Dana Wren
MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntario
Read these numbers carefully. They cover the orders Renterly has processed from applications brought by tenants — not applications brought by landlords, which make up most of a tribunal's caseload and are not listed here. Both directions of an order are counted, including applications that were dismissed or decided for the landlord. Amounts are what the order directed, not what was shown to have been paid, and orders we have not finished processing are missing entirely.
Orders
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 27, 2026
The tenants did not attend the case conference, so the tribunal dismissed their maintenance application as abandoned. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-040253-25 · T6 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 27, 2026
The tenant withdrew the application at the case conference, and the tribunal closed the file. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-046433-25 · T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 26, 2026$500 to the tenant
The parties settled the tenant's application by consent. The landlord agreed to pay $500 and provide rent receipts, but no breach was found.
LTB-T-040952-25 · T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 26, 2026
At a consent conference, the landlord agreed to investigate and remediate pest issues, fix the bedroom door, and provide paint, while the tenant agreed to prepare the unit for treatment. No findings of breach were made because the order was entered on consent.
LTB-T-087162-25 · T6;T2 · read the order
- Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 23, 2026$1,053 to the tenant$3,000 fine
The tribunal found the landlord breached the Residential Tenancies Act by illegally changing the locks and repeatedly serving invalid termination notices, which harassed the tenant and interfered with reasonable enjoyment. The landlord was ordered to pay the tenant $1,053 in compensation and filing costs, plus a $3,000 administrative fine to the Board.
LTB-T-073108-24 · T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 22, 2026
The landlord's request to review the earlier order was granted and the earlier order was cancelled. The tenants' applications were dismissed because the parties had agreed to withdraw them after the tenants vacated.
LTB-T-069567-25 · T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 22, 2026
The landlord's request to review the earlier order was granted, and the tenants' applications were dismissed as withdrawn after the parties settled. No findings or remedies remain against either party.
LTB-T-069598-25 · T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 22, 2026
The tenants' applications were dismissed as withdrawn after the parties reached a private settlement and the tenants vacated. No finding or order was made against the landlord.
LTB-T-069612-25 · T2 · read the order
- Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 20, 2026$164 to the tenant
The tribunal granted the tenant's review request, found the landlord failed to maintain the bathtub faucet, and ordered the landlord to pay $164.04 in rent abatement. The landlord had already completed the repair.
LTB-T-089853-24 · T6 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 19, 2026
Both the landlord and the tenant withdrew their applications at the hearing, and the tribunal dismissed both without making any findings against either party.
LTB-T-065745-24 · T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 15, 2026$10,000 to the tenant
The parties resolved the tenant's application by consent. The landlord agreed to pay $10,000 in two instalments to resolve all issues.
LTB-T-071847-24 · T2 · read the order