Ontario Landlord and Tenant Board
Alex Brkic
MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntarioBeta
Rulings, compared with the board
About the board's rate against tenantsDecided against tenants about as often as the board does on comparable applications, across 79 contested orders.
Orders are grouped by who applied and what they applied for, and this member’s record is compared with the board’s on that same mix. Withdrawn, settled and non-attendance dismissals are excluded. It measures how these decisions differ from the board’s on cases of the same type.
Dismissals, compared with the board
Bars tenants and landlords about as oftenDismissed tenants' and landlords' applications as not proved, out of jurisdiction or barred on procedure at rates that do not differ once the kind of application is accounted for, across 10 such dismissals of tenants' applications and 7 of landlords'.
Counts only dismissals the member ruled on — not proved, outside the board’s jurisdiction, or barred on procedure. Applications withdrawn, settled or dismissed because nobody attended are excluded, as they are above. The two sides are compared on this member’s own docket, against the board’s rate on the same kinds of application. It does not measure whether any decision was right.
Orders
Showing 1–50 of 123- No finding against either partyJune 30, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tenant's review request was granted, cancelling an earlier eviction order. At the rehearing, the parties reached a consent agreement establishing a conditional repayment plan for rent arrears to preserve the tenancy.
- Arrears · $20,400 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Decision against landlordJune 30, 2026$6,200 Damages
- Maintenance issues
- Illegal entry
- Vital services
- Rent reduction
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tribunal denied the landlords' request to review a previous decision that found against them for maintenance breaches, harassment, and substantial interference. The landlords remain liable for the outstanding $6,200.00 balance awarded to the tenant, which may be recovered through monthly rent deductions.
- Damages · $6,200
Rear, 1428 Old Forest Road, Pickering
LTB-T-093703-24 · T2;T6;T3Landlord and Tenant BoardJoes Car Hauler, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantJune 30, 2026
- Tenant agreed termination
The tenant's motion to set aside a previous eviction order was denied because the tenant had already vacated the rental unit. The previous order terminating the tenancy remains in effect.
- The tenant's motion to set aside the order terminating the tenancy is denied and the stay is lifted. · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedJune 29, 2026
- Rent reduction
The tribunal dismissed the tenant's application for a rent reduction after finding he did not prove the landlord had removed his parking spot. The order reaffirmed that the tenant's lease includes a designated parking space subject to lease conditions.
- Reaffirms that the monthly rent includes one designated parking spot subject to the conditions set out in paragraph 8 of the lease
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · settled by agreementJune 29, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
On consent of both parties, the tenant's motion to set aside an earlier eviction order was granted. The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for rent arrears was discontinued.
- Previous eviction order set aside and landlord's application to terminate tenancy discontinued on consent
LTB-L-030512-26 · L4Landlord and Tenant BoardAvanew Single Family Rental GP Inc.Read the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyJune 29, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tenant's motion to set aside a previous order was denied on consent of the parties. The stay of the prior order was ordered lifted on June 30, 2026.
- On consent, the tenant's motion to set aside Order LTB-L-027562-26 is denied and the stay of that order is lifted on June 30, 2026. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyJune 29, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tribunal granted the tenants' motion on consent to set aside a previous ex parte eviction order. The tenancy continues subject to the condition that the tenants pay full rent on time for 12 consecutive months.
- Ex parte eviction order set aside and tenancy reinstated on consent subject to 12-month on-time rent payment conditions
- Decision against tenantJune 26, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tenant's motion to set aside an ex parte eviction order was granted, cancelling the previous eviction. The tribunal denied the landlords' eviction application on the condition that the tenant pay outstanding rent arrears and costs totalling $3,298.50 according to a specified payment schedule.
- Arrears · $3,113 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
LTB-L-034860-26 · L4Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyJune 26, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The parties consented to set aside an earlier ex-parte eviction order and agreed to a payment plan for outstanding rent arrears and application fees. Eviction is conditionally denied provided the tenant makes the agreed installment payments.
- Arrears · $335 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Ex-parte eviction order LTB-L-032909-26 is set aside on consent, and eviction is conditionally denied
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedJune 23, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tenant's motion to set aside an eviction order was denied after the tenant breached the payment terms of a previous consent order. The stay of the eviction order was ordered lifted on June 30, 2026.
- The tenant's motion to set aside Order LTB-L-034214-26 is denied · to the landlord
- The stay of Order LTB-L-034214-26 is lifted on June 30, 2026 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 22, 2026
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application alleging substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment was dismissed as abandoned after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
LTB-T-018192-25 · T2Landlord and Tenant BoardSaphalata Investments Ltd, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against landlordLandlord's application dismissed · not provedJune 22, 2026
- Tenant agreed termination
The tribunal granted the tenant's request for review, cancelled a prior eviction order, and dismissed the landlord's application to terminate the tenancy. The tribunal determined that the tenancy was a joint tenancy and the agreement to terminate was invalid because the other joint tenant did not sign it.
