Rachel Gibbons
MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntario
Read these numbers carefully. They cover the orders Renterly has processed from applications brought by tenants — not applications brought by landlords, which make up most of a tribunal's caseload and are not listed here. Both directions of an order are counted, including applications that were dismissed or decided for the landlord. Amounts are what the order directed, not what was shown to have been paid, and orders we have not finished processing are missing entirely.
Orders
- Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 14, 2026
The landlord shared the kitchen and bathroom with the tenant, so the tenancy is exempt from the Residential Tenancies Act. The tenant's applications were dismissed because the Board has no jurisdiction.
LTB-T-002481-25 · T2 · read the order
- Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 14, 2026
The tribunal found the tenancy exempt from the Residential Tenancies Act because the tenant shared the kitchen and bathroom with the landlord, so the Act did not apply and the tenant's applications were dismissed. No finding or remedy was made against the landlord.
LTB-T-006506-25 · T1 · read the order
- Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 14, 2026
The tribunal found the Act does not apply because the tenant shared a kitchen and bathroom with the landlord, who lives upstairs. The tenant's applications were dismissed.
LTB-T-016061-25 · A1 · read the order
- Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 9, 2026
The tenant applied for a rent reduction, claiming the landlord locked him out of basement common areas and removed a vacuum. The tribunal dismissed the application, finding the tenant had not proven a discontinuance of services or facilities.
LTB-T-036079-25 · T3 · read the order
- Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 8, 2026$1,048 to the tenant
The tenant proved that the landlord's predecessor substantially interfered with their reasonable enjoyment and harassed them. The tribunal ordered the landlord to pay the tenant $1,000 in rent abatement plus the $48 filing fee.
LTB-T-065437-22 · T2 · read the order
- Decision against landlordJanuary 7, 2026$5,453 to the tenant
The tribunal found the landlords gave the tenant a notice of termination in bad faith and ordered them to pay the tenant $5,453 for increased rent and the filing fee.
Unit BASEMENT, 48 Brass Drive, Richmond Hill
LTB-T-025095-23 · T5 · read the order
- Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 6, 2026$2,204 to the landlord
The tenants' application about the landlord refusing consent to sublet was dismissed, and the tenants were ordered to pay rent arrears to the landlord. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-078838-23 · A2 · read the order