Renterly

Adjudicators

Dawn Carr

MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntario

Orders listed184 against the landlord
Awarded to tenants$9,955avg $553
Awarded to landlords$875avg $49
Fines to the board$0none ordered

Read these numbers carefully. They cover the orders Renterly has processed from applications brought by tenants — not applications brought by landlords, which make up most of a tribunal's caseload and are not listed here. Both directions of an order are counted, including applications that were dismissed or decided for the landlord. Amounts are what the order directed, not what was shown to have been paid, and orders we have not finished processing are missing entirely.

Orders

  • Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 26, 2026

    The tenant's application was dismissed after the tribunal found the allegations were not proven on a balance of probabilities. The landlord's request for costs was also denied.

    LTB-T-065372-22 · T2 · read the order

  • Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 23, 2026$1,403 to the tenant

    The tribunal found the landlord failed to maintain the residential complex by not ensuring adequate snow removal, and ordered the landlord to pay the tenant a rent abatement and the application filing fee.

    LTB-T-011350-23 · T6 · read the order

  • No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 21, 2026

    The tenant applied claiming the landlord collected money illegally and unreasonably withheld consent to an assignment. The tribunal dismissed the application, finding no illegal charge and no unreasonable denial.

    LTB-T-080246-24 · T1;T2 · read the order

  • No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 21, 2026$6,000 to the tenant

    The parties settled the tenant's application by consent, with the landlords agreeing to pay the tenant $6,000. The order records an agreement rather than a finding against the landlords.

    LTB-T-080785-24 · T2 · read the order

  • Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 19, 2026

    The tribunal denied the landlord's request to review an earlier decision and kept the original order in place, meaning the earlier finding against the landlord stands.

    LTB-T-049032-23 · T5 · read the order

  • Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 19, 2026$1,504 to the tenant

    The tribunal found the landlord unreasonably refused consent to the tenant's proposed assignment and ordered the landlord to pay the tenant a rent abatement plus the application filing fee.

    LTB-T-102045-24 · A2 · read the order

  • Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 15, 2026

    The tenant's application about utility apportionment was dismissed. The tribunal found the landlord had not failed its obligations under the Act.

    LTB-T-012058-25 · T7 · read the order

  • No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 15, 2026

    The tenant did not attend the hearing, so the tribunal dismissed the tenant's application as abandoned. No order was made against the landlord.

    LTB-T-040787-25 · T2 · read the order

  • No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 15, 2026

    The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing. No findings were made against the landlord.

    LTB-T-069417-24 · T6 · read the order

  • No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 14, 2026

    The tenant did not attend the hearing, so the tribunal dismissed the tenant's maintenance application as abandoned. No findings or orders were made against the landlord.

    LTB-T-053075-25 · T6 · read the order

  • No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 14, 2026

    The tenant did not attend the hearing, so the tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned. No findings were made against the landlord.

    LTB-T-053985-25 · T1;T2 · read the order

  • No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 14, 2026

    The tenant did not attend the hearing, so the tribunal dismissed the tenant's application as abandoned. No findings were made against the landlord.

    LTB-T-066545-24 · T2;T5 · read the order

  • Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 14, 2026$1,048 to the tenant

    The landlords agreed to pay the tenant $1,000 plus the $48 filing fee to resolve the T1 application. The T2 and T5 applications were withdrawn.

    LTB-T-069205-24 · T1;T2;T5 · read the order

  • Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 14, 2026

    The tenant's application was dismissed because the tenant did not prove the landlord collected money illegally or interfered with reasonable enjoyment. The dispute involved rent payments the tenant had already agreed to make in a previous mediated settlement.

    LTB-T-069946-24 · T1;T2 · read the order

  • No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 13, 2026

    The tenant's application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing, so no findings were made against the landlord.

    LTB-T-054543-25 · T2 · read the order

  • No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 13, 2026

    The tenant's application about illegal charges, illegal entry, interference, and maintenance was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing. No findings were made against the landlord.

    LTB-T-068524-24 · T1;T2;T6 · read the order

  • No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 9, 2026

    The tenant's maintenance application was resolved by a consent order that ended the tenancy and waived any arrears, without any finding against the landlord.

    LTB-T-073060-25 · T6 · read the order

  • No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 8, 2026$875 to the landlord

    The tenants' applications about interference and maintenance were resolved by consent. The tenants agreed to pay the landlord $875 as a full settlement, and the landlord agreed to provide a receipt.

    LTB-T-054387-25 · T2;T6 · read the order