- The landlord's L3 application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant is dismissed because the N11 agreement was not signed by both joint tenants and is invalid.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 22, 2026
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application claiming substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment and harassment was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
- The tenant's T2 application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord
LTB-T-015512-25 · T2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 19, 2026
- Tenant rights
- Substantial interference
The tenant's application alleging substantial interference was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · settled by agreementJune 18, 2026
- Maintenance issues
- Vital services
- Harassment
The tenants withdrew their tenant rights and maintenance applications pursuant to a full and final consent settlement between the parties.
- The tenants withdrew both the T2 and T6 applications pursuant to a full and final consent settlement.
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 18, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the scheduled hearing.
- The tenant's T6 application is dismissed as abandoned due to non-attendance. · to the landlord
LTB-T-089887-25 · T6Landlord and Tenant Board2211382 Ontario Inc., Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against landlordJune 18, 2026
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
- Breach of conditions
The tribunal granted the tenant's motion to set aside an ex parte eviction order that was issued after a breach of a prior consent order. The eviction order was set aside and cannot be enforced, allowing the tenancy to continue under the existing consent order.
- The ex parte eviction order is set aside and cannot be enforced
Apartment 503, 25 Ontario Street, Quinte West
LTB-L-030447-26 · L4Landlord and Tenant BoardAmbassador Property Management Inc.Read the order (PDF) - Decision against landlordTenant's application dismissed · not provedJune 18, 2026$1,097 Deposit returned
- Maintenance issues
- Rent deposit disputes
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tribunal ordered the landlord to return the tenant's last month's rent deposit and key deposit and pay a rent abatement for substantial interference. The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed because the landlord acted promptly to complete repairs.
- Deposit returned · $1,097
- Deposit returned · $100
- Rent abatement · $110
- Filing fee · $48
Apartment 203, 3125 Sandwich Street, Windsor
LTB-T-015008-25 · T1;T2;T6Landlord and Tenant BoardAmiraco Properties Inc. c/o York Property ManagementRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 17, 2026
- Maintenance issues
The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed after neither party attended the hearing.
- The tenant's T6 application is dismissed due to abandonment / non-attendance. · to the landlord
LTB-T-089515-25 · T6Landlord and Tenant BoardSterling Karamar Property ManagementRead the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 16, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
- Breach of conditions
The tribunal denied the tenant's motion to set aside a previous ex parte eviction order after the tenant failed to attend the hearing. The stay of the eviction order will be lifted on August 31, 2026.
- The tenant's motion to set aside the ex parte eviction order is denied for non-attendance and the stay of eviction is ordered lifted on August 31, 2026 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedJune 15, 2026
- Maintenance issues
- Tenant rights
The tenant's applications regarding tenant rights and maintenance were dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
- The tenant's T2 and T6 applications are dismissed due to abandonment for non-attendance. · to the landlord
LTB-T-089451-25 · T2;T6Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantJune 11, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The tenant paid all outstanding rent arrears and enforcement costs into the tribunal, successfully voiding the previous eviction order. The tribunal ordered the $10,986.00 held on deposit to be paid out to the landlords.
- Arrears · $10,986 · to the landlord
- Order LTB-L-108047-25 is void and cannot be enforced by the Landlord
LTB-L-108047-25 · L1Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantJune 10, 2026$2,712
- Renovation and demolition
The tribunal granted the landlords' application to terminate the tenancy so the rental unit can be converted to non-residential hotel use under an N13 notice. The eviction was postponed to August 31, 2026, and the tenant was ordered to pay $41,763.40 in daily compensation.
- Arrears · $41,763 · to the landlord
- Replacement payment of statutory compensation under section 52(1) if the tenant has not cashed the original cheque · $2,712
LTB-L-055596-22 · L2Landlord and Tenant Board10717720 Canada Inc., Sign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against landlordTenant's application dismissed · not provedMay 29, 2026$600 Rent abatement
- Maintenance issues
- Vital services
- Substantial interference
The tribunal ordered the landlord to pay a $600 rent abatement and $48 for filing costs due to an unreasonable delay in resolving a fluctuating hot and cold water issue. The tenant's separate application regarding vital services and substantial interference was dismissed.
- Rent abatement · $600
- Filing fee · $48
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · not provedMay 27, 2026
- Safety concerns
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenants for allegedly impairing safety was dismissed.
- The landlord's L2 application for termination of tenancy and compensation is dismissed.
