Jitewa Edu

MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntario

Orders listed212 against the landlord

Awarded to tenants$6,900avg $329

Awarded to landlords$0avg $0

Fines to the board$0none ordered

Read these numbers carefully. They cover the orders Renterly has processed from applications brought by tenants — not applications brought by landlords, which make up most of a tribunal's caseload and are not listed here. Both directions of an order are counted, including applications that were dismissed or decided for the landlord. Amounts are what the order directed, not what was shown to have been paid, and orders we have not finished processing are missing entirely.

Orders

No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 27, 2026
The tenant withdrew their maintenance application at a case conference, and the tribunal dismissed it. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-045154-25 · T6 · read the order
Findings both waysNot yet reviewedJanuary 26, 2026$2,900 to the tenant
The parties settled on consent: the landlord agreed to waive $2,900 in arrears and send professionals to investigate a heating complaint, while the tenancy was terminated and the tenant must move out by April 30, 2026.
LTB-T-046041-25 · T2;T6 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 21, 2026
The tenant did not attend the hearing, so the tribunal found the application abandoned and dismissed it. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-082635-24 · T6 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 20, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because neither party attended the hearing. No findings were made against either party.
LTB-T-081734-24 · T1;T2 · read the order
Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 12, 2026
The tenant's applications for illegal entry, changed locks, harassment, and maintenance failures were dismissed. The tribunal found the tenant had not proven the allegations and had already moved out, so no remedy was ordered against the landlord.
LTB-T-060621-23 · T2;T6 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 12, 2026
The tenant did not attend the hearing, so the tribunal dismissed the tenant's applications as abandoned. No findings or remedies were ordered against the landlord.
LTB-T-068461-24 · T2;T6 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 12, 2026
The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-074452-24 · T6 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 9, 2026
The tenants applied for a finding that the landlord gave a termination notice in bad faith. The tribunal dismissed the application because the tenants did not prove that the landlord's family member failed to move into the unit within a reasonable time.
LTB-T-021560-24 · T5 · read the order
Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 9, 2026
The tenant's application alleging harassment and interference with reasonable enjoyment was dismissed. The tribunal found the landlord disclosed the tenant's arrears to relatives but that this did not amount to substantial interference.
LTB-T-021749-25 · T2 · read the order
Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 9, 2026$4,000 to the tenant
The parties settled both applications by consent. The landlord must pay the tenant $4,000, and the landlord's own application for arrears was dismissed.
LTB-T-071710-24 · T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 9, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because it was filed more than one year after the alleged conduct. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-072040-24 · T2 · read the order
Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 7, 2026
The tenant's claims about mold and illegal entry were dismissed. The tribunal found the landlord met maintenance obligations and did not harass or illegally enter the unit.
LTB-T-014835-22 · T2;T6 · read the order
Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 6, 2026
The tenants applied for an order finding that the landlord, superintendent and agent substantially interfered with their reasonable enjoyment. The tribunal dismissed the applications, finding the issues were only inconveniences and did not meet the threshold of substantial interference.
LTB-T-007483-23 · T2 · read the order
Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 6, 2026
The tenants claimed the landlord substantially interfered with their reasonable enjoyment by moving furniture, changing policies, and removing amenities. The tribunal dismissed the applications, finding these were mere inconveniences that did not rise to substantial interference.
LTB-T-007649-23 · T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 6, 2026
The tenants applied for an order against the landlord for substantial interference and harassment. The tribunal dismissed all the tenants' applications, finding the issues were only minor inconveniences that did not amount to substantial interference.
LTB-T-007663-23 · T2 · read the order
Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 6, 2026
The tenants' application was dismissed. The tribunal found that the landlord's actions were inconveniences, not substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment.
LTB-T-007669-23 · T2 · read the order
Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 6, 2026
The tenants' application was dismissed. The tribunal found the landlord's actions were only minor inconveniences and did not substantially interfere with reasonable enjoyment.
LTB-T-007693-23 · T2 · read the order
Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 6, 2026
The tenants' application for substantial interference and harassment was dismissed after a hearing on the merits; the tribunal found the landlord's actions were only minor inconveniences and did not meet the legal threshold. No remedy was ordered against the landlord.
LTB-T-007698-23 · T2 · read the order
Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 6, 2026
The tenants' applications alleging substantial interference and harassment were dismissed after a hearing on the merits. The tribunal found the landlord's actions were inconveniences, not substantial interference, and no remedies were ordered.
LTB-T-007701-23 · T2 · read the order
Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 6, 2026
The tribunal dismissed the tenants' application, finding the landlord's actions were only minor inconveniences that did not substantially interfere with their reasonable enjoyment. No remedy was ordered against the landlord.
LTB-T-013372-23 · T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 6, 2026
The tenant's applications about maintenance and interference were dismissed. The tribunal found the landlord responded reasonably to the pipe burst and did not substantially interfere with the tenant's enjoyment.
LTB-T-020514-25 · T2;T6 · read the order