Renterly

Adjudicators

Greg Witt

MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntario

Orders listed50 against the landlord
Awarded to tenants$0avg $0
Awarded to landlords$0avg $0
Fines to the board$0none ordered

Read these numbers carefully. They cover the orders Renterly has processed from applications brought by tenants — not applications brought by landlords, which make up most of a tribunal's caseload and are not listed here. Both directions of an order are counted, including applications that were dismissed or decided for the landlord. Amounts are what the order directed, not what was shown to have been paid, and orders we have not finished processing are missing entirely.

Orders

  • Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 21, 2026

    The tenant's bad-faith eviction application was dismissed because the tenant testified they moved out due to safety concerns, not because of the notice of termination.

    LTB-T-079363-24 · T5 · read the order

  • Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 8, 2026

    The tenant's application alleging harassment and substantial interference was dismissed after a hearing on the merits. The tribunal found the tenant did not prove the claims, so there was no finding against the landlord.

    LTB-T-043608-23 · T2 · read the order

  • No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 8, 2026

    The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed because it did not list any remedies and the request to amend was denied. No findings were made against the landlord.

    LTB-T-063378-23 · T6 · read the order

  • No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 7, 2026

    The tenant's application was dismissed because the only remedy requested, a replacement unit, is not available under the Act, and the request to amend was denied. No finding was made against the landlord.

    LTB-T-063395-23 · T2 · read the order

  • Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 6, 2026

    The tenant's application alleging harassment and substantial interference was dismissed. The tribunal found the tenant did not prove the allegations on a balance of probabilities.

    LTB-T-042062-23 · T2 · read the order