- Decision against tenantMay 25, 2026$190 Deposit returned
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord's application was granted, terminating the tenancy and ordering the tenant to vacate and pay outstanding rent arrears and application costs.
- Deposit returned · $190
- Deposit returned · $1
- Arrears · $15,464 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Daily compensation for use and occupation of the rental unit starting April 17, 2026 until the tenant vacates · $33 · to the landlord
LTB-L-041481-25 · L1Landlord and Tenant BoardLondon and Middlesex Community HousingRead the order (PDF) - Findings both waysMay 25, 2026$1,500 Deposit returned
- Non-payment of rent
- Whether the Act applies
The tribunal determined on the A1 application that the co-signor was not a tenant and ordered the landlord to reimburse their filing fee. The landlord's L1 application was granted, terminating the tenancy and ordering the tenant to pay rent arrears.
- Filing fee · $53
- Deposit returned · $1,500
- Deposit returned · $56
- Arrears · $13,279 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedMay 21, 2026
- Lockout and illegal eviction
- Illegal charges or collection
- Substantial interference
- Whether the Act applies
The tribunal determined that the Residential Tenancies Act applies and that a valid tenancy exists between the parties. The tenant's claims that the landlords altered the locks and collected illegal money were dismissed on the merits, and the landlords were directed to provide keys to assist the tenant in taking possession.
- The landlords shall help the tenant take possession by furnishing keys to the rental unit door and mailbox
LTB-T-033809-26 · A1Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantMay 21, 2026
- Lockout and illegal eviction
- Illegal charges or collection
- Substantial interference
- Whether the Act applies
The tribunal determined that the Residential Tenancies Act applies and that the tenancy remains valid and fully prepaid. The tenant's claims of landlord wrongdoing and request for monetary compensation were rejected, and the landlords were ordered to provide replacement keys to facilitate the tenant taking possession.
- The landlords shall help the tenant take possession by providing keys to the rental unit door and mailbox on or before May 15, 2026, and provide a new lock and keys if needed.
LTB-T-030577-26 · T1;T2Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyMay 19, 2026$7,900 Deposit returned
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord and tenant reached a consent agreement for a standard voidable eviction order regarding rent arrears. The tenant was given until June 9, 2026, to pay the outstanding balance to void the termination of the tenancy.
- Deposit returned · $7,900
- Deposit returned · $271
- Arrears · $40,279 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Daily compensation for use and occupation starting May 13, 2026 until tenant vacates · $260 · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantMay 19, 2026
- Substantial interference
- Breach of conditions
The landlord applied under section 78 to evict the tenants for breaching conditions of a previous order regarding noise and carpet installation. The tribunal found breaches occurred but granted conditional relief from eviction, ordering specific noise restrictions and allowing the landlord to install carpeting.
- Tenancy maintained conditionally subject to the tenants permitting carpet installation and complying with strict quiet hours rules · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · withdrawnMay 15, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for non-payment of rent was withdrawn. The tribunal also denied the tenants' request for costs.
- The Landlord's L1 application is withdrawn and the file is closed. · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantMay 11, 2026
- Illegal act
The tribunal terminated the tenancy and ordered the tenants evicted due to an illegal act involving drug possession and trafficking in the unit. The tenants were also ordered to reimburse the landlord's filing fee.
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedMay 11, 2026
- Lockout and illegal eviction
- Illegal entry
- Harassment
- Substantial interference
The tenant's rights application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing.
- The tenant's application is dismissed as abandoned due to failure to attend the hearing. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnMay 8, 2026
- Vital services
- Substantial interference
The tenants withdrew their application regarding substantial interference and vital services. The tribunal granted the withdrawal request and closed the file.
- The tenant's T2 application was withdrawn at the hearing.
LTB-T-017120-26 · T2Landlord and Tenant Board1828107 Ont Ltd, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedMay 6, 2026$875 Deposit returned
- Non-payment of rent
- Maintenance issues
- Rent deposit disputes
- Harassment
The landlord's application for rent arrears was granted after the tribunal determined the tenancy ended in July 2024. The tenant's section 82 claims regarding maintenance and harassment were dismissed.
- Deposit returned · $875
- Deposit returned · $159
- Arrears · $10,186 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $201 · to the landlord
LTB-L-018536-25 · L1Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - Decision against tenantMay 5, 2026$2,150 Deposit returned
- Non-payment of rent
- Substantial interference
The landlord's L1 and L2 applications were granted after the tenant failed to appear. The tenancy was terminated due to substantial interference from smoking and unpaid rent arrears, with the tenant ordered to pay $21,395.87 and vacate.
- Deposit returned · $2,150
- Deposit returned · $48
- Arrears · $23,408 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Daily compensation for use and occupation of the rental unit starting April 28, 2026 · $71 · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantMay 1, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord's application for eviction was conditionally denied, subject to the tenants paying $1,776.12 in rent arrears and application fee reimbursement on a monthly payment schedule.
- Arrears · $1,590 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantMay 1, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord's application was amended to an arrears-only claim after the notice of termination was found invalid. The tenants were ordered to pay $2,416.50 in rent arrears and application costs under a 12-month payment schedule.
- Arrears · $2,231 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $186 · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · withdrawnMay 1, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord withdrew its non-payment of rent application with the tenant's consent, and the tribunal closed the file.
- Decision against tenantApril 29, 2026$1,400 Deposit returned
- Non-payment of rent
The tribunal terminated the tenancy and ordered the tenants evicted for non-payment of rent, subject to the tenants' right to void. The eviction date was postponed to June 1, 2026, and the tenants were ordered to pay outstanding arrears and filing costs.
- Deposit returned · $1,400
- Deposit returned · $53
- Arrears · $16,136 · to the landlord
- Filing fee · $201 · to the landlord
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedApril 21, 2026
- Rent increase disputes
- Illegal charges or collection
The tenant's T1 application seeking a rebate of rent increases paid above the guideline was dismissed. The tribunal found the landlord acted lawfully in issuing notice of an above-guideline rent increase while its L5 application was pending.
- The tenant's T1 application is dismissed as the claim was not proved on a balance of probabilities. · to the landlord
- No finding against either partyLandlord's application dismissed · withdrawnApril 21, 2026
- Non-payment of rent
The landlord requested to withdraw the application for non-payment of rent, and the tenant did not oppose. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.
- The Landlord's L1 application is withdrawn upon request.
- Decision against landlordApril 20, 2026$50 Deposit returned
- Rent deposit disputes
- Illegal charges or collection
The tribunal ordered the landlord to return a $50.00 key deposit plus $48.00 for the application filing fee. The tenants' claim for the return of their $1,750.00 rent deposit was dismissed because a binding tenancy agreement had been formed and the landlord was entitled to apply the deposit to rent arrears.
- Deposit returned · $50
- Filing fee · $48
Apartment 204, 55 Talos Circle, Ottawa
LTB-T-096622-25 · T1Landlord and Tenant BoardB. Riley Farber Inc in its capacity as court appointed receiver of 9114785 Canada Inc. -carrying on business as Silver Maple Developments – care of Sleepwell Property ManagementRead the order (PDF) - Decision against landlordApril 20, 2026$300 Deposit returned
- Rent deposit disputes
- Illegal charges or collection
The landlord was ordered to return a $100 key deposit and a $300 unlawful utility deposit to the tenant, plus reimburse the filing fee.
- Deposit returned · $100
- Deposit returned · $300
- Filing fee · $48
- No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · withdrawnApril 17, 2026
- Illegal charges or collection
The tenant withdrew their application regarding alleged illegally collected or retained money, and the tribunal closed the file.
- The tenant's T1 application was withdrawn and the file was closed.
- Decision against tenantTenant's application dismissed · not provedApril 16, 2026
- Rent deposit disputes
- Illegal charges or collection
The tenant's application for the return of a last month's rent deposit was dismissed. The tribunal found the tenant gave improper notice to terminate the tenancy, leaving them liable for rent for the following month which properly absorbed the deposit.
- The Tenant's T1 application is dismissed because the claim was not proved on a balance of probabilities.
LTB-T-104277-25 · T1Landlord and Tenant BoardSign in to view Landlord, Sign in to view LandlordRead the order (PDF) - No finding against either partyTenant's application dismissed · nobody attendedApril 14, 2026
- Illegal charges or collection
The tenants' application alleging the landlord collected or retained money illegally was dismissed after the tenants failed to attend the hearing.
- Decision against landlordApril 14, 2026$2,800 Deposit returned
- Maintenance issues
- Rent deposit disputes
- Illegal charges or collection
The tenant applied for a return of their first and last month's rent after moving out shortly after taking possession over maintenance concerns. The tribunal found the tenant unilaterally broke the lease so the first month's rent was not refundable, but ordered the landlord to return the last month's rent deposit and reimburse the filing fee.
- Deposit returned · $2,800
- Filing fee · $48
- Decision against landlordApril 13, 2026$1,800 Deposit returned
- Rent deposit disputes
- Illegal charges or collection
The tribunal ordered the landlord to return the tenants' last month's rent deposit plus accrued interest and reimburse their application filing fee. The landlord had retained the deposit after the tenants paid rent in full through the end of the tenancy.
- Deposit returned · $1,800
- Deposit returned · $49
- Filing fee · $48