Anthony Bruno
MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntario
Read these numbers carefully. They cover the orders Renterly has processed from applications brought by tenants — not applications brought by landlords, which make up most of a tribunal's caseload and are not listed here. Both directions of an order are counted, including applications that were dismissed or decided for the landlord. Amounts are what the order directed, not what was shown to have been paid, and orders we have not finished processing are missing entirely.
Orders
- Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 20, 2026
The tenant's application claiming the landlord gave an N12 notice in bad faith was dismissed. The tribunal found the landlord had a genuine intention for his mother to move in, and her medical collapse was an unforeseeable material change.
LTB-T-069204-24 · T5 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 9, 2026
The tenant did not attend the hearing, so the tribunal found the application abandoned and dismissed it. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-095149-23 · T2;T6 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 9, 2026
The tenant's application about illegal entry, harassment, maintenance, and services was dismissed because the tenant failed to comply with the tribunal's interim order and provided no evidence. No remedy was ordered against the landlord.
LTB-T-095320-23 · T2;T3;T6 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 8, 2026
The tenant withdrew the application at the hearing, and the tribunal consented to the withdrawal. The case is closed with no findings against either party.
LTB-T-014067-24 · T2 · read the order
- Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 7, 2026
The tenant applied alleging the landlord failed to maintain the flooring and dishwasher. The tribunal dismissed the application, finding the landlord responded reasonably and the tenant declined repairs and withheld information.
LTB-T-011855-24 · T6 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 7, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because the tenant failed to comply with the interim order and did not provide any evidence to support the claim. No finding was made against the landlord.
LTB-T-016315-24 · T2 · read the order
- Decision against landlordJanuary 6, 2026$18,000 to the tenant
The landlord's application to evict for personal use was dismissed. The landlord was ordered to pay the tenants $18,000 for interference with reasonable enjoyment, including rent abatement, compensation for lost tools, and general damages.
LTB-T-015466-25 · T6 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 5, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because the tribunal found it lacked jurisdiction: the tenant shared a bathroom and kitchen with the landlord, so the Residential Tenancies Act did not apply. No findings or orders were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-004321-24 · T2 · read the order
- Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 5, 2026
The tenant's application alleging substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment was dismissed after a hearing on the merits. The tribunal found the landlord did not cause the police visits or neighborhood crime and therefore did not breach the Act.
LTB-T-056371-25 · T2 · read the order