Reid Jackson

MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntario

Orders listed2811 against the landlord

Awarded to tenants$48,035avg $1,716

Awarded to landlords$0avg $0

Fines to the board$0none ordered

Read these numbers carefully. They cover the orders Renterly has processed from applications brought by tenants — not applications brought by landlords, which make up most of a tribunal's caseload and are not listed here. Both directions of an order are counted, including applications that were dismissed or decided for the landlord. Amounts are what the order directed, not what was shown to have been paid, and orders we have not finished processing are missing entirely.

Orders

No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 26, 2026
The tenants did not attend the hearing, so the tribunal dismissed their application as abandoned. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-056362-23 · T1;T2;T6 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 23, 2026
The tenant applied about maintenance but did not attend the hearing, so the application was dismissed as abandoned. No finding was made against the landlord.
LTB-T-041659-24 · T6 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 23, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing. No findings or remedies were ordered against the landlord.
LTB-T-083719-23 · T2 · read the order
Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 22, 2026$5,000 to the tenant
The landlord was ordered to pay the tenant $5,000 by January 30, 2026 as part of a consent order resolving the tenant's maintenance application and the landlord's application. Simple interest accrues at 4% annually if the payment is late.
LTB-T-033750-25 · T6 · read the order
Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 22, 2026$5,000 to the tenant
The parties settled on consent, and the landlord agreed to pay the tenant $5,000 by January 30, 2026 to resolve all matters.
LTB-T-044387-25 · T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 22, 2026
The tenant did not attend the hearing, so the tribunal found the application abandoned and dismissed it. No finding was made against the landlord.
LTB-T-097788-24 · T5 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 21, 2026
The landlord withdrew its eviction application at the hearing, and the tribunal closed the file. No findings or orders were made against either party.
LTB-T-032786-25 · T2;T6 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 21, 2026
The tenant did not attend the hearing, so the application was dismissed as abandoned. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-034405-25 · T6 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 21, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-040327-25 · T2 · read the order
Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 20, 2026$305 to the tenant
The tribunal found the landlord failed to pay interest on the tenant's last month's rent deposit and ordered the landlord to pay $304.65, including the filing fee. The tenant's claim that the landlord illegally kept the rent deposit was dismissed.
LTB-T-064363-25 · T1 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 19, 2026$2,000 to the tenant
The tenant's application was resolved by a consent order. The landlord agreed to pay the tenant $2,000 as a full and final settlement of all issues.
LTB-T-035761-25 · T1;T2;T5 · read the order
Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 19, 2026$553 to the tenant
The landlord was ordered to repay the tenant $500 for an illegal security deposit plus $53 for the filing fee. The tenant's claim for the return of the last month's rent deposit was dismissed.
LTB-T-072932-25 · T1 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 16, 2026
The tenant applied claiming the landlord collected money illegally, but the tribunal dismissed the application as filed outside the one-year limitation period. No finding or remedy was made against the landlord.
LTB-T-059999-25 · T1 · read the order
Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 16, 2026$1,769 to the tenant
The landlord's eviction application was dismissed. The tenant's application partly succeeded: the landlord was found to have harassed the tenant with a hallway camera and must pay $1,769.41 and stop installing cameras that capture the interior of rental units.
LTB-T-080113-24 · T2;T6 · read the order
Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 14, 2026$1,092 to the tenant
The tenant proved the landlord collected excess rent and kept the last month's rent deposit, so the landlord was ordered to repay those amounts plus the tenant's filing fee.
LTB-T-064015-25 · T1 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 14, 2026
The tenant's applications about drainage and maintenance were dismissed. The tribunal found the landlord had not breached its maintenance obligations or interfered with reasonable enjoyment.
LTB-T-066065-22 · T6 · read the order
Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 13, 2026$10,212 to the tenant
The tribunal found the landlord served a bad-faith N12 notice and ordered the landlord to pay the tenant $10,212 for increased rent, moving expenses, general compensation, and the filing fee.
LTB-T-075623-24 · T5 · read the order
Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 12, 2026$3,048 to the tenant
The tribunal found the landlord interfered with the tenant's reasonable enjoyment and harassed the tenant. The landlord was ordered to pay $3,048, including a rent abatement, general damages, and the tenant's filing fee.
LTB-T-016012-24 · T2 · read the order
Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 9, 2026$1,430 to the tenant
The tribunal found the landlord charged rent above the lawful amount without proper notice and ordered the landlord to repay the tenant $1,429.80.
LTB-T-046899-25 · T1 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 8, 2026
The tenant's bad-faith eviction application was dismissed because it was filed more than a year after the tenant moved out. No order was made against the landlord.
LTB-T-001037-23 · T5 · read the order
Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 8, 2026
The tribunal dismissed the tenant's application, finding it was brought as the wrong application type and that all allegations fell outside the one-year limitation period. No remedies were ordered against the landlord.
LTB-T-076988-23 · T2 · read the order
Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 7, 2026$16,579 to the tenant
The tribunal found that the landlord substantially interfered with the tenant's reasonable enjoyment and failed to maintain and repair the rental unit after a water leak and mold contamination. The landlord was ordered to pay the tenant $16,578.74 and the tenancy was terminated as of July 4, 2023.
LTB-T-052436-23 · T6 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 7, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing, so the application was found abandoned.
LTB-T-064006-25 · T1 · read the order
Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 6, 2026
The tenant alleged the landlord gave a notice of termination in bad faith. The tribunal dismissed the application, finding the tenant did not prove bad faith or an unreasonable delay in demolition.
LTB-T-012503-25 · T5 · read the order
Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 6, 2026
The tenant applied for an order that the landlord collected an illegal rent increase. The tribunal dismissed the application, finding the increase had been paid for more than 12 months and was deemed lawful.
LTB-T-041183-25 · T1 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 6, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing, so it was considered abandoned. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-063713-25 · T1 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 5, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-076551-25 · T1 · read the order
Decision against landlordJanuary 5, 2026$1,048 to the tenant
The tribunal found that the landlord interfered with the tenant's vital services and reasonable enjoyment when electricity was disrupted for about three weeks, and ordered the landlord to pay the tenant $1,048. The tenant's other maintenance complaints were dismissed.
Unit 1, 867 Frederick Street, Kitchener
LTB-T-087391-23 · T2;T6 · read the order