proactive measures to address a prolonged air conditioning failure. The landlord was ordered to pay the tenants a $350 rent abatement and reimburse their $48 application filing fee.
- Rent abatement · $350
- Filing fee · $48
Unit 1802, 19 Bathurst Street, Toronto
LTB-T-098103-24 · T6Landlord and Tenant BoardCondowong Real Estate Inc., BrokerageRead the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantFebruary 9, 2026$3,475 Deposit returned
- Non-payment of rent
- Persistent late payment
- Utility costs
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy was granted due to persistent late payment of rent. The Tenant was ordered evicted and required to pay rent arrears, unpaid utility costs, and the application filing fee.
- Deposit returned · $3,475
- Arrears · $14,633 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Compensation for unpaid utility costs (water) · $1,160 · to the landlord
- Daily compensation for use and occupation starting January 9, 2026 until the Tenant vacates · $108 · to the landlord
LTB-L-086791-25 · L1;L2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedFebruary 6, 2026
- Maintenance issues
- Vital services
- Illegal charges or collection
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The landlord's review request was granted because technical difficulties had prevented them from participating in the initial hearing. The tenants' applications were subsequently dismissed as abandoned when they did not attend the rehearing.
- The tenants' application (LTB-T-029985-24) is dismissed as abandoned.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedFebruary 6, 2026
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant did not attend the scheduled hearing. As a result, the application alleging harassment and interference was deemed abandoned and dismissed.
- The Tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedFebruary 6, 2026
- Substantial interference
The tenants' application alleging substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment was dismissed after neither party attended the hearing.
- The Tenants' application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance.