Jane Dean
MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntario
Read these numbers carefully. They cover the orders Renterly has processed from applications brought by tenants — not applications brought by landlords, which make up most of a tribunal's caseload and are not listed here. Both directions of an order are counted, including applications that were dismissed or decided for the landlord. Amounts are what the order directed, not what was shown to have been paid, and orders we have not finished processing are missing entirely.
Orders
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 27, 2026
The tenants' application was dismissed because they did not attend the case conference. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-038882-25 · T2;T6 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 22, 2026$300 to the tenant
The tenant applications were resolved by a consent order. The landlords agreed to pay the tenants $300 to settle all matters, but no breach was found.
LTB-T-037137-25 · T6 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 22, 2026
The tenant did not attend the case conference, so the tribunal dismissed the tenant's application as abandoned. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-037818-25 · T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 22, 2026
The tenant withdrew their application at the case conference, and the tribunal closed the file. No findings or orders were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-038868-25 · T1;T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 22, 2026$11,000 to the landlord
The tenant's maintenance application was resolved by a consent order at a case conference. The tenant agreed to pay $11,000 in rental arrears to the landlord on a schedule, with no findings against the landlord.
LTB-T-048237-25 · T6 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 22, 2026$900 to the tenant
The tenant's maintenance application was settled on consent, with the landlord agreeing to pay $900. Because this is a consensual settlement, no finding was made against either party.
LTB-T-050017-25 · T6 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 22, 2026$300 to the tenant
The parties resolved the tenants' applications by consent; the landlords agreed to pay $300 to the tenants. No breach or fault was found.
LTB-T-097557-25 · T1 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 21, 2026
The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the case conference. No findings or orders were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-048495-25 · T6 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 21, 2026
The tenants did not attend the case conference, so their maintenance application was dismissed as abandoned. No order was made against the landlord.
LTB-T-048765-25 · T6 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 21, 2026
The tenant withdrew their application because it was filed beyond the one-year limitation period, and no findings were made against either party.
LTB-T-050005-25 · T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 21, 2026
The tenants' applications were withdrawn on consent after the landlord had already paid $1,500. The order records that the parties resolved all matters and agreed not to bring further claims, with no findings against either party.
LTB-T-053116-25 · T1;T6 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 21, 2026
The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed because neither party attended the hearing, and the tribunal found the application abandoned. No findings or remedies were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-054376-25 · T6 · read the order
- Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 20, 2026
The tenants' application claiming the landlord gave a termination notice in bad faith was dismissed after a hearing on the merits. The tribunal found the landlord's explanation of changed circumstances credible, so no relief was ordered against the landlord.
LTB-T-024234-23 · T5 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 20, 2026
The tenant withdrew their application at the case conference, and the application was closed. No findings or orders were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-050014-25 · T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 13, 2026
The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed because neither party attended the hearing.
LTB-T-008204-25 · T6 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 13, 2026
The parties resolved all applications by consent. The tenancy will end on June 30, 2026, with conditions about early termination and a possible last-month's-rent credit. No findings of fault were made against either party.
LTB-T-050274-25 · T2;T6 · read the order
- Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 13, 2026$3,745 to the tenant
The tribunal ordered the landlord to complete a list of maintenance repairs by April 5, 2026, and to credit the tenant's rent account $3,745.43 as a rent abatement. The order was made on consent.
LTB-T-067364-25 · T6 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 12, 2026$6,888 to the tenant
The parties settled the maintenance application by consent. The landlord agreed to arrange electrical and heating repairs and to pay the tenant $3,444, with the tenant allowed further rent deductions.
LTB-T-051352-25 · T6 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 12, 2026
The tenant applied alleging illegal entry, interference with reasonable enjoyment, and harassment. The tenant did not attend the hearing, so the LTB dismissed the application as abandoned.
LTB-T-067561-25 · T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 12, 2026$3,444 to the tenant
The tenant's maintenance applications were resolved by a consent order. The landlord agreed to make electrical and heating repairs and to pay the tenant $3,444.
LTB-T-102986-25 · T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 9, 2026
The tenant did not attend the hearing, so the tribunal dismissed the tenant's application as abandoned. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-005729-25 · T5 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 8, 2026
The tenants' application was dismissed because they did not attend the hearing, so no findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-034247-25 · T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 8, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-046797-25 · T2 · read the order
- Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 7, 2026
The tenants claimed the landlords gave an N12 notice in bad faith after a planned sale of the property fell through. The tribunal dismissed the application, finding the landlords did not act in bad faith.
LTB-T-106116-24 · T5 · read the order
- Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 5, 2026
The tenant's applications for a rent reduction and for interference with reasonable enjoyment were dismissed. The tribunal found the landlord was exempt from the rent-reduction claim and that the landlord responded reasonably to the tenant's maintenance complaints.
LTB-T-054782-22 · T2;T3 · read the order