Jagger Benham
MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntario
Read these numbers carefully. They cover the orders Renterly has processed from applications brought by tenants — not applications brought by landlords, which make up most of a tribunal's caseload and are not listed here. Both directions of an order are counted, including applications that were dismissed or decided for the landlord. Amounts are what the order directed, not what was shown to have been paid, and orders we have not finished processing are missing entirely.
Orders
- Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 27, 2026$5,000 to the tenant
The landlord's request to review was denied, and the original order finding the landlord failed to maintain the unit and awarding a $5,000 rent abatement was confirmed. The tenant's maintenance application therefore stands against the landlord.
LTB-T-037244-22 · T6 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 23, 2026
The tribunal dismissed the tenant's application alleging illegal entry, interference with reasonable enjoyment, and failure to maintain the unit. No remedies were ordered against either party.
LTB-T-056700-22 · T2;T6 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 21, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing. No findings or remedies were ordered against the landlord.
LTB-T-024625-25 · T1;T6 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 19, 2026
The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed because neither party attended the hearing and the tribunal found it abandoned. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-033802-25 · T6 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 15, 2026
The tenants' application was dismissed because they did not attend the hearing, so no findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-035477-25 · T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 15, 2026
The tenant withdrew their maintenance application at the hearing, and the tribunal consented and closed the file. No findings or orders were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-065457-25 · T6 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 9, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing. No findings or remedies were ordered against the landlord.
LTB-T-049129-25 · T2;T6 · read the order
- Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 9, 2026
The tenant's application about substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment was dismissed because the tenant did not prove the landlord interfered. The landlord was not present at the hearing.
LTB-T-055790-23 · T2 · read the order
- Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 8, 2026
The tenants' maintenance application was dismissed. The tribunal found the landlord met its maintenance obligations under the Act.
LTB-T-057488-24 · T6 · read the order
- Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 7, 2026$2,043 to the tenant
The tenants proved the landlord failed to maintain the unit by not promptly fixing a recurring ceiling leak. The landlord was ordered to pay $2,043.26, including a rent abatement and the tenants' filing fee.
LTB-T-060166-24 · T6 · read the order