Lisa Del Vecchio
MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntario
Read these numbers carefully. They cover the orders Renterly has processed from applications brought by tenants — not applications brought by landlords, which make up most of a tribunal's caseload and are not listed here. Both directions of an order are counted, including applications that were dismissed or decided for the landlord. Amounts are what the order directed, not what was shown to have been paid, and orders we have not finished processing are missing entirely.
Orders
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 20, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because neither party attended the hearing, and the tribunal found the application abandoned. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-072353-24 · T2 · read the order
- Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 20, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because the alleged misconduct was not proven within the one-year limitation period. No order was made against the landlord.
LTB-T-077483-24 · T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 9, 2026
The tenant's request to review the earlier decision was denied because the tribunal found the tenant's representative was negligent in missing the hearing. No findings or remedies were ordered against the landlord in this decision.
LTB-T-032299-25 · T2 · read the order
- Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 8, 2026
The tribunal dismissed the tenant's application after a rehearing, finding the tenant had not proven that the landlord harassed or interfered with reasonable enjoyment. The landlord's evidence was found more credible, and no remedy was ordered against the landlord.
LTB-T-043167-22 · T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 7, 2026$1,800 to the tenant
The parties settled this application by consent. The landlord agreed to pay the tenant $1,800 to resolve all issues.
LTB-T-008956-24 · T1;T2 · read the order