Nersi Makki

MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntario

Orders listed3111 against the landlord

Awarded to tenants$64,952avg $2,095

Awarded to landlords$0avg $0

Fines to the board$0none ordered

Read these numbers carefully. They cover the orders Renterly has processed from applications brought by tenants — not applications brought by landlords, which make up most of a tribunal's caseload and are not listed here. Both directions of an order are counted, including applications that were dismissed or decided for the landlord. Amounts are what the order directed, not what was shown to have been paid, and orders we have not finished processing are missing entirely.

Orders

Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 27, 2026$1,048 to the tenant
The tenant applied for a rent abatement after flooding disrupted his rental unit and restoration took about six weeks. The tribunal ordered the landlord to pay the tenant $1,000 in rent abatement and $48 for the filing fee.
LTB-T-005023-24 · T6 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 26, 2026$1,030 to the tenant
The tenant's application was withdrawn as part of a consent order. The landlord agreed to pay the tenant $1,029.89 without admitting liability.
LTB-T-073561-25 · T1;T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 26, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed as abandoned because the tenant did not attend the case conference. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-093601-24 · T2 · read the order
Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 23, 2026$148 to the tenant
The tribunal found the landlords entered the rental unit illegally on February 14, 2024, and ordered them to pay the tenants $148.00. The tenants' other claims about surveillance, harassment, and other breaches were dismissed.
LTB-T-027890-24 · T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 23, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the case conference. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-091179-24 · T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 23, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the case conference and did not support the application. No findings or remedies were ordered against the landlord.
LTB-T-094339-24 · T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 23, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the case conference. No findings or remedies were ordered against the landlord.
LTB-T-098840-24 · T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 22, 2026
The tenants withdrew their bad-faith termination application, and the tribunal consented, closing the file with no findings against anyone.
LTB-T-046057-24 · T5 · read the order
Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 22, 2026$563 to the tenant
The tribunal found the landlord illegally retained the tenants' key deposit and utility overpayment, and ordered the landlord to repay those amounts plus the tenant's filing fee.
LTB-T-052987-25 · T1 · read the order
Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 22, 2026
The tenant's application for return of rent paid for May 2025 was dismissed. The tribunal found the tenant's notice of termination was invalid, so no money was ordered against the landlord.
LTB-T-052997-25 · T1 · read the order
Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 21, 2026
The tribunal dismissed the tenant's bad-faith eviction application, finding the tenant did not prove the notice was given in bad faith. No remedy was ordered against the landlord.
LTB-T-036815-25 · T5 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 19, 2026
The tenant did not attend the case conference, so the tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned. No orders were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-037002-25 · T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 16, 2026
The tenant withdrew their application at the case conference, and the Board closed the file. No findings or orders were made against either party.
LTB-T-037440-25 · T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 16, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because the alleged incidents occurred more than one year before the application was filed. The tribunal made no findings or orders against the landlord.
LTB-T-038380-25 · T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 16, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-039619-25 · T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 16, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because neither party appeared at the hearing, so no findings were made against anyone.
LTB-T-040809-25 · T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 16, 2026$850 to the tenant
The tenant's application about the landlord's conduct was resolved by a consent order. The landlord agreed to pay the tenant $850 to settle the matter, without any finding of fault.
LTB-T-042600-25 · T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 15, 2026
The tenant withdrew the application at the hearing after saying the alleged conduct had not been repeated. The tribunal consented and closed the file without any findings.
LTB-T-036957-25 · T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 15, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the case conference. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-037628-25 · T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 13, 2026$1,250 to the tenant
The tenants' application about illegal entry, harassment, and withheld services was resolved by consent. The landlord's agent agreed to pay the tenants $1,250; no findings were made against the landlords.
LTB-T-034683-25 · T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 12, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because the tenant did not appear at the hearing. No findings or orders were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-034352-25 · T2 · read the order
Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 12, 2026$10,750 to the tenant
The tribunal found that the landlord substantially interfered with the tenant's reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit by carrying out unsafe construction, and ordered the landlord to pay the tenant $10,750 in compensation. Other claims against the landlord and all claims against the former landlord were dismissed.
LTB-T-059581-22 · T2 · read the order
Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 9, 2026$7,000 to the tenant
The tribunal found that the landlord and the former landlord substantially interfered with the tenant's reasonable enjoyment because of construction noise, and ordered them to pay the tenant $7,000 in total compensation. The tenant's remaining claims for harassment, illegal entry, and withheld vital services were dismissed.
310 Mitton Street South, Sarnia
LTB-T-061470-22 · T2 · read the order
Decision against landlordJanuary 7, 2026$8,394 to the tenant
The tribunal found that the former landlord acted in bad faith by issuing false N12 notices to evict the tenant, and ordered it to pay the tenant compensation and storage costs. The current landlord was found not to have acted in bad faith.
Unit 1, 310 Mitton Street South, Sarnia
LTB-T-014625-23 · T5 · read the order
Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 7, 2026$1,500 to the tenant
The tribunal found the landlord failed to maintain the rental unit, including unfinished renovations, electrical issues, heating problems, and appliance disrepair. The landlord was ordered to pay the tenant a rent abatement of $1,500.
LTB-T-050675-23 · T6 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 7, 2026
The tenants' application for a rent reduction was dismissed because the tenants did not attend the hearing. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-057136-23 · T3 · read the order
Decision against landlordJanuary 6, 2026$9,000 to the tenant
The tribunal found that the former landlord gave bad-faith termination notices and ordered it to pay the tenant $9,000 in general compensation. The current landlord was found not to have acted in bad faith and no remedy was ordered against him.
Unit 4, 310 Mitton Street South, Sarnia
LTB-T-000213-23 · T5 · read the order
Decision against landlordJanuary 6, 2026$13,478 to the tenant
The tribunal granted the tenants' application, finding the landlord gave an N12 notice in bad faith. The landlord was ordered to pay the tenants $13,478 for increased rent, general compensation, and the filing fee.
Unit 1711, 36 Lee Centre Drive, Toronto
LTB-T-018233-24 · T5 · read the order
Decision against landlordJanuary 6, 2026$9,491 to the tenant
The tribunal ordered the landlord to pay the tenant $9,490.57, finding the landlord must refund prepaid rent, a key deposit, and interest on the rent deposit. The landlord's claims for utilities, damages, and rent were partly allowed and deducted from the refund.
68 Cannery Drive, Niagara-on-the-Lake
LTB-T-096673-24 · T1 · read the order
Decision against landlordJanuary 5, 2026$451 to the tenant
The landlord must pay the tenant $450.67, including a rent abatement and the tenant's filing fee. Several of the tenant's other claims were dismissed.
28 Bowerbank Drive, Toronto
LTB-T-030982-24 · T2 · read the order
Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 5, 2026
The tenant's application alleging the landlord gave an N12 notice in bad faith was dismissed. The tribunal found the landlord's delay in moving in was reasonably explained by extensive renovations, and the tenant's property damage claim failed for lack of credible evidence.
LTB-T-055822-25 · T5 · read the order