Amanda Kovats

MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntario

Orders listed82 against the landlord

Awarded to tenants$9,000avg $1,125

Awarded to landlords$0avg $0

Fines to the board$0none ordered

Read these numbers carefully. They cover the orders Renterly has processed from applications brought by tenants — not applications brought by landlords, which make up most of a tribunal's caseload and are not listed here. Both directions of an order are counted, including applications that were dismissed or decided for the landlord. Amounts are what the order directed, not what was shown to have been paid, and orders we have not finished processing are missing entirely.

Orders

Findings both waysNot yet reviewedJanuary 19, 2026$9,000 to the tenant
The parties settled the tenant's applications by consent. The tenancy ends, but the landlord must give a $1,000 monthly rent abatement for nine months.
LTB-T-044052-25 · T2;T6 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 19, 2026
Both applications were dismissed because the dispute became moot after the landlord bought the mobile home and the parties signed a mutual release. No findings or orders were made against either party.
LTB-T-101223-25 · A2 · read the order
Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 16, 2026
The landlord's request to review a prior order was denied, and the tribunal confirmed that the Residential Tenancies Act applies to the tenancy. The landlord's argument for an exemption was rejected.
LTB-T-095302-25 · T1;T2;T6 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 15, 2026
The landlord requested a review of an interim order, but the tribunal denied the request and confirmed the interim order. The tenant's application is still pending and no final findings have been made.
LTB-T-093479-25 · T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 14, 2026
The tenant did not attend the hearing, so the tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned. No findings or orders were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-042455-25 · T2 · read the order
Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 9, 2026
The tenant's applications were dismissed because the LTB found the Residential Tenancies Act does not apply — the tenant shares a bathroom or kitchen with the owner. The tenant's request for review was denied, so the dismissal stands.
LTB-T-084122-25 · T1;T2;T6 · read the order
Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 9, 2026
The tenant's application alleging an illegal lockout was dismissed after the tribunal found the video evidence showed the tenant had access to the unit. No remedy was ordered against the landlord.
LTB-T-097700-25 · T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 8, 2026
The tenant did not attend the hearing, so the tribunal dismissed the tenant's maintenance application as abandoned. No findings or orders were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-064028-25 · T6 · read the order